One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register ☰
Posts for: Common Sense Rebel
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Mar 14, 2015 08:05:08   #
(Main)
Wanna talk about drivers licenses for i******s
NO!
Go to
Mar 13, 2015 15:21:40   #
(Main)
This is just too funny by far.
no propaganda please wrote:
Marriage should be between a man and a woman, that is the definition. But a civil union should be allowed with legal rights between two men or two women so they can inherit the property, file income ta together. Just don't pretend it is marriage. but then the L***Q claim is that you are a man on those days you feel as if you are and a woman when you feel like one of those no matter what your DNA says.


NO!! Nothing for same sex unions of any kind!
It is plain wrong,
Immoral
A SIN.
A crime against Humanity
And all forms of L**t should be against the law period. Including public displays of affection.
Go to
Mar 13, 2015 10:12:00   #
(Main)
This is just too funny by far.
jelun wrote:
HAHAHAAAA, there IS a civil marriage that is MORE legal than the religious one. People can enter into the contract of a civil marriage without a church it cannot legally be done in reverse.


All marriages should be religious and between a man and woman only!
Go to
Mar 5, 2015 09:02:48   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-political talk))
Love Has No Boundaries
PaulPisces wrote:
I loved this illustration of how love, when we filter out our prejudices, looks pretty much the same wherever one sees it.
Enjoy!

http://skeleton-love.diply.com/auntyacid/kissing-skeletons-love-has-no-labels/101140


D********g!
Go to
Feb 22, 2015 10:35:23   #
(Main)
Have to do this: Secession=treason, the definition of stupid, and the diagnosis of insane
rumitoid wrote:
Does what Rand Paul is saying fall under Free Speech or the articles of s******n? His words are clearly unpatriotic and borderline, if not breaching that border, on treason. By his present actions and words, he could be declared an enemy of the state. And I feel he should be! His reckless rhetoric is a direct threat to the security and general well-being of this country. In my opinion, he is a greater terrorist than ISIS combined. Benedict Arnold is feeling a little inadequate next to this scum, Paul.
Does what Rand Paul is saying fall under Free Spee... (show quote)


I agree with all that you started except for one thing. These comments should be applied to OBAMA.
Go to
Feb 19, 2015 09:33:59   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-political talk))
Profound thoughts
BOHICA wrote:
There you go, jumping to conclusions. It was meant as a joke. I trust you did not think I was referring to my own sexual orientation. If so, I trust that your apology is in the mail. :lol:

Or am I jumping to conclusions?


All L.G.B.T acts are wrong, a sin, and are a crime against Humanity.
They should be against the law,
Go to
Feb 19, 2015 09:33:58   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-political talk))
Profound thoughts
BOHICA wrote:
There you go, jumping to conclusions. It was meant as a joke. I trust you did not think I was referring to my own sexual orientation. If so, I trust that your apology is in the mail. :lol:

Or am I jumping to conclusions?


All L.G.B.T acts are wrong, a sin, and are a crime against Humanity.
They should be against the law,
Go to
Feb 19, 2015 07:33:11   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-political talk))
Profound thoughts
BOHICA wrote:
That would really depend on your sexual orientation. Just saying. :mrgreen:


If you get excited by the same sex, you need mental help.
Go to
Feb 9, 2015 10:32:04   #
(General Chit-Chat (non-political talk))
New Neighbors From Hell
Haughty Lib wrote:
Given that on this board you rant like a crazy old man, I doubt you're telling the whole story.

Not to mention that unless the engine was completely missing, 500 was sort of a rip off.

.... and really,,so the guy changed his mind on selling the car to you, because he likely discovered you were trying to rip him off.

Grow the hell up. So you didn't get what you wanted.


So i guess that you don't believe that a man's word is his bond and a deal with a handshake is a deal.
Go to
Jan 9, 2015 14:17:08   #
(Main)
Liberals are forbidden to read or reply to this post.
Grugore wrote:
If someone does not worship God, then they worship the Devil. Those are the only options. Good or evil. If someone rejects God, then they embrace evil. There is no middle ground.


You are so correct! There is no middle ground on this.
Go to
Jan 9, 2015 09:58:13   #
(Main)
Liberals are forbidden to read or reply to this post.
That is incorrect. The school is not forcing them. It is a voluntary field trip and if they do not want to go they do not have to go. If they choose to go then they will have to observe the standards for all that attend the mosque.
Go to
Dec 23, 2014 08:10:47   #
(Main)
Tech help to Koch boycott
Kevyn wrote:
A new smartphone app allows shoppers to identify any products produced by Koch industry's or subsidiaries. This application will make it as simple as scanning a bar code to determine weather your purchase is from an ethical company or one run by scumbags. This will be a good tool to punish the people who are bent on rigging our democracy. This will obviously not put them out of business, but as tens of thousands of consumers shop their conscious it will cost the Kochs a bundle of money.


Thanks for the heads up!
We now need an app that lists all the producers and providers of goods and services that support the anti-Constitution agenda.
The ones that are for a******n, gun control, and immortality.
Boycott them all!

What goes around comes around.
Go to
Dec 13, 2014 16:06:58   #
(Main)
“separation of church and state”
Grugore wrote:
There are some good reasons, besides religious or political ones, to oppose polygamy. Just off the top of my head, I can see someone being irate because he can't find a wife. His neighbor snagged them all.


I can't handle more than one at a time!
Go to
Dec 13, 2014 15:51:51   #
(Main)
“separation of church and state”
grace scott wrote:
To me, this means that the government has to keep it's nose out of the business of the church, but the church is free to meddle into government business.

If this is true, why did our government object to a Mormon having more than one wife?


At the time there was no law regarding plural marriage. This was the Governments way of trying to control The Mormons.
Go to
Dec 13, 2014 09:05:28   #
(Main)
political cartoon (true)
sweetlips wrote:
right on the money


We all know better!


:D :D :D :D
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use | DMCA
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.