One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
Zemirah denied me access to reply to ALL HER LIES.
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Oct 22, 2018 20:08:57   #
Radiance3
 
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks against the Catholic Church. Her 500-year old Sola Scriptura, stolen from the Catholic Universal Church of Saint Peter he created 1,987 years ago was without the permit of Saint Peter. The f**e Sola Scriptura were selectively chosen from the original Saint Peter's Catholic Universal Gospel which Jesus Christ commanded him to build.

Matthew 16:18
https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm
"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.

But the gates of hell was able to get in and stole the Scriptures without permission from the Church of Saint Peter, the Catholic Universal Church which Jesus commanded him to build. He built that in 30 AD, all the Apostles and saints used and practiced it, until brought to St Peter in Rome, where the Saint Peter died being crucified by the pagan Nero of Rome. Saint Paul as well
spread the Catholic Universal Church among the gentiles, and converted more of his apostles he called brothers like Barnabas.

Zemirah has NO facts to present, or proven positive contributions of her Protestant Church so that all her writings are about attacks to the Catholic Universal Church, the mother of the Gospel commanded by Jesus to Saint Peter. The Catholic Universal Church was the source, where the Sola Scriptura was copied from.

Zemirah sound like democrat party with no positive contribution to present, but instead malicious attacks and lies. Very parallel approach with democrats, because her scriptures were not originated by her protestant Church but copied only.

Saint Paul another Apostle of Christ was also k**led by Nero in Rome by beheading him. Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium. Thus this three made up the complete Gospel of Christ.

Following are the Contributions of Saint Paul to the Catholic Universal Church, the New Testament.

LIST / PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION, HISTORY
St. Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament
WRITTEN BY: Melissa Petruzzello
SHARE:
Although St. Paul was not one of the original 12 Apostles of Jesus, he was one of the most prolific contributors to the New Testament. Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 or 14 are traditionally attributed to Paul, though only 7 of these Pauline epistles are accepted as being entirely authentic and dictated by St. Paul himself. The authorship of the others is debated, and they are commonly thought to have come from contemporary or later followers writing in Paul’s name. These authors likely used material from his surviving letters and may have even had access to letters written by him that no longer survive. Read on to learn which Biblical books St. Paul is known to have authored and which ones he probably did not write himself.
________________________________________
• Letter of Paul to the Romans
The sixth book of the New Testament, the Letter of Paul to the Romans, was written by St. Paul while he was in Corinth about 57 CE. It was addressed to the Christian church at Rome, whose congregation he hoped to visit for the first time on his way to Spain. The epistle is the longest and doctrinally most significant of St. Paul’s writings and is more of a theological treatise than a letter. In it he acknowledges the unique religious heritage of the Jews (prior to his conversion, Paul was a Jewish Pharisee) but asserts that righteousness no longer comes through the Mosaic Law but through Christ.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians and the Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians were both written by St. Paul. The first letter was probably written about 53–54 CE at Ephesus and addresses some of the problems that arose in the new Christian community that he had established in Corinth during his initial missionary visit (c. 50–51). The second letter was written from Macedonia about 55 CE and applauds the Corinthians’ response to his first letter and reaffirms his apostolic authority. The letters deal with a church of Gentile Christians and are therefore the best evidence of how St. Paul operated on Gentile territory.

• Letter of Paul to the Galatians
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53–54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law is no longer the exclusive path to righteousness and argues that Christians have a new freedom in Christ. The letter is very forceful and specific in dealing with the problems concerned and is the only epistle without kindly ingression, thanksgiving, or personal greetings appended to the final blessings.

• Letter of Paul to the Ephesians
Although the Letter of Paul to the Ephesians has been attributed to St. Paul, it is more likely the work of one of his disciples. Scholars think the letter was probably written before 90 CE and that the author consulted St. Paul’s letter to the Colossians as a reference. Of the 155 verses in Ephesians, 73 have verbal parallels with Colossians. When parallels to genuine Pauline letters are added, 85 percent of Ephesians is duplicated elsewhere. This and several other contested letters are usually designated as “deuter-Pauline epistles” to indicate that they were probably written by St. Paul’s followers after his death.

