How many times can Dems 'Cry Wolf' before v**ers tells them to F-Off??..Dems again cry 'V**er Suppression'..🙄🙄.
proud republican wrote:
https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/18/georgia-democrats-cry-v**er-suppression-over-a-law-that-will-restrict-b****t-harvesting-plans/
Their base is stupid, they will run to the same dog whistle faster than a moth to a flame.
Don't worry..... they will default back to n**is and racilscizm in 2 moons or less.
What ever is Nefarious, evil, illegal, immoral, against all intelligent thinking, & downright corrupt.....
Is what the Demoncrats are all about! [ Sadly...it didn;t used to be that way....Now....Demoncrats are everything wrong with this Republic!
They prove that every day!.....[ Bye...Bye Nancy!
,
,
]
One down.....250 to go!
proud republican wrote:
https://thefederalist.com/2022/11/18/georgia-democrats-cry-v**er-suppression-over-a-law-that-will-restrict-b****t-harvesting-plans/
Lolol just another “play on words without the play on words…”Do tell where is the ambiguity??
While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “ While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however —
section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times. runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times. I know its a reading comprehension issue~~~📜📚🤦‍♀️
V****g should be "cut, & dried"....easy, as ABC.......America must have v**er reform?
Open polls at "X" am....close at "X" pm....counted & reported within 24 hrs! [ "SO"...nothing counted past that time!]
valid Id, presented, or "NO V**E"! [ ONLY AMERICAN CITIZENS AUTHORIZED TO V**E!]
Ronald Hatt wrote:
V****g should be "cut, & dried"....easy, as ABC.......America must have v**er reform?
Open polls at "X" am....close at "X" pm....counted & reported within 24 hrs! [ "SO"...nothing counted past that time!]
valid Id, presented, or "NO V**E"! [ ONLY AMERICAN CITIZENS AUTHORIZED TO V**E!]
Simple common sense IF your purpose is to have a free, fair, and accurate v**e. But if your purpose is to muddy the waters, provide as much opportunity for v***r f***d as possible to those so inclined, well, then you would naturally oppose your solution. And the left does exactly that.
It is not lack of common sense on the leadership part.....it is a nefarious political strategy and permanent tactic by the Democrats.
lindajoy wrote:
Lolol just another “play on words without the play on words…”Do tell where is the ambiguity??
While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “ While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times. runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times.
I know its a reading comprehension issue~~~📜📚🤦‍♀️
Lolol just another “play on words without the play... (
show quote)
Welcome back linda you've been missed
bggamers wrote:
Welcome back linda you've been missed
Thank you, bg, nice to see everyone too..
Happy Thanksgiving~~~
valkyrierider wrote:
Really glad to see you back. Have missed your comments. Hope you are doing okay.
you hit the wrong quote reply. Try again
lindajoy wrote:
Lolol just another “play on words without the play on words…”Do tell where is the ambiguity??
While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “ While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times. runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times.
I know its a reading comprehension issue~~~📜📚🤦‍♀️
Lolol just another “play on words without the play... (
show quote)
Glad to see you back on the site. Missed your comments and humor. Hope you have been doing well and Happy Thanksgiving.
lindajoy wrote:
Lolol just another “play on words without the play on words…”Do tell where is the ambiguity??
While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “ While there is still plenty of time for v**ers to cast their b****ts before the runoff, Democrats are still trying to fuel the v**er suppression myth in a state that has seen record-breaking v**er turnout — particularly among minority v**ers — after Georgia strengthened its v**er laws last year.
Democrats argue that the law the state relies on to bar early v****g on Nov. 26 does not include the word “runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times. runoff,” so v**ers should not be prevented from v****g early on that Saturday. The first line of the section in question, however — section (d)(1)(B) of Georgia Code § 21-2-385 — refers to “each primary, e******n, or runoff” and mentions a “runoff” two additional times.
I know its a reading comprehension issue~~~📜📚🤦‍♀️
Lolol just another “play on words without the play... (
show quote)
Why the desperate need by the GOP to close v****g on Nov 26? Are Republicans barred from v****g on that day? Shouldn't we be making it easier to access v****g not to try to restrict it? Attempting to restrict v****g failed to help Republicans at Midterms.
They don't need to close it as their law says no v****g on that day. The republicans aren't b***hing as they are competent enough to get to the polls and v**e but the dumb ass Democrats can't. They must be afflicted with the dumbass diseases of being too stupid to v**e on the days allowed. ROFLMAO
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.