One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: AHO-C
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 next>>
Jul 27, 2019 22:05:12   #
Singularity wrote:
I am not here to argue that existence with you, I am asserting that my government cannot assert that we, meaning all citizens, trust in God, when 30% clearly do not. It is your assertion that we, inclusive of all citizens, trust in God. I don't. 30% don't..You may. Radience3 does.

Still, to assert we all do is a lie. That doesn't meant all don't believe or any one doesn't believe. It just is not a fact that all USA citizens trust in God.

In God some trust. There. Fixed it.

If you are objecting that you'd rather leave it fuzzy and imprecise, could you examine and explain the motive?
I am not here to argue that existence with you, I ... (show quote)



The National Anthem is about an occurrence that happened in 1812, t***scribed into a poem called 'Defence of Fort McHenry' in 1814, set to lyrics to a tune that was originally written in 1771 and re-named the Star Spangled Banner, was recognized for official use by the Navy in 1889, then by Woodrow Wilson in 1916, and finally codified as the National Anthem in 1931, Contains the following phrases in the 4th and closing stanza of our anthem:
"O, thus be it ever when freemen shall stand,
Between their lov'd homes and the war's desolation;
Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land
Praise the Pow'r that hath made and preserv'd us a nation!
Then conquer we must, when our cause is just,
And this be our motto: "In God is our trust"
And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave
O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave!
My advice...quit whining !!! You don't want to be part of the 'We' ...then don't ....you don't believe in God...then don't....BUT your personal lack of faith does not t***slate into a 't***h crisis' of monumental proportions in the USA ....Incidentally, God is not mentioned in the US Constitution....but ironically God or some other reference to a deity is included in every State Constitution....So a 'Motto' is not a Government law, nor is it a lie ( ie a false statement made with a deliberate intent to deceive )....Good Luck, stay healthy. I'm leaving it fuzzy ( because by definition Faith is fuzzy) or worse....I'm a religious fanatic bent on saying you are condemned to hell ....wh**ever you wish....Your quarrel is not with me ....nor do I care that you are playing a high stakes game of 'Eternity Poker' with what you perceive is the Winning Hand... remember stay true to your beliefs ...and don't blink or fold when you throw down your cards for the last hand of your life and ALL your chips are on the table...and the Dealer ,who you really can't make out visually, says ....'The House Always Wins....We never argue about God!!'

Cochise (Chief) 1812 - 1874 Apache:[b] We never quarrel about the Great Spirit.[/b]

Go to
Jul 27, 2019 20:04:47   #
Kevyn wrote:
It is not at all surprising that you would post an easily disproven bald faced lie. In 1989 members of congress earned $96,000 a year this year they earn $174,000 accounting for inflation this affords about the same purchasing power and is no where near the over 231% increase claimed in your lie.


Actually, Kevyn....that 'Motto' of term limits / Congressional pay having risen 231%/ with 'Nasty' Nancy 's picture was used during the 2016 e******n cycle...The Congressional pay ( both Houses) in 1986 was $75,100/yr and in 2016 it was $174,000/yr.....which by the magic of basic mathematics comes out to 2.31691078562 ( actually should have been 2.32 or 232% ..rounded ).....However, all of the % comparisons are meaningless so you need to actually look at are the following.....In 1970 Congressman made $42,500/yr vs. the Median Income of $7500+/- per yr..... in 2016 Congressman made $174,000/yr vs $59,039/ yr ....now it is important to remember that a Congressman averages about 150 Legislative Days/Yr and that their salary is not all of the income that they make in a year either, while the Median Income is all the money the Median family makes.....Also as you can see in terms of 'Real Dollars' the US Median Income has been basically flat over the years....so no matter how you look at Congressman, for a part time job they have been paid near the Top Quintile ( ie. top 20-25% income level ) and actually just with Congressional pay make more than 75-80 % of the people who elect them....so throw in 'Bennies and other perks' and it boils down to .....the V**ers should actually be approving their pay scales...not themselves !!
The whole situation of a self generated pay raise is the antithesis of Capitalism and wreaks of Royalty or in my case a hardworking C****e that is equal but better than you !!

US MEDIAN REAL INCOME ( up to Dec.2016)


US MEDIAN INCOME (up to Dec. 2016)





Go to
Jul 27, 2019 14:23:54   #
ImLogicallyRight wrote:
Good question nwtk2007. They can't or it would show how wrong they are.


I've been trying to tell others, on sites like this and in person, that the information I've read from scientists and graphs shows that CO2 follows g****l w*****g and doesn't lead it. It just isn't a green house gas except that it helps vegetation in the green house grow better.

Think about it. Graphs show that we are in a warming cycle since the last ice age and are nearing historical peaks as would be normal and within expected graph projections.

As for CO2, as we warm, more CO2 enters the atmosphere from the thawing of permafrost. an after effect. This in turn provides for more food for plants and the greening of the earth further north. Growing seasons go further north and last longer.

