The Royal family suck up millions of pounds sterling each year. The people of England get next to nothing from them but a wave as they go by in there Rolls.

A LAWYER CAN STEAL MORE THAN A THOUSAND MEN WITH GUNS.


Every Democrat p**********l nominee since 1984 went to law school (although Gore did not graduate).

Every Democrat vice p**********l nominee since 1976, except for Lloyd Bentsen, went to law school.


Barack Obama was a lawyer. Michelle Obama was a lawyer.
Hillary Clinton was a lawyer. Bill Clinton was a lawyer.
John Edwards is a lawyer. Elizabeth Edwards was a lawyer.


Look at leaders of the Democrat Party in Congress:
Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer is a lawyer.
Ex-Senator Harry Reid is a lawyer

The Republican Party is different.

President Trump is a businessman.
President Bush 1 and 2 were businessmen.
Vice President Cheney is a businessman
President Eisenhower was a 5 star General Officer.
The leaders of the Republican Revolution:
Newt Gingrich was a history professor.
Tom Delay was an exterminator.
Dick Armey was an economist.
Ex-House Minority Leader Boehner was a plastic manufacturer.
The former Senate Majority Leader Bill First is a heart surgeon

Who was the last Republican president who was a lawyer?
Gerald Ford, who left office 31 years ago and who barely won the Republican nomination as a sitting president, running against actor Ronald Reagan in 1976.

The Republican Party is made up of real people doing real work, who are often the targets of lawyers.

This is very interesting. I never thought about it this way.

The Democrat Party is made up of lawyers.

Democrats mock and scorn men who create wealth, like Trump, Bush and Cheney, or who heal the sick like First, or who immerse themselves in history like Gingrich.
The Lawyers Party sees these sorts of people, who provide goods and services that people want, as the enemies of America ..
And, so we have seen the procession of official enemies, in the eyes of the Lawyers Party, grow.

Against whom do Hillary and Obama rail?.... Pharmaceutical companies, oil companies, hospitals, manufacturers, fast food restaurant chains, large retail businesses, bankers, and anyone producing anything of value in our nation.
This is the natural consequence of viewing everything through the eyes of lawyers.

Lawyers solve problems by successfully representing their clients, in this case, the American people. Lawyers seek to have new laws passed, they seek to win lawsuits, they press appellate courts to overturn precedent, and lawyers always parse language to favor their side.

Confined to the narrow practice of law, that is fine. But it is an awful way to govern a great nation.

When politicians, as lawyers, begin to view some Americans as clients and other Americans as opposing parties, then the role of the legal system in our life becomes all-consuming.
Some Americans become adverse parties of our very government. We are not all litigants in some vast social class-action suit.
We are citizens of a republic that promises us a great deal of freedom from laws, from courts, and from lawyers.

Today, we are drowning in-laws; we are contorted by judicial decisions; we are driven to distraction by omnipresent lawyers in all parts of our once private lives.
America has a place for laws and lawyers, but that place is modest and reasonable, not vast and unchecked.
When the most important decision for our next president is who he will appoint to the Supreme Court, the role of lawyers and the law in America is too big.
When House Democrats sue America in order to hamstring our efforts to learn what our enemies are planning to do to us, then the role of litigation in America has become crushing.

Perhaps Americans will understand that change cannot be brought to our nation by those lawyers who already largely dictate American society and business.
Perhaps Americans will see that hope does not come from the mouths of lawyers but from personal dreams nourished by hard work.
Perhaps Americans will embrace the t***h that more lawyers with more power will only make our problems worse.

The United States has 5% of the world's population and 66% of the world's lawyers!
Tort (Legal) reform legislation has been introduced in congress several times in the last several years to limit punitive damages in ridiculous lawsuits such as spilling hot coffee on yourself and suing the establishment that sold it to you and also to limit punitive damages in huge medical malpractice lawsuits
This legislation has continually been blocked from even being v**ed on by the Democrat Party.

