Should one so dare here connect the dots ?

You are the living proof of the greatest s**m ever perpetuated on the Republic since the Murder of JFK Hint !

V****g will solve nothing... and if it did, they will not go quietly into the night nor hand you the keys to the Corporation...

Clowns dare prove the data wrong ?


XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX



Most Americans don’t realize we have elected a president whom we know very little about.

Researchers have discovered that Obama’s autobiographical books are little more than PR stunts, as they have little to do with the actual events of his life.

The fact is we know less about President Obama than perhaps any other president in American history and much of this is due to actual efforts to hide his record.

This should concern all Americans.

A nation-wide network of researchers has sprung up to attempt to fill in the blanks, but at every opportunity Obama’s high-priced lawyers have built walls around various records or simply made them disappear. It is estimated that Obama’s legal team has now spent well over $1.4 million dollars blocking access to documents every American should have access to.

The question is why would he spend so much money to do this?

The president who campaigned for a more “open government” and “full disclosure” will not unseal his medical records, his school records, his birth records or his passport records.

He will not release his Harvard records, his Columbia College records, or his Occidental College records—he will not even release his Columbia College thesis.

All his legislative records from the Illinois State Senate are missing and he claims his scheduling records during those State Senate years are lost as well.

In addition, no one can find his school records for the elite K-12 college prep school, Punahou School, he attended in Hawaii.

What is he hiding? Well, for starters, some of these records will shed light on his citizenship and birth.

Furthermore, now that at least three document authentication experts have declared the scanned “Certificate of Live Birth” Obama’s campaign team gave to a pro-Obama website to be an obvious phony; we know that he is hiding something here as well.

Over 49 separate law suits have been filed on the eligibility/birth certificate issue alone, with several of the suits making it all the way the United States Supreme Court, only to be denied a full hearing.

What’s more, there are questions about how he paid for his Harvard Law School education since, despite a claim by Michele Obama, no one has produced any evidence that he received student loans.

The Obamas will not release any student loan details despite repeated requests from the Chicago Tribune.

However, it appears that his Harvard education may have been paid for by a foreign source.

Khalid Al-Mansour, an advisor to Saudi prince Al-Walid bin Talah, told Manhattan Borough president, Percy Sutton, that he was raising money for Obama’s Harvard tuition.

Incidentally, Prince Tala is the largest donor to CAIR, a Muslim group declared by the U.S. Government in 2007 as an unindicted co-conspirator in a terrorist financing trial.

At least three of CAIR’s leaders have been indicted for terrorist activities.

Al-Mansour’s admission opens up speculation as to whether Muslim interests have assisted Obama’s career in the hope he would eventually be in a position someday to promote their interests.

More recently, it was discovered that Obama’s Selective Service card may have been doctored.

Federal law requires all American males to register for the Selective Service (the draft) in case a major war broke out.

Blogger Debbie Schlussel has discovered solid evidence that Obama’s Selective Service registration form was submitted not when he was younger as required, but rather in 2008 and then altered to look older.

Indeed, the forgers forgot to alter the “Document Location Number” which shows that it is clearly a 2008 form.

This is fraud and it’s a felony and Schlussel’s allegations are backed up by Stephen Coffman, a former high-ranking Federal agent.

Moreover, the document shows a September 4th, 1980 date and the location of the t***saction as Hawaii, but at that time Obama was thousands of miles away attending Occidental College in Los Angeles.

The real reason why Obama probably did not submit this form as a teenager is that he assumed his Kenyan or Indonesian citizenship exempted him from this requirement.

But clearly, as he grew older and entered politics, he saw that any documents revealing a foreign birth – Selective Service registration, birth certificate, school applications, etc – would be problematic if he ran for the presidency.

Thus, it is not a coincidence that every document which contains information about his birth or citizenship is either missing, sealed, or has been altered.

Indeed, everywhere one looks into Obama’s background, we find sealed records, scrubbed websites, altered documents, deception and unanswered questions. Can anyone imagine for a second if John McCain or George Bush had blocked access to his school, medical, and birth records? It would have been headlines in their case, but as with everything else concerning Obama, the media has given him a pass on this.

Of all these marvels, the latest mystery and probably most perplexing is that of Obama’s social security number. It appears that Obama has multiple identities in term of possessing numerous social security numbers.

Orly Taitz, an attorney who has filed numerous suits against Obama regarding his eligibility to serve as president, appears to have been the first to discover this.

