applebox wrote:
AuntiE,
I agree with your analysis via Websters'. However, I have an issue with the scope of that message. Do you think that the Second Amendment guarantees everyone in the USA the right to any weapon, knife and spear or RPG, Abrams M-1, etc.? If not, where is the line? The current school of thought in the Supreme Court is that the Constitution is a living document. That means that it must grow and change with current meanings and practices. But, does current practice, at least according to the NRA, mean that we now want everyone fully armed? Against what, exactly? It's supposed to be for resistance to a tyrannical government or a foreign power, or so I thought. So are we preparing to o*******w the government? Let me know if that's the plan. Art
AuntiE, br br I agree with your analysis via Web... (
show quote)
The second amendment reserves to the people the right to possess those arms peculiar to an individual, a side arm and a shoulder weapon of a kind and caliber in common use at the time and commonly available in the community. It does not include those weapons that are specially and exclusively ordered by government contract to supply army and naval forces.