When you see that 97% of the political contributions from the American Trial Lawyers Association go to the Democrat Party, then you realize who is responsible for our medical and product costs being so high.

A bit of info on the V***s.

well done...

https://youtu.be/BtN-goy9VOY

if there's someone who might benefit...

Woman intentionally coughs on grocery store’s food — so the store is forced to throw away $35,000 in wasted items

What is wrong with some people?

A Pennsylvania mom and pop grocery store chain was forced to dispose of at least $35,000 worth of goods in one of its stores after a woman reportedly entered the premises and coughed on several cases of food.

What are the details?

The incident took place on Wednesday when the as-yet identified woman entered a Gerrity's Supermarket in Hanover Township and reportedly intentionally coughed all over the produce, bakery, meat case, and more.

Store employees immediately phoned police, who arrived on the scene. At least 15 store employees and members of the Hanover Township's health department worked furiously to clean and disinfect the store.

The chain's co-owner, Joe Fasula, addressed the incident in a now-v***l Facebook post.

Fasula wrote, "Today was a very challenging day. At 2:20 PM today, I got a call from our Hanover Township store. The manager informed me that a woman, who the police know to be a chronic problem in the community, came into the store and proceeded to purposely cough on our fresh produce, and a small section of our bakery, meat case, and grocery."

"While there is little doubt this woman was doing it as a very twisted prank, we will not take any chances with the health and well-being of our customers," he continued. "We had no choice but to throw out all product she came in contact with. Working closely with the Hanover Township health inspector, we identified every area that she was in, we disposed of the product and thoroughly cleaned and disinfected everything."

Fasula said that he estimates the total product loss to be around $35,000.

"I am also absolutely sick to my stomach about the loss of food," Fasula added. "While it is always a shame when food is wasted, in these times when so many people are worried about the security of our food supply, it is even more disturbing.

Fasula said that the District Attorney's office is handling the case and will be "aggressively pursuing numerous charges."

URGENT UPDATE:
Stop Extreme Gun-Control Bills H.R. 5717 & S. 3254!

Under the “cover” of the C****av***s crisis, Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) introduced the most austere anti-Second Amendment companion bills in the House and Senate (H.R. 5717 and S. 3254), known as the “Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act of 2020.”

NOTE: Hank Johnson is the jerk that said Guam was going to capsize do to our military be there!

This far-reaching and onerous bill would:

Prohibit Americans from owning virtually any semi-automatic rifle,

Require all Americans to get a national permit in order to purchase a firearm,

Institute a 30% tax on purchasing a firearm and a 50% tax on purchasing ammunition,

Provide jail time for anyone who buys more than one firearm within a one-month period,

Criminalize the sale of “high capacity” magazines,

Establish a national gun registry,

Institute a nation-wide “Red F**g Gun Seizures” law,

Require all gun-owners to lock up their firearms at all times,

Criminalize the sale of any firearm to a person under 21,

Ban firearm suppressors (i.e. silencers), and

Criminalize manufacturing a gun in your own home (i.e. 3-D printed guns).

These measures are completely unconstitutional, violating the Second Amendment, which explicitly states (emphasis added below):

A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Please phone, email, tweet, and send a 30 second video to your U.S. representative and senators and urge them to oppose and v**e against the so-called “Gun Violence Prevention and Community Safety Act” (H.R. 5717 & S. 3254).

War is built into the human gean. Has been since Kane k**led Able. Cavemen raided other cavemen on the other side of the hill. I will fight anyone that wants to do me harm. So be careful champ.

Life comes with no guarantees. Washington Post, a C****e rag.

Just a small note: It matters not who v**es, it matters who counts the v**es.

What have we learned so far from the response to the Chinese C****av***s p******c?

One, the government, at the local, state, and federal levels, is not prepared for a large-scale national emergency, be it war, biological threat, or a natural disaster.

Two,
the nation's political leadership is unwilling to set aside politics to prioritize expenditures and logistics. One party, in particular, the Democrats, have refused to set aside political considerations in the advancement of their normal political agenda.

