One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Canuckus Deploracus
Page: <<prev 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 2981 next>>
May 4, 2022 21:50:52   #
AuntiE wrote:
This person had a great start in life. 

Mr.Allen  Swift:  Born - 1908 - Died  2010

 This man owned and drove the same car for 82 years.

 

Can you imagine even having the same car for 82 years? 

Mr. Allen  Swift (Springfield, Massachusetts) received this 1928 Rolls-Royce Piccadilly-P1 Roadster from his father, brand new - as a graduation gift in 1928.



He drove it up until his death in 2010.

 At the age of 102.

He was the oldest living owner of a car that was purchased new.

It was donated to a Springfield museum after his death.

It has 1,070,000 miles on it, still runs like a Swiss watch, dead silent at any speed
and is in perfect cosmetic condition.

82 years - That's approximately 13,048 miles per year (1087 per month).

1,070,000 - that’s  miles, not kilometres!  

That's British engineering of a bygone era.  



I don't think they make them like this any more!
This person had a great start in life.  br br Mr.... (show quote)


Things are built to break these days...

This is just more proof that the world needn't be as it is....
Go to
May 4, 2022 21:48:50   #
LogicallyRight wrote:
Let's start with, I think taking a life is always wrong. Same with the death penalty, as with a******n. Exceptions? To save a life, or war with the war part if it is not for conquering or pillage. Also to save the life of the mother. Just trying to establish that I'm not just for k*****g babies, but taking all life.

Life of an individual being begins at conception. There is no distinctive point from there to death in old age, from old age, where the being goes from here to there in a single moment. Yes, the body slowly develops from a single cell to a full adult human moment by moment. So, to me, this life at all points deserves to be considered a separate and distinct individual with the right to life.

So, how does this affect the woman. Nature created humans like most higher order animals in two forms, either male or female. That excludes t******s who have a mental disorder. But that is a different issue despite those that think men can now get pregnant and might want an a******n. They can't. Period. So, back to the female. She and a man get together, not saying how, and she provides an egg and he provides sperm. When they match up, a baby is created, no matter what you might call it. It is a distinct human. What else does the woman do for this baby. She essentially provides nutrition and shelter.

Now, this is the tricky part for me. Once the egg is fertilized, it is still floating along in her womb, looking for a moment where it can connect to the womb and anchor itself and hook up into all of those nutrients that the woman provides. The women say that it is their body and they get to decide what to do with their body. Somewhat agree. If her body does not accept that fertilized egg linking on, she is free of that baby and not responsible for it. Drugs, like a morning after pill or other birth control devices that interrupt that point of accepting that baby into and onto her body is her free choice. That is how I see it. While we might disagree, that is a distinct point of her taking responsibility, willing or not, for that baby. After that, the baby has a right to life. Like I said, my opinion.

Now. women have the choice to protect against conception in advance, and that is her responsibility, directed by nature and her life choices.

Who pays for that? Not sure, but a total government sponsored birth control is not a reasonable option. Some help is warranted. Hey guys, it could help save us from 20 years of child support.

This potential upheaval does not take away a woman's right to a******n. It just leaves that decision up to the states. Constitutionally, probably were it belonged all along. The democrats are blaming this whole issue on a right leaning Supreme Court. But wasn't it a left leaning Supreme Court that did the opposite some 50 years ago, and cause 60,000,000 babies to lose their chance at life. We don't need to expand the Supreme Court over this. Our Justices are there to verify law and constitutionality, not make law. Is this a correction? We'll need to read the decision and descent to decide of they corrected a mistake or made one.

Women and others for a******n have been going on forever that it is our right to decide what to do with their bodies. Were these same people and politicians letting us do what we wanted to do with our bodies over C***d. These damn politicians were already saying, yesterday, that women have a right to do what they want with their bodies. But these same politicians are still enforcing shots on public employees, police and our Armed Forces at the risk of their jobs and careers. And all over experimental shots that don't prevent C***d and failed miserably in living up to what they initially claimed. And their record of side effects is horrible, including causing deaths, and especially for women and their reproductive abilities. And these are proven facts. These were pushed by democrats. So, when you try to pin this potential Supreme Court decision on Republicans, remember that the democrats probably did a lot worse to you over the last two years them this decision will ever do.

Now remember, about half the states will allow a******n. And women will set up underground avenues for pills for chemical a******ns. It won't end a******ns. They will also set up t***sportation and such to states were it is legal. And remember, several of those states are not only not ending a******n, they are extending it to the last minute before birth and even for days or weeks after. That way you can look, decide, and screw the husband or wh**ever and still decide to k**l that baby. And quickly harvest the organs for t***splant and research in Frankenstein labs.

