The House impeachment process generally proceeds in three phases: (1) initiation of the impeachment process; (2) Judiciary Committee investigation (Inquiry), hearings, and markup of articles of impeachment; and (3) full House consideration of the articles of impeachment.

If the committee determines that impeachment is warranted, it will markup articles of impeachment using the same procedures followed for the markup of other legislation. If the Judiciary Committee reports a resolution impeaching a federal officer, that resolution qualifies for privileged consideration on the House floor.

If the House approves the impeachment resolution, it will appoint managers to present and argue its case in front of the Senate.

Schiff and the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence is conducting itself outside the bounds of the constitution, the law, and the established procedures for the impeachment process. (The impeachment inquiry was never supposed to be held in secret.)

As long as Schiff continues with his Machiavellian political game and runs his inquiry in secret hearings and leaks selected, highly prejudicial information to the media, he is going to play hell bringing legitimate grounds for articles of impeachment to the full House floor. Wh**ever that sleazy SOB comes up with, he'd better have sufficient proof of impeachable offenses, or he's going to eat s**t when the full house goes for the v**e. Schiff's subterfuge will never make it to the senate.

All past impeachment proceedings were conducted in full view of the American people. Neither Johnson, Nixon or Clinton were prohibited from exercising their constitutional rights to actively and aggressively engage their defense with all the constitutional and legal means available to them.

The United States of America is OUR country, it does not belong to the House of Representatives, or to the government in general, and it certainly is not the property of an insane pencil neck from California.

If I remember correctly, all of the committee members had the right to be in those hearings. It seems just like the Mueller investigation, the Dems didn't want to look at the unredacted or less redacted words of the Mueller probe. They chose to not look at it simply because they refuse to believe what was stated in that investigation. It wouldn't have fit their narrative. If I remember correctly in other hearing's held by the committee's, it seems someone left the room and texted of told someone about the proceedings that had just happened. That was shifty Schiff!

That doesn't mean it is fair to anyone being investigated by this committee by shifty Schiff. They are doing this so they can release what information they think will lead to their producing a case against President Trump. We already know the supposed whistle blower met with Schiff's staff to discuss his allegations. Then was told to get an attorney and lo and behold, who does he come up with, none other that attorneys that had worked for Hillary. They then proceeded to craft a document that read like a spy story and even had events as reported by the biased MSM. Just more pure BS by the left.

See, this would make you against the constitution and therefore unpatriotic at best. You talk about his criminal endeavors as if they have been settled and he has been convicted. What about the concept of innocent until proven guilty? But you apparently do see that as relevant as you have h**e for trump. Then you personally attack me with your statement that I am a criminal. You don’t know me from Sam I am. This would make you a bigot and pretty much irrelevant and anything you say is worthless.