One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rebob14
Page: <<prev 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 71 next>>
Sep 15, 2015 07:29:46   #
Not unusual in the least...............I could claim that steel eating termites were the culprit and you'd be all over it
Go to
Sep 14, 2015 08:13:01   #
I was within a stones-throw of the 2nd plane and can assure you that the only things "thrown" at those buildings were innocent people!!
Go to
Sep 12, 2015 09:32:07   #
badbobby wrote:
The typical household headed by a person 65 or older has a net worth 7 time greater than a household headed by a person under 35,according to an analyisis of cencus data.

You younger folks refer to us as senior citizens as old fogies,geezers and in some cases dinosaurs.some of us are "baby boomers"just getting ready to retire,while others of us have been retired for some time.We walk slower now and our hearing and eyesight"aint what it used to be".
We worked hard ,raised our children and worshiped God and we have grown old together.

We are the ones who you refer to as "over the hill"and that is certainly true.but before you write us off completely,here are some things you should know.
In school we studied history ,English,mathematics and sciencewhich enabled us to lead America into the technological age.
Most of us can remember out door toilets(outhouses"many with first hand experience.We remember telephones you had to dial ,and they were all on party lines,below 25 cents a gallon gasoline prices,and milk and ice delivered to our front doors.
And for those of you who don't know what an ice box is,today they are electric and are known as refrigerators.We remember when you hand cranked your car to start it.We lived those days.You call us old fashioned and out dated but remember this ,we fought and won ww2(that's world war two to you youngsters).We fought in Korea and in Viet Nam.
We can quote the pledge of allegiance and know where to place our hands while doing so.
We were in different.services and wore different uniforms
Army,Navy Air Force ,Coast guard ,Marines.
But we all fought under Old Glory
WE served our country with p***e and lost dear friends on the battlefield.
We didn't fight for the Socialist States of America,we fought for the home of the brave and the land of the free.
We all know the words of the Star Spangled Banner and you may see tears on our cheeks as we sing it.

We have lived--what you have only read in history books
(if the facts haven't been deleted yet).
We feel no obligation to apologize for America to any one or any nation.
Yes we are old and slow,but rest assured
we have one more good fight left in our old worn out bodies
.
We have loved this country ,fought and died for it,and now we are determined to save it.
America is our country and no one is going to take it away from us.
We took oaths to defend America against all enemies,foriegn and domestic and that is an oath we will keep.
There are those who want to change America and destroy our way of living.
WE WILL NOT CONCEDE
IT was mostly the younger generation that elected our Denocratic Government.You fell for the "hope and change"hype,which in reality was nothing but hyperbole.
you have now tasted socialism.
Do you like it?Are you happy?
With all the education we gave you you didn't see through the s**m ,and instead just "drank the cool aid".
today we have very few real jobs(most jobs in the restaurant field and part time jobs),lost mortgages,higher taxes,a lot more national debt and many lost freedoms.

This is what you v**ed for and this is what you got.

Well don't worry.
The" over the hill gang" is coming back and In 2016 we are going to take back our country.
In 2016 we are going to the polls by the million.
This land belongs to "WE THE PEOPLE"and we are going to reclaim it.
We hope then that you will preserve it and pass it along to your children,grand children and great grand children
And the next time you have the chance to say the pledge of allegiance,stand up- put your hand over your heart and honor our country.Then you might
thank God for the "over the hill gang"

In 2016 you will feel the ground shake as we go to the polls.
Wont you join us to save America????
The typical household headed by a person 65 or ol... (show quote)


My generations version of our republic was far from perfect, but, we never replaced the goal of "perfectabilty" with that of the lowest common denominator.
Go to
Sep 7, 2015 05:59:07   #
Guns are the response, not the cause
Go to
Sep 3, 2015 07:10:47   #
She Wolf wrote:
I agree with most of your post. However, perhaps we need anarchy. There are occasions when beauty has come from chaos.

In my opinion, when your government is owned, it is very hard to work within the system. Esp. when the system is a stacked deck. I would not like to see total anarchy, but I can not see a viable way to change our corrupt system. We continue to buy into the idea that by widening the gap between the elite and the rest of us, the greedy will somehow become decent human beings. Hasn't happened so far. The more we give, the more they want.

