One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Will the Real Motive for Supporting Trump Please Stand Up?
Page <<first <prev 15 of 17 next> last>>
Sep 22, 2017 17:43:49   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
Super Dave wrote:
http://img61.laughinggif.com/pic/HTTP2ltZzEud2lraWEubm9jb29raWUubmV0L19fY2IyMDE0MDgwNDAwNDIwOC9kZWFkbGllc3RmaWN0aW9uL2ltYWdlcy9kL2RiL0lyb25fbWFuX2Jvb20uZ2lm.gif

Damn Loki.. You don't have mercy on these mental pipsqueaks, do you?


Squeaking annoys me.

Reply
Sep 22, 2017 18:03:04   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Loki wrote:
Squeaking annoys me.


The squealing is annoying also!
https://www.facebook.com/TheTrumpRepublicans/videos/521912474820414/

Reply
Sep 22, 2017 22:50:24   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
eagleye13 wrote:
'Will the Real Motive for Supporting Trump Please Stand Up?'

Many that voted for Trump, knew it was a last shot.
Many knew something significant had to happen.
Many finally got pissed off enough to vote. And they did.
AND
The Demons tried to put The Beast back in the White House.
Now RINO have to go also.



Reply
 
 
Sep 22, 2017 22:52:12   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Super Dave wrote:
Sorry have to know that is BS, you can't be that stupid.

Democrats and Republicans agree that Obama did not have the authority to do what he did. Obama said over 20 times he didn't have the authority to do what he did.

It's just that the Democrats and many Republicans are okay with breaking it Constitution as long as it helps illegal aliens.

Hopefully you knew most of that otherwise you should be back in school by now.


Not to mention how many times he was shut down by the SCOTUS and still violated their rulings!!!

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 03:01:33   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Loki wrote:
Loki wrote:

*******
"I'm not going to waste any more time on your retarded antics. If you have something substantial to say about the topic or about my argument, then be my guest, but if you're just going to fill up pages with cheap shots and childish tit-tats then I'm not interested."

I understand. Your bullshit opinions are pearls of great price; but when they are refuted by US Law, they're bigoted ignorance.
*******
"OK, show me where anything I said on this entire thread is refuted by US Law.
How many times is this now, where you say something and I respond by asking you for some proof?"

**********
Let me correct your confusion once more; because once more you have posted your own comments and attributed them to me.
The two non-italicized sentences were mine. The rest you claimed were mine are yours.
Loki wrote: br br ******* br i "I'm not goi... (show quote)

Are you actually trying to confuse me with fancy tap dancing? YOU said my "bullshit" opinions are "bigoted ignorance" when they're refuted by law... That's from the "non-italicized" sentence YOU posted. (red)

...so, I asked... where did I ever say anything that's refuted by U.S. Law? That's from the italicized part, that I posted (blue)

Once again, you can't answer that, so you resort to smoke screens and, I dunno - LOL... "confusion tactics" ha, ha, ha...

But, ya know... now that I think about it, even thought I've never suggested breaking the law (unless someone's life depends on it), I actually DO have things to say that are currently refuted by law. But that doesn't make me ignorant. You actually said that when my opinions are refuted by law, they're bigoted ignorance. There's no basis for saying that and if there was, then all the Republicans with opinions refuted by the ACA (which is the law) are ignorant bigots. So, try to work THAT one into your elaborate web of excuses and exceptions.


Loki wrote:

As for your question, this one comes to mind, among others
*******
straightUp wrote:
"You're an idiot. How old were you when you realized Santa Clause isn't real? 23?
LOL
So, SHOW me where it says citizens have a right to live here that permanent resident aliens don't have."


I do believe I posted the following excerpts from the United States Code regarding immigrants:
8 USC 1186, 1201, 1227; all of which state reasons and procedures by which permanent resident status can be revoked.
THAT is where it says citizens have a right to live here that permanent legal residents do not. Stop picking your nose and pay attention.
br As for your question, this one comes to mind, ... (show quote)

But if you actually read through it (instead of glossing over what Google gave you) it would become apparent that according to 8 USC 1186, 1201, 1227, there are NO situations where a permanent resident could be deported that would not place him in prison if he were a citizen. I know six permanent residents personally and they don't trigger ANY of the conditions in the first section and they would only trigger flags in the second section of they were indeed convicted of criminal activity.

So yeah, if you want to get technical, being a citizen gives you the right to live here (in jail, without a right to vote or own a gun) that permanent residents don't always have. But for my six law abiding friends, they have as much right to live here as you do.

...Mother fucka.