• Letter of Paul to the Philippians
The Letter of Paul to the Philippians is believed to have been written by St. Paul while he was in prison, probably at Rome about 62 CE. According to several scholars, the canonical work is likely a later collection of fragments of Paul’s correspondence with the congregation in Philippi. Apprehensive that his execution was close at hand, yet hoping somehow to visit the Philippians again, St. Paul explains that he welcomes death for Jesus’ sake but is equally concerned to continue his apostolate.

• Letter of Paul to the Colossians
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to the Colossians is debated. For some scholars, the developed theology of the letter indicates that it was composed by St. Paul during his imprisonment in Rome about 62 CE. Others question Pauline authorship on the basis of the distinctive vocabulary and suggest that it is a deuter-Pauline epistle, written by Paul’s followers after his death. Given its similarities to the Letter of Paul to Philemon, some have suggested that a later Paulinist simply changed details to meet a different situation.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians
The first Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians was likely written by St. Paul from Corinth about 50 CE. However, the second letter is possibly deuter-Pauline in origin, though this is debated. Second Thessalonians is obviously an imitation of the style of First Thessalonians but seems to reflect a later time. Additionally, given that there is notable ambiguity about the proximity of Christ’s Second Coming, its authorship by St. Paul is doubted.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to Timothy
Neither of the two Letters of Paul to Timothy are thought to have been written by St. Paul. Linguistic facts—such as short connectives, particles, and other syntactical peculiarities; use of different words for the same things; and repeated unusual phrases otherwise not used by Paul—offer fairly conclusive evidence against Pauline authorship and authenticity. Both epistles are usually considered “trito-Pauline,” meaning that they were probably written by members of the Pauline school a generation after his death, likely between 80 and 100 CE.
Advertisement
• Letter of Paul to Titus
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to Titus is disputed. Given many of the similarities in content and style to the two Letters of Paul to Timothy, it is possible that this work is also a trito-Pauline epistle, written a generation after the death of St. Paul. In fact, the three letters together are often called Pastoral Letters, as they were written to instruct and admonish the recipients in their pastoral office rather than to address the specific problems of congregations like many of the other Pauline epistles.

• Letter of Paul to Philemon
The Letter of Paul to Philemon was probably composed by St. Paul in a Roman prison about 61 CE, though some sources date it earlier. The brief epistle was written to Philemon, a wealthy Christian of Colossae, on behalf of Onesimus, Philemon’s former s***e. While passing no judgment on s***ery itself, Paul exhorts Philemon to manifest true Christian love that removes barriers between s***es and free people.

• Letter to the Hebrews
While the Letter to the Hebrews has traditionally been ascribed to St. Paul, the work does not contain a salutation with the name of the author. The book is still included in the Pauline corpus in the East but not in the West. Given that the thoughts, metaphors, and ideas of Hebrews are distinct from the rest of the New Testament, most scholars doubt that it was written by St. Paul or his followers. Various authors have been suggested over the ages, and it is possible that the work was composed by a Jewish convert among the second generation of Christians suffering persecution.

Reply
Oct 22, 2018 22:11:14   #
debeda
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks against the Catholic Church. Her 500-year old Sola Scriptura, stolen from the Catholic Universal Church of Saint Peter he created 1,987 years ago was without the permit of Saint Peter. The f**e Sola Scriptura were selectively chosen from the original Saint Peter's Catholic Universal Gospel which Jesus Christ commanded him to build.

Matthew 16:18
https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm
"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.

But the gates of hell was able to get in and stole the Scriptures without permission from the Church of Saint Peter, the Catholic Universal Church which Jesus commanded him to build. He built that in 30 AD, all the Apostles and saints used and practiced it, until brought to St Peter in Rome, where the Saint Peter died being crucified by the pagan Nero of Rome. Saint Paul as well
spread the Catholic Universal Church among the gentiles, and converted more of his apostles he called brothers like Barnabas.

