Oh boy look at the FBI Rats scurrying around to cover their butts on this one... just wait for the SPIN Doctors to come and White Wash the stupid sheeple over this one...

No matter what the results are, 10 W***e A******ns have been slaughtered and the FBI is part to blame !

What is the Magic Number for MAGA M*****as to Retaliate ?


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


American Thinker
March 24, 2021
So the FBI knew all about the Colorado shooter ...
By: Monica Showalter

What, exactly, are the taxpayers paying for in the highly politicized and loaded-for-money wokester FBI these days?

The recent mass-shooting out of Colorado, from a murder-spewing freak they knew about, would suggest nothing. While they were out there busy looking for 'w***e s*********ts' this admitted refugee from Syria was making plans to k**l.

And he's not the first. Here's the ever-extending list of these known-wolf spray-shooters, from The Last Refuge / Conservative Treehouse:

The FBI knew in advance the Pulse Nightclub shooter (Omar Mateen) and were tipped off by the local sheriff.
The FBI knew in advance the San Bernardino Terrorists (Tashfeen Malik).
The FBI knew in advance the Boston Marathon Bombers (the Tsarnaev brothers) tipped off by Russians.
The FBI knew in advance the Garland, Texas, shooters (Elton Simpson and Nadir Soofi).
The FBI knew in advance of the Parkland High School shooter (Nikolas Cruz).
The FBI knew in advance of the Fort Hood shooter (Nidal Hasan); and now
the FBI knew in advance of Ahmad al-Aliwi Alissa.


Read More
Those are just off-the-top of my head… Anyone notice a pattern?

Two points leap to mind on this:

One, the FBI has gotten fairly ineffective since it has grown wokester-politicized, ignoring A****a and its depredations as non-existent, putting tremendous resources into busting Trump officials on process crimes, violating the law on surveillance of such Trumpsters, focusing its on hunting down 'w***e s*********ts' and now targeting pro-Trump conservatives as national security threats in the wake of the J*** 6 failed crowd-control incident at the Capitol, which involved no participants with firearms. Yes, there were a few plotters who planned and ignited the incident, and they have been and should be duly busted and thrown into jail. Nobody's arguing with that, but it's indisputable that these losers were awfully easy to find, what with the videos and selfies they took. No glory in catching those clowns. But the FBI's broad focus now on anyone who was simply attending the J*** 6 rally for President Trump is KGB-class stuff. That would be the same KGB (or wh**ever the hell they are called now) that allowed Chechen mass terror attacks to go on across Russia because they were so preoccupied with persecuting journalists, poisoning dissidents, and busting the zero-talent "singers" of Pussy R**t.

It's scary to see that kind of thing going on here, too.

The Treehouse has a revolting picture of 12 people wearing FBI vests "taking a knee" presumably to the American f**g, apparently to demonstrate their superceding loyalty to washed-up football player Colin Kaepernick, and the wokester Black L***s M****r r****rs.

According to Sundance:

A reminder…. 50 FBI agents were enlisted within the Trump-Russia investigation to push a narrative. 13 FBI agents were dispatched to Talladega speedway to investigate a garage pull-down rope and push a narrative. Thousands of FBI hours have been spent investigating the J****** 6th Washington DC protest… and once again another terrorist carries out a mass shooting where the FBI knew the suspect in advance.

Two, the politicization of the bureau seems to be going hand in hand with the increased money and personnel being larded onto the bureau.

The FBI's annual budget as of 2020 stands at more than $9.3 billion, with 35,500 personnel, about a third of whom are Special Agents. That's double of what it was in 2004, the last year of President Bush's first term, when the budget ran at $4.6 billion, and the agency employed about 30,000 people. The bureau is an old agency, dating from 1908, and not since the 1940-1950 period, according to this Congressional Research Service report, has it proportionally risen so sharply as it has in this most recent period, although there were some spikes in the Reagan and post-911 periods, too.

Presumably, the added outlays (most of which apparently went for cybersecurity and intelligence/counterintelligence) would bring more in added value to the taxpayer, as would the high amount it spends of gun-purchase background checks. Perhaps so on the counterintelligence and cybersecurity fronts (some great busts of Chicom spies in recent years, gotta give them that). But on the serious violent crime front, which ranks low on funding priorities, according to this report here, they have not. The gun-purchase checks section has had some failures, too. Detecting this kind of crime seems like a low-prestige backwater for the worst-performing agents or something, high resources have not apparently been going in to this kind of high-impact crime from these kinds of miserable losers. Yet they have enough to know about these people and they certainly did about this one in Colorado.

It yielded nothing. Now there's another round of them plotting the next copycat attacks and the evil cycle will continue. Which ones will be missed on the next murder spree? It's creepy to think about, because this agency is being paid to stop these creeps and it apparently doesn't have the will, or possibly, the tools, to stop them. If they need more legal tools, it's up for them to ask for them of Congress. Otherwise, there seems to be a great fail going on, a waste of money. Seems that if more resources can go into finding and stopping spray shooters, maybe they can take it out of the political budget. The prevalence of spray-shooters ought to leave the FBI no time for political persecutions that benefit only Democrats. They need focus now on real threats and be on the hot seat if they don't.