Loki wrote:

You are so busy trying to convince everyone how much smarter you are that you act like a dumbass with Attention Deficit.
Let me guess, you will once more demand "proof," since US Federal law governing immigration isn't good enough.
Are you really that stupid? Would you like me to write it on a postit note and mail it to you so you can put it on your bathroom mirror?
I could even write it backwards and you could paste it to your forehead so you could be reminded every time you saw your reflection.
br You are so busy trying to convince everyone ho... (show quote)

blah, blah, blah...

Loki wrote:

*****
"Why? I'm just asking for ANY counter argument. Don't fabricate things about me to justify your own limitations Loki"
As a matter of fact, you have no idea what you are asking for. You are simply grasping at any straw which will bolster your own belief in your own infallibility.
You deny making statements when I copy and paste those very statements. You deny that I offered proof when it is right in front of you. You are not nearly as clever as you imagine yourself to be.
br ***** br i "Why? I'm just asking for ANY... (show quote)

blah, blah, blah...

Loki wrote:

********
Loki wrote:
Bark, bark, asshole.
You said.....
"Yeah, that's pretty much all you're saying."

I knew if I persevered I could say something you would understand.

Very good Loki..! Yes, I *did* understand... Keep up the good work and one day you'll be able say words that actually mean things.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 03:14:47   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Loki wrote:
Squeaking annoys me.

You should figure out how to fix that without getting your ass kicked.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 03:23:28   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:


Ha, ha... that's so obviously an act.

They should just make genre out of degrading liberals. It's already becoming an ideology in it's own right. We can call it disliberalism - LOL

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2017 04:14:29   #
PeterS
 
Docadhoc wrote:
2 wrongs do not make a right. If it is illegal to over ride law through EO, Obama is guilty. His problem not mine, and you are quite incorrect with regards to potential charges he will be facing. There are several individuals and organizations building the cases as we speak and as he loses his left over government plants, the day of the filings draws nearer.

Have you bothered to look into the changes to the ACA brought by Obama's EOs? If you do you may find those changes were attempts to fix the poorly written law and in many instances compromised it further making it more and more unacceptable.
2 wrongs do not make a right. If it is illegal to... (show quote)

Oh with you conservatives Obama would have been guilty no matter what he did. And how did exempting small business from mandated coverage compromise 'it' further? Like I said, you set it up so that no matter what Obama did you are still pissed off.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 04:37:22   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
Very good Loki..! Yes, I *did* understand... Keep up the good work and one day you'll be able say words that actually mean things.

******
You really ARE that stupid, aren't you?
You said...

"But if you actually read through it (instead of glossing over what Google gave you) it would become apparent that according to 8 USC 1186, 1201, 1227, there are NO situations where a permanent resident could be deported that would not place him in prison if he were a citizen. I know six permanent residents personally and they don't trigger ANY of the conditions in the first section and they would only trigger flags in the second section of they were indeed convicted of criminal activity.
So yeah, if you want to get technical, being a citizen gives you the right to live here (in jail, without a right to vote or own a gun) that permanent residents don't always have. But for my six law abiding friends, they have as much right to live here as you do."


...Mother fucka

Your question was what rights does a citizen have that a permanent resident does not? The right not to be deported. Had YOU read the excerpts, instead of assuming you knew what they said, you would have found that permanent legal residents can have their status revoked. Once that happens, they are the same as any other illegal. They can be deported. A citizen cannot have his or her citizenship revoked, you arrogant prick.
You said nothing about your "six friends;" you said permanent residents in general. If they have the status, they have a smuch right to be here as I do. If that status gets revoked, they are simply illegals. Ergo, permanent legal resident status is NOT the same. They do not have the RIGHT to stay here. It is a revocable privilege extended by the US Government.
Next time, take the nice man's dick out of your mouth and pay attention before you post, and be more careful whom you call motherfucker.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 04:39:11   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
You should figure out how to fix that without getting your ass kicked.


Do you plan on tackling that job yourself, or farming it out to some of your precious wetbacks?

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 04:45:43   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
Very good Loki..! Yes, I *did* understand... Keep up the good work and one day you'll be able say words that actually mean things.


I almost forgot; one day, perhaps you will be able to comprehend words that mean things. You might even realize that you are nowhere near as smart as you think you are. Competency in one field does not automatically confer expertise or even knowledge in another. I once knew a very highly paid automotive R&D engineer who completely screwed up changing the spark plugs in his family car. Likewise a naval architect who was possibly the worst helmsman with whom I have ever had the misfortune to occupy the same sailboat.
You remind me of these two, for some reason. They also thought because they were skilled at their trades, they were authorities on everything else.

Reply
 
 
Sep 23, 2017 05:11:23   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
eagleye13 wrote:
NeoCONS/x-Democrats. The Right arm of the PTB Beast.
The R party is attempting to remedy that.

eagle... the neocons and "x-Democrats" are IN the "R" party.

eagleye13 wrote:

Still Too many R's fall for the War Mongering NWO CFR policy.
The D's fall for it also.
Hence no change in US foreign policy.

It's been like this for 80 years. If you don't mind cutting the PC bullshit, the original name for it is imperialism. The PTB as you call them have always wanted to expand their enterprises and when the U.S. became the dominate global military power, it was a natural inclination to develop an imperialist foreign policy administered by the Executive Branch, so dinners at the white house and closed meetings in the west wing, rather than the gridlock of partisan politics on the open floors of the Capitol Hill chambers.

Partisan politics has always been a domestic game. Foreign policy is entirely different because it's not about the Republic or it's people, it's about empire and it's dynasties.

eagleye13 wrote:

The Federal Reserve owners are NOT capitalists. Their "policy" has pretty much dried up free enterprise capitalism. They just "lend" to the government, with a "guaranteed" return, for creating "money" out of thin air.

The Federal Reserve is owned by banks who are in turn owned by capitalists. You *do* understand what a capitalist is right? If you invest money in something that creates a profit then you are a capitalist... pretty straight forward. Of course there is wide disparity between penny stock capitalists and the market manipulating capitalists, and it's the later group that own the Fed, including many who are not even American.

eagleye13 wrote:

Fascism and Communism are both Totalitarian

Not necessarily. As I've said... communism is a democratic theory... Totalitarianism is the absence of democracy... so the two concepts are fundamentally different. Fascism is a very loose set of patterns that involve populist fronts, and aggressive nationalism. Either communist theory or fascist behavior... or even unbridled capitalism can result in a tyrannical power structure... or not.

eagleye13 wrote:

The Internationalist Banker’s NWO Bilderberg Agenda has to be exposed.

How do you know about it if it's not exposed?

eagleye13 wrote:

To understand their agenda search; “CFR,TC,Bilderberg” -https://duckduckgo.com/

Do you just forget who you're talking to? I've already seen all this... It seems like every other post coming from you is a long list of links pointing to conspiracy theories about the same entities. CFR, TC, Bilderberg... You forgot Soros. ;)

eagleye13 wrote:

So now it should be obvious why the NWO globalists were behind Hillary.

It's always been obvious... They want stability. Clinton has the skill and the ability to provide that. Trump is so out of his league that the world is quite frankly, stunned.

eagleye13 wrote:

The Banksters control both parties by installing vetted CFR members
CFR members are very tightly affiliated with the U.S. government. Since 1940, every U.S. secretary of state (except for Gov. James Byrnes of South Carolina, the sole exception) has been a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and/or its younger brother, the Trilateral Commission. Also since 1940, every secretary of war and every secretary of defense has been a CFR member. During most of its existence, the Central Intelligence Agency has been headed by CFR members. Virtually every key U.S. national security and foreign policy adviser has been a CFR member for the past seventy years.

Zbigniew Brzezinski formed Trilateral Commission for David Rockefeller in 1973, and Jimmy Carter was made a founding member. Jimmy Carter became President,
& ZB was installed as Carter's National Security Adviser. (ZB is also advisor to Obama)

ZB - Referring to the rivalry between the USSR and the United States – “The eventual outcome of the competition is however, foreordained, given the inherent superiority of the communist system “ 'Between Two Ages' (1970 - ps.146,147) by ZB
“The Federal Reserve (privately owned banks) are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known.” – Senator Louis T. McFadden (22 years on the U.S. Banking & Currency Commission) Google : Louis T. McFadden, Congressional Record, Fed expose

Both parties have put our government in debt for $20 Trillion to the private banksters; for creating what was supposed to be sovereign government "money". No interest owed, to be used for legitimate purposes, than taxed back out of circulation. That WAS congresses responsibility. Article1; Section 8 of the Constitution.
br The Banksters control both parties by install... (show quote)

First of all, I can't get passed that you refuse to call a duck a duck. "Bankster" is one of those meaningless terms. Like "The Man"... Banking is actually a smaller part of the picture that you might think. There is a lot more money and power stored in bank alternatives, such as the less regulated investment firms that control Wall Street. If anything banks are the means to an end as motivated by capitalists.

eagleye13 wrote:

Restoration and use of US Notes, without interest to the banksters, is the only solution.
Abraham Lincoln and Andrew Jackson did it; John F. Kennedy started to.

And that's why it's NOT the solution... Every time someone tries it, we wind up back where we started, with some central bank.

You should check into block-chain. I'm betting that will be the revolution you've been waiting for. Block-chain is essentially a peer-to-peer network supporting a shared ledger where every transaction is recorded and every record propagated automatically. No single entity can control or hide the records. Block-chain is the basis for Bitcoin but it's being researched for other currency options and for things like copyrighted media distribution.

