One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Randy131
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 182 next>>
Nov 9, 2017 21:01:19   #
Nor is the blueprint the foundation of the finished building, what an assinine comparison. That fetus, as you like to call it, at less than 20 weeks has a heart beat, can feel pain, can hear and recognize sounds, has high brain function, has been proven to sleep and dream, and can cause itself to move around in it's mothers womb, has it's extremities move by it's own desire and actions, and most important, was given a soul by GOD at conception, which might be the cause of it's ability to dream. And i***ts like you lie to the mothers about all this, just to talk them into k*****g there own child with the consent for an a******n, that you convinced her that her child would not be good for her life style, which children always change for their parents, and for the better, and which the mother will have to live the rest of her life with the knowledge that she k**led her own baby. Pathetic and d********g, quit sowing your evil in the minds of others, for they will pay the same price as you are destined to do, if they take your advice and fulfill your deadly and evil prescribed actions.



rumitoid wrote:
A fetus by definition is, well, a fetus. In all likelihood in this day and age, the fetus will come to term and a child is born. A blueprint is not a building. Saying that the blueprint will eventually become a building still does not make it a building.

Any sane and decent person is against a******n. Who could actually be pro-a******n? If there were laws that, with DNA testing, would force the father to at least financially support the mother and child, maybe we would have less. As Gloria Steinem said, "If men could get pregnant, a******n would be a sacrament." Don't tell me that if you got pregnant you would let the government tell you that you had to come to term and care for that child. Alone, usually. Ending your career or plans for the future. Facing poverty. Facing shame and degradation by friends, family and society in general. The Right To Life is for all life, such as war and capital punishment and welfare for the poor.
A fetus by definition is, well, a fetus. In all li... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 20:42:38   #
Not if it also caused the murder of thousands of more, and allows the armed criminals to run rampant over all the forced unarmed law abiding citizens. The problem is that you don't think any of your supposed good ideas have consequences, just as Obama and the Democrats told us about their great "Affordable Care Act", proof of not a fully thought out idea, nor the acceptance of the consequences of it's not fully thought out failure.



rumitoid wrote:
If, say, there was a law that successfully saved the life of one person every year, would it be worth the legislative effort to enact it?
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 20:38:29   #
Yeah, we know, and another 90% is the criminals who are accountable for gun violence that we have laws banning them from possessing and owning guns, and why is that? Do we law abiding citizens have the right to own and possess guns to protect ourselves from those who you liberals can't enforce our laws to protect us law abiding citizens from, but want to ban us law abiding citiens from owning and possessing guns to protect ourselves when you can't? The best thing to happen to you, in order to keep the rest of us safe, is to experience the gun violence going on in Chicago or Washington DC, where the criminals that carry guns own the streets, and have made crime a very profitable business, as the cops don't have enough guns and people to stop them, or even slow them down. Then I suspect that you would want as many law abiding citizens to own and possess guns, in order to help the police in taking back our streets, and protect scumbags like you when those crimnals come for you, or accidently run into you.



rumitoid wrote:
Mental Health problems account for about 4% of gun violence. Google it. And other than that I agree.
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 20:23:17   #
If we could only get rid of all the liberals in the USA, we could get rid of about 90% of those gun k*****gs. Did you know that it is against the law for criminals to possess and own guns in the USA? Did you know that 90% of all gun murders in the USA are done by criminals with previous criminal records? Did you know that 97% of all criminals are liberals, and push for more gun banning laws, to eliminate any law abiding citizen, from being able to be armed with a gun, that they choose to make their victim, who might k**l them in self defense with the gun that our 2nd Amendment gives those law abiding citizens the right to own and possess, in order to protect themselves, their loved ones, and others, from criminals making victims out of them? Similar to what the "good guy with a gun" did in the Texas mass shootings at the church in order to stop any more murders, by shooting the mass murderer with the gun his 2nd Amendment right gave him to own and possess in the defense of those people who the mass murderer was trying to k**l.



rumitoid wrote:
According to The New York Times, it's reported that the number of Americans k**led on battlefields in all wars in history is a saddening 1,396,733 but, the number of Americans k**led by firearms from 1968 to 2015 is even higher at 1,516,863.

