One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
500 Scientists Write U.N.: ‘There Is No Climate Emergency’
Page 1 of 2 next>
Sep 25, 2019 14:29:48   #
SinnieK
 
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 14:38:07   #
truthiness
 
SinnieK wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/5... (show quote)

...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/weather/2019/08/04/c*****e-c****e-extreme-weather-getting-worse-in-these-20-places/39873609/

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 14:40:12   #
SinnieK
 


If it was that bad why the UN would not want to have a debate about it?

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2019 15:10:12   #
peg w
 
And they all got their PHD's thurogh the mail

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 15:19:29   #
SinnieK
 
And these were the predictions from their PHD's and Experts; all 41 predictions turned out WRONG.

LIST OF DOOMSDAY PREDICTIONS THE CLIMATE ALARMIST GOT WRONG

Here is the source for numbers 1-27. As you will see, the individual sources are not crackpots, but scientific studies and media reports on “expert” predictions. The sources for numbers 28-41 are linked individually.

1967: Dire Famine Forecast By 1975
1969: Everyone Will Disappear In a Cloud Of Blue Steam By 1989 (1969)
1970: Ice Age By 2000
1970: America Subject to Water Rationing By 1974 and Food Rationing By 1980
1971: New Ice Age Coming By 2020 or 2030
1972: New Ice Age By 2070
1974: Space Satellites Show New Ice Age Coming Fast
1974: Another Ice Age?
1974: Ozone Depletion a ‘Great Peril to Life
1976: Scientific Consensus Planet Cooling, Famines imminent
1980: Acid Rain K**ls Life In Lakes
1978: No End in Sight to 30-Year Cooling Trend
1988: Regional Droughts (that never happened) in 1990s
1988: Temperatures in DC Will Hit Record Highs
1988: Maldive Islands will Be Underwater by 2018 (they’re not)
1989: Rising Sea Levels will Obliterate Nations if Nothing Done by 2000
1989: New York City’s West Side Highway Underwater by 2019 (it’s not)
2000: Children Won’t Know what Snow Is
2002: Famine In 10 Years If We Don’t Give Up Eating Fish, Meat, and Dairy
2004: Britain will Be Siberia by 2024
2008: Arctic will Be Ice Free by 2018
2008: Climate Genius Al Gore Predicts Ice-Free Arctic by 2013
2009: Climate Genius Prince Charles Says we Have 96 Months to Save World
2009: UK Prime Minister Says 50 Days to ‘Save The Planet From Catastrophe’
2009: Climate Genius Al Gore Moves 2013 Prediction of Ice-Free Arctic to 2014
2013: Arctic Ice-Free by 2015
2014: Only 500 Days Before ‘Climate Chaos’
1968: Overpopulation Will Spread Worldwide
1970: World Will Use Up All its Natural Resources
1966: Oil Gone in Ten Years
1972: Oil Depleted in 20 Years
1977: Department of Energy Says Oil will Peak in 90s
1980: Peak Oil In 2000
1996: Peak Oil in 2020
2002: Peak Oil in 2010
2006: Super Hurricanes!
2005 : Manhattan Underwater by 2015
1970: Urban Citizens Will Require Gas Masks by 1985
1970: Nitrogen buildup Will Make All Land Unusable
1970: Decaying Pollution Will K**l all the Fish
1970s: K**ler Bees!
Sorry, Experts… Sorry, Scientific Consensus… Only a fool comes running for the 42nd cry of wolf.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 16:19:43   #
badbob85037
 
SinnieK wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/5... (show quote)


Those scientist don't know what they are talking about. I bet they didn't even consult Kevyn.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 17:56:23   #
Ricki
 
B.S. If I were paid millions of dollars I could have told you any thing you want to hear. It has always been hot and we have always had c*****e c****e. This is totally ridiculous. Scientists have been educated to the point they are stupid or paid to lie. This is a fabrication of the l*****t.

Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2019 18:01:54   #
gaconservative74
 


Some scientists say the blizzard is an example of human-caused c*****e c****e because it was an e*****e w*****r event.

This is called circular reasoning. This is the problem with the entire narrative and why open debate is necessary. Just because an e*****e w*****r event happened doesn’t mean “man made c*****e c****e” caused it.

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 18:18:06   #
77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States
 
SinnieK wrote:
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/500-scientists-write-u-n-there-is-no-climate-emergency/

More than 500 scientists and professionals in climate and related fields have sent a “European Climate Declaration” to the Secretary-General of the United Nations asking for a long-overdue, high-level, open debate on c*****e c****e.

