One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Betta
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 57 next>>
Oct 25, 2018 01:36:23   #
I'll tell ya one thing. I used to live in Houston years back. Got family there. Those folks do NOT mess around! I've always said whomever wishes to invade our land gotta get past those Texans first and they do not mess around. You'll have your ass handed to you on a steer's horn. God Bless Texas!


Sicilianthing wrote:
For those who do not understand yet or see what’s happening...

The Government you see Trump operating under is not the Government as you’ve always known it to be - WARNING!

With the Discoveries and Exposing the Fraud, Trickery and Thievery of the Federalists Criminal Foreign Interests Organization in D.C. we see here the Fragmenting of it’s authority as Patriots in States declare their sovereignty and take back the powers granted them to exercise their lawful rights and authority to act.

The Following Statement is an Official Declaration,

The Rest I can’t state here or they’ll come for me.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


Statement from the National Government of the State of Texas!


PUBLISHED BY THE REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY POST ON 10-24-2018

INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC NOTICE

Reference: Migrant Caravan heading to the State of Texas

My fellow Texans, we find ourselves in the middle of an International crises funded by people that do not like the fact that the State of Texas exists. These same people have worked tirelessly to undermine our core values.

In accordance with the Law of Nations, the Texans have the absolute right to protect the southern border by any means necessary. Anyone who volunteers to stand at post for the sole purpose of upholding their right under the Law of Nations is automatically immune from suit by any third party.

The National Government of the State of Texas will do everything within its authority to protect the lives, property and any other threat that may arise in political retaliation against you or your family. Your right under the Law of Nations is your protection.

It is time to put away childish fears, selfish wants and stand as the people with allegiance to the State of Texas. The Caravan must not succeed in their endeavors to violate the basic principles of the Law of Nations.

The National Government of the State of Texas is a Government of Laws and not of men, we must all do our part to protect the interests of our children, their future and their State from this lawlessness heading our way.

We must all support and have the backs of the U.S. Military, our M*****as and National Guard. Many have asked when, and the answer is now.

Published by the office of the registrar for the National Government of the State of Texas:

Email: graham@sadlbum.com
Graham Bradford Lascsak

10-24-2018
For those who do not understand yet or see what’s ... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 24, 2018 02:38:12   #
He also is known to aid and abet p*******es. But, besides all that, he's a false teacher.


Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>>

He’s an educated sick n twisted mindph**k operative fraud just like all those before him.

The sheeple are stupid and DOOMED !
Go to
Oct 23, 2018 04:29:56   #
When Jesus said he would rebuild the temple in 3 days, what was he talking about? Many thought he was talking about a brick and mortar temple. He wasn't. He was talking about himself as evidenced by his resurrection 3 days after his death on the cross. It wasn't Friday, Saturday and Sunday either as too many mistakenly believe. The same applies when he said upon this rock I will build my church. Peter was a mere man with weaknesses and frailties as evidenced by his thrice denial of Christ and preaching a contrary doctrine. Jesus is Divine, the only begotten son of God. HE, Jesus, is The Rock. Not Peter.


Radiance3 wrote:
That is according to your understanding. There are more than 30,000 Protestants who have similar or different view as yours. But I just don't listen to people like anybody and claim about what they know. All those things are waste of my time. Unless facts have been proven true.

You have the liberty to believe what you want. Don't impose it to me. I will allow you do discuss matters like yours. But a waste of time when things are not credible.

Good day.
Go to
Oct 23, 2018 00:41:36   #
Astounding, isn't it, that they actually believe they can come here illegally invading our country and get handed a job. Fact of the matter is that 5 minutes after they cross the border their next stop is the welfare office for the silver platter of taxpayer paid free benefits. Many are pregnant thinking their babies will hand them automatic US citizenship.


fullspinzoo wrote:
https://www.teaparty.org/nbc-interviews-asylum-seeker-migrant-caravan-reveals-real-reason-theyre-headed-us-329710/
Go to
Oct 23, 2018 00:14:56   #
Radiance3 wrote:
Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium.


