One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Floyd Brown
Page: <<prev 1 ... 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 ... 477 next>>
Jan 17, 2014 10:20:45   #
jay-are wrote:
We have to decide if we are going to give it back or keep it. What would you prefer?


Well I passed through there twice on my short lived army career.

I do not feel that in the long run it is worth trying to save. One day most of it may just end up in the ocean.
Go to
Jan 17, 2014 10:01:16   #
Brian Devon wrote:
There is a new meme in this nation: democracy vs republic. It is a straw man because this nation is BOTH a republic and a democracy. Why is this meme becoming prevalent? Because the Republicans are very afraid of democracy. They are in a panic. Last year, more minority babies were born than white babies. This is the year that Hispanics in California, will become the largest ethnic group, eclipsing Euro-Americans. Constitutional amendments have added B****s and women to the v****g rolls. There is a new ruling equation: Young women+liberal older white baby-boomers+b****s+hispanics=the new American majority=President Obama's twice being elected. They see Jefferson's white male, property owning America slipping away in terms of political dominance. This is why so many of them are infatuated with such things as the repeal of the direct e******n of senators...or Civil War 2.0, or even a military c**p. They see the writing on the wall and they are scared shi*less. Many of them are not only filled with h**e, they are also disloyal to this nation and have treason in their little hearts....
There is a new meme in this nation: democracy vs r... (show quote)


In a nut shell you went right to the core.

America was the melting pot. Things were just fine as long as those in power were pale enough.

I being some what paler hope that I can avoid being sucked down the tubes when those of more color take over.

The hope lays in those of us who truly feel that America can show the world what a real melting pot of all people can be.
Go to
Jan 17, 2014 09:47:12   #
RetNavyCWO wrote:
How many times do I have to answer your question? Until I agree with you that there is some hidden, nefarious, secret message he was sending?

Goodness, man! Congress has blocked him every step of the way from his first day in office. He cannot count on getting legislation through Congress. Of course he has objectives he would like to accomplish as president. Every president does! And the fact that he intends to use all the powers he has, just like every president (W issued more executive orders than Obama has) has, doesn't mean he's doing anything nefarious. I think his words mean exactly what they say.

You're deluded, fella! I don't mean that as an insult. I'm just pointing out a t***h to you! Someone musta slipped you a mickey or something!
How many times do I have to answer your question? ... (show quote)


Is that wall getting an more sense now that you keep banging on it?

Some peoples heads are even denser than that wall.

By now I would have thought that you would have seen that there is no logic that can get through that wall.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 10:50:51   #
oldroy wrote:
The $ 50 lesson

Recently, while I was working in the flower beds in the front yard, my neighbors stopped to chat as they returned home from walking their dog.

During our friendly conversation, I asked their 12 year old daughter what she wanted to be when she grows up. She said she wanted to be President someday.

Both of her parents - liberal Democrats - were standing there, so I asked her, "If you were President what would be the first thing you would do?"

She replied, "I'd give food and houses to all the homeless people."

Her parents beamed with p***e!

"Wow...what a worthy goal!" I said. "But you don't have to wait until you're President to do that!" I told her.

"What do you mean?" she replied.

So I told her, "You can come over to my house and mow the lawn, pull weeds, and trim my hedge, and I'll pay you $50. Then you can go over to the grocery store where the homeless guy hangs out, and you can give him the $50 to use toward food and a new house."

She thought that over for a few seconds, then she looked me straight in the eye and asked, "Why doesn't the homeless guy come over and do the work, and you can just pay him the $50?"

I said, "Welcome to the Republican Party."

Her parents aren't speaking to me.
The $ 50 lesson br br Recently, while I was work... (show quote)


Okay why didn't you hire the guy to do the work?
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 10:46:25   #
cold iron wrote:
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County ( L. A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes.
This is because they are predominantly i*****l i*******ts working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for i*****l a***ns.

3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are i*****l a***ns.

4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to i*****l a***n Mexicans on Medi-Cal,
whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 35% of all inmates in California detention centers
are Mexican nationals here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 i*****l a***ns in Los Angeles County are living in garages.

7... The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles
are most likely i*****l a***ns from south of the border.

8 Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal.

9. 21 radio stations in L. A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L.. A. County 5.1 million people speak English, 3.9 million speak Spanish..
(There are 10.2 million people in L. A. County.)

(All 10 of the above facts were published in the Los Angeles Times)

Less than 2% of i*****l a***ns are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare.
Over 70% of the United States’ annual population growth (and over 90% of California , Florida , and New York )
results from immigration.
29% of inmates in federal prisons are i*****l a***ns .

We are fools for letting this continue .
1. 40% of all workers in L. A. County ( L. A. Coun... (show quote)


It seems that at one time we took California & other parts of what was once part of Mexico. It looks like they are just trying to take it back.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 10:39:52   #
Brian Devon wrote:
Long attention spans are a lost cause. The internet has defeated books and lectures. Some things are indeed lost to the culture. On that list are: virginity, poetry, non-raunchy musicals, grapefruit juice, and anchovies on Pizza.


Hey what is this on grapefruit juice.

I am not high on anchovies though.

A long time ago late on night I ordered some pizza.
I was asked if I wanted anchovies & I said okay.

They most have been their last order & had a lot of anchovies left over because the pizza was covered heavy with anchovies.

Needles to say I never asked for them again.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 10:31:02   #
STORK wrote:
Would'st thou be an i***t? Assuredly.


From two post you have not said who you you are replying to.

From the tone of the posts it would seem to be to two different posts.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 10:20:24   #
rob2 wrote:
I just boiled it down to two questions for you, which you completely ignored. That hardly qualifies for even one paragraph. Jess, you just talk and dance around any direct inquiry you can't, or won't answer. For an academia person, you seem to have problems with in depth complex situations. Funny how I don't have similar complaints from others, even from the left.

The correct spelling in english for this use of the word is b-r-e-a-k. Maybe a little less time worrying about the British spelling of words ,and more time with english might improve those sk**ls.
I just boiled it down to two questions for you, wh... (show quote)


Thanks for the tip on spelling.

In your haste to reply you mixed up who you replied to.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 00:19:00   #
Look close people the light at the end of the tunnel are the flames from hell.
Go to
Jan 16, 2014 00:14:32   #
UncleJesse wrote:
Rob, the article is so long so if we're going to converse about it, let's maybe select a couple of the sections at a time.

The first section
It begins with misspelling of the word centralized in American English using British English, 'centralised'. That is a tell of the author who is anti-dollar, anti-euro and pro-pound. The British economy is not doing as well as the successful American monetary policy that has the US dollar equal to 0.61 British pound sterling and falling.
The section argues that a central bank decides who are placed in positions of power instead of a place where banks do their banking. There is a big problem with this opening idea and the creative imagination of the following history lesson makes the introductory problem even worse.

The Fed is a place for banks to draw from an account if they need to but they're required to have a certain percentage there. Having all banks make a deposit, if a few banks run out of money then the central bank can take money from the other accounts and lend it to the troubled ones - just like a local bank does to people and when a few people overdraw. Until the Fed was in place, banks routinely failed like that.
Rob, the article is so long so if we're going to c... (show quote)


I DO LIKE READING YOUR POSTS!

You seem to know so much & put it down so well.
Go to
Jan 15, 2014 10:44:22   #
rich278 wrote:
Right off the bat you should know I'm a retired business owner. You are a wannabe Republican but don't have the income to really be one so you go on line to take shots at the working man and union people. If the work force is not producing it is the fault of management every time. I have news for you most businesses fail because of poor management, not government or labor, except when in some cases when the Republican administration crashes the economy.


Rights & obligations.

What we have here now is many only this site only see the rights of businesses & not the obligations.

You say it like it is meant to be. If you run your business right
every one gains.

Yours is a breath of fresh air to the issue.
Go to
Jan 15, 2014 10:20:04   #
rob2 wrote:
Frankly that does not surprise me.

How about this, if you became president, what would your assessment of the health of our nation be? And what actions would you initiate as a result of your assessment?

Quit your mental midget mind games and answer a question with an answer instead of with another question.


Have you ever hear of putting things in paragraphs.

I just don't feel that I want to take the time to brake down a mess of words into some sort of sense.