Three,
the mainstream media refuses to set aside their profit and political agenda to report the news without unhelpful commentary. Continuing to sensationalize content to attract an audience as well as present conflicting and contrary content by giving a media platform to celebrities and individuals with credentials that have little or nothing to do with the ongoing event.

Sensationalized headlines from a news service which will appear in hundreds of newspapers scream C****av***s could k**l 81,000 in the U.S., subside in June -Washington University analysis lack context as to assumptions and methodology and the use weasel-words like could. Most individuals see k**l" 81,000, and university. The study is a pre-print and has not been peer-reviewed by the journal to which it was submitted. The data comes from the World Health Organization and other sources that may be suspect. The conclusions are based on graphing existing data and then curve-fitting to develop an equation that is then used as a model for predictions. While the researcher is well-credentialed and experienced, I am reminded of the old data processing adage Garbage In Garbage Out. All very scientific, but considering the increased testing of the population, the original statistics may be irrelevant when newer data is examined. And, we know the World Health Organization accepted falsified data from China, possibly because of a conflict of interest between the WHO Director-General and China who apparently assisted him is securing his position.


The unintended consequences of over-dramatizing potential actions and outcomes appears to be unnecessary anxiety and stress, and the hoarding of essential daily foods and household supplies. This panicked buying puts unnecessary pressure on the supply chain and causes local outages and disruptions. Anxiety and stress make you more prone to disease as they weaken your i****e s****m -- the body's own defense against bacteria and v***ses.

Those media outlets who engage in censorship, including partisan "fact-checking" and interference in official communications, should be identified and shunned by citizens. During an official crisis, media outlets should clearly and unambiguously identify analysis and commentary.
Partisan negativity is created by so-called news foundations and then fed to a complicit mainstream media without context.

Unlike the Obama Administration, which introduced extreme triage for senior citizens as part of an Obamacare cost containment protocol, was late to respond to the H1N1-flu epidemic, failed to restock critical emergency supplies, and received little or no media criticism during the time, we find the Trump Administration being excoriated by hit-piece articles such as Internal Emails Show How Chaos at the CDC Slowed the Early Response to C****av***s: The CDC fumbled its communication with public health officials and underestimated the threat of the c****av***s even as it gained a foothold in the United States, according to hundreds of pages of documents ProPublica obtained.

Four,
those who create models, charts, graphs, and other explanatory information continue to produce dramatic illustrations, sometimes using inappropriate or meaningless statistics and inappropriate scaling. The current evidence points to incorrect and unfounded assumptions in preparing presentations for public information. Just knowing the number of infected among those tested says nothing about the community and is a meaningless metric. As is the number of deaths among those who have tested positive for the v***s another meaningless statistic due to the lack of wide-spread testing in the community. Numbers without context are just numbers.

Remember the well-credentialed and widely-quoted epidemiologist, Neil Ferguson, from London's Imperial College whose models suggested that an uncontrolled spread of the v***s could cause as many as 510,000 deaths in Britain and up to 2.2 million deaths in the U.S.

He's back“ and the new numbers suggest the number of deaths in Britain is unlikely to exceed 20,000 and could be much lower. Another study suggests that half of those might have died anyway within the year due to existing conditions and underlying pathology. To provide perspective, approximately 17,000 individuals in England die from complications related to seasonal flu.

Five,
the American people may not follow the directions of their local, state, and federal leadership due to the posturing and political content of pronouncements over straight news. Especially when instructions, directions, and orders are ambiguous and not uniformly implemented in a region. And, are shocked when more authoritarian measures are introduced to enforce legal orders from duly authorized government agencies.

Six,
those who are in the highest risk categories are being placed at risk by thoughtless individuals or the unintended consequences of official instructions. An example, rather than surveying and screening children who naturally act as vectors for many communicable diseases, officials ordered children to be returned to homes where the highest risk individuals reside. Unfortunately, the proper response may demand that the riskiest cohort self-isolate within a home with children for at least a time corresponding to a reasonable incubation period.

