One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Franklin Graham: God’s Wrath Awaits Those Who Discuss Trump’s Extramarital Affairs
Page 1 of 2 next>
Oct 17, 2018 04:48:44   #
PeterS
 
So how is it you CC's can't bake a cake for a homosexual couple but you can v**e for a president who never repented for his extramarital affairs? If sin prevents you from doing the first why doesn't sin prevent you from doing the second? It makes me think that where politics are concerned what's expedient is what's important not what's morally right. I think Franklin should sit down and ponder that before telling god where his wrath is supposed to go...

https://bluestatedaily.com/franklin-graham-god-is-angered-by-discussion-of-trumps-extramarital-affairs/?utm_source=BlueStDaily&utm_medium=Content&utm_campaign=ANXstuff

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 05:34:58   #
Betta
 
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented? Have YOU repented from your sins? You're making assumptions about someone that you don't know personally. No one can throw stones. Jesus didn't condemn the woman they were about to stone to death when she was caught with a man other than her husband. Who are you to condemn anyone? That is judging which none of us have room to do. Think back on your own life, things you've done that make you cringe when you think about them. Don't say you don't have them because you do.

Baking a cake for a homosexual marriage is taking part in the celebration of an a*********n which makes one just as guilty. God tells believers not to do it.

Further, none of us are righteous. No, not an one as God puts it.

PeterS wrote:
So how is it you CC's can't bake a cake for a homosexual couple but you can v**e for a president who never repented for his extramarital affairs? If sin prevents you from doing the first why doesn't sin prevent you from doing the second? It makes me think that where politics are concerned what's expedient is what's important not what's morally right. I think Franklin should sit down and ponder that before telling god where his wrath is supposed to go...

https://bluestatedaily.com/franklin-graham-god-is-angered-by-discussion-of-trumps-extramarital-affairs/?utm_source=BlueStDaily&utm_medium=Content&utm_campaign=ANXstuff
So how is it you CC's can't bake a cake for a homo... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 05:45:56   #
PeterS
 
Betta wrote:
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented? Have YOU repented from your sins? You're making assumptions about someone that you don't know personally. No one can throw stones. Jesus didn't condemn the woman they were about to stone to death when she was caught with a man other than her husband. Who are you to condemn anyone? That is judging which none of us have room to do. Think back on your own life, things you've done that make you cringe when you think about them. Don't say you don't have them because you do.

Baking a cake for a homosexual marriage is taking part in the celebration of an a*********n which makes one just as guilty. God tells believers not to do it.

Further, none of us are righteous. No, not an one as God puts it.
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented?... (show quote)

I know that Trump said he hadn't repented--certainly not at the time of the e******n.

Snip>>>Trump on God: 'I don't like to have to ask for forgiveness'

After months of reflection, Donald Trump says he still doesn't regret his decision not to ask God for forgiveness for his sins.
In an interview on Sunday with CNN, the Republican p**********l frontrunner said that he does not regret never asking God for forgiveness, partially because he says he doesn't have much to apologize for.

"I have great relationship with God. I have great relationship with the Evangelicals," Trump said in the interview before piv****g to his poll numbers among Evangelical v**ers.

"I like to be good. I don't like to have to ask for forgiveness. And I am good. I don't do a lot of things that are bad. I try to do nothing that is bad."

Trump was responding to a question from moderator Jake Tapper, who said that a Trump rival — who many suspect is Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) — conducted a telephone survey testing several lines of attack, including a jab questioning the reality-television star's religious convictions.

"He shouldn't be doing that," Trump said of the Cruz campaign's potential survey questions. "Very unethical."

Late last year, Trump told Republican pollster and focus-group guru Frank Luntz that when the real-estate mogul has done something wrong, he tries to correct his error without getting God involved.


So the question begged is if you can't bake a wedding cake for a homosexual wedding because doing so would cause you to partake in their sin how can you v**e for Donald Trump, an unrepentant adulterer, and not partake in his sin? Please explain, I am dying to know...

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 10:44:01   #
Lonewolf
 
Trump said on tv he never felt the need to repent

Betta wrote:
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented? Have YOU repented from your sins? You're making assumptions about someone that you don't know personally. No one can throw stones. Jesus didn't condemn the woman they were about to stone to death when she was caught with a man other than her husband. Who are you to condemn anyone? That is judging which none of us have room to do. Think back on your own life, things you've done that make you cringe when you think about them. Don't say you don't have them because you do.

