One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: votenoobama
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
Jul 4, 2014 11:56:24   #
Bigmac495 wrote:
Biggest lying President! F.Y.I.



Biggest Liar Contest

Famous P**********l Lies Contest
Written by: To The Point News
LBJ:
• We were attacked (in the Gulf of Tonkin )

Nixon:
• I am not a crook

GHW Bush:
• Read my lips - No New Taxes

Clinton:
• I did not have sex with that woman... Miss Lewinski

GW Bush:
• Iraq has weapons of mass destruction

Obama:
• I will have the most t***sparent administration in history.
• The stimulus will fund shovel-ready jobs.
• I am focused like a laser on creating jobs.
• The IRS is not targeting anyone.
• It was a spontaneous r**t about a movie.
• If I had a son.
• I will put an end to the type of politics that
"breeds division, conflict and cynicism".
• You didn't build that!
• I will restore trust in Government.
• The Cambridge cops acted stupidly.
• The public will have 5 days to look at every bill that lands on my desk
• It's not my red line - it is the world's red line.
• Whistle blowers will be protected in my administration.
• We got back every dime we used to rescue the banks and auto companies, with interest.
• I am not spying on American citizens.
• Obama Care will be good for America .
• You can keep your family doctor.
• Premiums will be lowered by $2500.
• If you like it, you can keep your current healthcare plan.
• It's just like shopping at Amazon.
• I knew nothing about "Fast and Furious"
gunrunning to Mexican drug cartels.
• I knew nothing about IRS targeting conservative groups.
• I knew nothing about what happened in B******i .
• I have never known my uncle from Kenya who is in the country illegally and that was arrested and told to leave the country over 20 years ago.
• And, I have never lived with that uncle. He finally admitted (12-05-2013) that he DID know his uncle and that he DID live with him.
And the biggest one of all:
• "I, Barrack Hussein Obama, pledge to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America."

I believe we have a winner
Biggest lying President! F.Y.I. br br br br Bi... (show quote)





I second that V**e.
Go to
Jun 29, 2014 11:55:52   #
Obama's arrogance knows no bounds.

This is really over the top. Is this what the Libs want?

A total dictator?

Obama
Go to
Jun 29, 2014 11:45:20   #
According to a newspaper column released in 1979 by Vernon Jarrett, father-in-law of Obama confidente Valerie Jarrett, President Barack Obama might owe his success to a very controversial benefactor.

Early Obama critics will remember the particularly bizarre case of Percy Sutton, a leading African-American Civil Rights leader and entrepreneur who, while being interviewed on a New York area news program, dropped something of a bomb. Specifically, Sutton claimed that then-candidate Obama had earned his admission to Harvard thanks to the intervention of a mysterious lawyer named Khalid al-Mansour, who Sutton fingered as working for one of the wealthiest men on earth. According to Sutton, Mansour had asked him to write a letter of recommendation for Obama, and was in the process of “raising money” for Obama, though what this money could be for, he didn’t specify.

Khalid Al-Mansour (Photo Credit: African Leadership Academy)

The story, coming as it did from the then-octogenarian Sutton, and lacking any other evidence to substantiate it, was dismissed by Politico’s Ben Smith in a lengthy piece around the same time. Mansour, for his part, studiously denied that he had ever met Obama, let alone that he had interceded on his behalf at Harvard, or that he had raised money for Obama. Considering that Obama graduated with over $40,000 in student debt, the “raising money” accusation was dismissed, and with it, the rest of the story. Subsequent information after the death of Sutton that revealed that he had suffered from dementia seemed to drive a stake through the heart of the story.

http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/prnd/prn-theblaze;prntype=web;prngenre=conservative_talk;prnpage=interior;pos=bottom;sz=300x250;u=prntype*web!prngenre*conservative_talk!prnpage*interior!pos*bottom!sz*300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank" ><img src="
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/prnd/prn-theblaze;prntype=web;prngenre=conservative_talk;prnpage=interior;pos=bottom;sz=300x250;u=prntype*web!prngenre*conservative_talk!prnpage*interior!pos*bottom!sz*300x250;ord=123456789?" border="0" alt="" /></a>
Go to
Jun 20, 2014 12:08:48   #
3jack wrote:
Surely you wouldn't trust the word of this biased main stream, Obama loving media outlet...would you?

T***h is, Obama will be leaving office in 2017, so anything Chuck Todd or Rush Limpboy say about him means nothing. What you need to do is research the good things done by your clown posse gop 2016 candidates and post those accomplishments to bolster their chances in the 2016 e******n. Don't be disappointed if you can't find anything good to post.




