Quakerwidow wrote:
Excuse me: I am a Democrat and an editor/reviewer. There are just as many Republicans as Democrats on this site who appear not to have passed basic grammar in middle school.
Um, you forgot the Independents and fence-post sitters! We sometimes post in the wee hours of the morning when our brains are not properly directing our fingers.
Oh, wait! Quoting John Dunham's Achmed, the Dead Terrorist, "Wait for it;" I forgot to turn on Grammarly.
When the Madame Speaker of the House, and I use the term in the lowest historical meaning of the word, speaks, we are supposed to shut up, sit down, and be good little minions. Unfortunately, I failed at that type of indoctrination early on. I was taught history and how to think for myself and even in the first grade asked too many questions. I will see those that are like mind in the education camps after my freedom-loving, e******y-touting neighbors squeal on me for daring to politically incorrect and not toeing the draconian measures that our NC governor enacts with the full approval of the new federal administration.
Tiptop789 wrote:
There are some trump supporters that want a platform to spread h**e & lies & whip people into doing stupid things, ie storming the Capital.
<Sarcasm intended>Unlike the majority of the House, whose leading members have been openly advocating disorder and harassing those who disagree with their party line on the congressional record and on national television, no less. And those same members are not condemning the burning and l**ting of businesses in the cities and states that are ruled by that same majority party. Of course, these members are willing and able to stay at home, collecting their paychecks, while the people they serve? lose everything that they have Worked for over the years-- <All to be politically correct of course!>!
I just got on Parler. Didn't try to post or anything though.
I like using "it." Unfortunately, doing this stupidity will endanger multiple laws already written as congressional members can now rewrite laws to be "inclusive." We already know what happens when the laws have too many pages to be read. I***ts passing laws that they have not read--that determine the fate of our nation.
Kevyn wrote:
Sort of like police officer instead of policeman, firefighter rather than fireman, letter carrier instead of mailman. Language evolves as the world does.
Language evolves, it shouldn't be ordered or mainstreamed by lawmakers. Seems this is in violation of freedom of speech, much like Canada has already enacted. Next, we'll be penalized, jailed, fined, for not using "congressional approved nouns and pronouns" in order to be politically correct.
Me too. Especially since I wrote to each one that v**ed for it before the Veto Override was v**ed on by Congress again. Just hope someone NEW runs against these t*****rs. Too big to read and you v**ed YES! I'm v****g against these entitled Congressional members next cycle.
American Vet wrote:
Thus the need for strict controls on v****g: proof of citizenship, appropriate registration (including maintains the v***r r**********n rolls), and authorized, valid photo ID.
Yes, a trillion times yes!
proud republican wrote:
Can you read 6000 pages in 2 hrs???
I want a tee-shirt that says
If you didn't
read it?
V**e NO!!!
And since so many congresspersons are supposed to be lawyers...aren't you supposed to read the fine print before you sign on the dotted line?
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
Absolutely---instead of turning them loose from the prisons!
rebelwidacoz wrote:
.....and Trump said it was a Chinese dude, and there wasn't a p******c because the lone chinese man that brought it over here ass was immediately removed from the cruise ship and put in quarantine
You do understand this dude was on multiple international flights, going from country to country with Other international travelers--cooped up in a plane for hours upon hours. I have no idea if he was on the plane with the Chinese dude.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
....so according to you and yours if the persons displays no c****a symptons such has coughing or sneezing or hasn't a temperature there is no danger of he/she/it spreading it huh ?. The only thing wrong with that is that I have been consistently observing this p******c since its conception and I haven't heard the c****a v***s victim yet that can say with definity where or whom they picked it up from ,I mean it stands to reason that if a person whom has contracted the disease would say "I know who I got this from,it was that bastard who had that hacking cough ,or who kept sneezing. fact is they couldn't tell you when , who, or where the hell they got it from. this is what makes it sneakedly dangerous.
....so according to you and yours if the persons d... (
show quote)
We can tell where it came from. Government contract worker visited China, attended American Legion Executive meeting. Shook hands with the board members...every board member came down with hacking cough, sneezing, high fever, inability to breath, in under 3 weeks--actually 2 weeks or so. Only common ground--that meeting. This was the one and only place that they met the international traveling member in over a month. They all took that med that President Trump suggested, and were better in under a week. No deaths, and no additional family members got sick.
proud republican wrote:
Should v******tion be based on race or who needs the most . ..I for one think it should go to -1st Responders ,no matter what race they're ! !! Than it should go to elderly and people who work in the Nursing Homes and sick people . .(with underlying health conditions )
My household isn't taking it. Multiple medications and food allergies, older, heart problems, blood pressure issues, epi-pens, reactions to flu and penicillin v*****e shots. Just got taken off another med this week--adverse reactions.
The masks don't work or so many people wouldn't be getting sick because the masks are mandatory where the numbers are high.
Then there are false positives, deaths by trauma ruled c****-**, and the percentages of deaths by age groups remain almost the same historically in the US.
Wolfman888 wrote:
He's not Trump is the main reason any sane v**er v**ed for him.
Your reading comprehension appears to be zero. You did not address and answer the question that was asked. Nothing to read here, move on.