In her suit, representing a number of military officers who are refusing to serve under an ineligible commander in chief, she hired private investigator Neil Sankey to conduct research on Obama’s prior addresses and Social Society numbers.

Using Intelius, Lexis Nexis, Choice Point and other public records, Sankey found around 25 Social Security numbers connected with Obama’s name.

However, it may not be as many as 25, since Sankey also searched using closely related names such as: “Barak Obama,” “Batock Obama,” “Barok Obama,” and “Barrack Obama.”

There may very well be some Kenyans living in America with the same last name and a similar first name.

In any case, I will exclude these records for the purpose of this research and focus only on names spelled exactly like his name. Moreover, we can verify many of the Social Security numbers as valid since they’re connected to addresses at which we know Obama resided.

Needless to say, there are also a slew of address and social security numbers connected to addresses in states that Obama has no known connection to.

In Obama’s home state, Illinois, Sankey tracked down 16 different addresses for a Barack Obama or a Barack H. Obama, of which all are addresses he was known to have lived at. Two Social Security numbers appear for these addresses, one beginning with 042 and one starting 364.

In California, where Obama attended Occidental College, there are six addresses listed for him, all within easy driving distance of the college.

However, there are three Social Security numbers connected to these addresses, 537 and two others, each beginning with 999.

There are no addresses listed in New York where he attended Columbia University, but there is one listed for him in nearby Jackson, NJ, with a Social Security number beginning with 485.

In Massachusetts – where Obama attended Harvard Law School – we find three addresses, all using the 042 Social Security number. After Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2005, he moved into an apartment at 300 Massachusetts Ave NW; the Social Security number attached to that address is the 042 one.

Yet, three years later, Obama used a different Social Security number for an address listed as: 713 Hart Senate Office Building. This was the address of his United States Senate office. This Social Security number began with 282 and was verified by the government in 2008.

This mystery grows even stranger as other addresses and Social Security numbers for Barack Obama appear in a dozen other states not known to be connected to him. Again, I am excluding those records names not spelled exactly like his name.

Tennessee, one address with a Social Security number beginning with 427
Colorado, one address, with a Social Security number beginning with 456.

Utah, two addresses, with two Social Security numbers beginning with 901 and 799.

Missouri has one address and one Social Security number beginning with 999.

Florida has two addresses listed for his him, three if you count one listed as “Barry Obama.” One is connected to a Social Security number beginning with 762.

In Georgia there are three addresses listed for him, all with different Social Security numbers: 579, 420, and 423.

In Texas there are four different addresses listed for him, one is connected to Social Security number 675.

There are two addresses listed for Barack Obama in Oregon and one address listed for him in the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, South Carolina, and Pennsylvania.

All told, there are 49 addresses and 16 different Social Security numbers listed for a person whose name is spelled “Barack Obama.”

In some cases, the middle initial “H” is listed.

If you were to expand the search to include closely related names such as:

“Barac,” “Barak,” and “Barrack” Obama, you would find more than a dozen additional addresses and Social Security numbers.

Finally, the one Social Security number Obama most frequently used, the one beginning with 042, is a number issued in Connecticut sometime during 1976-1977, yet there is no record of Obama ever living or working in Connecticut.

Indeed, during this time period Obama would have been 15-16 years old and living in Hawaii at the time.

Nevertheless, all this mystery surrounding Obama appears to be a generational thing. Researchers have discovered nearly a dozen aliases, at least two different Social Security numbers, and upwards of over 99 separate addresses for Ann Dunham, his mother.

We do know she worked for the ultra liberal Ford Foundation but we also know she may have earned some income from pornographic poses, as evidenced by photos recently discovered by some researchers—how embarrassing. The only thing researchers are able to find out about Obama’s mother is the fact she made porn. I’m sure that’s a first for p**********l mothers.

But we also know that Obama’s mother and grandparents associated with C*******t Party leaders such as Frank Marshall Davis, a man who, according to Obama’s book, Dreams from my Father, was his main mentor during much of his Hawaiian boyhood (although Obama tried to disguise his identity in his book).

During the Cold War, Davis was named by congressional investigators as a key member of a secretive pro-Soviet networked that existed in Hawaii at that time.

The lack of documents regarding Obama also extends to his mother and to his grandparents. Indeed, researchers have been unable to find marriage licenses for his mother’s two marriages, assuming she was ever legally married. Ditto goes for the marriage license for Ann’s parents.

