missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy

Harpooner1

[quote=missinglink]The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy[/quote]

Eijah Cummings is a corrupt, lying Democrat who never wanted this investigation from the beginning. He has conducted himself not as part of an investigative body, but an obvious apologist for Hillary having to be there in the first place. He complains about the waste of taxpayers money, yet, he stalls and obfuscates because he has no intention of an investigation. All the Democrats acted the same....Oh, we apologize for asking you here, Sec. Clinton, .......We know you have more important things to do......
I saw much of her "testimony" in her second hearing. She came across as arrogant, and either incompetent or a liar. She didn't know s**t, apparently. I am sure she perjured herself, and the emails may have many contradictions to her sworn testimony. But, I don't think Hillary, Obama, or any of the scum in this administration would ever tell the t***h even under oath.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

I wished I had copied the very first meeting of this committee when he puffed up and bellowed how this horrible event was a disgracefully handled one and how HE was going to get to the bottom of it. Blah Blah and more blah.
The very next meeting, the very next one , he did a one eighty and started his Democrat Party duty and started blocking procedures. I am talking about the very next one.
The party yanked a knot in his tail. There is absolutely no doubt about that. Zero, Zip , Nadda

Harpooner1

Well, he is beholden to the liberal party of Maryland. He knows he has the best job he could ever get. He can't stray from the Democrat reservation.
Disgraceful man.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

Disgraceful indeed

robmull Loc: florida

Deception is the only tool the secular liberal progressive, "Marx/Alinsky" administration has to keep patriotic America from finding out exactly what they are doing, ml. It's absolutely amazing how all the out-and-out scandals perpetrated by who seem to be the Chicago mob, moved south. Stonewall after stonewall after lie after lie after...ad infinitum. The only reason I can see that may be holding-up the prosecutorial process is our Constitution's ability to solve our problems without resorting to another American Revolution.

"The pen is mightier than the sword," when "WE" are dealing with an ideology that has a moral agenda; but once the "strangers" started assaulting our borders, all bets were off the table. Dealing with the anti-American secular liberal progressive philosophy is bad enough, but now adding the "Taqiyya," look you in the eye and legitimately, in the eyes of Allah, lie 'til "the cows come home," is presenting problems that I pray will be quickly sorted-out by "T***h, Justice and the American way."

DamnYANKEE

[quote=missinglink]The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy[/quote]

CUMSPOT . Should be in Jail . And in fact . ALL those Tapes , belong to , WE the PEOPLE . WE ARE the GOVERNMENT . NOT those ELECTED Holier than thou Politicians . Even K**LERYS SERVER . And , EVERY E-MAIL SHE HAS/HAD , ON that Server

DamnYANKEE

And CUMSPOT , has Tried to DERAIL this investigation , since Day One . Wonder , is He going to Stop the FBI TOO ???

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

It will come out eventually. Most likely after the e******n. If Hitlary makes it we won't know the whole story for years.

Maybe someone on the committee will brake ranks and leak it.
Kind of doubt it but one of them might grow a conscious. We can hope.

missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore

If this goes to were I think it's going due to Obama lighting the fires, The it's going to be a target rich environment. I h**e to see it , it would be god awful . I know , seen it elsewhere.

samtheyank

[quote=missinglink]The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy[/quote]

They are waiting in the wings to screw you! They can't wait for the moment to use that big socialist ______ and place it in your ________. I know this is crude, but maybe if it is expressed in this manner you will have a higher degree of probability of getting the picture and idea! It is really sad for what you have to do for Simpletons!

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

This is how the democrats work. One lies and the rest swear to it.

samtheyank

AMEN!!!

Radiance3

[quote=missinglink]The public has the right to see testimony from Begashi Witness' and that shameful Representative from the left, the UN-honorable Rep. Cummings continues to block efforts of getting the facts out.
I don't care how much crap is hitting the Clinton Fan. This is the kind of info the American Citizen's should have at their disposal and for their own judgements. Not the dishonorable combatants in Congress.

Here's the story followed with a link to the letter Cummings
refuses to comply with. You all can figure out why. He is covering Clinton's rear. Honor amongst thieves .



As the House Select Committee on B******i continues to interview witnesses and individuals with considerable knowledge of the September 11, 2012, terrorist attacks, Republicans and Democrats on the committee are routinely at odds.

Now, a letter written Wednesday from committee chairman Trey Gowdy (R-SC) to the ranking member, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-MD), revealed that Democrats have refused to promise that they will not leak important information from the hearings.

In a statement Wednesday, Gowdy said Cummings refused to not selectively leak the investigation’s crucial witness transcripts:

“As recently as this afternoon, I offered Mr. Cummings total, unfettered access to, and control of, transcripts if he simply agreed he would not selectively leak them. He would not give me that assurance.”

Gowdy added that he has “no choice but to protect past witnesses, future witnesses, confidential material and the integrity of the investigation by allowing the Democrats equitable access but not control.”

The statement coincided with a letter to Cummings, in which Gowdy outlined the various intentional breaches and leaks by Democrats on the committee.

He wrote that Democratic members and staffers on the committee “refused to agree not to selectively release witness transcripts before the Committee completes its investigation and issues its report.”

Gowdy maintained that he wants to release the witness transcripts in due time, but such information must first be carefully evaluated.

In response to Gowdy’s letter, Cummings issued a statement that committee Democrats “will not agree to conditions that prevent us from putting out the facts that witnesses have told the Committee in order to rebut the conspiracy theories about B******i.”

Cummings added:

“Republicans are so desperate to keep us from sharing these facts with the public, they denied Democrats any access to some of these witness transcripts for weeks.

Republicans are writing a secret, partisan report that they plan to make public shortly before the e******n – and they are violating House Rules in order to try to silence Democrats from putting out the facts before then.”

The back and forth between Gowdy and Cummings began when the committee’s Democrats demanded access to the transcripts, which came in the form of a letter from Cummings.

Cummings wrote that Gowdy and his staff have been withholding the transcripts for more than a month and that such actions:

“…impair our ability to share the evidence supporting our fact-based analysis with the public, essentially quieting any dissent from your report from the start.”

Gowdy has made clear he is not willing to sacrifice the integrity of the investigation without the preconditions that Democratic members will not prematurely reveal the transcripts.

“[I] would be pleased to provide copies of these transcripts to Minority staff and members for your own custody just as soon as you commit to stop the practice of selectively releasing certain transcripts while ignoring the release of others,” Gowdy wrote.

The United States House Select Committee on Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in B******i was created in May of 2014.

You can read Gowdy’s letter in its entirety, below:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/305098476/Rep-Elijah-Cummings-Response-to-Trey-Gowdy[/quote]
=================
Trey Gowdy should have never trusted Cummings. Cummings job is obviously protecting his co-democrat associates, to hide and annul the crimes of the people in his own party. Cummings must never be trusted. Right and wrong he is there to negate, deny and cover-up all the crimes of te democrats especially that of Hillary Clintons' pervasive criminal offenses on the Ambassador, 3 other support team, and all the activities they were pursuing in B******i. It was an order by Clinton and president Obama why the ambassador was there. The Ambassador knew all the secretive activities and the very objectives why they are in B******i. I think he was not given protection though requested hundreds of times because he could spill the
beans later on. Ambassador Stevens knew all the secrets.

Hillary was major part of the crimes. In fact I believe she was the master mind, plotting the events that happened in B******i, and later on lied several times to the American people, to the world, and adding insults to injury, to the parents of the victims.

chuck slusser

and you expected more ????????????????????