Bottom line is... the world we live in now is mostly controlled by people who are good at hiding things, like taxable income, illegal sales, exploitation of undocumented workers... With a block-chain system, there won't be any place for bullshit and people will more likely get what they actually work for.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 05:30:56   #
Loki Loc: Georgia
 
straightUp wrote:
And that's why it's NOT the solution... Every time someone tries it, we wind up back where we started, with some central bank.

You should check into block-chain. I'm betting that will be the revolution you've been waiting for. Block-chain is essentially a peer-to-peer network supporting a shared ledger where every transaction is recorded and every record propagated automatically. No single entity can control or hide the records. Block-chain is the basis for Bitcoin but it's being researched for other currency options and for things like copyrighted media distribution.

Bottom line is... the world we live in now is mostly controlled by people who are good at hiding things, like taxable income, illegal sales, exploitation of undocumented workers... With a block-chain system, there won't be any place for bullshit and people will more likely get what they actually work for.
And that's why it's NOT the solution... Every time... (show quote)


Undocumented workers? You have a nomenclature crisis. You are perfectly willing to call anyone who disagrees with you a bigot or racist; (all the while ignoring your own blatant bigotry), and unwilling to call a criminal a criminal. You seem eager to confer sainthood on anyone who hails from south of 32 degrees 43 minutes North latitude. The legality of their entrance into this country is not a consideration. What a shame the government immediately south of us does not share your laissez faire attitude towards national sovereignty.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 06:06:49   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Loki wrote:
******
You really ARE that stupid, aren't you?
You said...

"But if you actually read through it (instead of glossing over what Google gave you) it would become apparent that according to 8 USC 1186, 1201, 1227, there are NO situations where a permanent resident could be deported that would not place him in prison if he were a citizen. I know six permanent residents personally and they don't trigger ANY of the conditions in the first section and they would only trigger flags in the second section of they were indeed convicted of criminal activity.
So yeah, if you want to get technical, being a citizen gives you the right to live here (in jail, without a right to vote or own a gun) that permanent residents don't always have. But for my six law abiding friends, they have as much right to live here as you do."


...Mother fucka

Your question was what rights does a citizen have that a permanent resident does not?
****** br You really ARE that stupid, aren't you? ... (show quote)

No, Loki... That's not what I asked. YOU actually quoted me so I don't know how you're so confused... I said...

So, SHOW me where it says citizens have a right to live here that permanent resident aliens don't have."

This is the second time on this thread now where I caught you misrepresenting what I said. Are you on some kind of medication that makes you delusional?

Loki wrote:

The right not to be deported. Had YOU read the excerpts, instead of assuming you knew what they said, you would have found that permanent legal residents can have their status revoked.

I read the entire thing Loki and nothing you just said has any bearing on my assessment. Yes, I got that permanent residents can have their status revoked I didn't say that can't happen. What I said is that according to ALL of the conditions described in the law no permanent resident can be deported unless they commit a crime, which is why I said my "law-abiding" friends who are permanent residents have as much right to live here as you do.

...Motha-Fucka

Maybe you should slow down and sound out the words so you can actually start to understand the laws that you think make you so special.

Loki wrote:

A citizen cannot have his or her citizenship revoked, you arrogant prick.

Yes, they can you ignorant bitch.
https://www.uscis.gov/policymanual/HTML/PolicyManual-Volume12-PartL-Chapter2.html

Loki wrote:

You said nothing about your "six friends;" you said permanent residents in general. If they have the status, they have a smuch right to be here as I do.

Go back and read dumb-ass... The only group of people that I literally said has as much right to live here as you do, was my six law-abiding friends. But I was using them as an example... there are millions of law-abiding green card holders with as much right to live here as you do and I know that bugs the shit out of you but you can't do anything about it you little faggot, so I guess your just going to have to sit in your sad little room drawing pictures of brutalized stick men.

Loki wrote:

If that status gets revoked, they are simply illegals. Ergo, permanent legal resident status is NOT the same. They do not have the RIGHT to stay here. It is a revocable privilege extended by the US Government.

IF and ONLY IF they commit one or more of the crimes described in the law. Just like a citizen would need to commit one or more of the crimes described in the denaturalization law to be stripped of his citizenship. (Which you TOTALLY didn't know.)

Loki wrote:

Next time, take the nice man's dick out of your mouth and pay attention before you post, and be more careful whom you call motherfucker.

I'll be very careful then... motherfucker.

Reply
Sep 23, 2017 06:13:50   #
straightUp Loc: California
 
Loki wrote:
Do you plan on tackling that job yourself, or farming it out to some of your precious wetbacks?

The squeaking isn't a problem for me, so I don't need to fix it... After 8 years of squeaky Republicans, I just got used to it.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 15 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.