We know (if you"re honest) that this spending bill i***t Joe and the Progressives want to push through is a disaster. However; we need not just look at the size of this monstrosity. We need to look at the ingredients. Here are some of the wonderful things in the Bill: ( Remember it is $4.3 trillion in spending. Eight times more than the Interstate Highway cost, the most in history).

$400 B for daycare (babysitting)
$2 Trillion tax increase (largest ever)
Incentives not to work
Higher business taxes
$50 B more in death taxes
$80 B in tax hikes on small business
Higher taxes on energy, employers, and cigarets
doubles the number of IRS agent
$10 B to colleges to encourage c*****e c****e courses
$2 B for Green New Deal job training
Blocks American energy exploration
$27 B for a "Green Bank" for wind and solar. (did this in California. Result; blackouts)
Billions in kickbacks for g***n e****y companies. ( Can you say Solyndra?)
$25M to study butterflies
$25M to study desert fish
$25 M to study mussels
$4 B slush fund for radicals to remove r****t infrastructure

I******S:
$100 B for amnesty
Free college
Tax Credits
Welfare

$500 M for culturally appropriate school lunch's
$4 B for Ivy league schools (already rich)
250 M for the health insurance companies (Didn't we bail them out with c***d funds?)
Free Housing for convicted felons
tax payer funded a******ns
grants for people suffering from loneliness

There is much more. If what you have read doesn't outrage you, IMO you are either an i***t or h**e this country. Probably both.

I am getting a surveyor out to legally establish property boundaries between the cattle ranch behind me and my neighbor to the side that is part owner of that. It has a fence that was done in the 1800's, and it is falling apart like it's over a hundred years old.

But the main thing is that it is at least 10 feet on my side of my property...that's 900 feet times at least 10 feet. Twenty or thirty years ago the cattle rancher would have won because county courts favored old range fences that were established decades and even hundreds of years ago. Now courts will correctly rule in favor of the true boundaries as can be surveyed and marked. This concept of using true lines really ticks conservatives off that are fine with where they put the fences in the first place.

The surveyor I'm using is a really interesting guy in regards to his perspectives and incidents he has gone through doing property boundary work in adverse conditions.

We were laughing about how the angry guys who come at him in a rage, often carrying guns, seem to be angry about the fact that when correct property lines are established, they are the ones that are going to lose what they see as what has always been their land as established by fences that are wrong. Half the time they can identify corner monuments, and it is obvious where a fence should be by simply looking from one corner to the next...but the prefer to go by what is wrong if it's in their favor. Flip that, and a fence gives them some of their neighbors land and they are all for that, in fact if that is the case they are probably the ones initiating the dispute and survey work.

Here is the difference between someone like myself and a conservative, my neighbors have their panties in a bunch about me establishing proper boundaries and putting up new fences. My attitude is that if the error is on the neighbors side and I "lose" a few feet of property I don't care, I just want it in the right spot as long as I'm paying for new fence, the true and correct spot being where it should be regardless. I don't even see why anyone would have a problem with accepting what is correct.

Across the cattle ranch out back, it is 900 feet of dilapidated 1800's range fence, falling over, propped up, antique barbed wire bolstered by newer layers. He commercially leases out range to guys that run a hundred cows or so, and I can't understand why he isn't willing to invest a few thousand dollars in good fence.

So now my quandary is whether I communicate what I'm doing and have it settled before I put in fence where the surveyor says it goes, which is my preference...or do I let them know where it is going and incur the expected confrontation.

I made them an offer to pay for half the fence installed by a professional that is leasing the 250 acres and keep it where it's at and they refused that offer. I told them if I am paying for the fence it is going exactly where it belongs and we know where that is. The next door neighbor made some comments about using a bulldozer, that being what they are for and he's done it before...I just said yeah right, wh**ever.

You know that thing that follows you around, goes everywhere you go? that's your shadow, not C****-**.

They tell us to "follow the science". Whose science? What science? There is Fauxi science and dozens of other sciences, whose do we follow?

I've seen people going somewhere alone in their car, windows up and wearing a mask. These "patriots" are not following any science, not even common sense, they have succumbed to FEAR. Irrational, inexplicable FEAR.

What terrorized such people? Confusion about the "science"; fear induced by propaganda, hyperbole, medical malpractice, political demagoguery, you name it.

The information and misinformation about SARS-CoV-2 coming at us from every direction - it's ability to spread, who it infects and why, who it k**ls and who it doesn't, the effectiveness of masks and social distancing, the efficacy of various v*****es, the whole 9 yards - is a miasma of conflict, contradiction and confusion.

Who ya gonna call?

In many places, to enter a restaurant you must be masked, obviously you have to remove it to eat, then you must mask up again before you leave. Where's the science in that? Science is based upon logic. Where's the logic?

Fauxi science is pure political demagoguery, no question. Beyond his daily flip-flops, his contradictions of his own contradictions, his "do as I say today, tomorrow may be different" approach, beyond that, the "science" projects that man has supported through NIH and NAIAD grants and funding rival those of the Butcher of Auschwitz.

An NIAID grant to the U of Pittsburgh genetic laboratory for experiments with the skulls of aborted babies grafted to the backs of lab rats. NIH funds to the W***n lab for c****av***s gain-of-function engineering. And, this man's "science" is the one to follow?

You made a decision, for yourself and your family, you chose a science to follow. You have a right to do so. You've been v******ted and you wear a mask. You are now supposedly immune.

So, Mother Meddlesome, who are you protecting?

You know that thing that follows you around, goes everywhere you go? that's your shadow, not C****-**.

They tell us to "follow the science". Whose science? What science? There is Fauxi science and dozens of other sciences, whose do we follow?

I've seen people going somewhere alone in their car, windows up and wearing a mask. These "patriots" are not following any science, not even common sense, they have succumbed to FEAR. Irrational, inexplicable FEAR.

What terrorized such people? Confusion about the "science"; fear induced by propaganda, hyperbole, medical malpractice, political demagoguery, you name it.

The information and misinformation about SARS-CoV-2 coming at us from every direction - it's ability to spread, who it infects and why, who it k**ls and who it doesn't, the effectiveness of masks and social distancing, the efficacy of various v*****es, the whole 9 yards - is a miasma of conflict, contradiction and confusion.

Who ya gonna call?

In many places, to enter a restaurant you must be masked, obviously you have to remove it to eat, then you must mask up again before you leave. Where's the science in that? Science is based upon logic. Where's the logic?

Fauxi science is pure political demagoguery, no question. Beyond his daily flip-flops, his contradictions of his own contradictions, his "do as I say today, tomorrow may be different" approach, beyond that, the "science" projects that man has supported through NIH and NAIAD grants and funding rival those of the Butcher of Auschwitz.

An NIAID grant to the U of Pittsburgh genetic laboratory for experiments with the skulls of aborted babies grafted to the backs of lab rats. NIH funds to the W***n lab for c****av***s gain-of-function engineering. And, this man's "science" is the one to follow?

You made a decision, for yourself and your family, you chose a science to follow. You have a right to do so. You've been v******ted and you wear a mask. You are now supposedly immune.

So, Mother Meddlesome, who are you protecting?