Are they just figuring this out? Most of us have know back in January 25, 2009 that Obama had already become a loser for America.
Go to
Jun 20, 2014 12:03:49   #
emarine wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/



That is so funny, because the Democrat Party and the News Media said, that there were not any WMD's in Iraq and that President Bush Lied just to go into Iraq.
The bad news is, Obama and the Democrat Party is now the lairs and they have let the WMD's fall into the enemies hands. This just goes to show how stupid the Democrat party is.

It has come time to dismantle the Democrat Party which is the same as the C*******t Party USA. There platform is the same.
Go to
Jun 20, 2014 11:56:43   #
Elwood wrote:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iraq/10913275/Isis-storms-Saddam-era-chemical-weapons-complex-in-Iraq.html

Who said that there were no WMDs in Iraq? If these yo-yos can utilize any of these chemicals does anyone think that they won't use them? :hunf:


Save America has already reported this story just a few line below your.
Have a great day. We have to keep the pressure up on the Democrats and the President.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:36:28   #
Brian Devon wrote:
**********
I doubt our commander in chief is going to lie awake at night worried about impeachment, conviction, and removal. He is a graduate of Harvard Law. He can do math and he knows it would take 13 or 14 Democratic senators, jumping ship to bring down his presidency. I am sure he is also aware that the impeachment advocates can't seem to name any of these Democratic "magical senators". Even if the U.S. Senate fell into Republican hands, there will not be the necessary super-majority (of 67) to shorten his term.

These dumb impeachment remarks on OPP are becoming laughable. There is a least one new of these asinine comments every day on this website.

Maybe the conservatives can get a group rate on a remedial math course.
********** br I doubt our commander in chief is go... (show quote)







Who said, Obama is a graduate of Harvard Law??? Where is no proof? The only person I know that has said that is Obama, which lies to us every day of the week and the bad news is, you believe him. Obama said, he was born in America. But, where is the proof? The birth certificate that Obama show us was a f**e. We all know that Obama Social Security number is a Fraud. If not where is the proof?

I can go on and on with what Obama claims. But, where is the proof????? You cannot claim Obama did anything, because there is not any proof that Obama did it.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:26:39   #
Retired669 wrote:
:thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


He is the same way, with the same thoughts as Brian. They are two peas in a pot.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:25:12   #
Brian Devon wrote:
**********
More brain droppings from the "build-your-own-planet-in the-basement" crowd.




BD, is a lifelong Democrat, Brian is also Black, Brian lives in California, Brian is Muslim, Brian believes we should not have any Freedom in America, Brian wants to Take All of Our Guns away from us, this is who Brian is and what he believes and that is why Brian V**es Democrat, because Brian has the same views as Obama. That's why Brian is dangerous, he's not for America.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:13:46   #
saveamerica wrote:
Last week, Commerce revised its numbers again to reflect even greater pessimism. The Commerce Department’s quarterly services survey, released last Wednesday, overhauled its original May 29 report to accommodate first-quarter health care spending data – and found it had underestimated the GDP contraction by almost half.
The revised figure estimates that the U.S. economy shrank during the first three months of 2014 by 1.7 percent. Commerce had reported on May 29 that American GDP had shrunk by an alarming 1.0 percent.

http://personalliberty.com/commerce-department-says-first-quarter-gdp-shrank-first-reported/
Last week, Commerce revised its numbers again to r... (show quote)




It's still possible that it is worse than that. We all know that Obama is milking the numbers every way he can.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:11:31   #
saveamerica wrote:
Who the real loser?

This is what happens to employees working for Minimum Wage when the last increase happened.

Since October 2009, three months after the last federal minimum wage increase, there has been virtually no jobs recovery for American teens. For May 2014, the official count puts the number of teens with jobs at a level that's 1,377,000 lower than the 5,927,000 teens who were counted as being employed in November 2007.

Yes, there were 1,377,000 less jobs. That means they were Laid Off. If they get the new increase there will be over 2,000,000 people Laid Off.

If no one has notice the whole labor force has been disappearing sense Obama has taken office.

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/politicalcalculations/2014/06/16/781000-jobs-to-go-until-full-recovery-n1851873?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl
Who the real loser? br br This is what happens to... (show quote)




Raising the Minimum Wage has never worked and there has always been a price to pay when done.
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:10:04   #
saveamerica wrote:
The official Twitter account of the Democrat party, @TheDemocrats, sent out this tweet yesterday to mark their celebration of F**g Day:

This shows what kind of Americans we have in the Democrat Party, maybe, they are not Americans.

You got to check this one out.