Taxing the rich will never happen so long as they own the government. Most of our representatives are billionaires. They are not going to tax themselves.
I agree with most of your post. However, perhaps ... (show quote)






Nobody took your wealth - - - you never created anything. Go earn what you feel you're entitled to. People who create nothing have been taking the wealth of those who do for thousands of years and the result is ALWAYS the same: nobody has anything after the dust settles. Wealth is not a fixed amount of resources, it is constantly created by those who are gifted with the desire to excell.
Go to
Sep 1, 2015 07:08:35   #
Glaucon wrote:
On Rightwing Christians: Have you noticed something odd about this Ashley Madison scandal?


by
SemDemFollow .

Since the Ashley Madison scandal broke, I have noticed a distinct lack of condemnation from you rightwing christians.

Where are all the youtube h**e videos against the subscribers practicing adultery?

Where are the droves of protestors picketing AshleyMadison.com like Planned Parenthood?

It's pretty clear where Jesus stands with c***ting on your spouse. In case you missed the Commandment of "Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's wife", Jesus laid it out:

In Mathew 5:27-30 he said if you even look at another woman with desire, then cut out your eye because it's better to "lose one of your members than to have your whole body go to hell".

Lust > C***t > Hell. Pretty straightforward. There were other things He directly condemned, like divorce. Yet He was most clear on His biggest pet peeve: excess wealth.

Yet those are three things that today's rightwing Christian doesn't care about.
Massive greed? That's called "prosperity gospel" now. The parable of Lazarus? They root for the rich guy in hell.

Divorce? Adultery? Child Molestation? whoopsey-daisies. No big whoop.

But gays and a******ns? That's where they burst arteries! Two issues Jesus said NOTHING about. Both of those things existed during His time. If they are the epitome of evil, you'd think they'd at least warrant a mention. But nothing.

So what about actual sins that are specifically mentioned and given no leeway at all in the Bible? Meh.

In fact, on Mike Huckabee's old cheesy talk show five years ago he featured Ashley Madison's CEO to tell "his side" of the story. Yes, Mike disagreed with what Ashley Madison was doing but then added "I could be wrong".

Seriously, go to 11: 43 of this video. That's what he said.

There is no ambiguity in the Bible about adultery. And yet, while the Bible says nothing about a******n, here is Huckabee defending Paraguay's awful decision to force an 11-year old raped by her stepfather to bear a child. Here is a man who said he would not be against using federal troops to stop women from getting a******ns! Here is a man calling for mass arrests over gay marriage. This is the same guy who convulsed with anger over gays being allowed to be happy.

In fact, Santorum, Huckabee, Cruz, et. al have said nothing about the AshleyMadison scandal or a word of condemnation to their millions of subscribers. Maybe they are worried about alienating some supporters, but that means their virulent rants on nonissues become even more meaningless. It's almost like they are full of something....

Clearly there is no righteous, religious h**e espoused for those who abuse or leave their marriages like there is for those who are in stable, homosexual relationships. Despite what the Bible says, these guys SWEAR to me that they know exactly who Jesus h**es.

And I find it absolutely amazing that it always happens to coincide with their preconceived prejudices. Go figure.

I'll bet if Jesus said to love their enemies, they'd find a way around it. (Oh wait...)

So you will have to excuse me when I roll my eyes over your next meltdown. Where is the indignant condemnation now?

Where is your moral outrage against these sinners?

You'll rally like crazy against things not even in the Bible, but ignore and stay silent about AshleyMadison.

I guess it's hard to condemn something that you probably have an account with.
.


.


Tags
On Rightwing Christians: Have you noticed somethin... (show quote)





Leave the Supreme Court and the misuse of the Law out of your
sins............stop insisting that society be conplicit in murdering
people and enjoy your adultery. See the difference?????
Go to
Aug 16, 2015 10:57:39   #
Glaucon wrote:
Have Christians abandoned the Old Testament entirely? I was under the impression that the Old and New were equal in importance to them.


They are. The old serves as a spiritual credential for the new. Abraham was the first revelation of God to man but man was so steeped in paganism that there was need of the Law to protect man untill the day of redemption, Jesus' ministry and example, so man could finally live in fellowship with God. The book of Romans explains. The old Testament is full of examples of promise and forgiveness, that the way back to Him is always available.
Go to
Aug 16, 2015 09:03:08   #
EEEEWWWWWW! Please watch your white context.
Go to
Aug 16, 2015 08:58:59   #
Glaucon wrote:
Dr. Laura Schlesinger (a popular conservative radio talk show host in the USA) said that homosexuality is an a*********n according to the Bible Leviticus 18:22, and cannot be condoned under any circumstance. The following response is an open letter to Dr. Laura.

Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an a*********n… end of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God’s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess s***es, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into s***ery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual unseemliness – Lev. 15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev. 1:9. The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to k**l him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an a*********n – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser a*********n than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this? Are there ‘degrees’ of a*********n?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev. 24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan,
James M. Kauffman, Ed. D.
Professor Emeritus Dept. of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education
University of Virginia
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God’s Law. I have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an a*********n… end of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some other elements of God’s Laws and how to follow them.
1. Leviticus 25:44 states that I may possess s***es, both male and female, provided they are purchased from neighbouring nations. A friend of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can you clarify? Why can’t I own Canadians?
2. I would like to sell my daughter into s***ery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair price for her?
3. I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her period of menstrual unseemliness – Lev. 15: 19-24. The problem is how do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offence.
4. When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a pleasing odor for the Lord – Lev. 1:9. The problem is my neighbours. They claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
5. I have a neighbour who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2. clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to k**l him myself, or should I ask the police to do it?
6. A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an a*********n – Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser a*********n than homosexuality. I don’t agree. Can you settle this? Are there ‘degrees’ of a*********n?
7. Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle-room here?
8. Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev. 19:27. How should they die?
9. I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
10. My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? Lev. 24:10-16. Couldn’t we just burn them to death at a private family affair, like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively and thus enjoy considerable expertise in such matters, so I am confident you can help.
Thank you again for reminding us that God’s word is eternal and unchanging.
Your adoring fan,
James M. Kauffman, Ed. D.
Professor Emeritus Dept. of Curriculum, Instruction, and Special Education
University of Virginia
Dr. Laura Schlesinger (a popular conservative radi... (show quote)




Good research on the old testament, what does the NEW testament have to say re: the Law and the Spirit? If you're going to "frame" the debate, you need to cover everything. There's a reason they are called old and new covenants.
Go to
Aug 14, 2015 06:30:42   #
Cool Breeze wrote:
O**h K****rs and ISIS both have taken vows! O**h K****rs To Protect Their Interpretation of The Constitution! ISIS In The Name Allah!

Four white civilians carrying military-style rifles and sidearms walked a r**t-torn street in Ferguson, Missouri, early Tuesday, saying they were there to protect a representative from an anti-government website, but their actions drew swift criticism from protesters in the mostly black neighborhood and from St. Louis County Police Chief Jon Belmar, who called their presence “unncessary and inflammatory.”



Constitution needs no "interpretation"...........it was written in English.
The appearance of the four men drew stares in the neighborhood, which was rocked by violence again Sunday night as protesters marked the police k*****g of Michael Brown, an unarmed black teen whose death one year ago reignited a debate on race relations.

The men identified themselves as members of O**h K****rs, which describes itself as an association of current and former U.S. soldiers and police who aim to protect the U.S. Constitution. The group reports having about 35,000 members nationwide and says there are African-Americans among its ranks.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a civil rights organization, has described O**h K****rs as a “fiercely anti-government, militaristic group” that fears the government could disregard the Constitution and take away the rights of citizens. The SPLC does not consider O**h K****rs a h**e group.

ISIS Vows To Conquer The World! (Bluster and Hyperbole)http://www.newindianexpress.com/world/ISIS-Vows-to-Take-Over-Most-of-the-World-By-2020/2015/08/10/article2967603.ece
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/oath-keepers-potentially-most-lethal :lol: :lol: :lol:
O**h K****rs and ISIS both have taken vows! O**h K... (show quote)
Go to
Aug 13, 2015 07:30:12   #
payne1000 wrote:
Another informative and entertaining expose by Oklahoma writer Sheila Samples.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article12571.htm


That's pretty "informative"............Any thoughts on what to do with your other brain cell?
Go to
Aug 8, 2015 10:33:53   #
ProudVeteran69 wrote:
Obama Gives I******s Jobs But Not Americans

Politics

by Andrew McNealy - Aug 7, 2015
939
obama-gives-i******s-jobs

The White House has issued more than 7.4 million work permits to foreign workers over Obama’s term of office, according to a recent report.