Zemirah has NO facts to present, or proven positive contributions of her Protestant Church so that all her writings are about attacks to the Catholic Universal Church, the mother of the Gospel commanded by Jesus to Saint Peter. The Catholic Universal Church was the source, where the Sola Scriptura was copied from.

Zemirah sound like democrat party with no positive contribution to present, but instead malicious attacks and lies. Very parallel approach with democrats, because her scriptures were not originated by her protestant Church but copied only.

Saint Paul another Apostle of Christ was also k**led by Nero in Rome by beheading him. Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium. Thus this three made up the complete Gospel of Christ.

Following are the Contributions of Saint Paul to the Catholic Universal Church, the New Testament.

LIST / PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION, HISTORY
St. Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament
WRITTEN BY: Melissa Petruzzello
SHARE:
Although St. Paul was not one of the original 12 Apostles of Jesus, he was one of the most prolific contributors to the New Testament. Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 or 14 are traditionally attributed to Paul, though only 7 of these Pauline epistles are accepted as being entirely authentic and dictated by St. Paul himself. The authorship of the others is debated, and they are commonly thought to have come from contemporary or later followers writing in Paul’s name. These authors likely used material from his surviving letters and may have even had access to letters written by him that no longer survive. Read on to learn which Biblical books St. Paul is known to have authored and which ones he probably did not write himself.
________________________________________
• Letter of Paul to the Romans
The sixth book of the New Testament, the Letter of Paul to the Romans, was written by St. Paul while he was in Corinth about 57 CE. It was addressed to the Christian church at Rome, whose congregation he hoped to visit for the first time on his way to Spain. The epistle is the longest and doctrinally most significant of St. Paul’s writings and is more of a theological treatise than a letter. In it he acknowledges the unique religious heritage of the Jews (prior to his conversion, Paul was a Jewish Pharisee) but asserts that righteousness no longer comes through the Mosaic Law but through Christ.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians and the Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians were both written by St. Paul. The first letter was probably written about 53–54 CE at Ephesus and addresses some of the problems that arose in the new Christian community that he had established in Corinth during his initial missionary visit (c. 50–51). The second letter was written from Macedonia about 55 CE and applauds the Corinthians’ response to his first letter and reaffirms his apostolic authority. The letters deal with a church of Gentile Christians and are therefore the best evidence of how St. Paul operated on Gentile territory.

• Letter of Paul to the Galatians
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53–54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law is no longer the exclusive path to righteousness and argues that Christians have a new freedom in Christ. The letter is very forceful and specific in dealing with the problems concerned and is the only epistle without kindly ingression, thanksgiving, or personal greetings appended to the final blessings.

• Letter of Paul to the Ephesians
Although the Letter of Paul to the Ephesians has been attributed to St. Paul, it is more likely the work of one of his disciples. Scholars think the letter was probably written before 90 CE and that the author consulted St. Paul’s letter to the Colossians as a reference. Of the 155 verses in Ephesians, 73 have verbal parallels with Colossians. When parallels to genuine Pauline letters are added, 85 percent of Ephesians is duplicated elsewhere. This and several other contested letters are usually designated as “deuter-Pauline epistles” to indicate that they were probably written by St. Paul’s followers after his death.

• Letter of Paul to the Philippians
The Letter of Paul to the Philippians is believed to have been written by St. Paul while he was in prison, probably at Rome about 62 CE. According to several scholars, the canonical work is likely a later collection of fragments of Paul’s correspondence with the congregation in Philippi. Apprehensive that his execution was close at hand, yet hoping somehow to visit the Philippians again, St. Paul explains that he welcomes death for Jesus’ sake but is equally concerned to continue his apostolate.