They cannot find birth certificates for her, her parents, or for even for her grandparents. Even more so, despite Obama’s boast of his grandfather’s military service, there’s no record of that either. For reasons no one knows, much of Obama’s life, his mother’s life and his grandparent’s life has been erased from the records as if they never existed.

But why would someone obtain so many Social Security numbers? According to investigators, those who create additional Social Society numbers are typically engaged in criminal activities such as Social Security fraud, tax fraud, real estate fraud, campaign contributions fraud, v***r f***d and so on.

While the private investigator who compiled this list says multiple social security numbers does not automatically prove there’s criminal activity involved, he states that “having said that, I have personally experienced many, many cases where such information has led to subsequent exposure of fraud, deception, money laundering and other crimes.

“What is interesting to note is that Obama’s grandmother, Madelyn Dunham, was a volunteer at the Oahu Circuit Court probate department and had access to the Social Security numbers of deceased people.

It is clear that more research needs to be done on this issue.

The healthcare system has been under the control of the bean counters for all of the 20th century and much of this century. That's why I couldn't understand the angst the ACA caused so many people. Those who had insurance, were often told which Doctors and which facilities to get care from. Everyone's insurance required "prior authorization" for many procedures and some procedures were outright denied.

Many hospitals require cash deposits before treatment. Many Doctors will not treat anyone without insurance, or who cannot present evidence of "ability to pay". Insurance companies tell you what you will pay and what they will pay the providers. Doctors and facilities order tests and treatments - according to what your insurance plan will/will not pay for. All this - and you still thought that your healthcare was up to YOU, or your Doctor?

Nearly every State requires automotive insurance, as a prerequisite to registration. Home lenders require homeowners insurance and property tax payments, as part of the mortgage contract. So, a Government agency requiring insurance to be purchased - is a time honored tradition - so what the real problem is?

Here we are, talking about whether Donald Trump stepped over the line when he insulted Megyn Kelly, or John McCain, or i*****l i*******ts from Mexico.

But the real scandal is sitting there, pretty much ignored.

Trump, who is currently in poll position for the Republican p**********l nomination, is proposing draconian changes to the U.S. tax code that would gut the federal budget, send deficits skyrocketing, and drive up the price you’d have to pay for everything from coffee to iPhones.

Meanwhile, these changes would save his own family an estimated $2 billion or more — probably much more — in taxes.

But, hey, what is that compared to Megyn Kelly’s monthly cycle, right?

Trump’s campaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Trump, in his 2011 political manifesto “Time To Get Tough,” said he wants to abolish the inheritance tax completely, even on kids inheriting billions of dollars from their Old Man.

Let’s call this proposal “Ivanka’s Law.”

He also said he wants to scrap the corporation tax — completely. And to slash the top rate of income tax by two-thirds, to 15% from 43%. That wouldn’t just apply to earned income. It would also apply to passive income — for example, oh, rental income earned by a billionaire landlord.

According to Trump’s own calculations, his estate contains at least $5.5 billion in net tangible assets. Now it’s true that we haven’t seen his most recent will, and we don’t know how exactly Trump plans to dispose of his fortune when he finally buys that big casino in the sky. But he’s 69 years old and so this isn’t purely academic.

Scrapping the 40% inheritance tax will save his family a lot of money on what he leaves them. Indeed if he leaves them that $5.5 billion, it would save them about $2.2 billion in taxes.

That’s an extra $400 million or so for each of his five children.

How’s that for estate planning?

Meanwhile scrapping the corporation tax, and slashing income taxes, would further save the family a fortune. We don’t know exactly how much but the number must be at least $100 million a year.

How? Simple. Trump says his businesses are worth $10 billion (including intangibles such as the Trump “brand”). Logically they must be generating hundreds of millions of dollars a year in gross income. Some or possibly most of that must be subject to corporation tax, and some of it to personal income tax rates as well.

Right now someone who is paying corporation tax (at 35%) and income tax (at 43%) is only taking home 37 cents on the dollar. Scrapping those and replacing them with a 15% tax leaves you 85 cents instead — more than twice as much.

We don’t know about Trump’s tax planning or how his businesses are structured (legally) to avoid taxes. But there is only so much even the cleverest accountants can do.

