10,000 Illegal Democrat Aliens Used the Same Social Security Number To V**e In 2020 Just In Arizona [VIDEO]
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
Did you hear about Kimberly Zapata?
What a surprise, a garbage propaganda source and an unattributed article with no reference to any legitimate sources.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
Yea yea they were able to hide it better.
AuntiE
Loc: 45th Least Free State
XXX wrote:
Yea yea they were able to hide it better.
That is how authoritarian cults behave.
Kevyn wrote:
What a surprise, a garbage propaganda source and an unattributed article with no reference to any legitimate sources.
Democrats two favorite sources are anonymous and unnamed.
XXX
Loc: Somewhere north of the Mason-Dixon
Ri-chard wrote:
I read it, thanks.
I think it's funny that she went to jail. I use it every time someone says ........ no evidence of v***r f***d.
XXX wrote:
Yea yea they were able to hide it better.
Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. As the following excerpt from that particular link explains...
"The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been monitoring e******n f***d cases state by state. E******n f***d covers a range of activities — such as registering someone to v**e and forging their signature, filling out an absentee b****t for someone who has died or moved away, v****g while ineligible, or pretending to be someone else at the polling place and v****g. They find that there have been 1,465 proven cases of e******n f***d — 1,264 of these resulted in criminal prosecutions and the remainder resulted in civil prosecutions, diversion programs, judicial findings, or official findings.
These may sound like big numbers, however, they must be examined in context. The findings encompass more than a decade of data during which, nationally, hundreds of millions of v**es have been cast. For instance, in Texas, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed e******n f***d. However, those 103 ranged from 2005 to 2022 during which time over 107 million b****ts were cast. There were 11 million b****ts cast in the 2020 p**********l e******n alone. The fraud in Texas amounted to 0.000096% of all b****ts cast — hardly evidence of a fundamentally corrupt system."
XXX wrote:
I think it's funny that she went to jail. I use it every time someone says ........ no evidence of v***r f***d.
It's usually/generally said that infinitesimal evidence may be found - but not enough to alter the outcomes.
slatten49 wrote:
Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. As the following excerpt from that particular link explains...
"The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank, has been monitoring e******n f***d cases state by state. E******n f***d covers a range of activities — such as registering someone to v**e and forging their signature, filling out an absentee b****t for someone who has died or moved away, v****g while ineligible, or pretending to be someone else at the polling place and v****g. They find that there have been 1,465 proven cases of e******n f***d — 1,264 of these resulted in criminal prosecutions and the remainder resulted in civil prosecutions, diversion programs, judicial findings, or official findings.
These may sound like big numbers, however, they must be examined in context. The findings encompass more than a decade of data during which, nationally, hundreds of millions of v**es have been cast. For instance, in Texas, Heritage found 103 cases of confirmed e******n f***d. However, those 103 ranged from 2005 to 2022 during which time over 107 million b****ts were cast. There were 11 million b****ts cast in the 2020 p**********l e******n alone. The fraud in Texas amounted to 0.000096% of all b****ts cast — hardly evidence of a fundamentally corrupt system."
Yea, yea, Heritage foundation can't be trusted. A... (
show quote)
And cnn can? Not to mention left wing rags
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.