• Letter of Paul to the Colossians
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to the Colossians is debated. For some scholars, the developed theology of the letter indicates that it was composed by St. Paul during his imprisonment in Rome about 62 CE. Others question Pauline authorship on the basis of the distinctive vocabulary and suggest that it is a deuter-Pauline epistle, written by Paul’s followers after his death. Given its similarities to the Letter of Paul to Philemon, some have suggested that a later Paulinist simply changed details to meet a different situation.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians
The first Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians was likely written by St. Paul from Corinth about 50 CE. However, the second letter is possibly deuter-Pauline in origin, though this is debated. Second Thessalonians is obviously an imitation of the style of First Thessalonians but seems to reflect a later time. Additionally, given that there is notable ambiguity about the proximity of Christ’s Second Coming, its authorship by St. Paul is doubted.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to Timothy
Neither of the two Letters of Paul to Timothy are thought to have been written by St. Paul. Linguistic facts—such as short connectives, particles, and other syntactical peculiarities; use of different words for the same things; and repeated unusual phrases otherwise not used by Paul—offer fairly conclusive evidence against Pauline authorship and authenticity. Both epistles are usually considered “trito-Pauline,” meaning that they were probably written by members of the Pauline school a generation after his death, likely between 80 and 100 CE.
Advertisement
• Letter of Paul to Titus
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to Titus is disputed. Given many of the similarities in content and style to the two Letters of Paul to Timothy, it is possible that this work is also a trito-Pauline epistle, written a generation after the death of St. Paul. In fact, the three letters together are often called Pastoral Letters, as they were written to instruct and admonish the recipients in their pastoral office rather than to address the specific problems of congregations like many of the other Pauline epistles.

• Letter of Paul to Philemon
The Letter of Paul to Philemon was probably composed by St. Paul in a Roman prison about 61 CE, though some sources date it earlier. The brief epistle was written to Philemon, a wealthy Christian of Colossae, on behalf of Onesimus, Philemon’s former s***e. While passing no judgment on s***ery itself, Paul exhorts Philemon to manifest true Christian love that removes barriers between s***es and free people.

• Letter to the Hebrews
While the Letter to the Hebrews has traditionally been ascribed to St. Paul, the work does not contain a salutation with the name of the author. The book is still included in the Pauline corpus in the East but not in the West. Given that the thoughts, metaphors, and ideas of Hebrews are distinct from the rest of the New Testament, most scholars doubt that it was written by St. Paul or his followers. Various authors have been suggested over the ages, and it is possible that the work was composed by a Jewish convert among the second generation of Christians suffering persecution.
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks a... (show quote)


Thanks for the reminders. I read a book some years ago about St. Paul, his travels, his incarceration and his letters. So uplifting

Reply
Oct 22, 2018 23:10:23   #
Radiance3
 
Thanks debeda. Saint Paul brought the Gospel of Christ to the Gentiles. He was the most prolific Apostles of Christ though he was not the original Apostle.

It is sad that he was beheaded in Rome by the pagan Nero, Emperor of Rome.

I feel so sad today. I feel our country needs unity. We will be invaded by so many aliens.
There are so much divisions in politics and even religion.
Jesus asks us to love one another.

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2018 23:48:54   #
debeda
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Thanks debeda. Saint Paul brought the Gospel of Christ to the Gentiles. He was the most prolific Apostles of Christ though he was not the original Apostle.

It is sad that he was beheaded in Rome by the pagan Nero, Emperor of Rome.

I feel so sad today. I feel our country needs unity. We will be invaded by so many aliens.
There are so much divisions in politics and even religion.
Jesus asks us to love one another.


Yes. Jesus did say love others as yourself. But, looking at the bigger picture, loving others is also NOT about enabling them to be helpless, or thieves, or criminals. "Judge not lest ye be judged". Hasn't the rest of the world judged Americans as being rich and selfish and entitled? "Thou shalt not covet what is thy neighbor's". Doesn't the rest of the world covet what America has been, and is trying to become again? Why don't they try to emulate? If they want what we have, emulate it in your own country. We will help them, as we always have in the past. Americans have always been generous. If everyone streams into this country unfettered, there'll be nothing to emulate but overcrowding and hunger. IMO.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 00:14:56   #
Betta
 
Radiance3 wrote:
Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium.