Eventually we will enter another cooling cycle as per earth's orbit and sun cycles and head for another ice age. It may start next year or five, ten, fifty years. But it will happen. More ice will form and the poles will freeze even more, and the max growing seasons will again drift south and water tables will shrink.

It is just earth living through its normal cycles. We simply aren't causing a thing. Get over it and focus on some reality.

ImLogicallyRight
Good question nwtk2007. They can't or it would sho... (show quote)


You are aptly 'named'





Hey ! Hey ! So am I ...AHO-C

Go to
Jul 27, 2019 13:37:26   #
Singularity wrote:
You are just throwing more irrelevant and unproven b.s at the wall to see what sticks. None of it does.

Prove that I and every other avowed atheist or the 30% or so of American citizens who have reported a religious affiliation of NONE believe in and trust your god, OR that I and they are not US citizens or stop lying.

OR just admit that you are sending yourself to Hell with your assertion of a known lie.

I don't need to review your propagandist history lesson. I live in the present. Presently, the USA is not a theocracy.

"In god WE trust is a propagandist lie."
You are just throwing more irrelevant and unproven... (show quote)


Sing !! God has never required that 'we' prove he exists. He always describes a non-believer as 'One of little faith!' . There are many things that cannot be 'proven' by science ....yet they still exist !! Does that mean that they 'Don't Exist '.....or does it mean 'we' don't understand it ??
Regardless !! WE can mean just mean... me and one other person.....OR it can be extended up to every being in the Universe.
The greatest thing about the USA is not the petty BS of diversity ( so long as we all think alike), immigration ( ultimately if you track humans back to one common thread...we ALL came from Africa)..etc. it is the Constitution ( this Document is what makes our Country different and better than any other Country past or present)..... and even while we are a Country founded on Judeo-Christian principles ...our Constitution gives us the 'Freedom of ( not from) Religion ' ...you can believe in God or not believe in God...I personally don't give a crap about your uppity 'pseudo-science' argument about proof of His existence or not and I have no intention of trying to 'convert' you.
I do not understand why so many atheists feel obliged to denigrate every 'God loving American' as a bunch of imbecilic automatons that uniformly march to the same mindless drumbeat....Just based on replies to your post virtually every person that believes in God has different words to describe why and how they do believe in God...to imply that they need to give 'you' proof or they are all 'liars' is the most pompous ,conceited, narcissistic, illogical argument against a belief concept that requires faith in order for it to be valid.
Who do you think you are to question the honesty and integrity of billions of people world wide just because you 'want proof God exists!!'....when you CANNOT even provide proof he doesn't exist ....just because you can't see something or understand something does not mean it does not exist or that it is also not cognizant of your existence!!
To answer your question in regard to the phrase " In God We Trust "..I already count me ( part of the requirement for 'we') and several others on this site ( in particular Radiance , who I personally envy for the way she can so beautifully describe her relationship with God) ..which is the final closing of the loop to being a 'we'.
The war you have against God is between you and Him....and you are placing your whole eternity on you being intellectually superior to Him....well the Rooster will crow 3 times for each of us to see if we deny Him...my bet is you are in for one Big Surprise when your clock stops ticking !!
Good luck ...'Thomas' !


Go to
Jul 19, 2019 10:20:15   #
Larai wrote:
Hahahahaha.. that is a priceless meme!!.. actually, it wouldn't surprise me at all if she actually thought that!...

Well she already said she wanted to go home!!! Send her Home! Send Her Home!


I go home!! I go home!

Go to
Jul 16, 2019 07:45:20   #
promilitary wrote:
I've always wondered what caused all the ice to melt in the Ice Age.
Man certainly didn't have the capacity to cause it.

I've also wondered why G****l W*****g was changed to C*****e C****e.

I don't buy any of the scientific bulls**t. God will take care of the climate.


Yo ProMilitary......The reason you don't buy the 'scientific bulls**t' is because it is not scientific...but it is bulls**t. I agree the 50+ year L*****t diatribe on 'G****l C*****g/Warming/C*****e C****e/back to Warming' combined with ' the world will end in the' : 80's....no 90's....no 2000 ( at Midnight)...no 2008...whoops 2015...whoops 2030...I meant 2050 but absolutely 2100 !!! is monotonous , has gone beyond boring ,and has reached a point where it is so obviously wrong that at least they finally openly admit....' It's about wrecking the USA Economy .....Stupid !!!' ( a Willie Clinton political slogan that was never chastised by the Left for it's obvious connotations.....but MAGA sends them into fetal position rigor mortise instantaneously ).
I am waiting for this to be strongly enforced....The D's are using B*M, A****a, 'News' Media, and various other alphabet soup Organizations /Methods to Coerce, Threaten, Harm, and Subvert the USA into a Lawless Vigilante system of 'Behavior Preference and Disorder ' !!
50 U.S. Code § 842. Proscription of C*******t Party, its successors, and subsidiary organizations
U.S. Code
Notes
prev | next
The C*******t Party of the United States, or any successors of such party regardless of the assumed name, whose object or purpose is to o*******w the Government of the United States, or the government of any State, Territory, District, or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein by force and violence, are not entitled to any of the rights, privileges, and immunities attendant upon legal bodies created under the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof; and wh**ever rights, privileges, and immunities which have heretofore been granted to said party or any subsidiary organization by reason of the laws of the United States or any political subdivision thereof, are terminated: Provided, however, That nothing in this section shall be construed as amending the Internal Security Act of 1950, as amended [50 U.S.C. 781 et seq.]

