One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Congratulations Dems...You have kids fight your battles
Page <<first <prev 3 of 16 next> last>>
Mar 15, 2018 11:13:27   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
proud republican wrote:
These kids cant even vote yet, they have 15 min fame on tv.....They need to be in school learning about how our government works and if they want to protest which i understand its in our Constitution they can protest after school or on weekend!!!!And you right about Congress not doing their job,maybe we should exercise our right as a citizens of the US and fire all of them..They are useless anyways...


Just because they can't vote doesn't mean they can't think about issues that matter to them. And they certainly don't need to be in school to learn how our government works. They are exposed to more information about government and how it works (or doesn't) than any generation before them. Their right to redress grievances is not limited to certain times of day or year by the Constitution. Protests don't work when they are convenient to everyone.

The reason you appear to be angry about this is because you see the rising Democratic tide, and it's not being led by DC. These kids are threatening because they will vote in 2020. They are more sophisticated than you give them credit for. They are also targeting state governments. They are organizing locally, just like the TEA parties taught them. These kids are not fighting for the Democrats, they are fighting for themselves and if you don't want them voting for the Dems, then perhaps you should give them a listen.

BTW, I thought conservatives don't like schools because students get indoctrinated, but now you want them in school?

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 11:26:38   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Kevyn wrote:
You are quite frankly wrong, and in this instance if you are wrong and not lying you should pay attention. As you can plainly see in the chart below 84% of Americans and 77% of gun owners support universal background checks. Further 68% support banning assault rifles and 65% high capacity magazines. Also worth noting is that majorities are against policies making it easier to carry or purchase guns. If you want to put your hands over your ears and hum so you don’t hear the truth be my guest, just know that ignorance is to your detriment.
You are quite frankly wrong, and in this instance ... (show quote)


So tell us, Kev, just HOW do you go about requiring "background checks" for private purchases? Oh, yes, only something like 3% of the guns purchases at gun shows are bought without a background check. I would like to see you provide evidence that any of them have been used to commit a crime by the purchaser.
Polls can be made to say whatever one wishes. It's all in your polling target and how you word the question. If the question were worded accurately, for instance, "Do you support banning a type of firearm of which only a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of one percent are ever used to commit a crime?" I suspect you would have a different result. Pew has an undeserved reputation for being unbiased. Sort of like Snopes.

Concerning banning sales to people on "no-fly lists" do you realize how easy it is to put someone on a no fly list? Proof is rarely required. Once on, it is almost impossible to get off. Politicians, clergymen, returning servicemen, businessmen and all sorts of people have found themselves placed on such lists by mistake. At least two Federal Agents were mistakenly placed on one such list and were refused boarding on a plane while they were transporting a Federal prisoner.

Your "nationwide database" is a violation of Federal law.

How you go about banning or confiscating the legal property of tens of millions of gun owners is an interesting question. Background checks do need to be more thorough, but requiring them for private sales is ridiculous and unenforceable. Do you really think a criminal is going to submit to a background check? The FBI's own stats show that the average gun used in a crime is a handgun that was stolen at some point and is several years old. In other words, the legal purchaser, the only person who would submit to such a check is not the one who commits a crime.

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 12:05:56   #
Lonewolf
 
They will be voters soon lol

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2018 12:11:31   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Lonewolf wrote:
They will be voters soon lol


You may be very sorry when that happens.

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 13:01:01   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
[quote=working class stiff]Just because they can't vote doesn't mean they can't think about issues that matter to them. And they certainly don't need to be in school to learn how our government works. They are exposed to more information about government and how it works (or doesn't) than any generation before them. Their right to redress grievances is not limited to certain times of day or year by the Constitution. Protests don't work when they are convenient to everyone.

The reason you appear to be angry about this is because you see the rising Democratic tide, and it's not being led by DC. These kids are threatening because they will vote in 2020. They are more sophisticated than you give them credit for. They are also targeting state governments. They are organizing locally, just like the TEA parties taught them. These kids are not fighting for the Democrats, they are fighting for themselves and if you don't want them voting for the Dems, then perhaps you should give them a listen.

