Brought to you courtesy of f*gs-R-Us.
Hemiman wrote:
Brought to you courtesy of f*gs-R-Us.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
This did not indicate love, it was a public performance with a purpose. Had it been an opposite sex couple it would not have been worth the bother, so it had to be a same sex couple to catch people's attention. I knew it was two women just by looking at the pelvic structure of the skeletons. Watching what the body does just to make a movement is fascinating however. I've watch this done with a number of animal species while veterinary students were learning about to treat injuries on performance dogs, and the distortions of the skeletons to do something is fantastic. As an example of "love" it leaves much to desire. I do not believe that making out behind a screen in a public place is anything more than a stunt, what ever it purports to be.
It's true, love has no boundaries... but sex does!
Common Sense Rebel wrote:
D********g!
How true. :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:
Good lord! These comments speak to a lot that is wrong around here. The Love that was illustrated here went through a lot of variations, from age to race to differing religions, most of which were illustrations of the bonds of friendship.
Why the focus on the two same-sex couples? Just because the post came from me? You all need to get out of your one-track minds.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.