One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: stan3186
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 112 next>>
Feb 26, 2015 06:54:49   #
jack sequim wa wrote:
The only successful war Obama has executed, is the war against America , Americans, Christians! !!


Why Pres. Obama Won't Say Islamic Terrorists - By Daymond Duck - http://www.raptureready.com/featured/duck/dd163.html 

 

 

No one doubts that Pres. Obama knows that most of the terrorist attacks in the world are caused by Islamic terrorists; that Christians and others are being persecuted, ens***ed robbed, shot, burned, beheaded, buried alive and driven out of their homes all over the Middle East by Islamic terrorists.

 

Pres. Obama is fully aware that women are second class citizens in Muslim countries; that CAIR is a front group for the Muslim Brotherhood; that the terrorist group Hamas is an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood; that the Muslim Brotherhood has often aligned itself with Al Qaeda, other Islamic terrorist organizations and more. Pres. Obama can't help but know these things.

 

He also most certainly knows that he has two dozen or more Muslim Brotherhood operatives (called terrorists in Egypt) in his administration; that he has promoted some of these operatives/terrorists to high positions in his administration; that his CIA Director is a Muslim; that Hillary Clinton's Chief of Staff was the daughter and sister of Muslim Brotherhood leaders and more.

 

 These things have been reported many times but I mention them here because they could have a bearing on why Pres. Obama won't say, "Islamic terrorists." It could be that he won't say it because he has given Muslim Brotherhood members/terrorists the keys to the White House.

 

It was recently reported that Pres. Abdel Fattah el-Sisi of Egypt, said, "ISIS and all other Islamic extremists descended from the Muslim Brotherhood." When he was asked which terrorist group is the greatest threat, ISIS or the Muslim Brotherhood, he replied that they are essentially the same because "they share the same ideology." Pres. el-Sisi went on to say that all of the terrorist groups in existence today (including ISIS) have their beginnings in the Muslim Brotherhood.

 

 Along these same lines, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke at the United Nations where he said that ISIS and Hamas (an offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood) are "branches of the same poisonous tree."  He said they share the "same fanatical creed." This confirms what Pres. el-Sisi said: ISIS and Hamas are offshoots of the Muslim Brotherhood and the theology of all three groups is the same.

 

 Furthermore, on Feb. 16, 2015, it was reported that  retired U.S. Air Force Gen. Tom McInerney "is mystified by the lengths to which the administration goes to avoid references to radical Islam." This famous high ranking General reportedly said, "I don't know. Maybe we have some Islamists embedded in the White House."

 

Then on Feb. 17, 2015, K. T. McFarland, a highly respected Fox News contributor and former official in Pres. Reagan's Administration, said the Muslim Brotherhood is "the mother ship of radical Islam." She added that "Pres. Obama welcomes them into the White House."

 

Based on these and many other facts, I believe the Muslim Brotherhood is an Islamic terrorist organization that is just as guilty as ISIS. What would happen if U.S. citizens suddenly realized that Islamic terrorists, or Islamic State sympathizers have offices at the White House where they influence our foreign policy, and influence Pres. Obama who is the commander of America's military, etc.?

 

The Muslim Brotherhood has to deceive people into thinking that there is a difference between Islam and Islamic terrorism. Why would the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists in the White House want Pres. Obama to speak against Islamic terrorists when they are the beginning of ISIS, Al Qaeda, Hamas and more? He won't say Islamic terrorists because he is trying to protect his cronies in the White House. They believe the beheadings, burnings, s***ery, etc. are their responsibility to Allah and not terrorist attacks.
The only successful war Obama has executed, is th... (show quote)


By now, anybody that doesn't know that Obama is a least a Muslim is either totally mentally r****ded or just plain stupid. Everything this man does is against America. I hope we can make it to 2017 to get rid of these threats but I have serious doubts.
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 22:02:23   #
AuntiE wrote:
In that case, our county will have to remove about five hundred i*****l i*******t children, as the v*****e requirement was waived for that many children.