One more issue. Costs. I believe that several states have made a******n free and even for out of state baby k**lers to just come on over and rip it out. At my expense. If you are going to k**l a baby, at least do it at your own damn expense. Don't make me pay for murdering some helpless baby.

With all of my thoughts over the years and a lot of reading, I hope I an right, I believe I am right, and I think I am.

Logically Right
Let's start with, I think taking a life is always ... (show quote)


We agree on many points...Well said
Go to
May 4, 2022 20:58:16   #
permafrost wrote:
Those are excellent Memes.. I knew more then a couple women back in the 70s that would be happy to shoot you over several of them..

But also you comment of going back to a time when men paid the bill and women kept the home and family... I would love that.. but doubt very much we will see it.. Or even possible..

Any way, it is time to do my weight lifting and calahopes... If I survive that again,, a book and sleep.. darn such a time..

Have a nice evening and come back tomorrow, I will try and answer some of these excellent replies..
Those are excellent Memes.. I knew more then a cou... (show quote)


I love weight lifting as well...
Try not to overdo it
Go to
May 4, 2022 19:08:20   #
woodguru wrote:
Some right wing genius twittered or tweeted or wh**ever within a couple hours of the news that the draft had been leaked that he had figured out who did it...

It was off to the races and the "evidence" is that thin.

The problem here is that these rabid anti a******n nutjobs are getting people k**led, they have splashed this person's face on posters and started the "needs to be charged with treason" rhetoric. This is dangerous horse crap and the worst is that they are turning someone's life upside down that is probably not the person who did this.

https://www.rawstory.com/sotomayor/?cx_testId=4&cx_testVariant=cx_1&cx_artPos=7&cx_experienceId=EXC93HV4HK4I#cxrecs_s
Some right wing genius twittered or tweeted or wh*... (show quote)


L*****ts are against doxxing all of a sudden
Go to
May 4, 2022 18:28:03   #
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Most unattractive d**g q***n ever.


😂😂😂

This one got me
Go to
May 4, 2022 18:15:24   #
bggamers wrote:
They have brought information the government DIDNT want to be brought to light because they got caught usually doing something wrong. But there are those that did the same as like the one who brought out what planned parenthood was doing and he is in jail facing 9 felony charges explain the difference, please


There is no difference... That I can see...
Go to
May 4, 2022 18:13:52   #
permafrost wrote:
Hypothetically, if Roe v. Wade is overturned, what would people do?
I can tell you what they won’t do, and that’s stop having a******ns.

Roe v. Wade isn’t as much about a******n as it is about a woman’s right to choose to have one. The need for a******ns will always be present, Roe just ensures there are legal avenues for receiving one. Overturning Roe will close one of those avenues and leave the matter entirely to the individual states.

Roe v. Wade makes a******ns legal on a federal level, but if the ruling is overturned, states are free to outlaw a******ns completely, rather than make them illegal past a certain point.

Understand this. A******ns won’t stop. Unsafe a******ns will rise. If Roe v. Wade is overturned, women’s reproductive rights will be set back 49 years.

That cannot happen.
Hypothetically, if Roe v. Wade is overturned, what... (show quote)


While I can certainly follow the reasoning of the meme, the logic is rather flawed...

Is society to start taking care of every individual's every need???

Hardly...

People love the idea of free stuff...

People rarely admit that nothing in life is free...

The saddest part of that meme is where she talks about maternity leave... If we could go back to the traditional g****r roles and the nuclear family there would be no need for maternity leave... Men would take care of the bills and women would build the family...

The modern world is a selfish, materialistic one... Full of greedy, unfulfilled people...








