slatten49 wrote:
Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. As the following excerpt from that particular link explains...
"The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been monitoring e******n f***d cases state by state. E******n f***d covers a range of activities — such as registering someone to v**e and forging their signature, filling out an absentee b****t for someone who has died or moved away, v****g while ineligible, or pretending to be someone else at the polling place and v****g. They find that there have been 1,465 proven cases of e******n f***d — 1,264 of these resulted in criminal prosecutions and the remainder resulted in civil prosecutions, diversion programs, judicial findings, or official findings.
These may sound like big numbers, however, they must be examined in context. The findings encompass more than a decade of data during which, nationally, hundreds of millions of v**es have been cast. For instance, in Texas, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed e******n f***d. However, those 103 ranged from 2005 to 2022 during which time over 107 million b****ts were cast. There were 11 million b****ts cast in the 2020 p**********l e******n alone. The fraud in Texas amounted to 0.000096% of all b****ts cast — hardly evidence of a fundamentally corrupt system."
Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. A... (
show quote)