One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: JDunneNow
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4
Mar 22, 2015 21:16:47   #
Don G. Dinsdale wrote:
CANADA FREE PRESS


Details of the Obama Forgery Exposed

By Doug Hagmann - March 22, 2015


Every American is the victim of one of the most insidious crimes ever perpetrated on the collective - the capturing of our nation from within. The set-up process occurred over decades, but culminated with the se******n and installation of Barack Hussein Obama, a/k/a Barry Soetoro, as the front man in this silent c**p.

One important piece of evidence to support this crime exists in the controversial Certificate of Live Birth, but not in the way you have heard, and not in the manner that you might suspect. The revelation of the manner and methods now exist in a document that the criminal elements of our government and the complicit media do not want you to see. And the evidence is as compelling as it is damning.

Based on the popularity of television shows like Criminal Minds, Law and Order: Criminal Intent, and Profiler from the late 1990s, a large number of people are fascinated by the investigative science of criminal profiling. One aspect of such behavioral profiling includes understanding the difference between a perpetrator’s modus operandi or “M.O.,” and their “signature.”

So far, the managed mainstream media has ignored the October 18, 2013 filing of two affidavits, one public and the other sealed, that identify twenty-(20) points of forgery on the most controversial document concerning the most controversial figure of our time: Barack Hussein Obama. In my view, this is undoubtedly the most detailed and compellingly damning document ever created pertaining to the controversy surrounding the long form birth certificate. It provides critical insight into the people behind the forgery, their methods, and more importantly, their mistakes.While all criminals have a modus operandi, analyzing a perpetrator’s “signature” is a bit more involved. Signature behaviors serve to satisfy some need of the criminal, and might be viewed as a “calling card” of sorts that link them to the crime. This is particularly true in cases of forgery, where the forger leaves a usually well hidden “signature” to identify them as the creator of the forgery. The preceding is provided as a formal introduction to the most important forgery of our time: Barack Hussein Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth.

Douglas Vogt, an author and the owner and operator of a scanning business who also has an accounting background, invested over two years conducting an investigation into the authenticity of Obama’s Certificate of Live Birth. Mr. Vogt, along with veteran typesetter Paul Ivey, conducted exhaustive research of the document provided to the White House Press Corps on April 27, 2011 - not the online PDF, a critical distinction that must be understood.

Using their combined experience of 80 years in this realm, they conducted extensive examinations of the “copy” that was used as the basis for the PDF document. They acquired the same type of equipment that was used back in the late 1950s and early 1960s in an attempt to recreate the document presented as an “authenticated copy” proving the legitimacy of Barack Obama. Instead, they found 20 points of forgery on that document and detail each point of forgery in the affidavit.

Even more interesting, Mr. Vogt claims to have identified the “signature” of the perpetrator, or the woman who created the forged document, hidden within the document itself. Her identity, in addition to the identity of other conspirators and their precise methods are contained in a sealed document supplementing the public affidavit.

In my extensive research of the open source evidence revealed by Mr. Vogt in the affidavit publicly released, I have been able to connect the dots myself. Mr. Vogt released additional and even more specific details in a nearly 3-hour long radio interview last evening on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report.

The elements of the alleged criminality behind the creation of this forged document, along with the forgery of the short form birth certificate are indeed staggering. The phrase that was born out of the exposure to the crimes related to Watergate, “plausible deniability,” has now been thrust forward to the present day.

The release of the long form birth certificate at a press gaggle three days before the reported k*****g of Osama bin Laden seemed to be ripped from the playbook used by the men behind Nixon’s Watergate. Some who were involved knew exactly what was taking place, while others served as useful dupes to quiet the growing number intent on seeing evidence of Obama’s eligibility. Early on, the perpetrators made a few key mistakes that they could not undo. Instead, they attempted to cover their mistakes through additional forgery.

In addition to the errors they attempted to cover, the alleged forger of the COLB covertly “signed” the forged document, leaving her signature on one of the most important forgeries of our time. Whether it was done out of personal hubris or to provide her own level of “plausible deniability” in a most convoluted sense, it is apparent once you know where to look. Then, it all begins to make sense.

The affidavit filed by Mr. Vogt asserts that violations of federal law, from misprision of felony to misprision of treason occurred by the hands of Obama himself, his White House counsel, the Hawaii Department of Health, Savannah Guthrie and her employer at the time, certain other media companies, and those listed as “John and Jane Does” in the unsealed affidavit. The John and Jane Does are identified in the sealed affidavit.

Using a brilliant legal tactic unlike anyone else who has attempted redress against this treasonous activity, Mr. Vogt tapped into a section of federal law that necessitates action on the part of the federal judiciary via a federal judge - currently in the hands of the U.S. District Court in the Western District of Washington in Seattle.