Simply not true. In fact, Peter began to preach a contrary doctrine for which Paul admonished him for it. And let us not forget that Peter denied Christ three times. Further, Peter is never referred to as the "rock" in scripture. This is greatly misinterpreted. Jesus was talking about himself. The Rock of Our Salvation.[/quote]




Radiance3 wrote:
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks against the Catholic Church. Her 500-year old Sola Scriptura, stolen from the Catholic Universal Church of Saint Peter he created 1,987 years ago was without the permit of Saint Peter. The f**e Sola Scriptura were selectively chosen from the original Saint Peter's Catholic Universal Gospel which Jesus Christ commanded him to build.

Matthew 16:18
https://biblehub.com/matthew/16-18.htm
"I also say to you that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build My church; and the gates of Hades will not overpower it.

But the gates of hell was able to get in and stole the Scriptures without permission from the Church of Saint Peter, the Catholic Universal Church which Jesus commanded him to build. He built that in 30 AD, all the Apostles and saints used and practiced it, until brought to St Peter in Rome, where the Saint Peter died being crucified by the pagan Nero of Rome. Saint Paul as well
spread the Catholic Universal Church among the gentiles, and converted more of his apostles he called brothers like Barnabas.

Zemirah has NO facts to present, or proven positive contributions of her Protestant Church so that all her writings are about attacks to the Catholic Universal Church, the mother of the Gospel commanded by Jesus to Saint Peter. The Catholic Universal Church was the source, where the Sola Scriptura was copied from.

Zemirah sound like democrat party with no positive contribution to present, but instead malicious attacks and lies. Very parallel approach with democrats, because her scriptures were not originated by her protestant Church but copied only.

Saint Paul another Apostle of Christ was also k**led by Nero in Rome by beheading him. Saint PAUL had followed all the doctrine of Saint Peter which consist of the Scriptures, the Sacred Traditions and the Magisterium. Thus this three made up the complete Gospel of Christ.

Following are the Contributions of Saint Paul to the Catholic Universal Church, the New Testament.

LIST / PHILOSOPHY & RELIGION, HISTORY
St. Paul’s Contributions to the New Testament
WRITTEN BY: Melissa Petruzzello
SHARE:
Although St. Paul was not one of the original 12 Apostles of Jesus, he was one of the most prolific contributors to the New Testament. Of the 27 books in the New Testament, 13 or 14 are traditionally attributed to Paul, though only 7 of these Pauline epistles are accepted as being entirely authentic and dictated by St. Paul himself. The authorship of the others is debated, and they are commonly thought to have come from contemporary or later followers writing in Paul’s name. These authors likely used material from his surviving letters and may have even had access to letters written by him that no longer survive. Read on to learn which Biblical books St. Paul is known to have authored and which ones he probably did not write himself.
________________________________________
• Letter of Paul to the Romans
The sixth book of the New Testament, the Letter of Paul to the Romans, was written by St. Paul while he was in Corinth about 57 CE. It was addressed to the Christian church at Rome, whose congregation he hoped to visit for the first time on his way to Spain. The epistle is the longest and doctrinally most significant of St. Paul’s writings and is more of a theological treatise than a letter. In it he acknowledges the unique religious heritage of the Jews (prior to his conversion, Paul was a Jewish Pharisee) but asserts that righteousness no longer comes through the Mosaic Law but through Christ.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians
The First Letter of Paul to the Corinthians and the Second Letter of Paul to the Corinthians were both written by St. Paul. The first letter was probably written about 53–54 CE at Ephesus and addresses some of the problems that arose in the new Christian community that he had established in Corinth during his initial missionary visit (c. 50–51). The second letter was written from Macedonia about 55 CE and applauds the Corinthians’ response to his first letter and reaffirms his apostolic authority. The letters deal with a church of Gentile Christians and are therefore the best evidence of how St. Paul operated on Gentile territory.

• Letter of Paul to the Galatians
The Letter of Paul to the Galatians, the ninth book of the New Testament, was authored by St. Paul. The letter was likely written between 53–54 CE and addresses division within the Christian community about whether new converts needed to be circumcised and follow the prescriptions of the Mosaic Law. He reaffirms his teaching that Jewish law is no longer the exclusive path to righteousness and argues that Christians have a new freedom in Christ. The letter is very forceful and specific in dealing with the problems concerned and is the only epistle without kindly ingression, thanksgiving, or personal greetings appended to the final blessings.