This totals roughly one million new foreign workers legally coming to America to work every single year–on top of immigrants who come over through using traditional methods, like getting a green card of a guest worker visa.

Worse, many of these workers are on American soil with work authorizations that haven’t even been okayed by Congress, who has the constitutional power to set the nation’s immigration policy.

Some of these i******s holding Obama worker visas include those enrolled in programs like the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program–which allows adults brought to America when they were young children to stay.

Largely, the type of permits that the Obama Administration has been issuing are supposed to only be used as a temporary benefit–but Obama has been issuing them to people who are not eligible for that temporary status and, in some cases, are not even eligible for any American visa whatsoever.

This report, which exposed the incredible lengths the Obama Administration will go to make sure more foreign workers come into America, shocked Congress.

The chairman of the Senate immigration subcommittee, Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), called for an investigation.

“This massive increase in the labor supply has occurred simultaneously with a steep drop in family incomes and a sharp rise in the number of Americans pushed out of the workforce. All jobs gains since the recession have gone to foreign workers, while the slack labor market has depressed median family incomes almost $5,000 in that time,” Sessions said.

http://www.citizenaction.com


Obama needs his criminal Arse, sent down the river of No Return!!!!. Now he is trying to starve and destroy America's Working Class, forever!!!and serve the Moochers. Take Obama's Job from him, and let him see how it feels to be out of work, and take every penny he has out of his pocket so he can see what's it's feels like to be poor!!!!.
Obama Gives I******s Jobs But Not Americans br br... (show quote)


Obama "has" no jobs to "give" to anyone. He, and the feds, create no value; they take productive peoples wealth and
give it away for influence.
Go to
Aug 7, 2015 07:21:51   #
Kachina wrote:
soooo pissed at Fox right now. they blocked the voodoo feed as soon as the debate started. greedy SOB's. Once again the media controlling our lives


Free registration on fox.com/community provides the stream
Go to
Aug 6, 2015 07:39:20   #
Sicilianthing wrote:
By Ron Ewart
August 5, 2015
NewsWithViews.com

The Framers of the American Republic and the U. S. Constitution knew how governments, left un- attended by the people, would eventually morph into kingdoms, dictatorships, or a pseudo Democracy run by the mob, in what Alexis de Tocqueville, 210 years ago, predicted would be the "Tyranny of the Majority".

The Framers set up two (2) major impediments to this evolution through 1) the Separation of Powers Doctrine in the executive, legislative and judicial branches of government, but 2) also granted to the states in the 9th and 10th Amendments to the U. S. Constitution, the following extraordinary rights:

9th Amendment: "The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

10th Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by this Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The basic idea of all these protections was to inhibit the federal government from becoming so powerful that it would overwhelm the rights of the states and the people. Welcome to today's America.

Since we have been essentially unsuccessful in getting others to join us in this fight against an ever more powerful central government and since it is the responsibility of the governors of the individual states to stop the federal government from exerting more power, we, unilaterally, are proceeding with charging the governors of several states with violation of their oath of office and criminal negligence in discharging their duties as governor, for failure to enforce the provisions of the 9th and 10th Amendments, along with other serious charges.

The President of the National Association of Rural Landowners (NARLO), being a staunch advocate for the American rural landowner, is making these charges against the governors for and on behalf of all rural landowners who find themselves virtually disenfranchised and unrepresented in the legislative and administrative law-making process. In fact, rural landowners find themselves having to bear almost the entire burden of environmental protection while their urban brothers and sisters remain unaffected.

The governor has a duty to serve all the citizens of his or her state, not just urban dwellers who have become the "Tyranny of the Majority" supporting sanctuary cities, social justice, radical environmentalism, multi-culturalism, collectivism, political correctness, Progressivism and the one-world-order. What do city folks care about the rural landowner being savaged by radical international environmental law that deprives them of their fundamental right of use, due process and 5th Amendment protections and reduces their property values?