Seven,
we are seeing the dark underside of politics as a number of politicians have been exposed for insider trading and other self-serving behavior as they pander to their special interests rather than assist their constituents. We also see that beneficial products and services have been or are being curtailed by a lobbyist-driven bureaucracy. Services like the use of telemedicine or the empowerment of nurse practitioners. We are also discovering artificial restrictions on the number of doctors trained, the number of facilities that can be opened, the number of beds per facility, and the number of advanced diagnostic machines.

Eight,
it is unconscionable for the government, especially the progressive socialist democrats, to attempt to disarm American citizens during a time when they are faced with the possibility of civil unrest where police stop responding, but even worse, facing a hoard of criminals who are being released from prisons and jails back into the community. There is a sound reason for the Constitution's Second Amendment self-defense against those who would harm you or take away your freedoms with their tyrannical political actions.

The two big questions

Attorney John Hinderaker (Harvard Law School) wrote:

Based on data from the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control. It shows, for one thing, how far C****-** has to go before it equals the average seasonal flu mortality, worldwide. If I had to predict, I would guess that it will eventually reach the average level. Will it get to 2x the average number of flu deaths, worldwide? Looking at current trends, I don't see how that will happen. But time will tell.

Likewise in the U.S. You still can't see the bar for C****-**, but it is there: 994 deaths so far, per the CDC, compared with 61,000 caused by the flu v***s just two years ago. The W***n v***s might equal or even exceed that total, but it is hard to forecast that at this point. And anyway, the 2017-18 flu deaths barely merited a news story, let alone a radical, economy-destroying shutdown. What has changed?

Even if the U.S. death total eventually amounts to, say, three times the toll of the flu just seasons ago around 180,000 dead what is the justification for the extraordinary measures our governments have taken, which are in the process of crushing our economy?

The answers are obvious to me. A non-traditional President, Donald Trump, and the almost complete infiltration of the Democrat Party by un-American progressive socialist democrats who have managed to gain a slim majority in the House of Representatives -- and anointed a queen, Nancy Pelosi, who governs as if the few people who provided the majority amounts to a mandate. Not to forget a corporatized mainstream media that has become hyper-partisan.

And, for the second question, the only justification I can see is because they can and are unopposed by the feckless cowards in the GOP who are afraid of the media during an e******n cycle.

Bottom line

You can't fully trust most politicians. You can't fully trust the media. And, you may not be able to fully trust the corporations who field legions of lobbyists to buy politicians. So that leaves you and your common sense. Protect yourself and your family above all. Follow commonsense guidelines but don't necessarily buy-in to the sensationalism of the media or self-serving pronouncements of the politicians.
You have clearly seen House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and her cadre of dirty progressive socialist democrats attempt to capitalize on this national emergency to push her radical agenda and reward the special interests who lobby the government. It is time to hold the Democrats accountable and send them packing in the 2020 e******n. Perhaps we will see a better crop of candidates in 2022 and 2024 but don't count on it.

We are fighting an invisible enemy that attacks mindlessly. We are also fighting against those who want to destroy our American way of life. Neither can be allowed to win the battle.

We are so screwed.

just a simple question.

Let's SEE SOME PROOF.

So, you are going to v**e for a r****d senile old man for President, lol..
Why, WHY DOESNT THAT BOTHER ANY DEMOCRAT?

You say I need help? You think Nancy P, once the queen of crime with her father in Baltimore has no control over ALL the Dems in congress, lol. Ok, she owns the gavel when she says jump they all jump. If you fail to follow her commands then at the next term all must run for ree******n she blocks any cash given to you and she funds your opponent in full. You will lose every time.
She has FULL control.

No doubt he is today a NO TRUMPER, so what he claims is just plain BS.
Your one sad sack of ????

That says it all.

It seems you at one time you wanted everybody south of the border to get into America not knowing if or what they may have as to any disease!