Go to
May 4, 2022 18:01:39   #
Peaver Bogart wrote:
RULES TO TEACH YOUR SON

1. Never shake a man’s hand sitting down.
2. Don’t enter a pool by the stairs.
3. The man at the BBQ Grill is the closest thing to a king.
4. In a negotiation, never make the first offer.
5. Request the late check-out.
6. When entrusted with a secret, keep it.
7. Hold your heroes to a higher standard.
8. Return a borrowed car with a full tank of gas.
9. Play with passion or don’t play at all…
10. When shaking hands, grip firmly and look them in the eye.
11. Don’t let a wishbone grow where a backbone should be.
12. If you need music on the beach, you’re missing the point.
13. Carry two handkerchiefs. The one in your back pocket is for you. The one in your breast pocket is for her.
14. You marry the girl, you marry her family.
15. Be like a duck. Remain calm on the surface and paddle like crazy underneath.
16. Experience the serenity of traveling alone.
17. Never be afraid to ask out the best looking girl in the room.
18. Never turn down a breath mint.
19. A sport coat is worth 1000 words.
20. Try writing your own eulogy. Never stop revising.
21. Thank a veteran. Then make it up to him.
22. Eat lunch with the new kid.
23. After writing an angry email, read it carefully. Then delete it.
24. Ask your mom to play. She won’t let you win.
25. Manners maketh the man.
26. Give credit. Take the blame.
27. Stand up to Bullies. Protect those bullied.
28. Write down your dreams.
29. Take time to snuggle your pets, they love you so much and are always happy to see you.
30. Be confident and humble at the same time.
31. If ever in doubt, remember whose son you are and REFUSE to just be ordinary!
32. In all things lead by example not explanation.
RULES TO TEACH YOUR SON br br 1. Never shake a ma... (show quote)




Go to
May 4, 2022 18:00:18   #
I'm seeing a lot of threads concerning a******n and Roe vs Wade....

One if the general arguments being made by the pro a******n clique is that women should have autonomy over there reproductive rights... That no one has the right to stop them from making decisions about the child they're caring... Certainly the government doesn't have the right ban the practice (although oddly it has the right to legalize it)...

Fair enough...

But I'm curious, why do these children suddenly become my responsibility after they're born???

Tax payer dollars go into all sorts of welfare and aid programs directed at children, especially of single mothers, or minorities...

What happened to that autonomy???

I'm not against charity... I think it's a fine thing, especially when directed towards children... I'm talking about government programs at the federal, state, and municipal level that allot tax payer money to the parents of disadvantaged children...

I'd also like to know why the autonomy of parents ceases to exist the moment children walk into a school???

Recent discoveries show that education has taken a rather disturbing path and that teachers are often behaving in a deceptive manner towards parents....With some school boards actively placing parents in the role of "enemy"...

There are several other examples along this line... But I think the point is clear...

Thoughts????
Go to
May 4, 2022 17:42:04   #
proud republican wrote:
https://www.thelist.com/319781/the-most-inappropriate-outfits-worn-by-michelle-obama/


Crude...
Go to
May 4, 2022 17:40:54   #
Grandpa Rick wrote:
A thought occurred to me today as I was commenting on a post: do we ever change our mind on a subject after reading an OPP post? I've put this question on occasion to two other discussion groups over the years, and never received an affirmative answer. But OPP is a very large (I assume?) audience so who knows?

If you've had an opinion changing experience please let us know about. I don't think rigid minds will cure many problems.


I used to be very anti Snowden and Assange... Thanks to several posters here providing me with information and asking questions that made me think I have a very different opinion today...

And there's lots I've learned about American and world history from the site...
Go to
May 4, 2022 09:35:51   #
Parky60 wrote:
Sensual demonic wisdom.


Yeah..She whupped you a couple of times...
Go to
May 4, 2022 09:29:19   #
dtucker300 wrote:
That's not like you.


In my 18 years in China, I've not once encountered anyone who had an issue with this system...

It's pretty much the same as a criminal record...

But the West loves to make it into a Boogeyman...
Go to
May 4, 2022 09:14:56   #
Grandpa Rick wrote:
If Roe v. Wade is overruled as seems certain probably half of the States will make a******n illegal. Women in those states who want an a******n will have to travel to other states. Travel and hotel costs (and lost wages) will be out of reach for many.

The "many" will be over represented by women of color so the proportion of children of color born will be higher than if all women, regardless of color, had access to less expensive a******n.

Many on the extreme right, who are antia******n also fear the increasing numbers of people of color in our population. The repeal of Roe will result in the very thing they fear.

And if people of color continue to v**e Democrat eventually the pro-a******n movement will have the v**es necessary to legalize a******n by repealing thr bans that are expected to follow the repeal of Roe.
If Roe v. Wade is overruled as seems certain proba... (show quote)


Your argument is that a******n should be legalized and subsidized in order to keep the number of colored folks down???

Brutal...
Go to
May 3, 2022 20:52:50   #
woodguru wrote:
You know that the angry right is far more dangerous than women in pink pussy hats


Then why are the barricades going up for the pussy hat crowd???
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 ... 2981 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.