BTW, I thought conservatives don't like schools because students get indoctrinated, but now you want them in school?[/quo


This is what you Dems support...This is what you want us to listen??/

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/378527-tennessee-students-tear-down-american-flag-jump-on-cop-car-during-walkout

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 13:02:41   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
For all of you who support this walk out



http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/378527-tennessee-students-tear-down-american-flag-jump-on-cop-car-during-walkout

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 14:42:42   #
Kevyn
 
Loki wrote:
So tell us, Kev, just HOW do you go about requiring "background checks" for private purchases? Oh, yes, only something like 3% of the guns purchases at gun shows are bought without a background check. I would like to see you provide evidence that any of them have been used to commit a crime by the purchaser.
Polls can be made to say whatever one wishes. It's all in your polling target and how you word the question. If the question were worded accurately, for instance, "Do you support banning a type of firearm of which only a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction of one percent are ever used to commit a crime?" I suspect you would have a different result. Pew has an undeserved reputation for being unbiased. Sort of like Snopes.

Concerning banning sales to people on "no-fly lists" do you realize how easy it is to put someone on a no fly list? Proof is rarely required. Once on, it is almost impossible to get off. Politicians, clergymen, returning servicemen, businessmen and all sorts of people have found themselves placed on such lists by mistake. At least two Federal Agents were mistakenly placed on one such list and were refused boarding on a plane while they were transporting a Federal prisoner.

Your "nationwide database" is a violation of Federal law.

How you go about banning or confiscating the legal property of tens of millions of gun owners is an interesting question. Background checks do need to be more thorough, but requiring them for private sales is ridiculous and unenforceable. Do you really think a criminal is going to submit to a background check? The FBI's own stats show that the average gun used in a crime is a handgun that was stolen at some point and is several years old. In other words, the legal purchaser, the only person who would submit to such a check is not the one who commits a crime.
So tell us, Kev, just HOW do you go about requirin... (show quote)

Require private sales be recorded with the local police or Sheriff and they do the background check on the spot. It could also be done by the DMV. Federal law can be changed to keep a national database on firearms similar to those kept on vehicles. Give a year for compliance and then make it a felony with a minimum 10 year prison sentence and lifetime ban on firearm ownership for anyone possessing an unregistered firearm. Also mandate reporting firearm theft and hold gun owners responsible for their safe storage to reduce thefts.

Reply
 
 
Mar 15, 2018 14:55:40   #
working class stiff Loc: N. Carolina
 
Proudrepublican
This is what you Dems support...This is what you want us to listen??/

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/378527-tennessee-students-tear-down-american-flag-jump-on-cop-car-during-walkout[/quote]


Yes, guilty as charged. We totally support all the worst elements you can find. The nth degree is not enough to denote the extremism we are willing to support. There are no rational folks among the Democrats.

Satisfied ?

Meanwhile, back in the real world.....

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 15:25:41   #
Lonewolf
 
since most of these shooting have been done with legally purchased weapons why do you want to punish law-abiding gun owners




Kevyn wrote:
Require private sales be recorded with the local police or Sheriff and they do the background check on the spot. It could also be done by the DMV. Federal law can be changed to keep a national database on firearms similar to those kept on vehicles. Give a year for compliance and then make it a felony with a minimum 10 year prison sentence and lifetime ban on firearm ownership for anyone possessing an unregistered firearm. Also mandate reporting firearm theft and hold gun owners responsible for their safe storage to reduce thefts.
Require private sales be recorded with the local p... (show quote)

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 18:47:29   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Kevyn wrote:
Require private sales be recorded with the local police or Sheriff and they do the background check on the spot. It could also be done by the DMV. Federal law can be changed to keep a national database on firearms similar to those kept on vehicles. Give a year for compliance and then make it a felony with a minimum 10 year prison sentence and lifetime ban on firearm ownership for anyone possessing an unregistered firearm. Also mandate reporting firearm theft and hold gun owners responsible for their safe storage to reduce thefts.
Require private sales be recorded with the local p... (show quote)