• Letter of Paul to the Ephesians
Although the Letter of Paul to the Ephesians has been attributed to St. Paul, it is more likely the work of one of his disciples. Scholars think the letter was probably written before 90 CE and that the author consulted St. Paul’s letter to the Colossians as a reference. Of the 155 verses in Ephesians, 73 have verbal parallels with Colossians. When parallels to genuine Pauline letters are added, 85 percent of Ephesians is duplicated elsewhere. This and several other contested letters are usually designated as “deuter-Pauline epistles” to indicate that they were probably written by St. Paul’s followers after his death.

• Letter of Paul to the Philippians
The Letter of Paul to the Philippians is believed to have been written by St. Paul while he was in prison, probably at Rome about 62 CE. According to several scholars, the canonical work is likely a later collection of fragments of Paul’s correspondence with the congregation in Philippi. Apprehensive that his execution was close at hand, yet hoping somehow to visit the Philippians again, St. Paul explains that he welcomes death for Jesus’ sake but is equally concerned to continue his apostolate.

• Letter of Paul to the Colossians
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to the Colossians is debated. For some scholars, the developed theology of the letter indicates that it was composed by St. Paul during his imprisonment in Rome about 62 CE. Others question Pauline authorship on the basis of the distinctive vocabulary and suggest that it is a deuter-Pauline epistle, written by Paul’s followers after his death. Given its similarities to the Letter of Paul to Philemon, some have suggested that a later Paulinist simply changed details to meet a different situation.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians
The first Letter of Paul to the Thessalonians was likely written by St. Paul from Corinth about 50 CE. However, the second letter is possibly deuter-Pauline in origin, though this is debated. Second Thessalonians is obviously an imitation of the style of First Thessalonians but seems to reflect a later time. Additionally, given that there is notable ambiguity about the proximity of Christ’s Second Coming, its authorship by St. Paul is doubted.

• First and Second Letter of Paul to Timothy
Neither of the two Letters of Paul to Timothy are thought to have been written by St. Paul. Linguistic facts—such as short connectives, particles, and other syntactical peculiarities; use of different words for the same things; and repeated unusual phrases otherwise not used by Paul—offer fairly conclusive evidence against Pauline authorship and authenticity. Both epistles are usually considered “trito-Pauline,” meaning that they were probably written by members of the Pauline school a generation after his death, likely between 80 and 100 CE.
Advertisement
• Letter of Paul to Titus
The authorship of the Letter of Paul to Titus is disputed. Given many of the similarities in content and style to the two Letters of Paul to Timothy, it is possible that this work is also a trito-Pauline epistle, written a generation after the death of St. Paul. In fact, the three letters together are often called Pastoral Letters, as they were written to instruct and admonish the recipients in their pastoral office rather than to address the specific problems of congregations like many of the other Pauline epistles.

• Letter of Paul to Philemon
The Letter of Paul to Philemon was probably composed by St. Paul in a Roman prison about 61 CE, though some sources date it earlier. The brief epistle was written to Philemon, a wealthy Christian of Colossae, on behalf of Onesimus, Philemon’s former s***e. While passing no judgment on s***ery itself, Paul exhorts Philemon to manifest true Christian love that removes barriers between s***es and free people.

• Letter to the Hebrews
While the Letter to the Hebrews has traditionally been ascribed to St. Paul, the work does not contain a salutation with the name of the author. The book is still included in the Pauline corpus in the East but not in the West. Given that the thoughts, metaphors, and ideas of Hebrews are distinct from the rest of the New Testament, most scholars doubt that it was written by St. Paul or his followers. Various authors have been suggested over the ages, and it is possible that the work was composed by a Jewish convert among the second generation of Christians suffering persecution.
Zemirah has lied all about her claim and attacks a... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 00:34:21   #
Radiance3
 
That is according to your understanding. There are more than 30,000 Protestants who have similar or different view as yours. But I just don't listen to people like anybody and claim about what they know. All those things are waste of my time. Unless facts have been proven true.