(Aug. 24, 1954, ch. 886, § 3, 68 Stat. 776.)
If no action is taken it will become a street battle of the Right's Vigilantes/Constables/M*****as vs The Left's A****a/Progressive JW's ....mark my words....I believe we are at a point ( or very close) where it will only take one "Shot heard 'round the World" type of event to break the existing '100 Year Dam of Patience' that the Right has constructed as the Prog's kept inching their way to the breaking point of this 'Dam' which is the point just before the C****e takeover of this Constitutional Republic as a Nation !!!
Go to
Jul 15, 2019 16:26:43   #
badbob85037 wrote:
So your'e telling me That every time I passed one of those smog control trailers on the free way pulling my chock on I did no good? What about the used oil I dump to honor Earth Day?


Every little bit helps....Good Work!!!


Go to
Jul 14, 2019 23:37:23   #
maxcorn wrote:
A rather remarkable resemblance of a mule-faced dimwit. I rather fancy the likeness.


Don't h**e me because I'm beautiful.....You can h**e me because I'm a stupid dimwit who has no understanding of Economics,Climate, International Relations, N**ism,F*****m, C*******m, Circumcisionism, OR Talkin' S**tism.....but on the upside at least I admit I am an AHO....si' !!!


Go to
Jul 14, 2019 23:28:24   #
maximus wrote:
Got a good laugh out of the photo!!! But you're right AOC and Pelosi were filmed telling I*****L a***ns how to avoid the Ice agents ( and this AFTER they have been ordered out of the country by a judge).


Go to
Jul 14, 2019 23:24:15   #
byronglimish wrote:
Yo AHO, just how blown out is the phlap? And does that backdoor appear as if a search warrant with forcible entry was achieved?

I mean was it knocked off the hinges, by a mob of fellow socialists?


LOL !!
The crying one was due to the Search Warrant with forcible entry being executed as I typed!!!


Go to
Jul 14, 2019 21:48:49   #
drlarrygino wrote:
Women cause g****l w*****g when they go through their menstrual change. When they get real hot and have their flashes a lot of heat is released into the environment and the warming can be felt by even their boyfriends and husbands. Add their change and bad disposition at this time in their lives and the whole world is heated by an equivalent of e=mc2. AOC will be wholly responsible for heating our world when she goes through her change and could be sued by the Green Crowd Agenda for causing a cataclysmic catastrophe.
Women cause g****l w*****g when they go through th... (show quote)


Sounds plausible to me....I'm an expert because I made myself 'The Boss!!'


Go to
Jul 14, 2019 21:07:30   #
tactful wrote:
supertramp isn't bad either .... just not my cup o tea all the time... normal is where the home is generally.and that's as easy as it gets.


LOL
Go to
Jul 14, 2019 21:06:23   #
byronglimish wrote:
Have you ever considered a few weekends at former Mayor of S.F. Willie Brown's house, khameleon Harris did. Khameleon launched on Willies Willy and now she is trying to screw all Americans.


LOL
Go to
Jul 14, 2019 21:04:49   #
JoyV wrote:
How can anyone who has even a passing acquaintance with reality think the orbital and axial changes of the earth can be affected by CO2. The Mailankovitch cycles are an explanation of how those changes affect climate. But CO2 cannot change the eccentricity nor axial tilt of the earth!!!! This is as bad as when someone argued with me that CO2 caused sunspot activity. And no; CO2 does not cause volcanic eruptions or earthquakes either.

No matter how much CO2 in our atmosphere, the orbital cycles and axial tilt cycles will not be altered by it.

And after reading the report on the NASA Venus climate model, one glaring omission pops out immediately. Venus' atmosphere is very high in sulfur. The cloud cover is made up mostly of H2So4. The model does not take that into account or explain it.
How can anyone who has even a passing acquaintance... (show quote)


You are absolutely talking over the comprehension level of those who talk about 'C*****e C****e' ...as if the earth never went thru 'Hot and Cold' cycles before !! A picture supports your research....Great job!!




Go to
Jul 14, 2019 20:52:57   #
Bcon wrote:
If I have a few hours with nothing better to do, which I doubt, I will try to decipher the gist of your post. Try as I might, I can make no sense of what you are trying to say


Exactly the point I believe you were making in your post about the left giving us a babbling i***t....AOK ( ie AOC )and gigginthebutt...who is more obsessed with being a Gay Wife....than he is about being Mayor of his City...let alone the President !!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 15 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.