There is more carbon in the wrong places than ever before . . .

I believe that one photo is inadequate as representative of a whole society's mores. Also, lots of past immigrants to this country had some folkways their descendants would find deplorable today.

Bear in mind, Pullet, many of the truly nasty behaviors, both of foreigners and our homegrown population, stem from their religious beliefs. Fortunately, in this increasingly objective world, religions are slowly dying.

teaman, you've fallen for a large dose of right wing, religion-inspired bulls**t.

Your source - "The American College of Pediatricians" is a phony, a non-group. The genuine group is called: The American Academy of Pediatricians. These genuine science types have a vast collection of genuine data which absolutely contradicts the nonsense article from "Constitution.com".

You gotta be careful these days, teaman. There's a whole passel of folks perfectly willing to tell you lies, hoping you'll support their political position. Constitution.com is just one of many . . .

Huh?

Without matter and energy there would be no facts, and thus, no information.

Facts are immaterial, but without matter and energy they cease to exist.

Information need not be factual - there's lots of bulls**t in the world.

You may accept that DNA is the result of intelligence, but all available facts point to DNA being the evolutionary child of RNA, i.e., no intelligence - just evolution.

[quote=missinglink]The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy[/quote]


I trust even the overwhelmingly dumb will understand that "selective" releases from a massive pile of evidence, is just a way to lead you to a badly twisted conclusion.

How many times in the past have you accepted that bit in your mouth?
How many times has "selective" data led you to an i***t conclusion?

Once again - a massive dose of belief from one who, somehow, lives outside the world of fact. Well, we've been warned!!

America Only is just another ignorant scumbag!

You'll notice that my capacity for calling noxious names is far superior to yours. Intelligent, educated folks DO have a knack . . .

A seer you ain't. Perhaps an ignoramus of your caliber would enjoy a f*****t government . . .

Don't hold your breath waiting to see that!

Hail Raylan!

OK Carol, here 'tis - F*****m: a governmental system led by a dictator having complete power, forcibly suppressing opposition and criticism, regimenting all industry, commerce, etc., and emphasizing an aggressive nationalism and often r****m.

Listen to the talk of Mr. Trump with your nose, Carol - it smells quite similar to the above . . .

Wolf is obviously a Bernie fan . . .

Mr. Toles - master prognosticator!

. . . "taking back our country!!!" Sounds VERY much like the f*****t slogan in 1930s Germany: Deutschland uber Alles!!!

So do you consider yourself a f*****t Workinman, or are you merely an admirer of Adolph Hitler's political rise?

The dummys who trot about crying that 'Human Life is Sacred' just haven't stopped to think of how stupid that statement is. I happen to have a liver and a kidney that are both human and alive. So my liver is sacred? My kidney is sacred? Will you insist that these organs are not human? Or maybe not alive? Or maybe both!!

The anti-a******n movement is based in religious belief and is, thus, an organized attempt to force the general population to abide by those beliefs. World history is replete with this, often vicious, nonsense; it's the same nastiness that ISIS practices in the Middle East.

Grow up :!: