Here's another question:

What did Obama mean when he said to the President of Russia over an open mic: "This is my last e******n. After the e******n I'll have a lot more flexibility." To which the Russian President responded: "I understand. I will t***smit this information to Vladamir and I stand with you."

The port-a-potties are pee-cans the nuts are called pee-CONS' or PEE'-cons depending where you're from. I think it's a southern thing. In Wisconsin we say pa-con really fast with no emphasis on either syllable.

Sounds like you strengthened my point pafret. It's the government not the wealthy that is to blame. The "rich" is just the straw-man the government sets up to distract the masses from the real culprits - themselves. Sadly it seems to be working. Every where you turn today someone is talking about soaking the rich. As if somehow that's going to do anything for anyone.

Which intelligence community should the president be blindly supporting? The one that got weapons of mass destruction wrong in IRAQ? The one that told us plutonium yellow cake was being sought after and sold to IRAN? Or the one's that have been covertly spying on and collect records on all US citizens for the past 2 decades? Those intelligence agencies? Funny how the left were screaming about weapons of mass destruction during the Bush administration and now stand so staunchly behind those same intel agencies when it suits their agenda. What a bunch of disingenuous hypocrites!

What a surprise. The Left found something else to call Trump. Now's he's a threat to national security. Just more fodder for the harpy's in OPP to regurgitate like bleating sheep {eyes rolling}

That song was hilariously annoying. His posts are just annoying. "No likey Trump - orange man bad!" over and over and over for two straight years now. We see you Kevyn ... we get it. Move on! There has to be something else you're capable of discussing, no?

Turns out I could have saved the FBI the trouble of fabricating its report. It was a false f**g event orchestrated by the gun-grabbers. Case closed.

[quote=Kevyn]Your I***t Pumpkinfuhrer is the t*****r, a t*****r to our nation, /quote]

Blah blah blah ... same old moldy oldy coming from this tired jukebox. Are we ever going to get a new tune out of you? ... something resembling an original thought would be nice. We could tune in to CNN and MSNBC if we wanted to hear these tired old tracks.

I don't think this should be allowed from either side of the aisle. These people are elected to represent their constituents not themselves! They were elected because they presented themselves as one thing or the other. If they decide after being elected they can no longer support the party they were elected under, then they should QUIT! Changing sides after you're elected is a blatant betrayal to the v**ers and should never ever be allowed.

Democrats are so desperate for the illegal's v**e they are willing to go to any extreme to get it. It is shameful. Make no mistake, while all democrats may not be quite so vocal about it, this is a major talking point in their Caucus. They have all been told by their leadership that this alone is the answer to their continued hold on power in Washington.

I'm noticing that the rise in popularity of American democratic socialism is directly proportional to the increased hatred of the rich and the battle cries from our elected officials to relieve them of their wealth. I'm not talking about the "few-million-dollars" rich, I'm talking about "billionaires-owning-100'-yachts" rich -- the uber wealthy ... Bezos, Gates, Buffet, Zuckerberg, Page, etc.

After all, if some of the newly elected Representatives are to be believe, we are all poor because they are rich. We are all down because they are up. If we could just get our hands on some of what they've got, we could all be much happier...much more equal. Bringing them down, just a little, will somehow raise us all up. That's how the argument goes. And that's how the argument has gone for nearly 100 years; since the the Bolsheviks rose up to eliminate the wealthy upper class in Russia. Just look how equal everyone is in Russia today. Why, the President, a lifelong government employee, is reported to have a net worth of at least $50 Billion. But I digress ... they're just not doing it right over there. Our elected officials would be much smarter, much more ethical about spreading the wealth around. After all, we don't have any life-long politicians who have somehow amassed large fortunes while serving we the people. Oops, I'm still digressing...

