JFlorio wrote:
Not really liar. Bush invaded Iraq on faulty intelligence, (maybe). Those 19 Intelligence agencies you all love to point too were wrong you say about Iraq but you swear on their accuracy when it comes to Russia. You can't have it both ways. Many still believe Saddam had those weapons shipped to Syria before the invasion. Saddam had broken many U.N. Resolutions. In my opinion the world is a better place without him and his sons.
if you knew anything about the Law, or anything else for that matter you would know Hillary broke the Law. Comey admitted it. The same statute she broke has put some of our service grunts in jail. The Obama administrations Justice Department decided not to prosecute her. Why would you ever stand up for this witch?
Not really liar. Bush invaded Iraq on faulty intel... (
show quote)
Well, see comments from Trey Gowdy (dumb toady), below... and under a Republican represented congress why didn't Trey bring any of that up, Deep State? Or.....no case....there was no case. It has been investigated by Republicans for nearly 8 years...THERE IS NO CASE. Well, on the other hand we certainly know how thorough Republicans investigated the Democrats case for Impeachment, do you hear Democrats whining about Mitch's schemes?
The U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence delivered their bipartisan report on the terrorist attacks on January 15, 2014. The majority of the committee offered the following conclusions:
-The attacks were preventable.
-There were no protests in the area prior to the attack.
-Although the attack did not arise from prior protests, it "did not require significant amounts of preplanning".
Terrorists who participated in the attacks included members of al-Qa'ida in the Lands of the Islamic Maghreb,
Ansar al-Sharia, al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, and the Mohammad Jamal Network.
-The CIA talking points were flawed but still "painted a mostly accurate picture of the IC's analysis of the
B******i attacks at that time, in an unclassified form and without compromising the nascent [FBI]
investigation of the attacks".
-In general, the majority concluded "that the inter-agency coordination process on the talking points followed
normal, but rushed coordination procedures and that there were no efforts by the White House or any other
Executive Branch entities to 'cover-up' facts or make alterations for political purposes".
...so what did Hillary do, what did Obama do?
House Republicans investigating the 2012 terrorist attacks in B******i, Libya, have found no new evidence to conclude that Hillary Clinton, secretary of state at the time, was culpable in the deaths of four Americans, according to the committee’s final report released on Tuesday.
The 800-page document released by the Republicans on the House select committee on B******i brought to a close a fiercely partisan, two-year, $7m investigation that included interviews with more than 80 witnesses. The report reveals new details about the night of the attack and concludes that the Obama administration failed to recognize the possibility of it happening.
Ambassador Christopher Stevens, his state department colleague Sean Smith and former Navy Seals Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were k**led when Islamist militants stormed the US consulate in B******i on 11 September 2012. Controversy has raged ever since over the chain of events and how much support the men had from Washington.
The White House noted tersely that this was the eighth congressional committee to investigate the attacks and went on longer than the 9/11 commission and the committees designated to look at Pearl Harbor, the assassination of President John F Kennedy, the Iran-Contra affair and Watergate. It accused Republicans of pursuing “wild conspiracy theories”.
Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, a Republican from South Carolina, denied that presumptive Democratic p**********l nominee Clinton was the target. “When the select committee was formed, I promised to conduct this investigation in a manner worthy of the American people’s respect, and worthy of the memory of those who died,” he said.
“That is exactly what my colleagues and I have done. Now, I simply ask the American people to read this report for themselves, look at the evidence we have collected, and reach their own conclusions.”
But a split emerged among Republicans on the committee. Two members, Jim Jordan and Mike Pompeo, issued a 48-page supplementary report more forthright in its criticism. It says: “What we did find was a tragic failure of leadership – in the run-up to the attack and the night of – and an administration that, so blinded by politics and its desire to win an e******n, disregarded a basic duty of government: tell the people the t***h. And for those reasons B******i is, and always will be, an American tragedy.”
Jordan, from Ohio, and Pompeo, from Kansas, were equally blunt in their condemnation of Clinton in particular. “Secretary Clinton and the administration told one story privately – that B******i was a terrorist attack – and told another story publicly – blaming a video-inspired protest,” they wrote.
Pressed on whether he believed that Clinton lied, Gowdy declined to give a direct answer, telling journalists to read the report. “You’re going to have to decide that for yourself,” he said.
GET A LIFE.