One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A Few Points Not To Forget About The WTC Complex and 911 Event
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
Apr 16, 2016 10:40:42   #
trucksterbud
 
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST

A Few points Not to Forget about the WTC Complex and 911 Event

by Walter Burien - CAFR1
04/13/16


I make my comments as a prior tenant of WTC1 from 1978-1980.

Watch as the tower falls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OASbBr99heQ

You will clearly see the effect of the squib-charges "systematically" going off several floors (8 to 10 floor) below the collapse line on the way down from both sides of the tower visible. When the squib charges explode, the ones you can see that are not yet masked by collapsing debris, they send out the distinctive puffs of smoke / dust blasting out and through the widows. The heat signatures on floors where no fires were burning, combined with spectral light "element" analysis seen establishes those "puffs of smoke" as coming rather conclusively from squib-charges going off. Done so to weaken the entire structure for demolition collapse.

The towers were built so that the core was designed to act as a guide post for the floors suspended from the core in the event of catastrophic failure. The core was designed to be left standing in the event of catastrophic failure. This was done to prevent the tower from falling "over" and hitting 20 or so other buildings. There are no if's or buts per the core remaining standing excluding controlled demolition below the impact damage zone, end of story period.

The WTC towers, Port Authority of NY and NJ, the owners of the complex knew the towers needed to be demolished. It came to their attention back in 1978 when asbestos was banned that the several hundred tons of asbestos fire insulation used on the internal structure was a BIG problem. As the asbestos broke down over time, the fine particles could circulate throughout the building exposing the tenants to the asbestos and law suits could amount in the billions of dollars.

In 1980 they installed a very expensive special air filtration system in the two towers to curtail spread of those fine particle. (I note also it was determined that if a level 4 or 5 hurricane with maintained winds of over 215 MPH made a direct hit on the towers they in high probability would not be able to withstand the millions of metric tons of wind force hitting the flat surfaced side walls) Port Authority then commissioned in 1979 for an estimate of the cost to demolish the towers. The price came back at 8 billion dollars and that did not include the law suits that could amount into extra billions of dollars from individuals who claimed they were damaged by being exposed to the asbestos when the towers were demolished.

Well, the "staged" collapse on 911, solved that problem and they got two bangs for the buck. It also initiated the go ahead for the wars in the middle east which I note were on the drawing boards over at the Pentagon and Whitehouse to be initiated on the exact dates the first invasions took place, and those dates were set 6-months before the towers collapsed.

Additionally the Port Authority was trying to sell the WTC complex after realizing their problem starting in 1978. No takers..

Then comes along Larry Silverstein in 2000, a joint US and Israeli citizen that takes out a 99-year lease for 3-billion dollars that required monthly payments of about 37-million dollars a month. He then secures a double indemnity insurance policy for "terrorism attacks" with the policy providing a maximum total coverage of 7-billion dollars. The policy issued and the signed ink was not even dry yet on that policy and down goes the towers and in goes Silverstien's claim for 7-billion. He settled on a 6.5 billion dollar payout and only had 4-months pay-ins to the rental contract. What a payout on about a 148-million dollar pay-in that in effect was already reimbursed him and extra from the rents being paid from the tenants.

Did Silverstien contribute as a gift $$$$$ directly to the re-building by Port Authority of NY and NJ of the new towers? No, but he did though as a business deal put up 1.4 billion dollars in advance payments for construction to lock in the prime and substantial rental space in the new complex. The complex is being rebuilt primarily at taxpayer's expense, offset by advance lessees payments - http://gfoa.net/cafr/COA2012/NewYorkAndNewJerseyPortAuthorityNJ.pdf

Page 84 of the .pdf document per Silverstein shows total in, and a search in the .pdf document for WTC or Silverstein will bring up many other relevant comments made in the report.

I note on the new WTC Tower design, not a flat side surface design. The new air-dynamic angled design can withstand up to 270 MPH winds. (They were not going to make that mistake of a flat side-wall design twice. Hurricane level 4 or 5 direct hit, not a problem now.. )

Math for Silverstein: 6.5 billion dollars (payout) - 1.4 billion dollars (advance lessees payments) = a Big smile on his face.

And the Beat Goes on!

TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612


Sent FYI and Truly Yours,


Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1.com
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel: (928) 458-5854 Arizona
___________________________________

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 10:42:19   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
trucksterbud wrote:
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST

A Few points Not to Forget about the WTC Complex and 911 Event

by Walter Burien - CAFR1
04/13/16


I make my comments as a prior tenant of WTC1 from 1978-1980.