What would all these changes do to the federal budget? Trump hasn’t told us, but we are not blind. Here are some quick back-of-the-envelope calculations, based on Trump’s own proposals and official U.S. government data:

Trump wants to replace the current income tax system with four progressive rates, from 1% up to 15%. Applying these rates to the IRS “statement of income” from 2012, the most recent year available, would have slashed federal income tax revenues by more than half, from $1.2 trillion to just $530 billion.

Scrapping the estate tax ($14 billion) and the corporation tax ($240 billion) as well would have resulted in a $900 billion collapse in federal revenues.

Meanwhile Trump says he wants to offset this in part by a 20% tariff on all imports. According to the U.S. Census, we imported $2.8 trillion in 2012, so a 20% tax would, crudely calculated, generate $560 billion. That would, of course, drive up the costs of imports, including many consumer products.

The net result? By this math, Trump’s proposals would have increased the 2012 federal deficit alone by a third, or $360 billion, to nearly $1.5 trillion.

This is the same man pounding President Barack Obama for raising the national debt so much.

Yes, these are only rough calculations. Trump’s tax cuts might have stimulated more economic activity, and that would have added to tax revenues. But as he wants a top tax rate of 15%, he’d have to stimulate $1 trillion in extra economic activity just to add $150 billion to the federal bottom line.

His tariff would have brought jobs home, raising income tax receipts. But then Uncle Sam would get less income from the tariffs.

Some of Trump’s ideas have individual merit. (There is, for example, a case in favor of some tariffs). But what matters if how various changes would fit together. Trump’s package as a whole would be massively regressive and plutocratic. It would revert the U.S. economy to the era of the “robber barons.”

How serious is this? Much more than most realize. Trump is still a long-shot for the Republican nomination. But he is leading in the polls. And wh**ever happens in the primaries, he is almost guaranteed to emerge with a lot of political leverage. The eventual Republican nominee, if it isn’t Trump, will badly need his endorsement — and his promise not to run as a spoiler third party candidate. Trump can extract all sorts of concessions in return.

Many of these policies are already popular in a Republican party that controls both houses of Congress. Don’t laugh too hard.

OH NO! engineer KHH1 posting from the internet pasting and copy works.....and nothing at all from any real experience.....CHOOOO CHOOOOO All ABOARD the R****t Express with the number one race baiter of the OPP!!!! Khh1 HIMSELF! Choooo CHOOOOOO....

There are no new jobs...dork head. There are LESS jobs.....you are just a ignorant Negroid and cannot find out anything for yourself...you have no education to know how to find anything out...so you depend on what ever a comic book tells you what to think and act like the MONKEY BOY you really are.....

Smile and take a bow for the camera now, Chimp! NAPPY it is YOU!

Now lets toss you a BOnana so you can be happy as possible about the fact, you...are....not.....WHITE! BOY!

Third party Don made it clear that he would pick up his marbles, and his half bright supporters and go home if the republicans do not give him the nomination. At this point the republican primary v**ers and party bosses have two clear choices Trump is given the nomination or the Democrats have another 4 years in the White House after Trump dismembers what is left of the republican party. Hillary Clinton is doing cartwheels after the last couple of GOP dog and pony shows, as are the rest of us. The circus is in town!

Published August 7, 2015
By Moses Frenck

The first GOP debate of the top 10 candidates on Thursday night yielded no clear winner and only served to reaffirm the Republican position when it comes to issues affecting women and minorities.

With more than 16 percent of U.S. households tuned into the debate on Fox News — the highest-ever ratings for a primary debate according to Nielsen — the GOP contenders had an opportunity to showcase why they would be best in leading the country forward.

While at times entertaining to watch, the candidates’ positions and rhetoric with regard to issues of gay marriage, a woman’s right to choose and immigration were the same conservative ideals ruled more by scripture than progressive societal norms.

Moreover, discussion of racial issues was nonexistent. Despite a graphic displayed by Fox News stating that 8.5 million people on Facebook were talking about racial issues, there was only one question to one candidate during the entire debate, and the answer couldn’t have been more generic.

The question, posed to Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, asked: “Many in the Black Live Matter movement, and beyond, believe that overly-aggressive police officers targeting young African Americans is the civil rights issue of our time. Do you agree? And if so, how do you plan to address it? And if not, why not?”

Walker’s answer: “I think the most important thing we can do when it comes to policing … it’s about making sure that law enforcement professionals have the proper training, particularly when it comes to the use of force.”