I say let's forego the steady drip drip drip of an annual wealth tax. Let's just take it all at once. Then we the little people can finally live happily ever after like the Russians, Chinese, Venezuelans, Cubans, North Koreans, etc. Here's how it would work:

As of 2018, there are 585 billionaires living in America. Those 585 people have a combined net worth of just under $3T (the top 400 hold $2.48T). That's Trillion with a T - and that's a lot of money. According to the OMB, the Federal Government spent $4.094T in fiscal year 2018 .... $4.094T. That's also a lot of money. So if we can just stop all the billionaires from all their charitable giving and confiscate every penny they own, we could run the Federal Government for the next 9 months without having to borrow any more money from the Fed. That sounds great to me. Sure, we'd still be $20T in debt ... and the billionaires would now all be be penniless .... but the Government won't have to borrow any money for the next 270 days! Woo-Hoo!

Now come October 2019, if we don't want to go un-governed, we'll have to find someone else's money to take. After all, we are still going to have $40B interest payments to make every month.

Let's see ... who's left out there ....

People, the reality is that it's all a big lie. We aren't poor because they are rich. Our elected officials need a straw man, somebody we can all blame for our troubles. If we're busy hating the rich, then we won't question our politicians on how they've manage to whittle away 98% of our currencies value in just under 100 years. We won't take to the streets when they tell us the Pentagon has Trillions of dollars unaccounted for. We won't ask Speaker Pelosi how she managed to amass a $200 million fortune while working a $187K job. And by hating the rich, we'll keep electing them on the premise that they are the only ones with the power to pry a few billion dollars out of the coffers of the rich ... and that that will somehow make life better for us all.

Don't buy the lie of socialism. It doesn't work. Can not work. Will never work. Making the rich less rich will not change your lot in life one iota. You will still be required to take responsibility for your own life. No one is going to champion a better life for you -- YOU must do that for yourself. Everyone thought they were going to get all kinds of free s**t when Obama got elected. Life was finally going to get good ... especially for the long-oppressed black community. Well, except for a few party favors like a flip phone or the occasional refrigerator, the only advancement people will ever realize is what they manage to do for themselves. There is plenty to go around for everybody. We don't have to take other people's stuff. YOU just have to GO out there and get it for yourself.

Trump should never have taken credit for the fraudulent stock market. I thought he was smarter than that. The left was just baiting him to do it knowing full well that if he took credit he must also take blame when it inevitably collapsed. The stock market has been fraudulently propped up for a decade now by central banking with quantitative easing. Obama benefited from this low interest cash infusion for 8 years, and now Trump will be the one stuck without a chair when the music stops. Only the ignorant would point to the stock market as a positive indicator of our economy, and only a complicit media (who must know it speaks to i***ts) would now use it as tool against Trump. Suckers!

Exit polls say 95% of Trump protesters are anti-capitalist, pro-socialist c****es. And apparently -- liars as well. 20% pro-s***ery? Puh-leeze! Even if it were true, you couldn't find 1% willing or stupid enough to openly admit it in this day and age. And .... again, if it is true .... who gives a sh*t. You disingenuous i***ts are always trying to paint all conservatives with the brush from the fringe elements.

How can you tell ... I used a lot of big words.

The omnipotent Kevyn speaks. "Kavanaugh lied throw his teeth under oath." Not sure how he could possibly know who is or isn't lying by watching T.V. but we must believe him. Maybe he was there binge drinking with Brett in college ... or maybe he was holding Brett's pants while he attempted to rape his liberal professor friend. Doesn't matter. The almighty Kevyn has spoken ... we must believe this all knowing, thoroughly impartial poster. He writes with such authority and definiteness.

This guy has posted on OPP 10,384 times and it's the same ole crap over and over. I'll summarize:

"I'm an ill-informed, low-information socialist who believes everything I see and hear on MSNBC. While I'm incapable of independent thought, I'm good at regurgitating what I'm told by my liberal leaders. I will rush to judgement and condemn everyone without due process unless they believe as I do; in which case, I will defend the indefensible and try to rationalize the wildly irrational until I've proven to everyone on OPP just how rabidly ignorant and one-sided I really am."

There. When you see this guys name on top of the post you can save yourself some time ...