One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: MPLSMAN
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 25 next>>
Sep 11, 2013 14:59:10   #
OldSchool wrote:
Bulls**t! And, you believe the NYT??!!


More than I believe right-wing blocs.

Guess that makes a stalemate.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 14:09:45   #
OldSchool wrote:
You need to listen to him for a couple weeks to really understand what Rush is all about. To just listen to him for a couple programs will not really tell you much about the man. he even tells new listeners to listen for a couple weeks, or more. I too thought he was a blowhard the first couple times I listened to him, but I hooked after listening to him for awhile.

Now, i will say that most liberals and some moderates don't like him and won't listen to him.

But, he is NO r****t.
You need to listen to him for a couple weeks to re... (show quote)


"Holocaust?" Ninety million Indians? Only four million left? They all have casinos -- what's to complain about?"
Do you consider this r****t?
"Look it, let me put it to you this way. The NFL all too often looks like a game between the Bloods and the Crips without any weapons. There, I said it."
Do you consider this r****t?
"Clyburn's worried about not having a car? Clyburn's worried about not having the perk of a big office? A driver? So, forth. The way this could all be worked out, Clyburn's new position: Driving Miss Nancy. He gets to keep the car. He gets to go everywhere she goes."
Do you consider this r****t?
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 13:53:31   #
OldSchool wrote:
Your president took $700B out of Medicare and rolled it over into Obamacare and Medicaid. Obamacare will also eliminate the Medicare Advantage medical insurance plans. The long range plan is to dissolve Medicare and roll it all into Obamacare. So, get ready for lower quality care, longer waits, higher costs. it's a comin'!


"THE ALLEGED “RAID ON MEDICARE” A Republican attack ad says that the reform law has “cut” $716 billion from Medicare, with the money used to expand coverage to low-
income people who are currently uninsured. “So now the money you paid for your guaranteed health care is going to a massive new government program that’s not for you,” the ad warns.

What the Republicans fail to say is that the budget resolutions crafted by Paul Ryan and approved by the Republican-controlled House retained virtually the same cut in Medicare."
New York Times, August 18, 2012.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 13:18:53   #
OldSchool wrote:
Your president took $700B out of Medicare and rolled it over into Obamacare and Medicaid. Obamacare will also eliminate the Medicare Advantage medical insurance plans. The long range plan is to dissolve Medicare and roll it all into Obamacare. So, get ready for lower quality care, longer waits, higher costs. it's a comin'!


Where are you getting your facts and figures?
Don't tell me it's another right-wing bloc.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:57:28   #
TroubleshooterTim wrote:
Did you just say that Medicare is the best plan in the country? How so?

Medicare reimbursement rates to Dr. & hospitals continue to drop. More Dr.s are not accepting Medicare patients. Even those on Medicare need to have insurance to cover expenses beyond Medicare (aka Medicare Advantage).
When you file for SS you must enroll in Medicare--regardless.

I still do not see how you determine that this is the best plan in the country!


I agree. I recently had a bladder infection. My bill for one office visit after medicare was over $250. They take $100 a month out of my SS and if I want more coverage I have to buy private insurance.
My wife (retired) pays $61 a month for Medical and Life insurance. Her Dental is an additional $51 a month. That comes to $111 a month for Full medical including prescriptions, Dental. and Life. That being the case she turned down Medicare.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:47:33   #
BoJester wrote:
The names I chose are in fact 'generalizations', and not directed at anyone in particular, however, the point is that the conservative movement is trying to destroy the ACA and most social programs, while many are using the very same programs.
But here is the deal, if and when certain posters refrain from calling the president the names they do, such as marxist, c****e, kenyan, muslim, Oillegal, Odummy, Obummy and ad nauseum, I will cease and desist from most name calling. I doubt that will happen.
The names I chose are in fact 'generalizations', a... (show quote)