There was no further discussion on race, race relations or issues related to police violence.

The remainder of the debate touched on issues of importance for women and minorities, but the GOP’s long-held beliefs remained the same.

With regard to a woman’s right to choose, Walker said he is “very much pro-life, like everyday Americans,” and insisted that despite the fact that 83 percent of the American public in favor of a life exception if the mother’s life is at stake, “I’ve got a position that’s in line with everyday America.”

Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee went even further, saying unborn fetuses are entitled to constitutional rights.

“I think the next president ought to invoke the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the constitution now that we clearly know that that baby inside the mother’s womb is a person at the moment of conception,” he said, adding that, “This notion that we just continue to ignore the personhood of the individual is a violation of that unborn child’s Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights for due process and equal protection under the law.”

On immigration, the pack remained firm on trying to fix “a broken system,” with Donald Trump sticking to building a wall, though he doesn’t “mind having a big beautiful door” to let in some legal immigrants.

Trump was also asked to provide proof of his claims that the Mexican government was intentionally funneling criminals into the U.S. He did not have much evidence other than some border patrol agents he spoken with, but forcefully added, “If it weren’t for me, we wouldn’t be talking about i*****l i*********n.”

Early on in the debate Trump said, “the big problem this country has is being politically correct … I don’t frankly have time for total political correctness. And to be honest with you, this country doesn’t have time either.”

Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, whose parents are Cuban, said he favored a balance for tightened borders with realism about the need to resolve the problem of our large illegal population: “This is the most generous country in the world when it comes to immigration,” he said, adding, “Despite our generosity, we’re being taken advantage of.”

Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush said he favors “a path to earned legal status,” arguing that immigration can serve as “a driver for high sustained economic growth,” but he did not offer specifics.

T*********r issues were lightly touched on, with Huckabee being asked his opinion about the military welcoming t*********r persons to serve openly.

Please explain this "war on women" horse s**t the libtards bring up every e******n cycle. Why is a******n fine but prostitution not? The answer is simple, the government receives large amounts of tax money from a******n "Drs" while pimps pay no taxes. It's that simple. The only war on women are the ones libtards gleefully accept as a******n. Sick perverts.

“The military is not a social experiment,” he shot back. “The purpose of the military is [to] k**l people and break things. It’s not to t***sform the culture by trying out some ideas that some people think would make us a different country and more diverse. The purpose is to protect America. I’m not sure how paying for t*********r surgery for soldiers, sailors, airmen, marines makes our country safer.”

Evidently the ATF working with the Justice department has been conducting civil rights stings on what they see as problem firearms dealers. Noting several dealers as being the source of weapons for right wing extremist groups a joint task force has been sending in undercover buyers to the shops in teams of two or three. At one time caucasian agents wearing a wire would arrive and attempt to purchase guns while openly discussing anti government and i**********nist views. At another time wired agents in middle eastern attire would arrive, inquire about and attempt to purchase firearms with no discussion of subversive opinion. The shops that refused to sell to the agents in Arab attire while selling to the white agents have had their licenses suspended for an administrative review process effectively preventing them from selling any firearms. So far this has effected four gun shops across the south and one in Idaho.

by theGrio | June 13, 2015 at 2:15 PM
Karen Fitzgibbon, a fourth grade teacher at Bennett Elementary School in the Frenship Independent School District in Wolfforth, Texas, was fired on Thursday after a r****t Facebook post about the McKinney pool party incident went v***l.

“This makes me ANGRY!” Fitzgibbons wrote in the original post, according to KCBD. “This officer should not have to resign. I’m going to just go ahead and say it…the b****s are the ones causing the problems and this ‘racial tension.’ I guess that’s what happens when you flunk out of school and have no education.”

“I’m almost to the point of wanting them all segregated on one side of town so they can hurt each other and leave the innocent people alone,” she continued. “Maybe the 50s and 60s were really on to something.”

R****t Teacher


After the post went v***l and the backlash began, Fitzgibbon apologized.

The district has since come out to issue a statement concerning Fitzgibbon’s termination from the school:

“Frenship ISD is deeply disappointed in the thoughtlessness conveyed by this employee’s post. We find these statements extremely offensive, insensitive, and disrespectful to our Frenship community and citizens everywhere. … The employee whose account is responsible for the post will be relieved of her teaching duties at Frenship ISD.”