Just as 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg addressed the U.N. Climate Action Summit in New York accusing world leaders of robbing her of her future, scientists were begging the United Nations to keep hysteria from obscuring facts.

“Climate science should be less political, while climate policies should be more scientific,” the declaration states. “Scientists should openly address the uncertainties and exaggerations in their predictions of g****l w*****g, while politicians should dispassionately count the real benefits as well as the imagined costs of adaptation to g****l w*****g, and the real costs as well as the imagined benefits of mitigation.”

The scientists underscored the importance of not rushing into enormously expensive climate action before fully ascertaining the facts.

“There is no statistical evidence that g****l w*****g is intensifying hurricanes, floods, droughts and suchlike natural disasters, or making them more frequent,” they declared. “However, CO2-mitigation measures are as damaging as they are costly. For instance, wind turbines k**l birds and bats, and palm-oil plantations destroy the biodiversity of the rainforests.”

The signatories of the declaration also insist that public policy must respect scientific and economic realities and not just reflect the most fashionable frenzy of the day.

“There is no climate emergency. Therefore, there is no cause for panic and alarm,” they note. “We strongly oppose the harmful and unrealistic net-zero CO2 policy proposed for 2050.”

“If better approaches emerge, and they certainly will, we have ample time to reflect and adapt. The aim of international policy should be to provide reliable and affordable energy at all times, and throughout the world,” they state.

In particular, the scientists criticize the general-circulation models of climate on which international policy is currently founded as “unfit for their purpose.”

“Therefore, it is cruel as well as imprudent to advocate the squandering of trillions on the basis of results from such immature models,” they propose. “Current climate policies pointlessly, grievously undermine the economic system, putting lives at risk in countries denied access to affordable, continuous electrical power.”

“We urge you to follow a climate policy based on sound science, realistic economics and genuine concern for those harmed by costly but unnecessary attempts at mitigation,” they declare.
https://www.breitbart.com/environment/2019/09/24/5... (show quote)


You're absolutely right sir. yesterday on the Alex Jones Show they found a Hitler Youth poster and put thread of Thornburg picture right beside it in it was a startling resemblance. One of the things they don't tell you about Greta is is that her parents are associated with a****a her parents are devout c*******ts and she's from Germany gee isn't that quaint. Another thing they didn't tell you about her is that she is autistic she has Asperger's Syndrome so what they're doing is committing abused this little girl she's absolutely right she should have to live through this because her parents need to tell her that she's being indoctrinated. Just like our Hitler Youth here in America they had their little rallies and every last one of them believe we were going to die in 12 years if we didn't do something what a crock of s***. How come we never showcase or Spotlight any of the people that are actually making great strides in the environment like the one kid who actually built a contraption that can actually take the CO2 out of the air and then replace it with clean air so I don't know what the hell's going on that lets you know that they don't want to do anything about the environment and is everything about politics it's another part of globalism it's just another way for them to try to make s***es out of us. Did they get the memo once brexit happened that this populist movement is going on actually gave us Trump and the rest of the populist parties that are going on around Europe. Don't they realize that globalism is dead

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 18:53:26   #
SinnieK
 
77Reaganite wrote:
You're absolutely right sir. yesterday on the Alex Jones Show they found a Hitler Youth poster and put thread of Thornburg picture right beside it in it was a startling resemblance. One of the things they don't tell you about Greta is is that her parents are associated with a****a her parents are devout c*******ts and she's from Germany gee isn't that quaint. Another thing they didn't tell you about her is that she is autistic she has Asperger's Syndrome so what they're doing is committing abused this little girl she's absolutely right she should have to live through this because her parents need to tell her that she's being indoctrinated. Just like our Hitler Youth here in America they had their little rallies and every last one of them believe we were going to die in 12 years if we didn't do something what a crock of s***. How come we never showcase or Spotlight any of the people that are actually making great strides in the environment like the one kid who actually built a contraption that can actually take the CO2 out of the air and then replace it with clean air so I don't know what the hell's going on that lets you know that they don't want to do anything about the environment and is everything about politics it's another part of globalism it's just another way for them to try to make s***es out of us. Did they get the memo once brexit happened that this populist movement is going on actually gave us Trump and the rest of the populist parties that are going on around Europe. Don't they realize that globalism is dead
You're absolutely right sir. yesterday on the Alex... (show quote)


A Climate Modeller Spills the Beans

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2019/09/a-climate-modeller-spills-the-beans/

The article is a bit long because of the detail explanation of it. But I just show a small paragraph of it.