All Links and Sources in here:
https://americanthinker.us17.list-manage.com/track/click?u=64b02e9269ba4913b764daf76&id=ca0262a3b4&e=563301fc83

Anybody here want to weigh in on what we can be expected from the media when finally granted access to the White House Occupant?
Anybody think questions will have to be submitted in advance?
Will Biden somehow incorporate a teleprompter to guide him through pat answers to presumed topical questions?
Will Biden yield to a cadre of department heads deployed on stage to field questions specific to their areas of oversight?
Will the media ask probing questions, while pressing for clarity with follow-ups?
Will patent contradictions between promises and policies be fair game?
Will Biden be called out on the double standard and "newspeak" employed to 'splain away the border crisis?
Will Biden be called upon to take a stand on HR-1, DC statehood, degrading the filibuster and adding justices to the Supreme Court?
Will i******s be eligible for ACA health coverage?
How can his proposed spending of trillions be sustainable with taxation aimed at raising billions?

Last question: over / under on 60 minutes and done?

Gerard Scimeca-townhall
|
Posted: Oct 30, 2020
The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Source: AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster
Two entirely different visions for America are on the b****t this November, espoused by two candidates who share not a single floor tile of common ground on the issues. As President Trump firmly embraces less government activism and a thriving free market, Joe Biden has surrendered to the far left wing of his party after decades as a left-leaning moderate. In this third quest for the presidency, Joe has shown just how malleable his principles have become.
Few issues, however, highlight Biden’s unparalleled duplicity so much as school choice, an idea he once passionately embraced as critical to helping the poor - minorities especially - escape the cycle of poverty and government dependency. In 1997, Biden pleaded from the well of the Senate, “Where the public schools are abysmal or dysfunctional or not working and where most of the children have no way out, it is legitimate to ask what would happen to the public schools with increased competition from private schools. Is it not possible that giving poor kids a way out will force the public schools to improve…”
Today Biden is the Democrat p**********l nominee and therefore a loyal puppet of the powerful National Education Association (NEA) teachers union that calls the party’s shots on education. Despite the overwhelming popularity of school choice, including its 78 percent support among black v**ers, Biden now opposes vouchers, charter schools, or any reform that would give poor kids “a way out.”
Biden’s lockdown of educational opportunities is a deliberate confrontation with the efforts of President Trump and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who have fought to expand school choice through federal grants, scholarship programs, and legislation. DeVos refers to school choice as a “matter of justice” and backs that up by advocating compassionate policies to rescue the victims of the education establishment’s massive failures. It is a position that no fair person could oppose; but no one claims the NEA or Democrats are fair. Biden’s children benefited from attending private schools, underscoring the hypocrisy of his position that willfully condemns poor children stuck in dysfunctional classrooms to a bleak future.
Just as troublesome, Biden has adopted his party’s hostile position on choice in higher education as well. For years Democrats and their allies in the elitist education establishment have attempted to hijack government agencies ranging from the IRS to Veterans Administration (VA) to delegitimize and deny accreditation to hundreds of career-oriented, for-profit and not-for-profit colleges that are helping America fill its deficit of sk**led workers. Institutions such as ECPI University, Grand Canyon University, the University of Phoenix, Full Sail University, and many other highly valued and successful institutions would be devastated by the Democrats’ legislative and regulatory assault on colleges that don’t fit the traditional four-year mold.
Active duty military personnel and veterans would see their ability to apply GI Bill tuition assistance to the school of their choice greatly restricted. Biden would alter the 90-10 rule that sets the formula for what percentage of federal student aid career-oriented schools can accept. Curtailing a benefit our veterans have earned is not only an egregious slap at our men and women in uniform, but will likely lead to dozens of schools closing while others will have to raise tuition to make up the difference.
Biden has pledged to fire DeVos “day one” in office and reverse the unprecedented work she has accomplished in expanding education options. He would follow the advice of highly-paid, ultra-left education activists Bob Shireman and David Halperin, former Clinton and Obama advisors, who routinely disparage private college education with jaded "research" that never acknowledges the quality and accomplishments of dozens of career-oriented colleges. Shireman and Halperin happily do the dirty work of the entrenched education establishment to promote policies designed to shut down college options, such as through the Gainful Employment Rule (GER). The GER empowers federal bureaucrats to police school degree programs based on arbitrary salaries its students earn, a rule totally inapplicable at traditional four-year state schools or elite Ivy League universities.
Biden’s education reforms would ignore the numerous problems plaguing traditional four-year colleges and universities, such as student debt, admissions scandals, poor graduation rates and tenure, and instead seek new ways to harass career-oriented universities with oppressive rules and regulatory oversight. A Biden administration will do nothing about campus speech codes, growing levels of ideological intolerance, or lack of due process that has turned what should be a time of open-minded exploration for college students into an exercise in oppressive left-wing indoctrination.
Joe Biden frequently jokes that his wife Jill is a teacher, and that he has to answer to her on education policy. But Biden’s plan to k**l school choice from grade school through to college is no joke, and no laughing matter. Biden is the candidate of the NEA and its cohorts in the education establishment that seek a complete government monopoly on policy and iron grip on the distribution of education funding. His goal is to stop choice across the board, and end the innovations that threaten the traditional four-year college model. He will take us backwards, and hurt millions of students at every age level in the bargain.
Gerard Scimeca is an attorney and co-founder of CASE, Consmer Action for a Strong Economy, a free-market oriented consumer advocacy organization.