Baking a cake for a homosexual marriage is taking part in the celebration of an a*********n which makes one just as guilty. God tells believers not to do it.

Further, none of us are righteous. No, not an one as God puts it.
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented?... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 12:45:36   #
Lonewolf
 
Yep close your eyes and hold your nose and v**e Republican GODS not watching

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 16:52:08   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
PeterS wrote:
I know that Trump said he hadn't repented--certainly not at the time of the e******n.
<SNIP>
So the question begged is if you can't bake a wedding cake for a homosexual wedding because doing so would cause you to partake in their sin how can you v**e for Donald Trump, an unrepentant adulterer, and not partake in his sin? Please explain, I am dying to know...


Ah, yes, beg the questions, Pete. Lots of questions.

If a gay couple really needs a cake to celebrate their wedding, how many bakeries are there to choose from?
A dozen? A hundred?

Out of all bakeries available to them, why would a gay couple single out a Christian owned bakery to serve them? Why would they not look for a bakery owned by a homosexual, or an atheist, or anyone who has no religious affiliation?

Begs the questions, doesn't it? Is the gay couple motivated by a sincere affection for each other? Would they not find a celebratory and genuine well wisher in a gay baker? Even a non-religious one? Or, did they have an ulterior motive for choosing a Christian bakery?

Questions, simple ones.

There were only two viable p**********l candidates on the b****t in 2016. One has been a politician all her adult life. For 40 some years, she proved beyond a shadow of doubt that her political philosophies are diametrically opposed to ALL of the issues most important to conservatives and Christians, and this included her opinion of the Constitution of the United States. She stated in her book, It Takes a Village, that she prefers the term "progressive" over "liberal". The 100 year history of progressivism in America has proven disastrous to the principles upon which our nation was founded. The father of progressivism in America was an anti-constitutionalist and a virulent r****t. We are well aware of the anti-American character of the bastard child of C*******m.

In a speech not long before she launched her 2016 p**********l campaign, Hillary Clinton made a stunning declaration of war on religious Americans. Speaking to the 2015 Women in the World Summit, she declared that "deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed." Even many of her staunch supporters, including liberal reporters, were stunned by this statement.

As one of them wrote in the Washington Post, "This is perhaps the most radical statement against religious liberty ever uttered by someone seeking the presidency. It is also deeply revealing. Clinton believes that, as president, it is her job not to respect the views of religious conservatives but to force them to change their beliefs and bend to her radical agenda favoring taxpayer-funded a******n on demand." Clinton's stand against religious liberty has been expressed many times since. The WaPo reporter continued, "This is the context in which we must read a recently released trove of emails — which, according to WikiLeaks, come from the accounts of Clinton staff — showing the rampant anti-Catholic bigotry that permeates Clinton World."

Once again, a question is begged. Has Hillary Clinton repented for her sins? Has she gotten down on her knees and asked the Lord to forgive her?

The candidate opposing Clinton was a horse of a different color. Out of nowhere he came, a Dark Horse, never once serving in a public office, never once elected to any government position. A non-politician on a mission. He rode roughshod over his fellow Republican candidates, like a rampaging bull, he blew through the political bulls**t and landed with both feet firmly planted on the Never Hillary platform. He pulled no punches in expressing his unwavering opposition to everything Clinton stood for. "Make America Great Again" had a resounding ring to it. And, he made it very clear where he stood with Christian beliefs. Music to our ears.

Still, we were shocked by this man's brash and bold party crashing campaign. Many of us didn't quite know what to think about this guy, but we never doubted where Hillary Clinton would take our nation if she became POTUS. It was the political philosophies of the candidates, it was their stand on the issues, not their faith, not whether or not they'd repented their sins, that decided it for us. For many of us, it was simply a Never Hillary v**e.

Unlike the gay couples who had many bakers to choose from, we had no choice for whom to v**e.

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 17:32:38   #
Lonewolf
 
thats why we v**ed for hillery

Blade_Runner wrote:
Ah, yes, beg the questions, Pete. Lots of questions.

If a gay couple really needs a cake to celebrate their wedding, how many bakeries are there to choose from?
A dozen? A hundred?