So what? Remove them.
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 19:35:22   #
straightUp wrote:
Thank you for proving what I mean when I said all I got was pages and pages of links. I'm sorry that the sheer volume of accusations doesn't impress me into thinking any of it is true. If you want to pick one and present the case I will be happy to hear it, but I'm not going to waste my time disproving a link that you merely copied and pasted from somewhere. I've already done enough of that back on that thread... I was doing all the work of reading them and analyzing them only to find false positives... "1 down 530 to go..." You think that's fair? Or is that the point? ...shovel so much s**t that I won't want to make any effort to look at it so therefore you win? Wrong. YOU are the one making the accusation that Obama is a liar so YOU are the one with the burden of proving it.

Go take a pill and calm down... Then go through your big giant turd and pick out something you make a case out of and do it. Otherwise, flush and put the toilet seat down.
Thank you for proving what I mean when I said all ... (show quote)


Wow, what a liberal POS you are. The poster posted a very detailed post to prove his point and you won't even read it.. Typical lazy assed liberal, let some else do the work and then ignore it if it proves a point. Take credit if it proves your point of view. TYPICAL POS LIBERAL.
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 07:44:41   #
KHH1 wrote:
**Those of us who v**ed for him to win TWICE feel that way and that is all that matters to us...not what some confederate yokels think**


If you think this Muslim is doing a great job, why don't you just move to Iraq or Iran and try speaking your BS there. Or better yet move to Britian and try to say something in the Non Entry zones where the Muslims are allowed to practice Sharia law and even the police won't enter the areas. This is what Obama wants here but he wants the entire country to be like those areas. Anyone who continues to support this radical Muslim needs to join him in his country that he so loves, Iran. See what your free speech gets you there. If you have such a problem with this society, then go somewhere where you will be happier. I***TS
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 07:25:32   #
Rufus wrote:
Evidently you haven't spent much time on here. There are quite a few outspoken l*****t liberal socialists on here. There are some Marxists. There are some c*******ts. There are some that don't know what they are because they don't even understand that all of these are separate ideology. It appears you don't. There are many who refuse to accept personal responsibility and want to blame all of the troubles they have personally caused on others or on America. There are some purely Anti- Americans on here. There are some anti- Christs on here. And there are some flaming liberal f*ggots on here. For your own safety and peace of mind I suggest you stay away from any and all of these groups.
Evidently you haven't spent much time on here. The... (show quote)


There is also at least one of these in the White House. Is there ANY doubt that Obama is a liberal Marxist and Muslim supporter? If anyone pays any attention to what garbage falls out of his mouth, then there is no doubt any longer. He won't even deny it now.
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 07:11:19   #
jack sequim wa wrote:
The true numbers are on the BLS site for all too see, and as this post state's 5.6 is a lie. You seem to overlook t***hs when convenient Rummy.
I don't recall main stream conservatives calling Romney a landslide, could you post your source?


I would normally disagree with anything that a dumbocrap said but Carl Rove did predict a landslide victory for Romney but he's an i***t. Gallop never did such a thing. Obama lies and lies and lies. He stood up yesterday at a conference and disgraced and ridiculed America again yesterday saying that the Crusades were just as bloody and nasty as the ISIS group is today. What he failed to mention was the Crusades were in defense of another group of Muslims that tried to overrun Europe in the 1200's. We grew and changed our way of thinking over time. The Muslims still are living in the 7th century and haven't changed anything in there book of laws, the Koran.
Go to
Feb 6, 2015 07:01:27   #
lpnmajor wrote:
Rand Paul, a Doctor, ought to know better and I bet he does, but being a politician first - requires a great deal of dumbing down. It appears as though a cabal within the GOP are still equating science with witchcraft, mistakenly believing that all things that happen are Gods will, so preventable tragedies must not be prevented.