Simply not true. In fact, Peter began to preach a contrary doctrine for which Paul admonished him for it. And let us not forget that Peter denied Christ three times. Further, Peter is never referred to as the "rock" in scripture. This is greatly misinterpreted. Jesus was talking about himself. The Rock of Our Salvation.[/quote]




Radiance3 wrote:
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks against the Catholic Church. Her 500-year old Sola Scriptura, stolen from the Catholic Universal Church of Saint Peter he created 1,987 years ago was without the permit of Saint Peter. The f**e Sola Scriptura were selectively chosen from the original Saint Peter's Catholic Universal Gospel which Jesus Christ commanded him to build.

Matthew 16:18
https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm
"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.

But the gates of hell was able to get in and stole the Scriptures without permission from the Church of Saint Peter, the Catholic Universal Church which Jesus commanded him to build. He built that in 30 AD, all the Apostles and saints used and practiced it, until brought to St Peter in Rome, where the Saint Peter died being crucified by the pagan Nero of Rome. Saint Paul as well
spread the Catholic Universal Church among the gentiles, and converted more of his apostles he called brothers like Barnabas.

Zemirah has NO facts to present, or proven positive contributions of her Protestant Church so that all her writings are about attacks to the Catholic Universal Church, the mother of the Gospel commanded by Jesus to Saint Peter. The Catholic Universal Church was the source, where the Sola Scriptura was copied from.

Zemirah sound like democrat party with no positive contribution to present, but instead malicious attacks and lies. Very parallel approach with democrats, because her scriptures were not originated by her protestant Church but copied only.

Saint Paul another Apostle of Christ was also k**led by Nero in Rome by beheading him. Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium. Thus this three made up the complete Gospel of Christ.

Following are the Contributions of Saint Paul to the Catholic Universal Church, the New Testament.

LIST / PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION, HISTORY
St. Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament
WRITTEN BY: Melissa Petruzzello
SHARE:
Although St. Paul was not one of the original 12 Apostles of Jesus, he was one of the most prolific contributors to the New Testament. Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 or 14 are traditionally attributed to Paul, though only 7 of these Pauline epistles are accepted as being entirely authentic and dictated by St. Paul himself. The authorship of the others is debated, and they are commonly thought to have come from contemporary or later followers writing in Paul’s name. These authors likely used material from his surviving letters and may have even had access to letters written by him that no longer survive. Read on to learn which Biblical books St. Paul is known to have authored and which ones he probably did not write himself.
________________________________________
• Letter of Paul to the Romans
The sixth book of the New Testament, the Letter of Paul to the Romans, was written by St. Paul while he was in Corinth about 57 CE. It was addressed to the Christian church at Rome, whose congregation he hoped to visit for the first time on his way to Spain. The epistle is the longest and doctrinally most significant of St. Paul’s writings and is more of a theological treatise than a letter. In it he acknowledges the unique religious heritage of the Jews (prior to his conversion, Paul was a Jewish Pharisee) but asserts that righteousness no longer comes through the Mosaic Law but through Christ.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians and the Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians were both written by St. Paul. The first letter was probably written about 53–54 CE at Ephesus and addresses some of the problems that arose in the new Christian community that he had established in Corinth during his initial missionary visit (c. 50–51). The second letter was written from Macedonia about 55 CE and applauds the Corinthians’ response to his first letter and reaffirms his apostolic authority. The letters deal with a church of Gentile Christians and are therefore the best evidence of how St. Paul operated on Gentile territory.

• Letter of Paul to the Galatians
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53–54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law is no longer the exclusive path to righteousness and argues that Christians have a new freedom in Christ. The letter is very forceful and specific in dealing with the problems concerned and is the only epistle without kindly ingression, thanksgiving, or personal greetings appended to the final blessings.

• Letter of Paul to the Ephesians
Although the Letter of Paul to the Ephesians has been attributed to St. Paul, it is more likely the work of one of his disciples. Scholars think the letter was probably written before 90 CE and that the author consulted St. Paul’s letter to the Colossians as a reference. Of the 155 verses in Ephesians, 73 have verbal parallels with Colossians. When parallels to genuine Pauline letters are added, 85 percent of Ephesians is duplicated elsewhere. This and several other contested letters are usually designated as “deuter-Pauline epistles” to indicate that they were probably written by St. Paul’s followers after his death.

• Letter of Paul to the Philippians
The Letter of Paul to the Philippians is believed to have been written by St. Paul while he was in prison, probably at Rome about 62 CE. According to several scholars, the canonical work is likely a later collection of fragments of Paul’s correspondence with the congregation in Philippi. Apprehensive that his execution was close at hand, yet hoping somehow to visit the Philippians again, St. Paul explains that he welcomes death for Jesus’ sake but is equally concerned to continue his apostolate.

• Letter of Paul to the Colossians
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to the Colossians is debated. For some scholars, the developed theology of the letter indicates that it was composed by St. Paul during his imprisonment in Rome about 62 CE. Others question Pauline authorship on the basis of the distinctive vocabulary and suggest that it is a deuter-Pauline epistle, written by Paul’s followers after his death. Given its similarities to the Letter of Paul to Philemon, some have suggested that a later Paulinist simply changed details to meet a different situation.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians
The first Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians was likely written by St. Paul from Corinth about 50 CE. However, the second letter is possibly deuter-Pauline in origin, though this is debated. Second Thessalonians is obviously an imitation of the style of First Thessalonians but seems to reflect a later time. Additionally, given that there is notable ambiguity about the proximity of Christ’s Second Coming, its authorship by St. Paul is doubted.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to Timothy
Neither of the two Letters of Paul to Timothy are thought to have been written by St. Paul. Linguistic facts—such as short connectives, particles, and other syntactical peculiarities; use of different words for the same things; and repeated unusual phrases otherwise not used by Paul—offer fairly conclusive evidence against Pauline authorship and authenticity. Both epistles are usually considered “trito-Pauline,” meaning that they were probably written by members of the Pauline school a generation after his death, likely between 80 and 100 CE.
Advertisement
• Letter of Paul to Titus
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to Titus is disputed. Given many of the similarities in content and style to the two Letters of Paul to Timothy, it is possible that this work is also a trito-Pauline epistle, written a generation after the death of St. Paul. In fact, the three letters together are often called Pastoral Letters, as they were written to instruct and admonish the recipients in their pastoral office rather than to address the specific problems of congregations like many of the other Pauline epistles.

• Letter of Paul to Philemon
The Letter of Paul to Philemon was probably composed by St. Paul in a Roman prison about 61 CE, though some sources date it earlier. The brief epistle was written to Philemon, a wealthy Christian of Colossae, on behalf of Onesimus, Philemon’s former s***e. While passing no judgment on s***ery itself, Paul exhorts Philemon to manifest true Christian love that removes barriers between s***es and free people.

• Letter to the Hebrews
While the Letter to the Hebrews has traditionally been ascribed to St. Paul, the work does not contain a salutation with the name of the author. The book is still included in the Pauline corpus in the East but not in the West. Given that the thoughts, metaphors, and ideas of Hebrews are distinct from the rest of the New Testament, most scholars doubt that it was written by St. Paul or his followers. Various authors have been suggested over the ages, and it is possible that the work was composed by a Jewish convert among the second generation of Christians suffering persecution.
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks a... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 21, 2018 01:05:24   #
Rosie needs to be arrested and given a one way ticket to Venezuela never to be allowed to set foot on our shores again. What a miserable LGBQ she is.


son of witless wrote:
http://www.angrypatriotmovement.com/rosie-wants-revolt-against-trump/
Go to
Oct 19, 2018 05:14:26   #
But here's the thing. Affordable Care Act (NObamaCARE) doesn't kick in until deductible is paid, which can be as much as $12,000. That's not healthcare. That's a ponzi scheme s**m. People are paying actual dollars for virtually no health care. Only those who are truly ill will spend that. A healthy person paying through the nose for premiums and copays is actually paying for others, i******s for instance, to get free healthcare.


Bad Bob wrote:
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mcconnell-defends-trump-backed-suit-080000483.html


(Bloomberg) -- Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell defended a lawsuit to undo the Affordable Care Act’s protection of insurance for pre-existing health conditions even though it’s become a problem for Republican candidates in the campaign for control of Congress.
“Our candidates are able to deal with it,” McConnell said regarding a barrage of Democratic ads criticizing his party’s candidates on the issue. "There’s nobody in the Senate that I’m familiar with who is not in favor of coverage of pre-existing conditions."
The case, filed by Texas and backed by the Trump administration, contends that because Congress eliminated the tax penalty for violating the requirement that most individuals have insurance, the rest of the law including the consumer protections must be thrown out. Many legal scholars see the lawsuit as a long shot, including some conservatives who supported previous suits against Obamacare.
During an interview Tuesday with Bloomberg News, McConnell said he doesn’t think the lawsuit is a mistake.
"It’s no secret that we preferred to start over" to repeal and replace Obamacare, he said. That v**e failed in 2017. "So no, I don’t fault the administration for trying to give us an opportunity to do this differently and to go in a different direction," the majority leader said.
While Republicans sometimes have accused Democrats of turning to courts and executive actions when they were unable to get their way in Congress, McConnell said he didn’t see an issue with backing the lawsuit.
‘Nothing Wrong’
"Nothing wrong with going to court. Americans do it all the time; we can do it too," he said.
Vulnerable red-state Senate Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Claire McCask**l of Missouri have used the lawsuit as a cudgel against their Republican opponents -- in each case the attorney general of their state -- who signed on to the lawsuit.
A recent Manchin ad featured the senator shooting a copy of the lawsuit and accusing Attorney General Patrick Morrisey of wanting to "take away health care from people with pre-existing conditions; he is just dead wrong." McCask**l has run a series of video testimonials featuring Missourians who depend on the health-care rules.
Other Democrats like Indiana Senator Joe Donnelly, Florida Senator Bill Nelson and Montana Senator Jon Tester are similarly using the GOP’s support for the Texas lawsuit against their Republican rivals in competitive races. Republican candidates argue that Obamacare isn’t necessary to protect pre-existing health conditions, although they have yet to agree on an alternate plan to preserve those provisions. GOP-backed bills in the House and Senate would open the door to letting insurers charge higher rates to sick people or provide fewer benefits.
The clash comes down to a difference between Democrats and Republicans about what it means to cover pre-existing conditions. Democrats believe insurers should have to cover a minimum set of benefits without price discrimination based on medical history, while many Republicans want to relax those rules as a way to reduce premiums for healthier people.
Several Republican senators have criticized the Texas lawsuit, including Susan Collins of Maine, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, chairman of the health committee. Alexander backed legislation that would restore some protections for pre-existing conditions if the lawsuit is successful, but Collins declined to back it, saying it didn’t go far enough to save provisions in the Affordable Care Act.
To contact the reporters on this story: Steven T. Dennis in Washington at sdennis17@bloomberg.net;Sahil Kapur in Washington at skapur39@bloomberg.net
To contact the editors responsible for this story: Kevin Whitelaw at kwhitelaw@bloomberg.net, Laurie Asséo, John Harney
For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com
©2018 Bloomberg L.P.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/mcconnell-defends-trump... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 19, 2018 02:17:52   #
She sings it beautifully and full of heart. Gave me chills. I pray that she has or will renounce the lifestyle she has chosen. God will not accept it.


rumitoid wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_NpxTWbovE&pbjreload=10
Go to
Oct 18, 2018 03:17:23   #
What others do is their business. When praying I am talking to God in Jesus name. Those are the instructions Jesus gave to a man when he asked Jesus how we are to pray. I do not put saints (man) before God nor do I pray to them.. He tells us not to even pray or bow down to angels or graven images. I don't hold on to prayer beads or gold crosses. Those are idols.

I believe in God. I also believe what He says. And I believe every word of the bible. Every jot and tittle of it.


Doc110 wrote:
03/08/2017 What Is Prayer ? Talking to God and to the Saints

Scott P. Richert
https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-prayer-542573


Prayer is a form of communication, a way of talking to God or to the saints.
https://www.thoughtco.com/saints-101-3897876

Prayer may formal or informal.

While formal prayer is an important element of Christian worship, prayer itself is not synonymous with worship or adoration to Jesus Christ, The Holy Spirit and to God The Father.



The Origin of the Term:

The word pray is first found in Middle English, meaning to "ask earnestly."

It comes from the Old French preier, which is derived from the Latin word precari, which simply means to entreat or ask.

In fact, although pray is not often used this way anymore, it can simply mean “please,” as in “pray continue your story.”


Talking to God:

While we often think of prayer primarily as asking God for something, prayer, properly understood, is a conversation with God or with the saints.

Just as we cannot hold a conversation with another person unless he can hear us, the very act of praying is an implicit recognition of the presence of God or the saints here with us.

And in praying, we strengthen that recognition of the presence of God, which draws us closer to Him.

That is why the Church recommends that we pray frequently and make prayer an important part of our daily lives.


Talking With the Saints:

Many people (Catholics included) find it odd to speak of "praying to the saints."
https://www.thoughtco.com/why-do-catholics-pray-to-saints-542856

But if we understand what prayer truly means, we should recognize that there is no problem with this phrase.

The trouble is that many Christians confuse prayer with worship, and they understand quite rightly that worship belongs to God alone, and not to the saints. 

But while Christian worship always includes prayer, and many prayers are written as a form of worship, not all prayer is worship.

Indeed, prayers of adoration or worship are only one of the five types of prayer.
https://www.thoughtco.com/the-types-of-prayer-542772

How Should I Pray ?

How one prays depends on the purpose of one's prayer.

The Catechism of the Catholic Church, in discussing the five types of prayer in paragraphs 2626 through 2643, provides examples and pointers on how to engage in each type of prayer.
www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p4s1c1a3.htm


Most people find it easier to begin praying by making use the traditional prayers of the Church, such as the Ten Prayers Every Catholic Child Should Know or the 

https://www.thoughtco.com/prayers-every-catholic-child-should-know-542773
https://www.thoughtco.com/how-to-pray-the-rosary-542582


Structured prayer helps us focus our thoughts and reminds us of the way in which to pray.

But as our prayer life deepens, we should advance beyond written prayer to a personal conversation with God.

While written prayers or prayers that we have memorized will always be a part of our prayer life.

After all, the Sign of the Cross, with which Catholics begin most of their prayers, is itself a prayer.
https://www.thoughtco.com/why-catholics-make-sign-of-cross-542747

Over time we should learn to speak with God and with the saints as we would with our fellow men and women (though always, of course, maintaining a proper reverence).


More About Prayer:

You can learn more about prayer in Prayer 101: Everything You Need to Know About Prayer in the Catholic Church.
https://www.thoughtco.com/prayer-in-the-catholic-church-3897878
03/08/2017 What Is Prayer ? Talking to God and to ... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 17, 2018 05:34:58   #
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented? Have YOU repented from your sins? You're making assumptions about someone that you don't know personally. No one can throw stones. Jesus didn't condemn the woman they were about to stone to death when she was caught with a man other than her husband. Who are you to condemn anyone? That is judging which none of us have room to do. Think back on your own life, things you've done that make you cringe when you think about them. Don't say you don't have them because you do.

