One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Janc469
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
Jun 16, 2013 08:50:28   #
Beautifully written description of the basics of our government outlined in the Declaration of Independence.

Thank you for taking the time to write this.
Go to
Jun 16, 2013 08:46:27   #
rumitoid wrote:
I feel that the founding documents of America are the most astonishing and progressive movement of humanity ever conceived, which is not, of course, my own idea but shared by most able-minded historians and thinkers. Had we but listened to our Declaration of Independence and made it to include from the start Negroes, women, native Americans, and those W****s without property, I feel the world would have been t***sformed and most of our future problems thoroughly obviated. Yet we did not.

And as a result we had an avoidable Civil War. And as a result we had an avoidable 100 year history of suppression of the indigenous people, breaking every agreement we ever made. So many detours and bumps and tragic twists that could have been avoided with a simple commitment to our founding documents.

The luxury and marvel of freedom of speech is not unlike the wonder and beauty of water: without it life as a viable person cannot truly exist. It is the very lifeblood of our existence, and of progress. That we have reached the very sad and sorry state in America where a difference of opinion does not inspire soul-searching arguments and spirited debate, a perhaps reluctant but nonetheless admiring glance across the aisle, yet rather automatic hatred and attack is an utter disgrace for the notion of freedom. Such an attitude speaks that we do not deserve it. And has made us savages.

Before the get-go of Revolution, there were fundamental and seemingly irreconcilable differences intra- and extra-mural of the colonies. Basic religious and economic concerns. A look from today's mindset of stalwart d******eness on these difficulties: absolutely impossible to come together—and rightly so. Let's k**l each other. Somehow they did manage to come to compromise and put their differences aside for the greater good. “THE GREATER GOOD”: a crucial foundation of freedom and all but forgotten today.

It is all about “we the people”--and we will perpetually have differences of opinion and interests. Urban from rural. North from South. Industrial from Agricultural. Poor from Rich. Left from Right. It is not a “versus” unless we make it so. Do we therefore give up on trying to resolve these natural differences for THE GREATER GOOD or to forget the greatest and most wondrous and hope-filled expression of the dignity of humankind ever conceived in our Founding Documents? Do we forget the dead at Bunker Hill, the Alamo, Gettysburg, Iwo Jima, or Hamburger Hill? Persevering in trying to maintain, strengthen, and enhance the ideals of America means at times eating crow, shaking hands with i***ts, or going home empty-handed. Yet I feel such ideals as conceived by our Founding Fathers are worthy of any—any and every—sacrifice. Few seem to agree at One Political Plaza.

Disrespect for the presidency and government, as if neither are part of what makes America great, is ignorance. But I can understand the frustration which promotes attacks on both. We can be seriously wrong-headed about our direction and purpose, lost for a season or more and the prospects grim. Yet by God and the grace of our Constitution, we eventually put things right...given the chance. We presently still have a government that accepts such condemnation or rebuke and looks at itself. That is the greatness of America, despite all its faults in the past.

A******n, same-sex marriage, and Second Amendment rights are not minor issues. Socialist programs are, of course, a great concern for a Republic. Yet none of these issues is greater than our unity in basic freedoms, our capacity to work for THE GREATER GOOD. The willingness to stretch, to put personal concerns not aside but not maintained as an overriding priority without the possibility of an acceptable agreement, is crucial to finding a way for democracy to be the basis of our planet's existence.

Liberty for all and a future of democracy for humankind is entrusted to us in America, as Americans. Let's do this thing as -WE THE PEOPLE!
I feel that the founding documents of America are ... (show quote)
Go to
Jun 11, 2013 17:33:11   #
Yankee Clipper wrote:
“We’ve got congressional oversight and judicial oversight,” Obama said. “And if people can’t trust not only the executive branch but also don’t trust Congress and don’t trust federal judges to make sure that we’re abiding by the Constitution, due process and rule of law, then we’re going to have some problems here.”

Remarks in bold by Yankee Clipper

I don't know about anyone else but Obama's trust thingy is failing him fast. I never did trust the Marxist bastard myself and he goes out of his way to confirm my concerns.