It's too bad that they don't remember that most of the miracles in the Bible required some action on the part of the recipient. Even the General had to dip himself in the river seven times before being cured of leprosy, similar to taking one's children to the Doctor for v******tion - to receive the miracle of immunity. Sometimes God works in UN mysterious ways, in fact, they're pretty obvious.
Rand Paul, a Doctor, ought to know better and I be... (show quote)


V******tion should be required at all levels and schools though out the country. No v******tion, no entry into schools. Why do you think this stuff is suddenly showing up again for. The i******s crossing the border, it is obvious. Shut down the borders and at least require the kids to be v******ted before attending schools.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 14:57:30   #
Voice of Reason wrote:
An answer? From Glaucon? LOL...

He may respond, but he'll never answer.


He is and has always been, our special I***T. Live long and prosper or ES and die.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 12:29:21   #
Glaucon wrote:
I have to wonder what you might have learned if you had allowed yourself to read and tried to understand the point of the article and the compelling evidence It offered. I don't know you, so I don't know if you just lack the mental capacity or if you are merely a bigot.


You are a total radical POS who has never posted anything but liberal lies and dribble on this forum. I don't know where you went for so long , but please go back. You have alway made me nauseous and continue to do so.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 12:23:50   #
motive power wrote:
All one must do is look at the federal records that are online. B****s do 70 to 73 percent of the crime depending on what part of the country you live in. Are nearly 80% of the prison population. They are #1 in rape, murder, assult and theft. Until they admit they have a problem and get thier heads out thier backsides things are not going to change.


Do You really think there is any chance that they will do that on their own?Do you really believe there is a politician out there enough guts to slam the hammer down on these ingrates. It has been far far too long that we conservative Americans which make up the vast majority of the population of this country have laid back and let these lowlifes rule how we should behave. The liberals which are mostly just loudmouths scream and yell about the injustices of the poor b****s and Hispanics. I got news for you liberals the injustices are occurring to the average American white working man and had been for many many years.

Why do you think they behave as they do? Because it's become expected that they can do what they want and there not being any punishment for it. If we had a man that was ahead of this country unlike the sissy that we have today, then something could be done about. Yeah the liberals would yell, the b****s with scream the jails for fill up and then they would be empty by prompt execution of the worst offenders. Something needs to be done, but unless we get a strong white leader in charge of this country that is just going to get worse and worse until all the decent people move out of the country and the b****s wind up with an entire country of ghetto.
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 10:55:14   #
motive power wrote:
Just in case you ever wake up and smell the roses. Police during the last year that data has been completely compiled, k**led 330 w****s and 123 b****s. When you figure that police encounter b****s involved in crimes nearly 4 times as frequintly as w****s by the same data source. It is very apparent that the police aren't out there just shooting up b****s for sport. It really seems that the cops are cutting them a lot of slack!