Baking a cake for a homosexual marriage is taking part in the celebration of an a*********n which makes one just as guilty. God tells believers not to do it.

Further, none of us are righteous. No, not an one as God puts it.

PeterS wrote:
So how is it you CC's can't bake a cake for a homosexual couple but you can v**e for a president who never repented for his extramarital affairs? If sin prevents you from doing the first why doesn't sin prevent you from doing the second? It makes me think that where politics are concerned what's expedient is what's important not what's morally right. I think Franklin should sit down and ponder that before telling god where his wrath is supposed to go...

https://bluestatedaily.com/franklin-graham-god-is-angered-by-discussion-of-trumps-extramarital-affairs/?utm_source=BlueStDaily&utm_medium=Content&utm_campaign=ANXstuff
So how is it you CC's can't bake a cake for a homo... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 17, 2018 03:28:24   #
Gillum will absolutely decimate and destroy this state if he is elected governor, which I don't think he will win. Here's hoping the people of Florida will know better. Scott was an excellent Governor. H**e losing him due to term limits but he's going to the senate. Isn't Gillum under investigation for some funny business with money and how's he's made a mess of Tallahassee?
Go to
Oct 16, 2018 06:32:40   #
And just WHERE do you think anyone who sells drugs gets them from? The white boy. FACT!

PeterS wrote:
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37204837?SThisFB&fbclid=IwAR1yC6DqjmIJzDNzl_4S_1iVIdXil0pJj6FUi7pN_xM1jHTWr0mp5FilS-w#

The governor of Maine has said that people of colour were enemies of his state, and appeared to suggest they should be shot.

Speaking about Maine's effort to combat drug crime, Paul LePage said that "the enemy right now... are people of colour or people of Hispanic origin".

"When you go to war... and the enemy dresses in red and you dress in blue, then you shoot at red," he said.

Leading Democrats have urged him to resign.

Mr LePage made the comments while seeking to clarify remarks he made earlier in the week which were criticized as r****t.

The press conference capped a controversial 72 hours for the Republican governor.

Mr LePage was asked about a statement he made in January, in which he blamed the state's heroin problem on "guys by the name D-Money, Smoothie, Shifty" who "come from Connecticut and New York".

"They come up here, they sell their heroin, then they go back home. Incidentally, half the time they impregnate a young, white girl before they leave," he said.

Speaking on Wednesday, he denied it was r****t, but said that since January he had been putting together a binder cataloging drug arrests in the state, and that "90-plus percent of those pictures in my book, and it's a three-ringed binder, are black and Hispanic people".
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-37204837?... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 15, 2018 01:36:13   #
Fidelis, there is help. I know what you're going through. Been there. You can't do this alone or you will end up dying trying. Have you tried social services in your city/state? My mom is in memory care now, happy and doing well but not without some bumps in the road. Before she went in, social services through the county sent help into the home for 16 hours per week. I paid something like $40/month. Private message me. Maybe I can help with some info. You need help! Only those who have gone through being a caregiver of a loved one with dementia knows what it is like.


fidelis wrote:
Millions spent supporting I******S but I can't get assistance to help me care for my wife with dementia. But then I only served with Uncle Sam for ten years, and yes I was born in this country of second generation Polish / German legal immigrants. Paid my taxes never arrested, obeyed all laws to the best of my ability never took unemployment or welfare. Go seek government assistance; "sorry we dont have funds for that but thank you for your service, have a nice day." CLICK. Go figure.
Go to
Oct 14, 2018 06:10:10   #
I'm surprised no one took him out by now. How does one live being so full of h**e?
PeterS wrote:
I really have nothing to say...

http://www.patheos.com/blogs/progressivesecularhumanist/2018/06/republican-nominee-god-is-a-white-s*********t-jews-come-from-satan/

Republican nominee for the North Carolina General Assembly says God is a w***e s*********t and that Jews are descended from Satan.