Newsflash....The gun manufacturer has a record of the serial number of the firearm, and there is already a record of the original dealer to whom it is sold. Any firearms sold through an FFL dealer already have a paper trail. In case you didn't notice, the FBI says most firearms used to commit crimes are stolen. So your solution is to make a law abiding citizen a criminal for not registering a weapon. Believe it or not, it has already been established legally that criminals do not have to register their firearms since doing so would violate their 5th Amendment rights. So once more, you would stop drunk driving by revoking the licenses of non drinkers, since you are going to stop crime by punishing non criminals.
I notice you did not say a word about stiffer sentences for violent criminals. I suppose that you think they'll be deterred by the Draconian punishments you wish to inflict on people you would turn into criminals. In your mind, law-abiding gun owners, rather than murderers and armed robbers, are the real criminals.

Reply
Mar 15, 2018 19:30:14   #
Lonewolf
 
Loki wrote:
Newsflash....The gun manufacturer has a record of the serial number of the firearm, and there is already a record of the original dealer to whom it is sold. Any firearms sold through an FFL dealer already have a paper trail. In case you didn't notice, the FBI says most firearms used to commit crimes are stolen. So your solution is to make a law abiding citizen a criminal for not registering a weapon. Believe it or not, it has already been established legally that criminals do not have to register their firearms since doing so would violate their 5th Amendment rights. So once more, you would stop drunk driving by revoking the licenses of non drinkers, since you are going to stop crime by punishing non criminals.
I notice you did not say a word about stiffer sentences for violent criminals. I suppose that you think they'll be deterred by the Draconian punishments you wish to inflict on people you would turn into criminals. In your mind, law-abiding gun owners, rather than murderers and armed robbers, are the real criminals.
Newsflash....The gun manufacturer has a record of ... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Mar 16, 2018 03:38:07   #
Kevyn
 
Lonewolf wrote:
since most of these shooting have been done with legally purchased weapons why do you want to punish law-abiding gun owners
I am not suggesting punishing gun owners, registering your car and insisting you don’t leave the keys in the ignition is hardly punishing auto owners.

Reply
Mar 16, 2018 05:53:50   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Kevyn wrote:
I am not suggesting punishing gun owners, registering your car and insisting you don’t leave the keys in the ignition is hardly punishing auto owners.


I am trying to think of a single instance where registration did not eventually lead to some sort of confiscatory policy, and I can't. Of course, that's what you really want, isn't it?
Driving is not a right enumerated in the Constitution. Self-defense is. I notice you don't advocate punishing a car owner who leaves his keys in the car when that car is stolen and used to commit a crime. As I said earlier, you have not said a word about stiffer sentencing and more rigorous enforcement of existing laws. Your entire focus is to punish law abiding gun owners. Should a real criminal or two get caught in the hoplophobic dragnet, they can probably get an early parole.

Reply
Mar 16, 2018 06:58:07   #
Big Kahuna
 
proud republican wrote:
These kids cant even vote yet, they have 15 min fame on tv.....They need to be in school learning about how our government works and if they want to protest which i understand its in our Constitution they can protest after school or on weekend!!!!And you right about Congress not doing their job,maybe we should exercise our right as a citizens of the US and fire all of them..They are useless anyways...


The kids I taught in middle school couldn't even put three cohesive sentences together to make 1 paragraph. I was appalled at how the educational system had become dumbed down over the years. The students nowadays are dumber than bricks and the left is now using these dumbos as their propaganda machine!! I really don't need these propagandized students trying to tell me why I don't need a gun for self protection and the media fawns all over these dull ones.

Reply
Mar 16, 2018 07:53:06   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
drlarrygino wrote:
The kids I taught in middle school couldn't even put three cohesive sentences together to make 1 paragraph. I was appalled at how the educational system had become dumbed down over the years. The students nowadays are dumber than bricks and the left is now using these dumbos as their propaganda machine!! I really don't need these propagandized students trying to tell me why I don't need a gun for self protection and the media fawns all over these dull ones.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 16 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.