You have the liberty to believe what you want. Don't impose it to me. I will allow you do discuss matters like yours. But a waste of time when things are not credible.

Good day.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 00:43:50   #
Radiance3
 
debeda wrote:
Yes. Jesus did say love others as yourself. But, looking at the bigger picture, loving others is also NOT about enabling them to be helpless, or thieves, or criminals. "Judge not lest ye be judged". Hasn't the rest of the world judged Americans as being rich and selfish and entitled? "Thou shalt not covet what is thy neighbor's". Doesn't the rest of the world covet what America has been, and is trying to become again? Why don't they try to emulate? If they want what we have, emulate it in your own country. We will help them, as we always have in the past. Americans have always been generous. If everyone streams into this country unfettered, there'll be nothing to emulate but overcrowding and hunger. IMO.
Yes. Jesus did say love others as yourself. But, l... (show quote)


=================
You are exactly right. That is why God gave us a leader who is also under God, and we must support him. He is working for the interest of the people and country.

Foreigners who came and commit crimes or just demand what they want, or just yell at us as "r****ts", then those are not the right kind of people who needs to be here in the US.

America has been helping many countries for free.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2018 04:29:56   #
Betta
 
When Jesus said he would rebuild the temple in 3 days, what was he talking about? Many thought he was talking about a brick and mortar temple. He wasn't. He was talking about himself as evidenced by his resurrection 3 days after his death on the cross. It wasn't Friday, Saturday and Sunday either as too many mistakenly believe. The same applies when he said upon this rock I will build my church. Peter was a mere man with weaknesses and frailties as evidenced by his thrice denial of Christ and preaching a contrary doctrine. Jesus is Divine, the only begotten son of God. HE, Jesus, is The Rock. Not Peter.


Radiance3 wrote:
That is according to your understanding. There are more than 30,000 Protestants who have similar or different view as yours. But I just don't listen to people like anybody and claim about what they know. All those things are waste of my time. Unless facts have been proven true.

You have the liberty to believe what you want. Don't impose it to me. I will allow you do discuss matters like yours. But a waste of time when things are not credible.

Good day.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 05:22:53   #
Radiance3
 
Betta wrote:
When Jesus said he would rebuild the temple in 3 days, what was he talking about? Many thought he was talking about a brick and mortar temple. He wasn't. He was talking about himself as evidenced by his resurrection 3 days after his death on the cross. It wasn't Friday, Saturday and Sunday either as too many mistakenly believe. The same applies when he said upon this rock I will build my church. Peter was a mere man with weaknesses and frailties as evidenced by his thrice denial of Christ and preaching a contrary doctrine. Jesus is Divine, the only begotten son of God. HE, Jesus, is The Rock. Not Peter.
When Jesus said he would rebuild the temple in 3 d... (show quote)


=====================
Betta, you could talk whole day about your belief, but I am not interested. So, good luck to your understanding. I am not stopping you.

No more Betta for me, okay? I'd appreciate that.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 09:10:19   #
debeda
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
You are exactly right. That is why God gave us a leader who is also under God, and we must support him. He is working for the interest of the people and country.

Foreigners who came and commit crimes or just demand what they want, or just yell at us as "r****ts", then those are not the right kind of people who needs to be here in the US.

America has been helping many countries for free.



Oh, and PS, regarding zemirah?? I think she must've blocked me a long time ago. I thought she left OPP. I haven't felt any loss from this. Kinda nice, actually. As I remember she was kinda warmish and smug.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 16:03:02   #
Radiance3
 
debeda wrote:
Oh, and PS, regarding zemirah?? I think she must've blocked me a long time ago. I thought she left OPP. I haven't felt any loss from this. Kinda nice, actually. As I remember she was kinda warmish and smug.

