100% of scientists urge Trump to dump UN climate change agreement...
Feb 24, 2017 18:05:58 #
HedgeHog wrote:
Who's your ghost writer, now, Cool Breeze?
You're the ghost! You have no substance!
Feb 24, 2017 18:16:15 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
HedgeHog wrote:
As opposed to an infinite possibility. And I'm not sure, exactly, what that even means.
It's like going half way to something. After an infinite number of half steps, you still aren't there!
Feb 24, 2017 18:16:54 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Cool Breeze wrote:
You're the ghost! You have no substance!
Like the women you date, or try to??
Feb 24, 2017 18:25:31 #
eagleye13 wrote:
This is a no brainer.
The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!
As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.
BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.
The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!
As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.
BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.
What will a can of Coke look like and cost if the fizz escaping all those drinks has to be captured?
Feb 24, 2017 18:25:52 #
HedgeHog wrote:
Ovomit forgot that the "science is never settled". What an absolute idiot he is, believing that people who think would ever go along with that.
They almost did.
They almost did.
That's the point. It's not science, it's a religion. The Church of Climate Change. To disagree or question the 'science' is blasphemy of the highest order. So now you know...
Feb 24, 2017 18:30:31 #
JW wrote:
What will a can of Coke look like and cost if the fizz escaping all those drinks has to be captured?
Hey! That's a pretty good question. Clearly there'd have to be some device attached to the opening to catch all the bubbles before they reach the atmosphere and disperse. It would also have to allow the liquid through to the mouth when taking a drink. That's way beyond my pay grade....
Feb 24, 2017 18:31:07 #
JW wrote:
What will a can of Coke look like and cost if the fizz escaping all those drinks has to be captured?
Good point. And can I have my aerosol anti-perspirant back now? I understand the ozone layer has been fixed.
Feb 24, 2017 18:37:54 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
It's like going half way to something. After an infinite number of half steps, you still aren't there!
Can you imagine how G. Cantor felt, after showing that the number of even numbers equaled the number of odd numbers equaled the number of all integers, (equal to infinity), then finding out that there were more real numbers than that?
He was in an institution for awhile.
There was a young fellow from Trinity
Who took the square root of infinity
But the number of digits
Gave him the fidgets;
He dropped Math and took up Divinity.
From "One, Two, Three,,,Infinity" by George Gamow
Feb 24, 2017 18:42:38 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
HedgeHog wrote:
Can you imagine how G. Cantor felt, after showing ... (show quote)
Gawd ignores math; he thinks right past it. It's what makes him unbelievable. He is in-numerate!
Feb 24, 2017 18:46:00 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
HedgeHog wrote:
Can you imagine how G. Cantor felt, after showing ... (show quote)
Cantor never saw Congress do a budget!
Feb 24, 2017 18:46:59 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Gawd ignores math; he thinks right past it. It's what makes him unbelievable. He is in-numerate!
Oh, I don't know. I heard that Feynstein said the language God speaks is Calculus. Well, Calculus IS the mathematics of change. God doesn't change, but the time-space-material world does, Hegel, Marx and Lenin notwithstanding.
I was going to say that Depak Chopra sometimes referred to a "God-figure" as a "non-local domain of infinite possibilities", which I guess is a pretty good description.
Feb 24, 2017 18:49:01 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Gee Marvin think there's more than a finite probability N. Korea or Iran might use a nuke? Using your logic we should obliterate them before they might use a nuke .. Come to think of it you might have something there.
MarvinSussman wrote:
There is no certainty in any of the climate models. But that misses the point. If there is a finite probability of catastrophe, then reason implies that every effort should be made to avoid it. Those opposed to the effort are arguing that the probability is ZERO! They are wrong!
Feb 24, 2017 18:50:02 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Cantor never saw Congress do a budget!
He probably never would have escaped from that institution if he did!
Speaking about that "non-local domain of infinite possibilities"...
Feb 24, 2017 18:51:15 #
JFlorio wrote:
Gee Marvin think there's more than a finite probability N. Korea or Iran might use a nuke? Using your logic we should obliterate them before they might use a nuke .. Come to think of it you might have something there.
Feb 24, 2017 18:56:05 #
nwtk2007 wrote:
Gawd ignores math; he thinks right past it. It's what makes him unbelievable. He is in-numerate!
I wonder what the "finite probability" of an asteroid hitting the earth and eliminating the dinosaurs so that the new life thus generated could evolve into what we see today? Anyone?
Or the "finite probability" that the cotton gin would have been invented in about the year 1820, pushing back the emancipation of the slaves?
Or the "finite probability" that Joan of Arc could have existed?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.