Russell Walker, the Republican nominee running for state House District 48, loves the Confederate f**g, refers to Martin Luther King as “Martin Luther Coon,” and believes that God is a w***e s*********t.

Newsweek reports:

A North Carolina state House of Representatives candidate who recently won the Republican primary has claimed Jews are Satanic, U.S. soldiers are being poisoned by the government and that God is a w***e s*********t.

The Charlotte Observer reports:

A website tied to a candidate for the North Carolina General Assembly says God is a r****t w***e s*********t and that Jews are descended from Satan.

Newsweek notes:

Walker’s website that touts his candidacy for the North Carolina General Assembly suggests a wide variety of claims about race, Jews and the Bible.

For example, on his website Walker claims:

What is wrong with being a w***e s*********t? God is a r****t and a w***e s*********t. Someone or group has to be supreme and that group is the w****s of the world … there is no such thing as e******y. Someone or something has to be superior and someone and something has to be inferior.

On Tuesday, after reports concerning their deplorable candidate began to circulate in local media, the North Carolina Republican Party withdrew its support for Walker. In a statement GOP chairman Robin Hayes said:

Based on recent behavior and previous statements, the North Carolina Republican Party is unable and unwilling to support the Republican nominated candidate for North Carolina House District 48. The NCGOP along with our local parties in Hoke, Scotland and Robeson Counties will be spending our time and resources supporting Republican candidates that better reflect the values of our party.

And while it is all well and good that the GOP is now withdrawing their support from Walker, one wonders what took so long. Walker has made no secret that he is a w***e s*********t, and has a very public record of making openly r****t statements.
For example, last year, Walker appeared on local media after filing a lawsuit defending the Confederate f**g. In the brief clip below Walker can be seen claiming the f**g is not a “symbol of r****m,” and in the very next breath he refers to civil rights icon Martin Luther King as “Martin Luther Coon.”
I really have nothing to say... br br http://www.... (show quote)
Go to
Oct 10, 2018 07:03:38   #
You left some parts out, didn't you? The husband also submits to his wife, to love her as he loves himself. It is submission of love not as a tyrant. Did you know that a wife who is married to an unbeliever sanctifies her husband and vice versa? That's sanctify. Not save. That's the problem with folks who do not believe but try to tell believers what the bible actually says. They don't tell the whole t***h because they know none of the t***h.

PeterS wrote:
Now here's my question--is this interpretation held by all Christians or just those of the Christian Conservative bend? There is more so you guys really should listen to it all--but it seems more a Christian Conservative rendition tailored purely for your view...

https://www.facebook.com/NowThisE******n/videos/2103839929640111/?t=82

Now to me, it sounds like a bunch of horny men is responsible for writing the bible. Here the male of the household can say you aren't rebelling against me you are rebelling against God all mighty.

See Blade, I'm not targeting Christians but those who are ignorant enough to submit when they already know that doing so will result in physical and mental harm.

Have you ever watched Poldark on PBS? It takes place in the late 18th and early 19th and it gives a wonderful view to the status system employed by the British to maintain power by the rich and wealthy and out of the common people hand--whom they believed were far too ignorant to know how to v**e. It's a wonderful plot, especially for a conservative to whom authoritarianism and the monarchy are the means by which they maintain their status. There is a character who was forced to marry a minister and when her sister came to stay with them he promptly seduced her all so he could satisfy himself while his wife was recovering from delivering a baby. There are enough twists and turns to keep everyone interested but just at looking at history I don't think Conservatives came out that far ahead. Give it a watch if you can.

https://www.amazon.com/gp/video/offers/signup?ie=UTF8&benefitID=masterpiece&ref=DVM_US_JK_PS_MASTERPBRb2|c_261580310152_m_PgSM0G1M-dc_s__
Now here's my question--is this interpretation hel... (show quote)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ... 57 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.