100% of scientists urge Trump to dump UN climate change agreement...
Feb 24, 2017 16:26:04 #
Cool Breeze wrote:
Do you believe Climate Change is an elaborate scientific scam against corporate interests?
I think you meant to say: "Climate change hoax" is an elaborate....
Feb 24, 2017 16:27:53 #
PeterS wrote:
Nice ass!!!
Last I heard, the (dumb)ass is still the logo of the Leftist/Liberals.
Feb 24, 2017 16:29:16 #
fredsgirl1 wrote:
Fake news of the first order. If they are said that then why did have a hugh crowd of them come together to march in protest of Trumps destruction of climate change data.
Could you please reword your sentence? I didn't sleep well last night and am having some trouble (make that doubts) with your syntax.
Check out topic: The Crisis Actors and Prophets of the Covid-19 Hoax
Feb 24, 2017 16:30:25 #
reconreb wrote:
Ask fred to show you how the qoute reply function works ..
After she gets her syntax straightened out!!
Feb 24, 2017 16:36:29 #
MarvinSussman wrote:
There is no certainty in any of the climate models. But that misses the point. If there is a finite probability of catastrophe, then reason implies that every effort should be made to avoid it. Those opposed to the effort are arguing that the probability is ZERO! They are wrong!
Tell that to Dr. Ben Franklin, or even the Leyden scientists in the late 18th century.
There is more possibility of damage to the environment for pseudo-scientists to go off half-cocked. Read "State of Fear".
And anyway, we know it is a hoax, because it is another attempt at destroying capitalism. Just as the sabotage of the Deep Water Horizon drilling rig and platform was an attempt to discredit capitalism. Were you born yesterday?
How naive Americans are!!
Just go out and march with your pussy on your head, Marv.
Feb 24, 2017 16:37:42 #
Feb 24, 2017 16:40:33 #
Larry the Legend wrote:
Depends whether the 'science' fits a given politic... (show quote)
Ovomit forgot that the "science is never settled". What an absolute idiot he is, believing that people who think would ever go along with that.
They almost did.
Feb 24, 2017 16:41:22 #
eagleye13 wrote:
This is a no brainer.
The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!
As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.
BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.
The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!
As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.
BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.
I didn't know that about you, ee.
Feb 24, 2017 16:42:51 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Their Gawd is Mr Yippy Skippy. And oh how they cry when Gawd is persecuted.
Mr. Yippy Skippy? Can you post a picture?
Feb 24, 2017 16:49:50 #
MarvinSussman wrote:
There is no certainty in any of the climate models. But that misses the point. If there is a finite probability of catastrophe, then reason implies that every effort should be made to avoid it. Those opposed to the effort are arguing that the probability is ZERO! They are wrong!
"If there is a finite probability of catastrophe, then reason implies that every effort should be made to avoid it."
Are you really that dim witted Marvin?
Leave it to you to be for throwing Billion$ at BS?
While lining the pocks of Al Gore and his fellow scammers.
The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!
As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.
BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.
Feb 24, 2017 17:13:01 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
HedgeHog wrote:
Mr. Yippy Skippy? Can you post a picture?
Picture a pretty unicorn, crapping rainbows as it floats by.
Feb 24, 2017 17:14:30 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
eagleye13 wrote:
"If there is a finite probability of catastro... (show quote)
There's a finite possibility that I might win the lottery if I bought a thousand tickets. But should I?
Feb 24, 2017 17:30:05 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
There's a finite possibility that I might win the lottery if I bought a thousand tickets. But should I?
"There's a finite possibility that I might win the lottery if I bought a thousand tickets. But should I?" - nwtk
Great analogy.
I think Marvin should buy at least a thousand tickets twice a week, until he scores!!
Of course he wants others to buy his tickets.
Feb 24, 2017 17:52:27 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Picture a pretty unicorn, crapping rainbows as it floats by.
And only a Lib could believe in a unicorn!
Feb 24, 2017 17:53:25 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
There's a finite possibility that I might win the lottery if I bought a thousand tickets. But should I?
As opposed to an infinite possibility. And I'm not sure, exactly, what that even means.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.