It is this method or loophole in the federal statutes that separates this filing with all others. Additionally, it makes this filing by orders of magnitude much more dangerous to those involved in the alleged conspiracy to insert a foreign agent in the highest office in America.

This is a very big deal. This is a very viable threat to those who believe they are impervious to legal action for their s*******s and treasonous activities, and the very people who have and continue to facilitate them. This is the best evidence yet that America is a captured operation.

~~~~~

If you knew Obama was lying about who and what he was before becoming a Ill. State Senator, ie: Marxist, Socialist, C*******t, Muslim, anti-American, and you did nothing would you be as guilty as the perpetrator of the crime of lies and treason???

Now here's the hard part, he becomes president by "Hook & Crook", not unlike other men in our modern times, that's the first term, but now the nation has a four year history of hiss incompetence and lack of leadership...

And some of the lies start to percolate to the top, and you see them, and maybe you even "Google some question" and you become convinced at least some of his action are questionable, would you be guilty of what, being stupid, or taken in at least???

So now you know or suspect the t***h what to do...

I've always know the t***h about him and I've worn a path to my Senators and my Congressman...

Now I think it's your turn to take responsibility for the biggest mistake in our history, closely followed by Jimmy (I H**e Jews) Carter...

Good Luck, I hope you do your duty... Don D.
CANADA FREE PRESS br br br Details of the Obama ... (show quote)


A few things that may or may not matter: to expose or even convincingly suspect Obama as an unnnaturalised citizen is Pulitzer Award material: every investigative reporter or crazy is on the trail. And nothing conclusive after 6 years.
Go to
Mar 22, 2015 21:03:23   #
mwdegutis wrote:
Next thing you know they’ll eye peeing and pooping as unhealthy polluters because of the ammonia and methane gas resulting in the EPA trying to find ways to regulate these totally natural endeavors.

Posted on by Ben Bullard | March 18, 2015
As part of the Environmental Protection Agency’s current push to hand out $15,000 grants to anybody with a heavy hand, the University of California-Riverside will benefit from government backing to develop a way to reduce emissions from backyard barbecue grills.

According to the agency’s grant summary, EPA will hand UC-Riverside the funds in order to “perform research and develop preventative technology that will reduce fine particulate emissions (PM2.5) from residential barbecues.” If the outcome of the research is scalable, it will indicate a “potential for global application.”

How’s that supposed to work? According to the proposal, by modifying current grill designs with a grease-catching tray to reduce “the amount of grease that is volatilized via direct contact with an open flame,” and by equipping grills with a powered “secondary air filtration system” that uses automation or the grill operator’s own hand power to “mitigate the remaining aerosol and particulate matter formed.”

It’s actually a bit more complicated than that but the bottom line, according to a Republican lawmaker from Missouri who says he’s worried about the idea taking hold nationwide, is more government encroachment into personal behavior on private property.

“The idea that the EPA wants to find their way into our backyards, where we’re congregating with our neighbors, having a good time, on the Fourth of July, barbecuing steak or hamburgers, is ridiculous and it’s emblematic of agency that’s sort of out of control,” Missouri State Sen. Eric Schmitt told Fox 2 St. Louis. Schmitt also staged a Twitter-based protest: #porksteakr*******n, a PR campaign encouraging people in the Show-Me State to go outside and grill to their hearts’ content.

Publicity aside, the EPA is on a roll this month with its nickel-and-dime strategy. It recently awarded a separate $15,000 grant to the University of Tulsa for a research program intended to goad hotel guests into “modifying their behavior” by monitoring how much hot water they use while showering.
Next thing you know they’ll eye peeing and pooping... (show quote)


There is over-regulation and there is needed regulation. A backyard Barbeque, environmentally hurtful or not to the cooker, is ridiculous oversight. Kids lemon-aid stands regulated? They need a break at the EPA or an edict of humor.
Go to
Mar 22, 2015 20:54:44   #
She Wolf wrote:
Yesterday was my Birthday. Never thought I would live to be 61. I must admit I was a little depressed. I was having an bad MS episode and feeling sorry for myself.

Enter the Grandkids. Presents, cake, and ice cream. It was then I realized how fortunate I truly am. I may be older than dirt but I have a daughter and two beautiful Grandkids who love me. Sure I have problems but who doesn't?

I have been blessed. Life may not be easy but when you have people that love you even when you may not deserve that love, it sure is truly a wonderful life. So I thanked my God for the many blessing I have and vowed to stop complaining about the things I want but obviously do not need.
Yesterday was my Birthday. Never thought I would ... (show quote)


Funny how that works, like the movie "It's a wonderful life" summarized and and far better produced in the smile or presence of a grandchild. You are exceedingly blessed. Happy belated birthday!
Go to
Mar 22, 2015 20:48:21   #
We each can make this world a little colder or warmer for our neighbor. That is are two choices in society: exclusion or welcome.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.