Watch as the tower falls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OASbBr99heQ

You will clearly see the effect of the squib-charges "systematically" going off several floors (8 to 10 floor) below the collapse line on the way down from both sides of the tower visible. When the squib charges explode, the ones you can see that are not yet masked by collapsing debris, they send out the distinctive puffs of smoke / dust blasting out and through the widows. The heat signatures on floors where no fires were burning, combined with spectral light "element" analysis seen establishes those "puffs of smoke" as coming rather conclusively from squib-charges going off. Done so to weaken the entire structure for demolition collapse.

The towers were built so that the core was designed to act as a guide post for the floors suspended from the core in the event of catastrophic failure. The core was designed to be left standing in the event of catastrophic failure. This was done to prevent the tower from falling "over" and hitting 20 or so other buildings. There are no if's or buts per the core remaining standing excluding controlled demolition below the impact damage zone, end of story period.

The WTC towers, Port Authority of NY and NJ, the owners of the complex knew the towers needed to be demolished. It came to their attention back in 1978 when asbestos was banned that the several hundred tons of asbestos fire insulation used on the internal structure was a BIG problem. As the asbestos broke down over time, the fine particles could circulate throughout the building exposing the tenants to the asbestos and law suits could amount in the billions of dollars.

In 1980 they installed a very expensive special air filtration system in the two towers to curtail spread of those fine particle. (I note also it was determined that if a level 4 or 5 hurricane with maintained winds of over 215 MPH made a direct hit on the towers they in high probability would not be able to withstand the millions of metric tons of wind force hitting the flat surfaced side walls) Port Authority then commissioned in 1979 for an estimate of the cost to demolish the towers. The price came back at 8 billion dollars and that did not include the law suits that could amount into extra billions of dollars from individuals who claimed they were damaged by being exposed to the asbestos when the towers were demolished.

Well, the "staged" collapse on 911, solved that problem and they got two bangs for the buck. It also initiated the go ahead for the wars in the middle east which I note were on the drawing boards over at the Pentagon and Whitehouse to be initiated on the exact dates the first invasions took place, and those dates were set 6-months before the towers collapsed.

Additionally the Port Authority was trying to sell the WTC complex after realizing their problem starting in 1978. No takers..

Then comes along Larry Silverstein in 2000, a joint US and Israeli citizen that takes out a 99-year lease for 3-billion dollars that required monthly payments of about 37-million dollars a month. He then secures a double indemnity insurance policy for "terrorism attacks" with the policy providing a maximum total coverage of 7-billion dollars. The policy issued and the signed ink was not even dry yet on that policy and down goes the towers and in goes Silverstien's claim for 7-billion. He settled on a 6.5 billion dollar payout and only had 4-months pay-ins to the rental contract. What a payout on about a 148-million dollar pay-in that in effect was already reimbursed him and extra from the rents being paid from the tenants.

Did Silverstien contribute as a gift $$$$$ directly to the re-building by Port Authority of NY and NJ of the new towers? No, but he did though as a business deal put up 1.4 billion dollars in advance payments for construction to lock in the prime and substantial rental space in the new complex. The complex is being rebuilt primarily at taxpayer's expense, offset by advance lessees payments - http://gfoa.net/cafr/COA2012/NewYorkAndNewJerseyPortAuthorityNJ.pdf

Page 84 of the .pdf document per Silverstein shows total in, and a search in the .pdf document for WTC or Silverstein will bring up many other relevant comments made in the report.

I note on the new WTC Tower design, not a flat side surface design. The new air-dynamic angled design can withstand up to 270 MPH winds. (They were not going to make that mistake of a flat side-wall design twice. Hurricane level 4 or 5 direct hit, not a problem now.. )

Math for Silverstein: 6.5 billion dollars (payout) - 1.4 billion dollars (advance lessees payments) = a Big smile on his face.

And the Beat Goes on!

TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612


Sent FYI and Truly Yours,


Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1.com
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel: (928) 458-5854 Arizona
___________________________________
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST br br A Few points Not to For... (show quote)


:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :shock:

Man, you conspiracy theorist wackos don't give up, do you??? Gullible!!!!!!!

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 10:58:09   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
Jmo; are you brain dead; or do you have a huge guilt complex?
Associating yourself with the likes of Silverstein and other perps.


