100% of scientists urge Trump to dump UN climate change agreement.. (Page 3): Maybe, just maybe because if no man made climate change then no need for grants and other government...

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Maybe, just maybe because if no man made climate change then no need for grants and other government freebies. I don't believe in man made climate change. Could be wrong. Don't care. Not one suggestion from the panicked climate change, sky is falling crowd is realistic. Just distributes tax payer money elsewhere. The thing I hate the most about man made climate change is it takes money, resources, and time from a much more real problem. Pollution! If all that money wasted on man made climate BS would have been put into cleaning up the oceans and waterways, air and soil count me in. Anyone remember the reactor meltdown in Japan? Guess what? Still going on. The damage being done, right now is greater than any thing man made climate change can predict. No, can't do that according to the left. Must transfer billions to the UN to give to third world countries that are still burning buffalo chips for warmth and cooking. Maybe they will put a solar panel on their mud hut. Or just maybe the governments of those poor countries will keep all that money like they generally do.

fredsgirl1 wrote:

Fake news of the first order. If they are said that then why did have a hugh crowd of them come together to march in protest of Trumps destruction of climate change data.

Cool Breeze

Super Dave wrote:

No, it's a license to be free.

How is that so hard to understand?

Free of what pray tell? Free of God?

Cool Breeze

PeterS wrote:

Who doesn't like a lack of responsibility? Sounds like fun to me....

It usually is until you have to pay the piper!

JW

Cool Breeze wrote:

Therefore the whole concept is a scam and your only objection is whose getting paid. You would rather see the Oil Companies and Energy Conglomerates get paid than wacko enviromentalists and their buddies (for a small fee of course)

My objection is to the perversion of science for financial gain. Where in the scientific method does consensus have validity? Forty years ago, the hue and cry was global cooling. What's next, the terrors of climate moderation?

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

JW wrote:

It is an elaborate scam to line the pockets of a few greedy bastards who have neither scruples nor an understanding of science.

How 'bout, it's just bad science??

Larry the Legend Loc: Not hiding in Milton

JW wrote:

Where in the scientific method does consensus have validity?

Depends whether the 'science' fits a given political agenda or not. Where it fits, it rapidly becomes 'settled science'. Those who hold up a hand and proclaim 'wait a minute, something ain't right!' are immediately vilified as blasphemers and sent to the scientific equivalent of the back of the bus. Just because CO2 is a naturally occurring atmospheric gas that facilitates the growth and survival of myriad plant life is neither here nor there. The 'science' is settled and you're a blasphemer who is about to be burned at the stake.

eagleye13 Loc: Fl

JW wrote:

300 scientists send letter to President Trump requesting he abandon the UN climate change agreement. 100% of them say climate change is a fraud, increasing CO2 levels is a good thing. It allows increased plant growth which increases planetary oxygen levels.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/300-scientists-tell-trump-to-leave-un-climate-agreement/

This is a no brainer.

The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!

As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.

BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Now you've done it. Blasphemer! Now these lib whackos are going to have to find another deity to worship.

eagleye13 wrote:

This is a no brainer.

The real issue is, or should be; Man made climate change verses natural climate change.
Man Made is the BS portion.
Blaming and trying to capture CO2 is ludicrous. ABSURD!!!!

As an HVAC Mechanical Engineer, I know the HUGE costs involved, in CO2 capture, as well as how ludicrous it is to put it somewhere to store.

BTW; It would do almost nothing to lower the climate temperature.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

JFlorio wrote:

Now you've done it. Blasphemer! Now these lib whackos are going to have to find another deity to worship.

Their Gawd is Mr Yippy Skippy. And oh how they cry when Gawd is persecuted.

HedgeHog

JW wrote:

300 scientists send letter to President Trump requesting he abandon the UN climate change agreement. 100% of them say climate change is a fraud, increasing CO2 levels is a good thing. It allows increased plant growth which increases planetary oxygen levels.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/300-scientists-tell-trump-to-leave-un-climate-agreement/

MIT, doesn't get any better than that! Finally.

HedgeHog

Mr Bombastic wrote:

The UN climate agreement was nothing less than an attempt to gain more control over us, and make certain people rich. Just follow the money. It never lies.

Mr. B, it, and the whole anthropogenic global warming hoax, was/is an attempt to destroy capitalism and capitalists. I've heard it through the grapevine, that the "Climate Agreement" that was signed, was not nearly as catastrophic as the one they were asked to sign by Ovomit and his Leftist-agenda buddies.

HedgeHog

JW wrote:

300 scientists send letter to President Trump requesting he abandon the UN climate change agreement. 100% of them say climate change is a fraud, increasing CO2 levels is a good thing. It allows increased plant growth which increases planetary oxygen levels.
http://freebeacon.com/issues/300-scientists-tell-trump-to-leave-un-climate-agreement/

I'm sure the Russians were behind this letter; after all, they have a huge commitment to oil and gas. Well, that's what the Leftist/Liberals will say. Mark my words.

HedgeHog

JW wrote:

I figured someone would make an issue of that. That is why I put it that way. I used exactly the same criteria the climate alarmists used to get their famous 97% figure. No one ever said either number included all scientists. I said 100% of the scientists who signed the letter. The alarmists said 97% of scientists who wrote on the subject between 2000 and 2007. Both numbers are meaningless.

I didn't know that. I knew they were hoaxing, but that is a good refutation.

HedgeHog

Cool Breeze wrote:

Therefore the whole concept is a scam and your only objection is whose getting paid. You would rather see the Oil Companies and Energy Conglomerates get paid than wacko enviromentalists and their buddies (for a small fee of course)

Who's your ghost writer, now, Cool Breeze?

HedgeHog

PeterS wrote:

Of course climate change is a fraud--what else could it possibly be? Here in N Texas we had the hottest winter since the mid 1880's--or so they say!!! Was anyone actually there though? I mean really, simply because we had a record high winter doesn't mean it's getting hotter. Only a fool would think that. No, it simply means that today, at this particular point in time, the winter was warmer. And just who doesn't like a warm winter? Not me!!! Climate change my ass, phfsst!!!!

You have never struck me as the "deepest" thinker in the world. Can't go beyond, things are getting hotter, so it is all that CO2 Big Oil releases into the atmosphere. Nice.