One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dher490
Page: 1 2 next>>
Apr 17, 2016 15:10:30   #
Well, this is pretty interesting information. I've seen a couple of these before... the firefighter and his accounting of what he and those with him did and observed is one that was familiar to me. I do know from several friends I have in the industry and realize there's a huge split between where their thoughts fall on this.

I guess, for my own edification I'll poke around a lot more. I haven't paid much attention to this since Jesse Ventura climbed on board. Prior to and subsequent to his "theories" I was still unconvinced. He just pushed me farther away from the theories.

Thanks for the information. Interesting and it raises a lot of questions. But, which one is the conspiracy? The argument that the terrorists flew the aircraft into the buildings or the arguments that are being presented here.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 14:41:31   #
Oh, and I'm not being paid to cast suspicion on theorists. I just do it to ferret out t***h... if there is any. It's somewhat of a passion of mine, having been a fact finder and puzzle solver for over 40 years.

But it is fun to dabble in fantasy from time to time too.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 14:39:15   #
Gener wrote:
I disagree. This was used at that time. The airplanes that hit the tower made u-turns that would have created too much g force for anyone in the plane to survive. That would not be possible except by remote control.


I rest my case Pennylynn.

It never ceases to amaze me how conspiracy theorists can conjure up wh**ever they want to accomodate their theories. And folks accept it as fact... that's the unbelievable part of it. I guess my question re: the post above by a "dissenter" to your theory would be where's the factual information in support of his theory located so we, the readers can review it and determine it for ourselves. Something other than the X files.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 14:32:42   #
Thank you Pennylynn. I've been browsing and commenting a bit as I go but given time I expect to participate more. Great post re: the remote overrides by the way. Facts make differences but there'll be an argument that will most likely refute your facts. One of those smoke and mirrors arguments.

Good post though. Thanks for the information. AND the welcome.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 14:30:14   #
Hmmm... as Pennylynn eloquently points out, there's a little "pin prick" in that "remote controlled to fly into the buildings" theory now isn't there. The installation of those overrides didn't occur until 2006, and that would be on select aircraft. Of course, it's going to be argued that the four jets were all selectively altered prior to the event by the forces from middle earth or zenatua or wherever.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 14:26:13   #
Thanks eagleye13. I'm getting some good reads and am enjoying the progression of many posts.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 13:12:52   #
Thanks emarine. I've been reading along on several of these threads just to get the feel and the tone. There are some interesting "reads" on here for sure.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 12:19:06   #
Great analogy!
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 12:06:57   #
From the headlines I thought this was about Bill Clinton...

But being as it was about Lewandowski... he grabbed her arm and he pulled her away from Trump. He did nothing wrong. I've done that many, many times. No lawsuit here. The "lady" has a history of trying to make money via frivolous lawsuits.

Hopefully she's done with the "news" business now. Breitbart did good by getting rid of her sorry ass.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 11:50:16   #
Conspiracy theorists are so damned fun to toy with! LOL. When confronted with fact, actual personal observations, historical data that's more accurate than the tea leaves and hashish they or their "experts" are consuming then they get all excited and want to "pound that right up your worthless ass" and cry "scum". It's fun to watch. Kind of a morbid entertainment of mine.
Go to
Apr 17, 2016 11:38:29   #
More B.S. on the WTO attack via jetliners and muslims (OBL to be exact) being an inside job! LOL. I thought this site was better than this but hey, we live and learn.
Go to
Apr 15, 2016 23:49:04   #
I've carried since I was 17 yrs. old, still carry and will carry wherever and whenever I want. Most folks have no idea I'm carrying and those that do know me think nothing of it. I just got another CCW permit this year only because I bought a bigger gun. Don't look for any logic in that last statement because I couldn't figure out why I bought the permit after I bought the gun either. But for over four decades I've carried without a CCW permit. The first and only one I had until this year I got in 1974 when I turned 21 yrs. old, after I ETS'd from the Army. I never renewed it. Didn't see the need to. The constitution was enough for me but then again, I never had to "legally" argue that point to anyone with any "authority". So now I have a concealed carry permit but really don't care. Call it a weak moment or something, me buying that damned permit. But I did, so I guess I can keep carrying. (Secret... I was going to anyways).
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 12:52:03   #
Thank you!
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 00:44:38   #
Yeah, I remember reading about the disdain for our military that the Butcher B***h of B******i held for our military and in particular those who were assigned to protect her. I have no doubt that she carried that all the way with her to her failed Secretary of State stint and beyond. To this day I don't believe a word that comes out of her mouth. She's nothing more than a lying, self serving, egotistical, whiny b***h. Given her failures as Secretary of State alone she should be tried for malfeasance. Unfortunately, that ain't going to happen anytime soon. Her politico whoring has earned her a spot on the varsity roster of candidates for POTUS. I can only hope the v**ers know better come e******n time... like that will make any difference. Personally, I think it's already a done deal. A POTUS has already been decided. We're just being played and humored as "v**ers". I'm just not sure who it might be but am pretty sure it'll be another bleeding heart lib.
Go to
Apr 14, 2016 00:24:25   #
Well... I enjoy a good brawl. Skin's tough and from what I've been able to glean from the stuff posted so far it's nothing new to other sites I've been on. I just hope I don't get bored. That's usually my gauge. If the site's boring or redundant then I'm not long for it.

By the way, thanks for the welcome. This could be fun.
Go to
Page: 1 2 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.