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2014/06/15/fail-democrats-tweet-out-pic-of-wrong-f**g-for-f**g-day-n1851782?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl




Who F**g is that???
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:08:29   #
AuntiE wrote:
An excellent decision by the SCOTUS.

Supreme Court Upholds Key Element In Federal Gun Laws

WASHINGTON (MCT) — The Supreme Court has upheld Federal gun laws that make it a crime when buying a weapon to lie about plans to give it to someone else.

By a 5-4 v**e, the justices agreed that a “straw purchaser” of a gun is guilty of a crime, even if he and the ultimate owner are both legally entitled to own firearms.

Justice Elena Kagan said the Federal firearms laws assume that gun purchasers will tell the t***h when they fill out Federal forms and return them to a licensed dealer. One question asks: “Are you the actual buyer of the firearm listed on the form?” It includes, in bold letters, a warning that a dealer cannot sell a weapon to someone who is not the actual buyer.

If buyers were free to lie, she said, it “would undermine — indeed, for all important purposes, would virtually repeal — the gun law’s core provisions.”

The laws aim to keep guns “out of the hands of criminals and others who should not have them,” she said in the decision in Abramski vs. United States. “And no part of that scheme would work if the statute turned a blind eye to straw purchases.”

Speaking for the dissenters, Justice Antonin Scalia said it was not clear that the plain language of the gun laws prohibited a legal buyer from purchasing a weapon for another legal buyer.

The ruling upholds the conviction of Bruce Abramski, a former Virginia police officer, who offered to buy a Glock 19 handgun for an uncle who lived in Pennsylvania. He said he could get the weapon for a better price. He had a $400 check from his uncle when he bought the weapon and falsely checked “Yes” on the form claiming he was the “actual buyer.”

He was later arrested and his belongings searched in an investigation of a bank robbery, but he was charged only with violating the gun-purchase laws. He entered a guilty plea and was given five years of probation. He then appealed, contending his purchase of the Glock was legal because he and his uncle were legal buyers.

Kagan disagreed, noting that it was not legal for him to buy a weapon if he was “merely a straw.”

If he had told the t***h, “the sale could not have gone forward,” she noted. Justices Anthony M. Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen G. Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor agreed.

–David G. Savage
Tribune Washington Bureau
(c)2014 Tribune Co.
An excellent decision by the SCOTUS. br br b Su... (show quote)




Great News!!!!!!!!!
Go to
Jun 16, 2014 21:07:48   #
If you were happy to see establishment Republican House Majority Leader Eric Cantor booted from his seat by underdog conservative David Brat, you’re going to love the predictions made in new polling data out from Gallup.
The polling agency predicts that v**er frustration over lackluster performance from Congress combined with widespread dissatisfaction with the Obama Administration is going to cause problems for incumbents during the midterms this fall.

Gallup’s data show that fewer than one in four Americans are satisfied with the current state of affairs in the U.S. Based on the approval ratings recorded for President Barack Obama, 44 percent, and Congress, 16 percent, it’s clear who Americans are blaming for their dissatisfaction.
The polling agency notes that when Congressional approval is low during e******n cycles, incumbents tend to be sent packing. And Obama’s unpopularity spells particular danger for Democrats hoping to hold on to their districts. It will be a land slide defeat for Democrats, they may not even receive 30% of the total v**e.

“Although the president is not a candidate in midterm e******n years, his standing with v**ers is usually a significant predictor of e******n outcomes. When presidents are unpopular, their party typically loses a substantial number of seats in the House of Representatives,” Gallup says. “Conversely, in the 1998 and 2002 e******ns, when Presidents Bill Clinton and George W. Bush had approval ratings above 60%, their parties gained House seats, providing rare exceptions to the historical trend of midterm seat losses for the president’s party.”

Noting that President Obama’s approval numbers are more reflective of George W. Bush in 2006, Gallup suggests that the midterms could bring big losses for Democrats. I believe the Democrats will be embarrass after the e******n in 2014. It could be the worst lost of any e******n in history.

“In those years, the president’s party lost more than 20 seats,” the polling agency reports.

Gallup’s analysts predict that the chances of Obama, the Democrats and the overall Congressional incumbency turning the tide before this fall are low, adding that it’s more likely that approval ratings will plummet further.
The Senate will fall to the Republicans and they will control both houses.

Obama will be in serious trouble after the 2014 and Impeachment will be h*****g over his head.
Go to
Jun 10, 2014 23:57:06   #
LAPhil wrote:
Just got an update on the difference in the spending.

Cantor: $22 million
Brat: $206,000




This is the Voice of Americans. We do not want I*****l A***ns in America.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 22 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.