JMHO wrote:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :shock:

Man, you conspiracy theorist wackos don't give up, do you??? Gullible!!!!!!!

Reply
 
 
Apr 16, 2016 11:03:26   #
trucksterbud
 
JMHO wrote:
:roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :shock:

Man, you conspiracy theorist wackos don't give up, do you??? Gullible!!!!!!!


Gullible...?? This came from a former tenant at the WTC. And he understood the REAL reason the WTC was "DEMOLISHED"..... Gullible...?? How much proof from how many angles do you need to see the "T***H" behind all the lies...??

For once JMHO, look it up for yourself. The link is provided..

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:07:01   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
trucksterbud wrote:
Gullible...?? This came from a former tenant at the WTC. And he understood the REAL reason the WTC was "DEMOLISHED"..... Gullible...?? How much proof from how many angles do you need to see the "T***H" behind all the lies...??

For once JMHO, look it up for yourself. The link is provided..


Like I said: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: gullible fool!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:09:57   #
trucksterbud
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Jmo; are you brain dead; or do you have a huge guilt complex?
Associating yourself with the likes of Silverstein and other perps.


Lets all keep in mind here that Larry Silverstein TRIED to collect four times over for this.

Once for each tower. Total of $7 Billion. Indemnity clauses. He actually was awarded $3.8 Billion in the final stage of the lawsuit.

Then, he also tried to file lawsuits against American Airlines for "Accidental Coverages" written into the airlines coverages for such events as a crash into a building, or a crash onto a highway during approach or takeoff. These lawsuits are basically stalled in court (last I checked) or have now been dismissed as "Frivoulous" since Mr. Silverstein was already paid once over...

Total payout known so far..... $3.8 Billion on a $198 Million investment...

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:10:42   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
JMHO wrote:
Like I said: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: gullible fool!!!!!!!!!!!!


Like you continually prove jmo.
No need to look at the facts, or address them. Why?
Guilt complex?
Willful ignorance?
I don't think it is stupidity.

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:11:31   #
trucksterbud
 
JMHO wrote:
Like I said: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: gullible fool!!!!!!!!!!!!


You've got to be a paid troll.. Always directing the conversation away from the subject. How much did they pay you to say that....??? The NSA....???

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:14:14   #
trucksterbud
 
JMHO wrote:
Like I said: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: gullible fool!!!!!!!!!!!!


Ya, I know JMHO.... As always, got to play the "More Intelligent than Thou" A**HOLE in the matter. Hey, I got an IDEA...!! Why don't you post your information that CONTRADICTS what I posted. And of course, Mr. Buriens. His information was the meat of the original post.... Did ya get that part...??

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:17:05   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
trucksterbud wrote:
You've got to be a paid troll.. Always directing the conversation away from the subject. How much did they pay you to say that....??? The NSA....???


What ever it is; jmo is paid too much. He is not worth his salt.
jmo is a troll for sure for the F*****t arm of the g*******ts.

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:22:29   #
cesspool jones Loc: atlanta
 
trucksterbud wrote:
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST

A Few points Not to Forget about the WTC Complex and 911 Event

by Walter Burien - CAFR1
04/13/16


I make my comments as a prior tenant of WTC1 from 1978-1980.

Watch as the tower falls.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OASbBr99heQ

You will clearly see the effect of the squib-charges "systematically" going off several floors (8 to 10 floor) below the collapse line on the way down from both sides of the tower visible. When the squib charges explode, the ones you can see that are not yet masked by collapsing debris, they send out the distinctive puffs of smoke / dust blasting out and through the widows. The heat signatures on floors where no fires were burning, combined with spectral light "element" analysis seen establishes those "puffs of smoke" as coming rather conclusively from squib-charges going off. Done so to weaken the entire structure for demolition collapse.

The towers were built so that the core was designed to act as a guide post for the floors suspended from the core in the event of catastrophic failure. The core was designed to be left standing in the event of catastrophic failure. This was done to prevent the tower from falling "over" and hitting 20 or so other buildings. There are no if's or buts per the core remaining standing excluding controlled demolition below the impact damage zone, end of story period.

The WTC towers, Port Authority of NY and NJ, the owners of the complex knew the towers needed to be demolished. It came to their attention back in 1978 when asbestos was banned that the several hundred tons of asbestos fire insulation used on the internal structure was a BIG problem. As the asbestos broke down over time, the fine particles could circulate throughout the building exposing the tenants to the asbestos and law suits could amount in the billions of dollars.