I think the cops (white) bend over backwards to keep from k*****g anybody much less a black. Look at all the grief they have to go through and the paperwork as well as suspension until the investigation is over. Why would they k**l someone just for the hell of it, it's a lot of grief
Go to
Jan 4, 2015 09:54:13   #
Glaucon wrote:
Racial Bias, Even When We Have Good Intentions
JAN. 3, 2015
By SENDHIL MULLAINATHAN
The deaths of African-Americans at the hands of the police in Ferguson, Mo., in Cleveland and on Staten Island have reignited a debate about race. Some argue that these events are isolated and that r****m is a thing of the past. Others contend that they are merely the tip of the iceberg, highlighting that skin color still has a huge effect on how people are treated.
Arguments about race are often heated and anecdotal. As a social scientist, I naturally turn to empirical research for answers. As it turns out, an impressive body of research spanning decades addresses just these issues — and leads to some uncomfortable conclusions and makes us look at this debate from a different angle.
The central challenge of such research is isolating the effect of race from other factors. For example, we know African-Americans earn less income, on average, than w****s. Maybe that is evidence that employers discriminate against them. But maybe not. We also know African-Americans tend to be stuck in neighborhoods with worse schools, and perhaps that — and not race directly — explains the wage gap. If so, perhaps policy should focus on place rather than race, as some argue.
But we can isolate the effect of race to some degree. A study I conducted in 2003 with Marianne Bertrand, an economist at the University of Chicago, illustrates how. We mailed thousands of résumés to employers with job openings and measured which ones were selected for callbacks for interviews. But before sending them, we randomly used stereotypically African-American names (such as “Jamal”) on some and stereotypically white names (like “Brendan”) on others.
The same résumé was roughly 50 percent more likely to result in callback for an interview if it had a “white” name. Because the résumés were statistically identical, any differences in outcomes could be attributed only to the factor we manipulated: the names.
Other studies have also examined race and employment. In a 2009 study, Devah Pager, Bruce Western and Bart Bonikowski, all now sociologists at Harvard, sent actual people to apply for low-wage jobs. They were given identical résumés and similar interview training. Their sobering finding was that African-American applicants with no criminal record were offered jobs at a rate as low as white applicants who had criminal records.
These kinds of methods have been used in a variety of research, especially in the last 20 years. Here are just some of the general findings:
■ When doctors were shown patient histories and asked to make judgments about heart disease, they were much less likely to recommend cardiac catheterization (a helpful procedure) to black patients — even when their medical files were statistically identical to those of white patients.
■ When w****s and b****s were sent to bargain for a used car, b****s were offered initial prices roughly $700 higher, and they received far smaller concessions.
■ Several studies found that sending emails with stereotypically black names in response to apartment-rental ads on Craigslist elicited fewer responses than sending ones with white names. A regularly repeated study by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development sent African-Americans and w****s to look at apartments and found that African-Americans were shown fewer apartments to rent and houses for sale.
■ White state legislators were found to be less likely to respond to constituents with African-American names. This was true of legislators in both political parties.
■ Emails sent to faculty members at universities, asking to talk about research opportunities, were more likely to get a reply if a stereotypically white name was used.
■ Even eBay auctions were not immune. When iPods were auctioned on eBay, researchers randomly varied the skin color on the hand holding the iPod. A white hand holding the iPod received 21 percent more offers than a black hand.
The criminal justice system — the focus of current debates — is harder to examine this way. One study, though, found a clever method. The pools of people from which jurors are chosen are effectively random. Analyzing this natural experiment revealed that an all-white jury was 16 percentage points more likely to convict a black defendant than a white one, but when a jury had one black member, it convicted both at the same rate.
I could go on, but hopefully the sheer breadth of these findings impresses you, as it did me.
There are some counterexamples: Data show that some places, like elite colleges, most likely do favor minority applicants. But this evidence underlies that a helping hand in one area does not preclude harmful shoves in many other areas, including ignored résumés, unhelpful faculty members and reluctant landlords.
Racial Bias, Even When We Have Good Intentions br ... (show quote)


