One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Otisimo
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
Nov 8, 2018 08:30:07   #
Bigdog wrote:
Hello All, this is my introduction email. I live in California on the Central Coast. Politically speaking I am democratic on social issues and conservative on fiscal issues. That being said, the more a read, the more I realize how much I don't know. What is true? What is not? What is just political propaganda and/or bulls**t?
Thus my reason for joining is to learn. I am not here trying score any points. I do not have an agenda. I believe we all are just trying to make a better world to live in. I am with you. Teach me.
Bigdog
Hello All, this is my introduction email. I live i... (show quote)


Welcome Bigdog! You’ll find interesting reading every day on here for sure! How much of it is accurate is open to debate.
Go to
Nov 1, 2018 08:48:46   #
proud republican wrote:
There WILL be Revolution if Democrats win the House in my opinion,because no sane American wants Socialism in our country!!!!


Our country has had socialist institutions for decades. Public libraries, police departments, fire departments, public schools, all are forms of socialism. And despite what crazy people may say, it has been to the benefit of all Americans.
Go to
Oct 21, 2018 08:51:40   #
Doc110 wrote:
10/17/2018 Is It Morally Licit to Smoke Pot? (Part 1)

E. Christian Brugge
http://m.ncregister.com/blog/christianbrugger/is-it-morally-licit-to-smoke-pot


DIFFICULT MORAL QUESTIONS: Although it is sometimes morally licit to smoke pot for purposes of healing, it is never licit to smoke it to get high.

Q. Pot smoking is legal in my state. I know pot is a bridge drug to other worse drugs.

But I was wondering if occasionally smoking it is okay. 



My parish priest says there’s nothing wrong with it, so long as I don’t get dependent.

What do you think? Thanks, Rahl.

I think your priest’s advice is misguided.

The simple answer to the title question is:

Although it is sometimes morally licit to smoke pot for purposes of healing, it is never licit to smoke it to get high.


YES

“Brain Altering Substances” (BAS)

Medicine uses the term “therapeutic” to refer to something related to facilitating good physical or psychological functioning.

Using BAS for therapeutic reasons is using them to obtain real human goods.

But most BAS also have harmful effects, which mustn’t be the reason we choose them. In the words of moral theology, we mustn’t intend those effects as ends or means.

We all use BAS sometimes for therapeutic reasons, and many of us use them daily. We drink a cup of coffee or cola for an energy boost;

We have a glass of wine to calm feelings of stress after a long day at work;

We take antidepressants to ameliorate blue mood, or melatonin or Ambien to help quiet the sleep centers in our brain;

We take analgesics to assist with back pain;

And occasionally we take very powerful narcotics such as morphine to help relieve severe pain.

Each of these can be done quite innocently, as each can be a way of realizing genuine human goods.

Marijuana is a BAS, which too, doctors tell us, can have therapeutic effects. Physicians sometimes prescribe it to aid discomfort from headaches, cancer, glaucoma or nerve pain.

But ingesting it also has bad affects.


Moral Norm

I may use a BAS — whether Advil, pot or morphine — for therapeutic reasons if two conditions are met:

a. First, I intend only the therapeutic effect:

My intended end is healing, my intended means is the substance’s ameliorating mechanisms, and I merely tolerate — as unintended side effects — the harms caused by using it;

b. Second, there must be no other reason for me not to use it.

What are other reasons not to use a BAS (including pot) therapeutically?

Whenever using it would be contrary to another moral obligation:

For example, such use is illegal where I live; or it places me in a near occasion of sin (e.g., I cannot use it with clinical moderation because of an addiction);

Or the unintended bad side-effects from using it would be manifestly disproportionate to the benefits;

Or it would unfairly harm someone else, for example, I’m a father and my therapeutic pot smoking is likely to influence my teenage son to think drug use in general is okay.


Church Teaching

These two elements — therapeutic use and fidelity to moral obligations — are noted in the teaching of Pope Pius XII on using paink**lers.

He taught:

“The Christian, then, is never obliged to accept pain for its own sake. …

The patient, anxious to avoid or calm the pain, can in good conscience make use of the means discovered by science and that in themselves are not immoral.”

In this way, the Pope continues, “he is seeking, in accord with the ordinance of the Creator, to bring suffering under man’s control.”

He goes on to say, however, that a person has an obligation not to seek to relieve suffering “whenever he is faced with the unavoidable alternative of enduring suffering or acting contrary to a moral obligation, either by an action or omission”

(Responses to three questions regarding analgesia, 1957).
https://w2.vatican.va/content/pius-xii/es/speeches/1957/documents/hf_p-xii_spe_19570224_anestesiologia.html


NO Abusing BAS:

Some people use BAS, including pot, not for therapeutic reasons, but in order to alter their consciousness for the sake of the experience of the altered state itself — to get high.

Since the highness it causes, however pleasurable, is a bad effect, to intend it as an end or means is to intend harm myself (and to others if I support them in getting high).

This is never morally legitimate.


Why is highness a bad effect?

Because it entails an alteration and impairment of my sensory, rational and volitional faculties, making it more difficult for me to understand things clearly and to choose well.

Although I may tolerate such impairment as a side-effect of taking BAS for therapeutic reasons, to will it for its own sake is wrongful.


One might reply:

But when I get high, I do it for the pleasure it brings me.

Isn’t a pleasurable experience self-justifying?

No, pleasure of itself is no justification — is not a reason — for acting.

Pleasure is good if it arises from the pursuit of real human goods and bad if it arises from what harms human goods.