But people take them personally. I too get angry at the name-calling (and I admit replying in the same ilk), but to stand here and call each other names is "schoolyard stuff" and doesn't solve a single problem.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:43:13   #
Albert Maslar wrote:
Hypocrisy is a national political disease. There is not one good side and one bad side politically, but only a thinly disguised "One-Party Two-Party" system that is bent on incumbency and the necessary re-e******n.
Mark Twain said, "V**e the rascals out," but the Maslar political philosophy is a bit more harsh.
"If they choose, on their own, to run for office, elect them for two terms at a time, and let them spend the first term in jail, because they must've done something."
Hypocrisy is a national political disease. There i... (show quote)


Amen
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:41:51   #
ginnyt wrote:
I know that I may be viewed as completely stupid. But, you keep referring to Rush. Would that be Limbaugh? He is very abrasive, some of my friends listen to him and they laugh, but I can not see or understand his "humor." Because he is so anti-everything, I have not been able to listen to him for more than a minute. Therefore, I do not know anything about him other than his tone is irritating and I can recognize his voice and then I change the channel.


Yes, Rush Limbaugh.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:39:25   #
Gloria 311 wrote:
NO MORE WAR!


I agree. But, you must admit, it is a dilemma. If Assad did, indeed, use chemical weapons and the world just looks the other way, that opens the gates for everyone else to use every dirty weapon they can come up with.
So what do we do?
I'm tired of these Mid-Eastern Wars, just as you apparently are.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:33:38   #
bmac32 wrote:
Just read the transcript and it never asked.
I did Cheney makes several false claims about WMDs and nuclear capabilities.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:31:38   #
There is something wrong with my keyboard. Should read:
. . or they could invest the money here and grow our economy.
Re paying taxes to other countries. Why do they have one room corporate headquarters in other countries that have no income taxes, if it isn't to avoid taxes here?[/quote]
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:29:37   #
OldSchool wrote:
I don't agree with either of your suggestions. Money moved overseas just means our tax system is to regressive. Reduce the taxes, and that money will stay here. As for the "lowest paid employee" idea, what if his legitimate business deductions are over that? BTW, that socialism.

When taxes are reduced, the rich keep more money here in country, and free up more for capital investment. New companies start with this investment and more people are employed. Increase taxes, and the rich hoard more money, and move it into tax shelters, of which many are overseas. Rich people do the hiring, not the poor, or lower middle class.

The U.S. currently has the second highest corporate tax in the world, and is the only country that taxes companies that have company entities overseas on top of the taxes they pay to that host country. That needs to change. the problem is the democrats are in power, and they only know how to raise taxes. Exception being JFK, the only democrat to reduce taxes, and it worked.
I don't agree with either of your suggestions. Mo... (show quote)


. . or they could invest the money here and grow our economy.
Re paying taxes to jost countries. Why do they have one room corporate headquarters in other countries that have no income taxes, if it isn't to avoid taxes here?
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 12:22:43   #
Dave wrote:
Seems a lot of effort by a lot of people to discuss Limbaugh and whether or not he lied, was a hypocrite, got away with a crime, and on and on.


However, he appears to be the de facto leader of the Republican Party. What he says seems to set the Party Line. That is why the interest.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 11:08:44   #
BoJester wrote:
Too bad for cruz and pauli, the majority of their audience was comprised of geezers already on Medicare. For the very dumb conservatards, Medicare is a government run health program for geezers, one of the best available plans in the country.
Very bad optics for the teabag crowd, and proof that the conservatards even h**e themselves. Bet none of the geezers want to give their Medicare coverage, and they are whining because the over-paid Medicare Advantage program was brought in line with traditional Medicare plans.


http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/10/rand-paul-ted-cruzs-defund-obamacare-rally-attracts-dozens-medicare-elderly-people.html
Too bad for cruz and pauli, the majority of their ... (show quote)


As a liberal, I would ask you to cease the name calling, etc. I can tell you are intelligent enough to just state your opinion and facts without doing so.
Go to
Sep 11, 2013 10:57:28   #
(Excuse me hit wrong button) on Meet The Press, Sunday, March 16, 2003.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 25 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.