Out of all bakeries available to them, why would a gay couple single out a Christian owned bakery to serve them? Why would they not look for a bakery owned by a homosexual, or an atheist, or anyone who has no religious affiliation?

Begs the questions, doesn't it? Is the gay couple motivated by a sincere affection for each other? Would they not find a celebratory and genuine well wisher in a gay baker? Even a non-religious one? Or, did they have an ulterior motive for choosing a Christian bakery?

Questions, simple ones.

There were only two viable p**********l candidates on the b****t in 2016. One has been a politician all her adult life. For 40 some years, she proved beyond a shadow of doubt that her political philosophies are diametrically opposed to ALL of the issues most important to conservatives and Christians, and this included her opinion of the Constitution of the United States. She stated in her book, It Takes a Village, that she prefers the term "progressive" over "liberal". The 100 year history of progressivism in America has proven disastrous to the principles upon which our nation was founded. The father of progressivism in America was an anti-constitutionalist and a virulent r****t. We are well aware of the anti-American character of the bastard child of C*******m.

In a speech not long before she launched her 2016 p**********l campaign, Hillary Clinton made a stunning declaration of war on religious Americans. Speaking to the 2015 Women in the World Summit, she declared that "deep-seated cultural codes, religious beliefs and structural biases have to be changed." Even many of her staunch supporters, including liberal reporters, were stunned by this statement.

As one of them wrote in the Washington Post, "This is perhaps the most radical statement against religious liberty ever uttered by someone seeking the presidency. It is also deeply revealing. Clinton believes that, as president, it is her job not to respect the views of religious conservatives but to force them to change their beliefs and bend to her radical agenda favoring taxpayer-funded a******n on demand." Clinton's stand against religious liberty has been expressed many times since. The WaPo reporter continued, "This is the context in which we must read a recently released trove of emails — which, according to WikiLeaks, come from the accounts of Clinton staff — showing the rampant anti-Catholic bigotry that permeates Clinton World."

Once again, a question is begged. Has Hillary Clinton repented for her sins? Has she gotten down on her knees and asked the Lord to forgive her?

The candidate opposing Clinton was a horse of a different color. Out of nowhere he came, a Dark Horse, never once serving in a public office, never once elected to any government position. A non-politician on a mission. He rode roughshod over his fellow Republican candidates, like a rampaging bull, he blew through the political bulls**t and landed with both feet firmly planted on the Never Hillary platform. He pulled no punches in expressing his unwavering opposition to everything Clinton stood for. "Make America Great Again" had a resounding ring to it. And, he made it very clear where he stood with Christian beliefs. Music to our ears.

Still, we were shocked by this man's brash and bold party crashing campaign. Many of us didn't quite know what to think about this guy, but we never doubted where Hillary Clinton would take our nation if she became POTUS. It was the political philosophies of the candidates, it was their stand on the issues, not their faith, not whether or not they'd repented their sins, that decided it for us. For many of us, it was simply a Never Hillary v**e.

Unlike the gay couples who had many bakers to choose from, we had no choice for whom to v**e.
Ah, yes, beg the questions, Pete. Lots of question... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 17:43:36   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Lonewolf wrote:
thats why we v**ed for hillery

Of that I have no doubt. Anti-Americanism is the name of the progressive game.

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 18:23:42   #
Lonewolf
 
Nothing American about trump

Blade_Runner wrote:
Of that I have no doubt. Anti-Americanism is the name of the progressive game.

Reply
Oct 17, 2018 19:08:34   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
Lonewolf wrote:
Nothing American about trump

Trump believes in the sovereignty of America and not the g*******t agenda. And that's one of the main reasons that he's h**ed so much. Hitlery and most of the rest of the world are g*******ts who want in one world government. One reason for the push of open borders.

I could go on but you're too blind to see.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 08:34:55   #
stanley trent bemis
 