No, you are right, I'm a r****t. I wasn't a r****t until Obama was elected. I thought ok good now maybe we can get all this 200 years of race stuff behind us now. The b****s can'b b***h anymore because they aren't being treated fairly. It should shut up the race baiters of Sharpton, Jackson and Faraghan. It should put things on a more peaceful even playing field and do away with affirmative action B.S. that the supremes allowed back in the 60's.Anyway, that's what i actually thought and was hoping for.
Now that the reality is here. This is the most r****t administration this country has ever had. Obama h**es not only white people but Americans in general. He is a marxist Muslim hell bent on destroying this country. He only makes statements or speeches when someone white k**ls someone black.NEVER THE OTHER WAY AROUND. He never mentions that the reason the b****s have so many young poor black people disproportionately in prison is because they cause the disapportion amount of crime. They commit 10 times the number of violent crimes than all the latinos and caucasians combined. Poor little black kid. Didn't have a daddy to help his poor little mommy raise him and that's why he is like he is. So, we should just let him go about his marry way and continue to steal and l**t and mug people because he just don't know know better por little thing.
The fact is the trash they call mother is the reason they are in the fix they are in. The only way their "mothers" can see to feed themselves and sometimes the kids is by having more kids and selling her self on the streets. What should happen is to take all the warefare away and let her get a job and give free childcare while she is working, add wh**ever formula to her pay for her job to be able to make the bare minimums and no other amounts at all. If she quits working put her to working cleaning up the cities. If she refuses, take the kids away and put her a$$ on the street which is where she most of the time anyway trying to score some drugs or sex for more money and who knows maybe even another welfare baby.
It's d********g the way the leaders of these "people" don't ride their asses to do something for themselves. But Obama and friends have always been radical. And low life trash. Lining their own pockets.
By the way, I hear the leader of the "new black panthers" say they were going to start k*****g white people in their homes and in the White neighborhoods for a change. Stupid, stupid person. Doesn't he not realize that we outnumber them by 8:1. I personally look forward to some black bad asses to come into my house. There, they will be pleasantly presented with a sawed off fast action pump 12 gauge shotgun, and AK47, a 20 gauge sawed off quick action shotgun with a 6 clip and 12 shot sidecar. Plus the 9 and my favorite 357 mag. So, come on down and let's party.
As far as your studies of Professors of University of Chicago( a very liberal college at best) they probably had Bill Ayers do the study, after all his views are the views of that garbage liberal/socialist organizatiion. Oh, and Harvard, what can you say about Harvard other than a bunch of rich spoiled brats that get taught nothing about the real world and only concern themselves over their Liberal Professors who know nothing about nothing.
You want studies, go to the streets where b****s and w****s are working together side by side in harmony. You know why they do this. because if they don't someone will be in their place tomorrow. University studies are garbage done by no brained stupid liberals who have never worked a real day in their lives.
Go to
Jan 3, 2015 02:19:02   #
old white guy wrote:
If what you say is true you are either drunk or a fool. The boy will never be free of your control/clutches, or is that what you prefer?


no, she just loves her grandson, just like I love mine. I would help them a much as possible also.
Go to
Jan 2, 2015 11:52:37   #
grace scott wrote:
I think we can agree on one thing. Taxes on business is far too high.


What you have to understand that the less in taxes and the more tax incentive legislation you give to business, the more they will spend.Here is a prime example of what I am talking about. In the 80s there was a tax incentive vehicle that was given to business to invest in capital equipment. It was called the ITC which could be treated as a commodity so if I am a company that would like to have the latest greatest power press but I didn't need the $100,000 tax credit (10% of the cost in this instance assuming a $1 million piece of equipment of which 10% would be $100,000 tax credit) I could sell that tax credit to another company that needed the credit but had no need for additional equipment.

What does that do for the economy? Well, several things all of which are good. It produces more manufacturing of the equipment that needs to be built (more jobs) being the purchasing company the equipment it needs to be more proficient and most likely hire more sk**led people. Reduces the taxes of the company that is doing very well by purchasing the credit who will undoubtedly invest that money into the company in order to produce more product. Therefore, hiring more people.

It would also cause a new business type to be formed that would buy and sell the tax credits as a commodity. Which would be a huge business in and of itself. This stuff is not rocket science but the politicians will never do something like this because they can't profit from it.
Go to
Jan 2, 2015 11:31:57   #
rkevin wrote:
If Israel put down [her] weapons, Israel would be pushed into the sea. If Palestine, Hamas and Hezbollah put down [their] weapons there would be peace!!! "If America turns [her] back on Israel, God will turn His back on America!!!"


Undoubtedly what you say is true.if Israel were to put down their weapons that would be the end of Israel, we all know this so does Obama, so does Eric holder and their puppet masters. Unfortunately, I believe that Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel's prime minister may very well be assassinated. When and if that happens all hell is going to break loose. Israel launch nukes at Iran and other enemy Islamists Muslim states in order to save their country. What other choice would they have because the next thing that would happen is for the surrounding radical Islamists Muslim states to try to overrun Israel as I said before that is not going to happen, not without Israel putting up the best fight that they can and to hell with what the United States thinks as well as the UN. What would we do? Well that is a bit different most of us would probably celebrate.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 112 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.