(Think of the pleasure of an athlete versus the pleasure of a sex trafficker.)

Since the pleasure experienced in pot smoking arises from something harmful to us, it is wrong to seek.


Moreover, ingesting marijuana is harmful to our mind and body in a host of other ways.

The NIH website lists the following:
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/marijuana

a. Worsens memory, learning, problem-solving and verbal ability; impairs body movements; increases anxiety, depression, suicidal thoughts, and causes loss of IQ points if heavy use begins in teens;

b. Causes hallucinations, delusions, paranoia and psychosis (from long-term use); leads to a decline in academic and career success;

c. Increases job absences, accidents and injuries; acts as a “gateway drug” to harder drugs; leads to lower life satisfaction.


Presumably pot smokers do not intend any of these effects; they only want to get high.

But we’ve already shown that this is a bad effect.

Therefore, getting high is not a reason to smoke pot, but a reason not to.

Add to this the many other harms caused by ingesting the THC found in marijuana, and we end up with several reasons not to smoke pot to get high.

(End Part 1)
10/17/2018 Is It Morally Licit to Smoke Pot? (Par... (show quote)


Wow! The writer of this crap took a really convoluted route to try to rationalize and justify their own opinions about marijuana. Morally licit? Really? But alcohol is fine.. God made pot, man made alcohol! Enough said there.
Go to
Sep 15, 2018 13:18:45   #
SilentGeneration wrote:
I agree with Slat.


Nope, sorry but it’s a Squid. He’s also training the dolphin swimming under him. 🐬
Go to
Sep 3, 2018 08:25:07   #
Richard Rowland wrote:
You're the second person to refer to her as a s**t, is this just an opinion, or do you know something specific? I admit, had someone asked me who Ariana is prior to this, I would not have known. I also admit being in the lecherous old guy faze of life, that, I find her to be a young- impetus on young- attractive woman. As for the song, was it one of Aretha's?


I thing the song was written by Carol King but it was a hit for Aretha.
Go to
Aug 21, 2018 14:56:53   #
fullspinzoo wrote:
We might get the t***h yet on Robert Mueller and how much of it is exactly what they say "a witch hunt". https://www.teaparty.org/army-fbi-whistleblowers-ready-testify-mueller-320126/ The longer the Manafort case goes the better it looks for Manafort. https://www.teaparty.org/army-fbi-whistleblowers-ready-testify-mueller-320126/


teaparty.org is hardly an unbiased source of information, very much a right wing propaganda site. IMO the only thing that makes any sense at this point is to let the investigation conclude and then deal with the actual results. Any thing else is speculative at best.
Go to
Jul 27, 2018 12:09:18   #
BigMike wrote:
Which do you think looks better; the California Buckeye Burl (top) or the Spalted Maple (bottom)?


I like the top one
Go to
Jun 5, 2018 15:59:11   #
Justsss wrote:
That’s ok kevyn, maybe you’ll remember my words when you’re standing in line for your “mark”. But most likely not, but you’ll enjoy all of eternity remembering it.


I don’t get it. What is the big deal about an enhanced license? I got one because w e go back and forth between western N.Y. And Michigan and it’s two hours shorter going thru Canada than to go around Lake Erie to the south. And with it I don’t have to take my passport with me. For years ya didn’t even need that!
Go to
Jun 1, 2018 08:36:53   #
BigMike wrote:
Ah...the reverse Firebirds!

Mini-hunbuckers...an answer to the Strat...and a whammy bar that was so simple it actually stayed in tune...with a fatal flaw! The head could break IN THE CASE!


There weren't many made in 64 and not many survived. They've been remade, I hear, and the remakes aren't equal to the originals.


The remakes used a different pickup, just don’t have the same sound quality. A friend has one of the originals and I used it one night at a gig when my guitar malfunctioned. It was like having a cement block h*****g around your neck! Sounded great through my Peavey Classic 30 tho. 👍
Go to
May 30, 2018 13:10:47   #
Mike Easterday wrote:
The only good Lib , is a dead one!


Really??? Damn dude! H**e much?
Go to
May 30, 2018 09:02:39   #
lindajoy wrote:
Are you a muslim?? don’t’ they get 72?? Lolol


So is that all Muslim’s? Or just the men that get the 72 virgins? Just curious.
Go to
May 28, 2018 16:59:21   #
TrueAmerican wrote:
Oh how I wish this James Brown look-a-like would run for president !!!!!!


Hey! James Brown is bad ass! Just saying.
Go to
May 19, 2018 08:32:57   #
👍 ✌️ 🙏
Go to
May 1, 2018 11:26:29   #
Chocura750 wrote:
I don't think conservatives and Trump can take a joke or is it because they are against free speech. Google her speech and read it yourself.


I didn’t think any of it was funny myself. There is a difference between a joke and a personal attack. Ms. Sanders can’t help her appearance or the fact that she has a wonky eye. What Ms.Wolf did was tasteless and crass in my opinion.
Go to
Apr 8, 2018 08:48:58   #
Squiddiddler wrote:
We live in a society in which we are constantly bombarded with stories of POLITICS, crime, poverty and war. For this reason, it appears that kindness and happiness appears to be a dying personality trait. But this simply isn't true. While acts of kindness, and happy news seldom make the evening news, it doesn't make them any less prevalent. The photos below show us the true beauty of life - one that is filled with kindness and happiness.


It’s nice to know that out of the political arena life goes on in REAL America! 👍
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.