Around the world, those countries have substantially lower rates of deaths from gun homicide. In Germany, being murdered with a gun is as uncommon as being k**led by a falling object in the United States. About two people out of every million are k**led in a gun homicide. Gun homicides are just as rare in several other European countries, including the Netherlands and Austria. In the United States, two per million is roughly the death rate for hypothermia or plane crashes.

In Poland and England, only about one out of every million people die in gun homicides each year — about as often as an American dies in an agricultural accident or falling from a ladder. In Japan, where gun homicides are even rarer, the likelihood of dying this way is about the same as an American’s chance of being k**led by lightning — roughly one in 10 million.

In the United States, the death rate from gun homicides is about 31 per million people — the equivalent of 27 people shot dead every day of the year. The homicides include losses from mass shootings, like Sunday’s Las Vegas attack, the Orlando, Fla., nightclub shooting in June 2016, or the San Bernardino, Calif., shooting in December 2015. And of course, they also include the country’s vastly more common single-victim k*****gs.

To give you a sense of how unusual America’s gun violence problem is, consider the daily death toll compared with other Western democracies. The chart below imagines that the populations of those countries were the same as the population of the United States.

Let me repeat this: "gun homicides is about 31 per million people — the equivalent of 27 people shot dead every day of the year." For the following countries gun homicides are at or below 5 people shot every day:

Norway
Ireland
Austria
Germany
Australia
Canada
Iceland
Finland
Spain
Slovenia
Portugal
Lithuania
According to The New York Times, it's reported tha... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 20:06:16   #
Not until you can see how absurb it is to k**l our unborn children, which GOD gives a soul upon conception, and most are torn apart in a******ns when they can feel the pain at 20 weeks and longer, but maybe even earlier, which is true morbid torture. But what the hell do you care, you want to take away people's defense against the criminals, who own most of the guns in the USA today, even though we have federal laws and state laws all across the USA that bans them from that privileged right, that you want to take away from the law abiding citizens who protect others, as the "good guy with a gun" did in the recent Texas mass murders in the church.



rumitoid wrote:
So are you saying do nothing about gun violence is right because a******n is legal?

Are you saying doing it without a "medical bill"is tolerable?

Are you saying doing "it quickly with a bullet" is better?

Can you see how absurd you are?
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 19:56:42   #
I believe that, I've read some of Nickolai's comments.



Loki wrote:
But Nikolai has the mind of one.
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 19:54:30   #
Very good post Bob, well said and well researched, keep up the good work, there's a new Sheriff in town, congratulations.



badbob85037 wrote:
These numbers are dead wrong the gun deaths in Detroit alone is 55 per 100,000 and I know what I'm talking about because I have seen these bull s**t lies before because like all these gun grabbing groups it's ok to lie to further their own agenda of scaring people out of money. Donate, donate often, donate a lot.

I'll tell you what's better than subtracting points for states with no gun laws lets try using something these i***ts never use, the number of gun deaths and let's use a starting point that isn't a false f**g . There is Detroit, Saint Louis, Baltimore, Chicago, DC, Oakland, Fresno. These cities have between 35 and 55 per 100,000 gun murders a year and the way it looks this year will set records in these cities, Even with these high numbers America has 4.5 per 100,000 murder rate

Now due to the fact none of these gang bangers that's life is going nowhere had a daddy around or the NRA to teach them how to shoot they hit everyone around but the one they are shooting at. The way they have learned off the streets to shoot a hand gun has made it impossible to teach them the right way. So just like the ROTC we give them rifles at least a 30/06 or 7MM mag. Teach them all to aim and shoot like their daddy would do if they had one. We then have a 'pay for view' battle royal at some laser tag arena. The last man standing will be given some of the profit to go to school with me taking the rest for my good idea. But the last thing you or anybody want to do is trust an anti gun organization putting out stats. Case in point, when the Brady Center claimed "child gun deaths were sky rocketing" They just took the age one becomes an adult 18 and made it 26 to include most all drug and gang related k*****gs.

