Back when America was great, we got into a war. Not one of these dinky little wars against 2-bit countries. This was a real war, fought for National survival against some of the most industrialized countries in the world. Tax rates went up to almost 90% for wealthy individuals and corporations. The government spent $7 million a minute for three years and nine months. That was no fly swatting expedition like Grenada or Panama or the first Gulf War. We won that war. And instead of being in debt to the tune of $trillions, it was all paid for in three years. So spare me your accusations of "c*******m." I suspect that you wouldn't know a c*******t if one bit you.

War, which we have been in for two decades, is defined as "diplomacy, but carried on by different means." But it is also, and always has been, a way to redistribute wealth. What Ike warned us about, that military/industrial complex, is alive and well. The government taxes chumps like you and me, and gives it to a few chosen industrys. So if you are really a libertarian, you should be in favor of getting the government out of that sort of activity and letting free enterprise run free.

Presently there are 407 parts per million CO2, that nefarious greenhouse gas in our atmosphere. That's a whopping 0.047% of our atmosphere. To be absolutely clear, that's what the c*****e-c****e, chicken little alarmists are talking about - 0.047% of CO2. They want to get that down to net zero.
And, even though it's labeled a "greenhouse gas", CO2 is what all plant life inhales. And they exhale, or expire O2, or oxygen, which we humans need to live. So CO2 is actually necessary to maintain life on earth.
Never mind that one solar flare or even a single volcano will undo thousands of years of a country's driving hybrid cars, changing your light bulbs, eliminating straws, or not eating hamburgers, all to reduce CO2.
It all seems pretty ridiculous to go to all that effort, when you look at the big picture.
But "true believers" are beyond being rational.

https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.

==============================================

Friend, you are talking r*******n or revolution and world government, and, in addition, our citizens not fighting to turn events back to our Democratic Constitution. Then, you sort of say "lie down and let it happen." On these points I totally disagree. True Americans will stand up for what we believe in, not curl up into a big ball and await their fate.

A world government is a total absurdity, unless it is forced upon us by outside powers, none of which really wants to tackle our military. Without question America will fight to ensure that our nation will exist and prosper, and not be governed by i***ts from the rest of the world. We are a sovereign nation, and that means everything to freedom and liberty lovers.