100% of scientists urge Trump to dump UN climate change agreement...
Mar 6, 2017 14:47:38 #
peter11937
Loc: NYS
Tgards79 wrote:
To be clear, the lead scientist in this letter, Lindzer, also believes lung cancer is unrelated to smoking. And it is not "100% of Scientists" it is 100% of the scientists WHO SIGNED THE LETTER. They represent a tiny fraction of all scientists --- 99% of ALL scientists disagree with this tiny group of nutcases.
More BS, . Show where Dr. Lindzer stated smoking tobacco does not cause cancers. Since he never said anything like that, it might be a long long wait.
Mar 6, 2017 19:13:30 #
permafrost wrote:
Eagle,
Never heard of that Tony, but I like it..
wait a minute... tony Tiger.....LOL LOL..
Never heard of that Tony, but I like it..
wait a minute... tony Tiger.....LOL LOL..
TOUCH DOWN!!!!
Mar 6, 2017 22:25:24 #
eagleye13 wrote:
Thanks again for asking about weather modification patents, straightUp.
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/an-extensive-list-of-patents/
That's not actually what I was asking about. I may have misunderstood your original post... You said: "Why is it the CO2'ers ignore the government's usage of patented weather modification techniques, and their damage/poisoning of the environment? Specifically spraying Chemicals in the air (chem trails; aluminum, barium, etc) And HAARP (EMF) sites?"
I said: "If there is a patent for chemtailing you should be able to find it. So have fun looking."
So... although there is no patent for chemtrailing specically, weather modification is a different thing. My bad.
Still, I think there's a wide gap between a collection of patented, tin-box contraptions and the evil plan to poison us all with commercial airplanes.
eagleye13 wrote:
br Climate Engineering: 13 Patents Explain the Ch... (show quote)
1338343 – April 27, 1920 - (We used to use dry ice in a bucket.)
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – (Ah, reminds me of summer at the beach reading whatever the skywriters were paid to write.)
None of these suggest the actual destruction of anything. It's like saying someone has a time machine just because he has a bunch of scientific equipment and a DeLorean.
Mar 7, 2017 06:55:47 #
straightUp wrote:
1338343 – April 27, 1920 - (We used to use dry ice in a bucket.)
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – (Ah, reminds me of summer at the beach reading whatever the skywriters were paid to write.)
None of these suggest the actual destruction of anything. It's like saying someone has a time machine just because he has a bunch of scientific equipment and a DeLorean.
1619183 – March 1, 1927 – (Ah, reminds me of summer at the beach reading whatever the skywriters were paid to write.)
None of these suggest the actual destruction of anything. It's like saying someone has a time machine just because he has a bunch of scientific equipment and a DeLorean.
As my dad used to say; "Straighten up and fly right!"
Ignore what you chose, straightUp.
Mar 9, 2017 09:13:12 #
eagleye13 wrote:
As my dad used to say; "Straighten up and fly right!"
Ignore what you chose, straightUp.
Ignore what you chose, straightUp.
We all do, eagleeye.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.