================
Zemirah and bahmer, are Catholic h**ers who won't allow me to answer their heretic claims of their belief system. So much of their worship is hatred, p***e and arrogance. Won't even allow me to reply to their heretic claims. Because they don't profess the true faith of God.

They are filled with hatred. Based on all their post at OPP,. Nothing is positive but attacks to Catholic Church, and myself. Catholics don't attack unless we are attacked to defend. They are the proponents of hatred and attacks. A very clear display of Satanic cult.

As I have indicated before I love all children of God. Until they started attacking me and my Catholics faith. I came to defend because God asked me to.

Reply
 
 
Oct 23, 2018 21:20:28   #
debeda
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
Zemirah and bahmer, are Catholic h**ers who won't allow me to answer their heretic claims of their belief system. So much of their worship is hatred, p***e and arrogance. Won't even allow me to reply to their heretic claims. Because they don't profess the true faith of God.

They are filled with hatred. Based on all their post at OPP,. Nothing is positive but attacks to Catholic Church, and myself. Catholics don't attack unless we are attacked to defend. They are the proponents of hatred and attacks. A very clear display of Satanic cult.

As I have indicated before I love all children of God. Until they started attacking me and my Catholics faith. I came to defend because God asked me to.
================ br Zemirah and bahmer, are Cathol... (show quote)


Zemirah I get, but Bahmer??? Sure you don't mean someone else?

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 21:39:08   #
Radiance3
 
debeda wrote:
Zemirah I get, but Bahmer??? Sure you don't mean someone else?


================
I'm sure of that. You know what ? I used to like bahmer too. But since he joined his heretic beliefs with Zemirah, TexaCan. Jack etc. on their relentless p***e and arrogance attacking the Catholic Church, I feel so sad for these people.

There are about 5 to 7 of them attacking the Catholic Church. Their gospel is attacking, and hating the Catholic Church, which are all contrary to the Gospel of Christ.

What makes them do that and claim as a Christian is beyond me. I think theirs is the work of Satan.

Reply
Oct 23, 2018 22:46:01   #
debeda
 
Radiance3 wrote:
================
I'm sure of that. You know what ? I used to like bahmer too. But since he joined his heretic beliefs with Zemirah, TexaCan. Jack etc. on their relentless p***e and arrogance attacking the Catholic Church, I feel so sad for these people.

There are about 5 to 7 of them attacking the Catholic Church. Their gospel is attacking, and hating the Catholic Church, which are all contrary to the Gospel of Christ.

What makes them do that and claim as a Christian is beyond me. I think theirs is the work of Satan.
================ br I'm sure of that. You know wha... (show quote)


Maybe it's just the pope they don't like. Cuz I don't like him either and can't imagine what the college was thinking when they elected him.

Reply
Oct 24, 2018 03:44:14   #
Radiance3
 
debeda wrote:
Maybe it's just the pope they don't like. Cuz I don't like him either and can't imagine what the college was thinking when they elected him.

===============
Most Protestants don't like everything about the Catholic Church, like the ones here at OPP. In their church where they preach, they peach hatred towards the Catholic Church.
In our Catholic Church, we preach about love and support for all people of God.

I have few Baptist friends, but they don't say anything bad about the Catholic Church.

I regretted, I realized now that I made a quick judgement about the Pope. Fact of the matter is the democrats and liberals are using the Pope as their propaganda. Using him that the Pope favors them and Obama.

I think we really don't know the whole t***h, what is in the Pope's mind. Granting we separate this Pope from the entire Catholic Church. But we must learn from history, 1,987 years ago, that the Catholic Church is the right Church built by Saint Peter as commanded by Christ.

The most important in the Catholic Church is the Holy Eucharist. Please read the Scriptures carefully what Jesus said.
John 6:53
Jesus said to them, "Very truly I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you".

It is Jesus with us and us in him. It is the COVENANT between him and all of us. That is why Jesus is present in the Eucharist. There were miracles that proved Jesus is present in the Holy Eucharist. It is the most important gift of God to us, making us part of him, and him in us.
That is why we are one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church of God. Catholic means Universal.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-political talk)
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.