The remarks at the top are taken from the following AP editorial link"

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/06/10/the-scathing-obama-column-written-by-an-associated-press-editor-with-big-promises-often-come-big-failures/
“We’ve got congressional oversight and judicial ov... (show quote)


:) what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Humans are so screwed up.

Trust comes from the love and devotion of an animal. I've been lucky to have two exceptional dogs. Both came from shelters. Andy was 1 yr or so and Sunny (Sundance Kid came from a junk yard in the South Bronx.) I learned so much from both.
Go to
May 27, 2013 09:56:07   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
Watch the video of Gohmert. And then say what you think.


At first listening to the State Senator leaves me speechless. Then it dawns on me, perhaps that explains why he can say things like he did. Born without a brain and too late to abort for humane reasons.
Go to
May 23, 2013 11:49:44   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
Jesus Christ didn't give other people's money to the poor.

Christian compassion is not government compulsion.


How sad and pathetic are the two legislators. But even more pathetic are the v**ers who for some reason return them to office.
Go to
May 22, 2013 09:08:27   #
OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_tornado_aid_totally_different_from_sandy_aid/


Thank you for the thoughtful researched article. :thumbup:
Go to
May 20, 2013 16:26:07   #
straightUp wrote:
Yes we do... don't elect him - LOL


That's a great suggestion for those who v**e in his jurisdiction.
Go to
May 20, 2013 16:16:01   #
OPP Newsletter wrote:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/20/ron-paul-fix-irs-shutting-it-once-and-all/?utm_source=RSS_Feed&utm_medium=RSS


Do we have the same option for Ron Paul?
Go to
May 13, 2013 10:06:16   #
stymie wrote:
Hey General how about crawling back into your foxhole and covering your head. Seems as that's what you have been doing all your life. Why would anyone debate anything with someone as stupid as you. You just admitted that if someone proved that God existed you would still not pull your head out of nothingland. What a waste of time attempting to debate anything with you would be. It's people like you that got us where we are today. The uninformed sx?t for brains liberals.


Stymie you are something else. If you believe in God, do you think you behave as though you were following some religious teaching or do you just disagree with anyone who has a different point of view?
Go to
May 12, 2013 23:41:28   #
General Mosh wrote:
My name is General Mosh and I'm from New Jersey. Yes, I'm a dreaded liberal. I'm an agnostic, and even if I found out a God does exist, I refuse to worship him/her/it. I'm looking forward to some political debate in my down time. That's about it so...yeah.


So, is General a name or a rank? There are more liberals that read and respond to items in one political plaza (OPP). I'm mostly a liberal, non-religious New Yorker so if having kindred minds helps, consider yourself having company. This is a fascinating cross section of opinions.
Go to
May 11, 2013 10:29:51   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
No. You think she is not intelligent and informed, but you misjudge. If Weinstein had a case, he would have gotten a court order against her. He instead has attacked her in public, depending on people, like you, to shut her up. I am certain her g factor is higher than mine, it is people believing Michelle Bachmann is stupid that allows people like Weinstein to use them against their political adversaries. If Weinstein brings his suit, the court will pass judgment. Or are you of the opinion people are to be considered guilty until they prove themselves otherwise?
No. You think she is not intelligent and informed,... (show quote)


I stated my opinion.Is that an attempt to shut her up? I doubt it will have that effect. That sentence was an opinion also.
Go to
May 11, 2013 08:46:09   #
Augustus Greatorex wrote:
I don't know anyone else who caucuses with their lawyers, I wish him a fair trial.


Michele Bachmann what a human being.

Wouldn't it be marvelous if legislators were tested before, during and after they become legislators. Tested for intelligence. Stupidity is not illegal but if the constituents knew she had the limited intelligence
would they really re-elect her?
Go to
May 9, 2013 16:02:32   #
Tasine wrote:
When you write a reply, it's a good idea to avoid the "reply" button and click on the "quote reply" button so that everyone can see to whom you are replying. Otherwise your comment gets lost as to whom you are talking. Someone had to tell me about that, and thought you might like to know it too. :-)


Thanks, that's really helpful.
Go to
May 8, 2013 21:40:55   #
Me too sort of.
janc469@gmail.com
Go to
May 8, 2013 21:34:53   #
you sound intelligent! amazing.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.