Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
No but found out that both m*****a and p****r are a Gates/F***i v*****e I think I will wait for Astrazeneca /Johnson&Johnson vac
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
That would be better than setting them free. And then they could be the guinea pigs.
Serving a purpose to pay for their keep. I’ll wait and see, not in any rush for wh**ever Gates had in mind.
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
If nothing else it would protect Corrections officers. C***d is running rampant in prisons.
Kevyn wrote:
If nothing else it would protect Corrections officers. C***d is running rampant in prisons.
43% of all deaths are happening in the Nursing Homes . .. Nursing Homes should be number 1 priority before convicts !!
[quote=proud republican]Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?[/
Yes,for the same reasons the essential workers are given the v*****e first. The inmates proximity to the corrections officers is direrly near ; v*****e or not, to not give the inmates the v*****e defeats the purpose of giving the first responders the shot first - and, they are not that learnerd of the v*****es efficacy and the amount of time of its efficacy, they will be functioning in a sea of c****a v***s. - increases the possibilities for ESCAPE ! ,like GITMO.
Carol Kelly wrote:
That would be better than setting them free. And then they could be the guinea pigs.
Serving a purpose to pay for their keep. I’ll wait and see, not in any rush for wh**ever Gates had in mind.
That's what I was going to say, better than letting them go
proud republican wrote:
43% of all deaths are happening in the Nursing Homes . .. Nursing Homes should be number 1 priority before convicts !!
How about the guards and their families?
proud republican wrote:
43% of all deaths are happening in the Nursing Homes . .. Nursing Homes should be number 1 priority before convicts !!
Why not both at the same time? I still think more research is necessary.
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
Yes.... Should have started when they skipped animal testing...
bggamers wrote:
No but found out that both m*****a and p****r are a Gates/F***i v*****e I think I will wait for Astrazeneca /Johnson&Johnson vac
....experts say take what you can get ,their inability or un - certainty of whether they can produce enough v*****e to accomodate the demand or need decrees a philosophy of "beggars can't be choicy"
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
Priority should be based upon risk factors, not social status.
rebelwidacoz wrote:
....experts say take what you can get ,their inability or un - certainty of whether they can produce enough v*****e to accomodate the demand or need decrees a philosophy of "beggars can't be choicy"
I'm 70 at this point don't go anywhere order what I want not working so I'm good.There not going to give someone like me a shot priority(health care workers/first responders /nursing homes/ prisons) everyone else after that
proud republican wrote:
Should prisoners be v******ted before elderly and sick?
If there's anything wrong with those v******tions, I think it's better to find out on the prisoners, not me!!!😡😡😡
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.