not long ago,it was on tv, Mr trump at the wh-which belongs to both republicans n to democorates-Mr trump invited a group of white evangelical Christians to the wh,n told them that he'd come through for them by his support,n now he wanted something in return,than he launched into saying that the democrat agenda was counter to his,n they would be violent if they were elected n be harmful to his agenda,so they needed to tell their flocks to v**e for him"this waas n is the greatest distain for the separation of church n state I've ever seen.sec Clinton's words were poorboy praised,n somewhat vague,what was she saying,people must change their belief in the trinity,in cardinal doctrines,or,maybe that christians need to know that their prejudices were not to continue to bind people ,but people were to be free to have life,liberty,n" the pursuit of happiness.".they were to understand that this country is not a theocracy,n it can believe wh**ever they want to believe,but must not seek to force their beliefs on society at large.if you don't believe in a******ns,don't have one,if you do not have homo-sexual urges,than don't marry a member of the same sex as your's,but your days of dictating your moral standards on others were over.it is not so much that their is a war against Christianity as it is so called Christianity trying to force it's values on other people.ms Clinton is a christian,believe it or not,a united Methodist,n her faith is sufficient integral to her life that at least one book was published about it. unless he has a conversion experience n starts living differently,which would be made obvious by his change in many of his policies,there will be no similar books about Mr trump.you say you had no choose but to v**e for Mr trump? i did not like sec Clinton,n still don't,but felt i had no chose because she's lived a public life of service n dedication where ass her opponent has lived a life as a con man, a ruthless .conniving negative force in the world,a man who would make fun of a handi-capped person,would stick children in cages, n would make fun of a traumatized woman.ms clinton wouldn't have done any of that.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 09:17:15   #
Lonewolf
 
Nice post thanks




stanley trent bemis wrote:
not long ago,it was on tv, Mr trump at the wh-which belongs to both republicans n to democorates-Mr trump invited a group of white evangelical Christians to the wh,n told them that he'd come through for them by his support,n now he wanted something in return,than he launched into saying that the democrat agenda was counter to his,n they would be violent if they were elected n be harmful to his agenda,so they needed to tell their flocks to v**e for him"this waas n is the greatest distain for the separation of church n state I've ever seen.sec Clinton's words were poorboy praised,n somewhat vague,what was she saying,people must change their belief in the trinity,in cardinal doctrines,or,maybe that christians need to know that their prejudices were not to continue to bind people ,but people were to be free to have life,liberty,n" the pursuit of happiness.".they were to understand that this country is not a theocracy,n it can believe wh**ever they want to believe,but must not seek to force their beliefs on society at large.if you don't believe in a******ns,don't have one,if you do not have homo-sexual urges,than don't marry a member of the same sex as your's,but your days of dictating your moral standards on others were over.it is not so much that their is a war against Christianity as it is so called Christianity trying to force it's values on other people.ms Clinton is a christian,believe it or not,a united Methodist,n her faith is sufficient integral to her life that at least one book was published about it. unless he has a conversion experience n starts living differently,which would be made obvious by his change in many of his policies,there will be no similar books about Mr trump.you say you had no choose but to v**e for Mr trump? i did not like sec Clinton,n still don't,but felt i had no chose because she's lived a public life of service n dedication where ass her opponent has lived a life as a con man, a ruthless .conniving negative force in the world,a man who would make fun of a handi-capped person,would stick children in cages, n would make fun of a traumatized woman.ms clinton wouldn't have done any of that.
not long ago,it was on tv, Mr trump at the wh-whi... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 18, 2018 14:49:55   #
stanley trentbemisartworksartworks
 
lone wolf, thank you. This is my first posting n your statement makes me feel welcomed. I expect I will receive many negative responses to other posts I make. Since I have strong opinions, but I feel a support at this positive beginning.

Reply
Oct 18, 2018 15:03:02   #
moldyoldy
 
Betta wrote:
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented? Have YOU repented from your sins? You're making assumptions about someone that you don't know personally. No one can throw stones. Jesus didn't condemn the woman they were about to stone to death when she was caught with a man other than her husband. Who are you to condemn anyone? That is judging which none of us have room to do. Think back on your own life, things you've done that make you cringe when you think about them. Don't say you don't have them because you do.

Baking a cake for a homosexual marriage is taking part in the celebration of an a*********n which makes one just as guilty. God tells believers not to do it.

Further, none of us are righteous. No, not an one as God puts it.
You know Trump personally that he hasn't repented?... (show quote)



How many a*********ns are ignored everyday? It seems hypocritical to just pick and choose.





Reply
Oct 18, 2018 15:53:31   #
Lonewolf
 
Your welcome I have a few opinions myself


stanley trentbemisartworksartworks wrote:
lone wolf, thank you. This is my first posting n your statement makes me feel welcomed. I expect I will receive many negative responses to other posts I make. Since I have strong opinions, but I feel a support at this positive beginning.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.