In 1980 they installed a very expensive special air filtration system in the two towers to curtail spread of those fine particle. (I note also it was determined that if a level 4 or 5 hurricane with maintained winds of over 215 MPH made a direct hit on the towers they in high probability would not be able to withstand the millions of metric tons of wind force hitting the flat surfaced side walls) Port Authority then commissioned in 1979 for an estimate of the cost to demolish the towers. The price came back at 8 billion dollars and that did not include the law suits that could amount into extra billions of dollars from individuals who claimed they were damaged by being exposed to the asbestos when the towers were demolished.

Well, the "staged" collapse on 911, solved that problem and they got two bangs for the buck. It also initiated the go ahead for the wars in the middle east which I note were on the drawing boards over at the Pentagon and Whitehouse to be initiated on the exact dates the first invasions took place, and those dates were set 6-months before the towers collapsed.

Additionally the Port Authority was trying to sell the WTC complex after realizing their problem starting in 1978. No takers..

Then comes along Larry Silverstein in 2000, a joint US and Israeli citizen that takes out a 99-year lease for 3-billion dollars that required monthly payments of about 37-million dollars a month. He then secures a double indemnity insurance policy for "terrorism attacks" with the policy providing a maximum total coverage of 7-billion dollars. The policy issued and the signed ink was not even dry yet on that policy and down goes the towers and in goes Silverstien's claim for 7-billion. He settled on a 6.5 billion dollar payout and only had 4-months pay-ins to the rental contract. What a payout on about a 148-million dollar pay-in that in effect was already reimbursed him and extra from the rents being paid from the tenants.

Did Silverstien contribute as a gift $$$$$ directly to the re-building by Port Authority of NY and NJ of the new towers? No, but he did though as a business deal put up 1.4 billion dollars in advance payments for construction to lock in the prime and substantial rental space in the new complex. The complex is being rebuilt primarily at taxpayer's expense, offset by advance lessees payments - http://gfoa.net/cafr/COA2012/NewYorkAndNewJerseyPortAuthorityNJ.pdf

Page 84 of the .pdf document per Silverstein shows total in, and a search in the .pdf document for WTC or Silverstein will bring up many other relevant comments made in the report.

I note on the new WTC Tower design, not a flat side surface design. The new air-dynamic angled design can withstand up to 270 MPH winds. (They were not going to make that mistake of a flat side-wall design twice. Hurricane level 4 or 5 direct hit, not a problem now.. )

Math for Silverstein: 6.5 billion dollars (payout) - 1.4 billion dollars (advance lessees payments) = a Big smile on his face.

And the Beat Goes on!

TREASON: "Treason doth never prosper; what's the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it treason." Sir John Harrington, 1561-1612


Sent FYI and Truly Yours,


Walter J. Burien, Jr. - CAFR1.com
Saint Johns, AZ 85936

Tel: (928) 458-5854 Arizona
___________________________________
CAFR1 NATIONAL POST br br A Few points Not to For... (show quote)


How do the airplanes fit in?

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:22:45   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
eagleye13 wrote:
Like you continually prove jmo.
No need to look at the facts, or address them. Why?
Guilt complex?
Willful ignorance?
I don't think it is stupidity.


Facts????? FACTS??????? Where????? lots of speculation and OPINION, but no facts!!!! Wake up stupid old fool.

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:23:42   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
cesspool jones wrote:
How do the airplanes fit in?


Airplanes? What airplanes? Don't confuse these fools with facts.

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:24:16   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
eagleye13 wrote:
What ever it is; jmo is paid too much. He is not worth his salt.
jmo is a troll for sure for the F*****t arm of the g*******ts.


More gibberish and bulls**t from an old fool...sigh.

Reply
Apr 16, 2016 11:27:03   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
trucksterbud wrote:
Ya, I know JMHO.... As always, got to play the "More Intelligent than Thou" A**HOLE in the matter. Hey, I got an IDEA...!! Why don't you post your information that CONTRADICTS what I posted. And of course, Mr. Buriens. His information was the meat of the original post.... Did ya get that part...??


I am not going to waste my time to debate a conspiracy theorist wacko...it's like spitting into the wind. You have drank the Kool Aid, and REAL FACTS with go in one ear and out the other. You conspiracy theorist nut bags will swallow any conspiracy theory you see on the internet, any real facts be damned. Gullible fools, that's you and eagleye13.

Reply
Page 1 of 17 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.