So, on behalf of the American rural landowner that produces our food, our wood products and are oil and minerals, we are making the following charges against the governors of certain states, starting with Jay Inslee, the Democrat Governor of Washington State, with a Certified - Return Receipt Requested letter and an accompanying Affidavit of T***h. In that letter and Affidavit we charge the governor with, TO-WIT:

1. The governor of said state, as its chief executive, has allowed the federal government to tax the citizens of his state and then allowed the federal government to blackmail those very same citizens by forcing those state citizens to accept federal law or policy, on the threat of withholding federal funds to that state if the state doesn't comply, funds that belonged to the state citizens in the first place. By so doing the governor has failed to uphold the provisions of the 9th and 10th Amendments of the U. S. Constitution and has by his or her actions given greater power to the federal government, thereby reducing the constitutional power of said state.

2. The governor of said state has allowed the invasion of international law to supersede and override federal and state constitutional law by not stopping the implementation of the International Maintenance Code, or other international codes or policies, in state, county and city regulations. In addition, the governor has allowed the United Nations affiliate agency called, the International Council on Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), to invade said state and contract with county and cities to further the implementation of international environmental policies that are in direct conflict with constitutional law, state and federal.

3. The governor of said state has instituted law to limit carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions across the board for the international con game of man-caused g****l w*****g, when the science of man-caused g****l w*****g is a theory at best and anything but settled science. By instituting those laws the governor has burdened the citizens of said state with millions of dollars in taxes and fees for an alleged future danger that in all probability is nothing more than the natural cooling and heating cycles of the earth over time. In fact, there is equal science supporting such a claim that directly contradicts the man-caused g****l w*****g theory, but it is ignored for political reasons. By purposely rejecting one of two scientific theories on alleged g****l w*****g in the governor's decisions, the governor has either knowingly, or unwittingly, become an unregistered international foreign agent, acting for and on behalf of foreign interests.

4. The governor of said state has allowed state agencies to violate the constitutional property rights of rural landowners by not prohibiting those agencies from promulgating draconian environmental regulations, driven largely by international radical environmental policies, such as UN's Agenda 21. These regulations fall disproportionately on rural landowners, in violation of their 5th Amendment and due process protections, as well as violating their equal protection rights under the U. S. Constitution. Rural landowners own most of the private land in said state, but find themselves totally disenfranchised from and virtually unrepresented in the legislative and administrative law-making process.

5. The governor of said state has allowed federal agencies, like the EPA, the DOE and the DoED, and others, to run amok in said state without invoking states' rights under the 9th and 10th Amendments. The federal government owns said state and the governor let it happen.

6. The governor of said state has allowed past and current run-away legislatures to buy v**es with public monies to fund welfare and public assistance to able-bodied citizens and i*****l a***ns and has done nothing to stop it. The governor has made promises to state employees for pension plans that are criminally under funded. By such actions the governor has violated his or her fiduciary and financial responsibility to state citizens, thereby sending state finances towards insolvency and further burdening state citizens with exploding taxes to pay for government's gross negligence.

Our first governor letter and Affidavit of T***h was sent to Governor Inslee of Washington State on August 3, 2015. We have given the Governor 30 calendar days to respond to these allegations. Copies of the letter and the Affidavit were also sent to the leaders of the State's House and Senate.



Because the issues we raise are so serious and systemic in all state governments and are the reasons why the federal government has become so powerful, thereby superseding states' rights in violation of the 9th and 10th Amendments, we will be contacting other state governors over the next few months and charging them equally, as we have done here, on behalf of the rural landowner that has been disenfranchised from the political process.

Subscribe to NewsWithViews Daily Email Alerts

Email Address *
First Name
*required field
States have become complicit and co-conspirators in these power usurpations by the federal government. It would seem very few Americans understand how vital is the relationship between the states and the federal government, to the separation of powers and to the success and survival of our allegedly "free" Republic.

Our first letter to Governor Inslee of Washington State and Affidavit of T***h are posted on the NARLO website HERE. All future letters to the governors of other states will be in the same format.

This effort will take a considerable amount of time and expense on our part. If you wish to donate to this effort, or become a member of NARLO, you can do so HERE.

[NOTE: The forgoing article represents the opinion of the author and is not necessarily shared by the owners, employees, representatives, or agents of the publisher.]

© 2015 Ron Ewart — All Rights Reserved
By Ron Ewart br August 5, 2015 br NewsWithViews.co... (show quote)


Constitutionally correct and long overdue!
Go to
Aug 6, 2015 07:30:14   #
Demote yourself to chickenhood if it removes you from a sense of
social guilt. Your d********g adolescent semantics change nothing!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 71 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.