So the p******c is over through its own volition- And- you just refuted and called every Doctor on the planet liars and cons.Only a sleazy ,Trumpian ,Maga ,Republican liar would perpetrate such a farce.What the hell would the constitution have to do with that .I have yet to grasp why people would v**e for any one of your caliber. M.McConnell ,K.McCarthy and D.Trump does ,they are aware that if they blow in your ear and grab your snatch,you will follow them any where
P.S. : I'LL BET YOU'RE NOT EVEN A SCIENTIST.

.....because there is no cure for c***d ; boosters, just like the Flu shots merely minimize your chances of getting it,therefore , it could potentially flare up again. No,you are confused- most Trumpian, confederate minded ,Republican type peoples are. Excuse me- not confused ,but stupid.

The reason why you have early v****g in the first place is to insure and make sure that citizens have easy access and opportunity to v**e,and this is consistent with the country's ( at least all my life) urgency to incentivize and always encourage its people to v**e , knowing they never had the correct amount of passion to excercise their right -to! -v**e.If you sincerely were a true conaseuer of politics you would know that it is rare when they boast of even a fifty percent turn out.Restricting people to v**e on Saturday certainly goes against the grain of - since it's conception- always making it easier to v**e as oppose to discouraging them or making it harder to v**e.

What is the difference between being mandated to have a passport and mandated to have a C***d ** passport- darling.

In a world of 8 billion people ,what makes "You Peoples " opinion count for more than the other 7.2 billion human beings opinion ,and the world can't do without you -and it will - also? The answer to that is ... just as Trump,you are not supreme intellects , but supreme NARCISSIST !!

Knew better than to mess with Reagan?,If that's their rendition of fear ; what kind of behavior will they exhibit when they have no fear of the U.S. - dumb_ss

You get Donald Musk,or Elon Trump,frankly, I can do without either one.

...now darling ,is that have anility( meaning old age or infirmed) or do you mean they have the - Ability-like the time Russia had nuclear subs off the Florida coast,and Reagan played it down,contending "that was no news,
those Russian nuclear subs had always been there "

I Know you don't; for your answer as to what we are talking about you should consult - Proud...uh- American - surprisedly, for once she had common intelligent central idea or thought.

F**e about what ? Darling. If I am one of the writers of the constitution and I write that the country's citizens .....no , since you say there is something wrong with my grammar and sentence structure, let me restructure my sentence
And I write the country's citizens have freedom of speech,and the right to plan their family ,I wouldn't promise liberties and abruptly deny them that particular church first , state second liberty - this is just an example of your hypocrisy or stupidity one.

"YEAH. I HAVE CONTENDED ALL ALONG THAT "YOU PEOPLE" are a bunch of lying _ _ _ ,stupid f**e _ _ _ human rights champions hypocrytes all over the world.

It is about time,I asserted this to loki five years ago.The reason why your advice should be heeded is because you and they do a lot of this^^^^^^^^^^

I will cite you one rule of grammar just to show you there are rules of grammar There is a rule of grammar specifying when to use -is - as oppose to are
for instance, your last sentence
NEVER START A SENTENCE WITH A COORDINATING CONJUNCTION. WHEN TALKING ABOUT AN ITEM DEPENDING ON WHETHER SPEAKING OF A, OR ONE ITEM ,YOU SHOULD USE -IS- WHEN TALKING ABOUTS THINGS IN A PLURALITY YOU SHOULD USE - ARE- ( the rules of grammar says your sentence should have went like this ; There aren't any rules of grammar.; the word ' rules is suggestive of a plurality instead of a singularity
This is just one of the many flaws of your sentence. I think you barely missed using what they call a double negative ,since the word -No- is in fact an answer when one is not affirming something as oppose to affirming something.
Just pointing out you should cease with the double standards of critiquing peoples grammar
-and - you don't know good grammar from bad grammar.The only reason I accepted that criticism from you is because I am not qualified to say what is good grammar or bad grammar , neither are you - very few people can.I know this because I caught your side of the political spectrum using and writing bad grammar all over the forum,that proud one , and a host of others just like her- not only that, but the essence of what this forum is suppose to be about - that is the efficiency of political ideas -well, your right wing ideas stink- they make no sense ,and are more emotional than logical .