These cities have more in common than murder. They have high poverty, useless education, massive gun laws and all long histories of being ran by democrats. Do you think they will ever realize the reason they are stuck in these drug and crime infested rat holes? I ain't holding my breath. But don't quote me with these so called facts because it's all bull s**t. Arizona number 3 WHAT A CROCK If any believe a word these limp wrest i***ts claim as states I have some beach front property for sale right outside Phoenix
These numbers are dead wrong the gun deaths in Det... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 19:49:13   #
And the Democrats keep them down on the "handout plantation", keeping them poor and v****g for Democrats forever.



BigMike wrote:
Addressing the symptom is much easier than addressing the problem and for those who favor a central authority this makes sense.

Never addressing the problem and only the symptom ensures perpetual relevancy for the bureaucracy.
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 19:45:32   #
He's not intelligent enough to be considered and elitist by anyone, but will be delegated as one of the f*****t "Useful I***ts" that Lenin and Stalin always bragged about using, and when he's no longer needed, his socialist and c*******t buddies will simply eliminate him, as Lenin and Stalin was infamous for doing.



BigMike wrote:
Machiavellian BS is what I call it. People like this can't be put into positions of power. They want a global authority. They're convinced they can eliminate war and poverty. We have to accept a political elite of course. And we'll all be poorer as our prosperity is siphoned off to the third world. And they'll naturally want to round up as many weapons as they can. And dissention would not be possible, of course. And to achieve that...

Can you imagine a person like Nic as president of the NWO (or wh**ever it names itself)?

That is the spirit of the antichrist.
Machiavellian BS is what I call it. People like th... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 19:38:57   #
Just uninformed as usual I see. The Russian ads on social media, as was admitted by all the social media site owners testifying to a congressional investigative committee, was for Hillary Clionton, and against Donald Trump, but don't believe the words of thos social media owners, whose testimony is nor in the Congressional record, according to you, they're all liars.

The only one who demonized Hillary Clinton in many people's minds, apparently millions of Democrats in the "Great Blue Wall" states of the rust belt and every battleground state across the USA, was Hillary Clinton herself through the release of her own Clinton Campaign and DNC e-mails, leaked by the murdered Seth Rich to Wikileaks who published them, and her crimes in handling US State Depertment classified materials, as explained by James Comey when reporting those crimes and exhonerating her for what every American knows they'd spend years in prison if they had done the same, on national TV in July 2016.

Your whole comment is nothing but a made up fantasy by a tremendous "H**ER" that has a morbid imagination, and has absolutely not one ounce of proof that anything he claimed is true, as the owners of those social media sites own words of the reality they found on all their sites, prove that your fantasy is nothing but one big lie.



Nickolai wrote:
I think the negative ads on social media by Russian bloggers by the thousands hurt her demonized her in many peoples minds and they concentrated these ads in rust belt states and it was four rust belt states by a total of 80,000 or so v**es that gave Schtrunmski the e*******l v**es that made the difference , Hillary never campaigned in those states taking them for granted it was a huge mistake but how was she to know the Russians were concentrating their ads on social media there . I saw a lot of those ads on Facebook saying bid news was coming in Oct that was going to blow Hillary out of the water. After the access Hollywood pussy grabbing her pole numbers went double digits and an hr later or so a barrage of negative fit hit the shan and she fell to dead even in a couple days and an admitted sexual abuser with the help of those Russian ads was elected to our highest office with no experience or any idea how to run a government. He still has a law suit pending from an accuser a woman who was a contestant on the Apprentice in 2006. She isn't suing for sexual harassment which she accused him of. He called her a lar and she is suing for defamation and a judge just ordered the case to go forward.
I think the negative ads on social media by Russia... (show quote)
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 12:32:19   #
Precisely Mike, good response to i***tic and insane ideas. Gun laws only work on self-enforcing citizens, which are the law abiding citizens that the liberals' extra and more gun banning laws would affect, as the lawless already have more guns than todays law abiding citizens, yet it is against the law for them to possess or own a gun, and even though the American people have given the liberals the laws they wanted to prevent these criminals from possessing and owning guns, the liberals refuse to enforce them, and Chicago and Washington DC are two prime examples of this, as bastions of liberal Democrats, with the strictest gun laws in the USA, yet they are the gun murder capitals of the USA, because of all the gun murders being committed by mostly only their criminals.