"Nakamura describes as “moronic” the claims that “tuned” ocean models are good enough for climate predictions. That’s because, in tuning some parameters, other aspects of the model have to become extremely distorted. {He says a large part of the forecast g****l w*****g is attributed to water vapor changes, not CO2 changes.} “But the fact is this: all climate simulation models perform poorly in reproducing the atmospheric water vapor and its radiative forcing observed in the current climate… They have only a few parameters that can be used to ‘tune’ the performance of the models and (are) utterly unrealistic.” Positive water vapor feedbacks from CO2 increases are artificially enforced by the modelers. They neglect other reverse feedbacks in the real world, and hence they exaggerate forecast warming."

Reply
Sep 25, 2019 21:54:50   #
EmilyD
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Those scientist don't know what they are talking about. I bet they didn't even consult Kevyn.


Reply
 
 
Sep 25, 2019 22:58:22   #
manning5 Loc: Richmond, VA
 
SinnieK wrote:
A Climate Modeller Spills the Beans

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/doomed-planet/2019/09/a-climate-modeller-spills-the-beans/

The article is a bit long because of the detail explanation of it. But I just show a small paragraph of it.

"Nakamura describes as “moronic” the claims that “tuned” ocean models are good enough for climate predictions. That’s because, in tuning some parameters, other aspects of the model have to become extremely distorted. {He says a large part of the forecast g****l w*****g is attributed to water vapor changes, not CO2 changes.} “But the fact is this: all climate simulation models perform poorly in reproducing the atmospheric water vapor and its radiative forcing observed in the current climate… They have only a few parameters that can be used to ‘tune’ the performance of the models and (are) utterly unrealistic.” Positive water vapor feedbacks from CO2 increases are artificially enforced by the modelers. They neglect other reverse feedbacks in the real world, and hence they exaggerate forecast warming."
A Climate Modeller Spills the Beans br br https:/... (show quote)


To my knowledge, no scientist and model builder has achieved an accurate model of the effects of clouds, nor can they, in addition to representing the true effects of the sun in their models. It is all an attempt to seize power globally. It is a shameful distortion of science.

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 01:02:48   #
SinnieK
 
manning5 wrote:
To my knowledge, no scientist and model builder has achieved an accurate model of the effects of clouds, nor can they, in addition to representing the true effects of the sun in their models. It is all an attempt to seize power globally. It is a shameful distortion of science.


The goal is controlling the globe and they could careless about shame as long as they get power.

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 06:20:39   #
Tug484
 
badbob85037 wrote:
Those scientist don't know what they are talking about. I bet they didn't even consult Kevyn.


They had to consult him.
You know he's smarter than God.
Not my opinion, but he sure thinks he's smart.
If the left said a chicken crossed the road to buy a cow and lead it home, he'd believe it.

Reply
Sep 26, 2019 06:23:51   #
Tug484
 
77Reaganite wrote:
You're absolutely right sir. yesterday on the Alex Jones Show they found a Hitler Youth poster and put thread of Thornburg picture right beside it in it was a startling resemblance. One of the things they don't tell you about Greta is is that her parents are associated with a****a her parents are devout c*******ts and she's from Germany gee isn't that quaint. Another thing they didn't tell you about her is that she is autistic she has Asperger's Syndrome so what they're doing is committing abused this little girl she's absolutely right she should have to live through this because her parents need to tell her that she's being indoctrinated. Just like our Hitler Youth here in America they had their little rallies and every last one of them believe we were going to die in 12 years if we didn't do something what a crock of s***. How come we never showcase or Spotlight any of the people that are actually making great strides in the environment like the one kid who actually built a contraption that can actually take the CO2 out of the air and then replace it with clean air so I don't know what the hell's going on that lets you know that they don't want to do anything about the environment and is everything about politics it's another part of globalism it's just another way for them to try to make s***es out of us. Did they get the memo once brexit happened that this populist movement is going on actually gave us Trump and the rest of the populist parties that are going on around Europe. Don't they realize that globalism is dead
You're absolutely right sir. yesterday on the Alex... (show quote)


When you have Asperger's syndrome, you get on a subject and you dwell on it and this goes on for years.
I believe what they're doing to her is abusive.
I know a teenage boy that has it and he spent years talking and dwelling on the same i***tic subject.
Not c*****e c****e, but something else.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.