BigMike wrote:
Again, this is why you can't be trusted with power. You will k**l more people and ruin more lives in the quest for Utopia than all the crazies roaming the streets combined.
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 12:20:53   #
"Economic deprivation, and extremely high rates of unemployment among this demographic", now how did that happen, since we've had federal government sponsored r****m through "Affirmative Action" for over 50 years now, where all black people have been given college slots that white people and orientals were more qualified for, but turned down because their skin wasn't dark enough, as well as b****s being given jobs first, when there are white people and orientals that were much more qualified for those jobs, which the results of this have been black people holding 20% of all government jobs (local, state, and federal), when they are only 13% of our population. This proves the advantage that black people possess over white people and orientals, which implies there must be another reason as well for what you describe is their "economic deprivation, and extremely high rates of unemployment", than r****m, since the federal government has sanctioned r****m on their behalf, against w****s and orientals. Do you think that it may be their culture of single parent familes and their aggrandizement of crime and gangs, as well as the Democrats keeping them on government sponsored welfare, food stamps, and all other handouts that the Democrats have invented to give them for their loyal v****g for all Democratic Party candidates, the real "plantation" of modern times?

Thank GOD there have been black people that have realized the plight being forced on them by the Democrats through federal government handouts, and have escaped the Democrats' "plantaion", and have gotten jobs and become independent and self reliant American citizens, despite being the exception to the rule. Most b****s accept the Democrats' induced plight on them of keeping them poor for generations by getting them to accept living off the federal government handouts, like the American Indians used to do before they wised up and worked to become free and independent of the federal government. But black people with no path to escape, except of throwing off the welfare chains and getting their own jobs to become independent and self reliant, refusing federal government handouts, which is a hard path to travel, but is needed to get out of this continuos "economic deprivation, and extremely high rates of unemployment" that keeps them poor for generation after generation.



Nickolai wrote:
These black on black k*****gs has nothing to do with levels of testosterone and every thing to do with economic deprivation, and extremely high rates of in employment among this demographic hence the presence of tribalism (gangs) fight over territory and high rate of criminal behavior in a struggle for survival. We have seen similar behavior among Irish, Jewish, and Italian gangs in the past where poverty is allowed to fester Society will continue to see this kind of behavior
.
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 11:44:50   #
Yeah, like we should listen to the opinion of an i***t that can't even spell "possession" correctly, and which most all of your opinions go against what are 'Founding Fathers' started this nation on, the rights and freedoms unalienable endowed by our Creator, not federal government elitist who think they know what is best for everyone, and only their opinions count, as the rest of the millions of Americans in the majority believe differently. Take a bow, you're a t*****r to our democratic Republic, and espouse dictatorship by an elitist oligarchy.



Nickolai wrote:
There should be a law anybody caught with a loaded gun in his passion should be summarily executed with on the spot with same
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 11:33:57   #
Who made you GOD to judge people like that, oh that's right, you don't believe in a GOD, then who made you King to judge others by your opinions, that don't amount to a hill of beans, and nobody could give a damn about?



Nickolai wrote:
You've got that right You support lax gun laws then you are complicit in the k*****gs your as nuts as the guy pulling the trigger
Go to
Nov 9, 2017 11:30:35   #
Yeah, he was, not because what he did in the movies, but what he did in real life, but movies or real life, we can't say the same about you without becoming a liar, like most liberals are. Why don't you tell us some things that make you so great, since you seem to love to demean other real great Americans?



Nickolai wrote:
That just cracks me up how John Wayne became the hero of the right I once saw a guy I knew to be a wing nut storing up for a big snow storm fixing to roar in and he was being interviewed by a tv reporter and he had a stack of DVD's in his hand to watch will the storm raged and on top was a Jon Wayne movie I laughed. I could have figured after all John Wayne wooped all the Indians and all the japs singlehandedly what a man
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ... 182 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.