For all I known you may have the best answers to what needs to be done. You just don't put your point across in an understandable fashion.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 17:58:05   #
rob2 wrote:
Ok, I'll try this one more time. It is not "crap", but fact that all liberal entitlement programs now in existence, and the supporting bureaucratic agencies, consume three fourths of the federal budget. These are not expenditures vital to the function of government, in the fulfilling of it's constitutional mandates. When those vital expenditures are added in, it results in 500 billion to 1.5 trillion dollars in excess of total tax revenues taken in. Does the typical liberal head of his house borrow the difference, year after year until there is so much debt, that the amount of interest only eventually consumes the entire income, and then goes on to require more borrowing (with more interest), just to pay the interest? We have methodically marched toward that eventuality for decades. Spending for these programs never decreases. It only and always increases. This is not "crap", but fact. The number of and percentage of people only increases, not decreases. This is not "crap", but fact. When you have to borrow every year to cover these expenditures, as the debt level rises, year after year, the amount of interest increases as well. Again, not "crap", but fact. A side effect is, as more and more people become dependent on these programs, there is less federal tax revenue taken in, therefore adding to the increased borrowing, or an increase in taxation from the working producers. Fact. Not "crap". We already have the highest tax rates in the world, and it only discourages hiring, business expansion, corporate holdings of overseas capital and profits, remaining there, to avoid the world's highest corporate tax rates. Fact, not "crap". The social security payroll tax originally produced surpluses each year, and was supposed to be kept separate from the general fund. Fact not "crap". Instead in order to artificially reduce the apparent amount of the deficit, these surpluses have been robbed year after year, but instead of using those funds to pay down debt, which even I may have gone along with, they have only been used to increase non vital government spending. Fact, not "crap". Although liberals are in denial, and refuse to acknowledge this fact we have reached the end of the line. Factual history shows the more you tax, the less the economy grows in order to keep up with population growth, unemployment increases as business does less or no hiring and federal revenues stagnate. From Kennedy to Reagan to Bush 43, when taxes were reduced federal revenues soar. Fact not "crap". As government takes more capital out of the free market through taxation, people and businesses have less to spend. These are all basic mathematical facts, not "crap". With this model, debt increases to the point where interest on that debt increases to the point where the amount of revenues does not even cover the amount of interest owed, much less the 17 trillion principal. 17 trillion dollar is almost 5 times annual revenues. This, no matter the deniers, is the legal defination of bankruptcy. Fact not "crap." All the wealth distributionist policies, all the taxation, all the borrowing, all the robbing of trust fund surpluses, (private pensions and 401k's are the next target, as Harry Houdini has indicated), will not bail you out of the hole you have dug. It is fact not "crap" you could take 100% of the 30% highest wage earners in this country, yes, take it ALL, and igt would not so much as dent the deficits we run each year. Fact, not "crap". We are there. This is the liberal model and we now see the results. Our currency values, the price of gold, are collapsing. Our economy has already collapsed, they are just not telling us the t***h as to how bad it really is. Unemployment is twice as high as they are telling us. They, are in fact lying to all of us. QE2 has only artificially propped up the stock market investors, primarily wall street and bankers, and all indications are it is projected to "correct" this spring to summer. Big Time.

Now, I have taken a different approach here, in order to be "succinct". Consider it my way of accomodation to your professed inability to see the point. I believe I have already been as about as succinct as you can get. Yes, I'm keenly aware I may be a little more blunt than most. We have no more time for any other approach. I have grown weary of the continued song and dance of those who, (1) deny this is a failed model, and continue said policies as if it is producing prosperity for all. Or that blame "rich" people as the cause of it's failure. Rich people don't get rich by taking everyone else's piece of pie. They take their profits and just make more pies. It's called increased volume. And (2), blame everyone but themselves for it's failure and relentlessly press for a double downing more of the same, which caused the failure to begin with. The problem is we've run out of road for the can kicking game, and out of time, as it is crumbling and will not take much to collapse the whole system, and anarchy will ensue. It is time to realize and admit, like the tooth fairy, there is no such thing as Utopia.

So my as simple as you can get, succinct question is: What is the liberals formula for turning this around? Your model is not correcting this problem. Your credit limit is exceeded. Five years of Obama has made it worse. Please don't give me the "r****t" excuse for that statement. If your answer is more of the same, then I give up. To me it will be just another example of denial, and final proof that I am correct, in that there can be no debate to save this country. Only war between us. I hope I'm wrong, but I sure don't see it getting better, only worse. Please if you cannot reciprocate with a "succinct" answer, please save your self the time responding.
Please remember, we ALL will live with wh**ever consequence is next. If it be war and anarchy, God help us all.


Again, what is a succinct sentence of what you're wanting to know?
Ok, I'll try this one more time. It is not "... (show quote)
[/quote]

I would like to reply but when you put info in this format it is hard for me to make much sense of it.
Go to
Jan 14, 2014 10:31:10   #
maelstrom wrote:
[quot“This is the problem with you liberals. You are not honest. You divide us and accuse us of being everything but descent people. And then you go out and set the example for the worst of the worst with your demagoguery, and personal attacks. At least conservatives speak honestly about their views and solutions. Liberals have to conceal their agenda, lie about it,”…crap and the unbelievable thing about is you expect us to take you serious, when you try and have us believe your agenda is good for Americans”…CRAP
“Why don't you just admit you are scared to death of Palin, not because of her doing damage to the nation, but because she will do damage to the liberal agenda”… Crap
“Sarah Palin sees what we see, and has the vision aka Ronald Reagan of what she believes must be done, which yes, involves destroying liberalism once and for all.”
The American dogma for the typical right extremists, which equals unrealistic and unreasonable.

“It is a cancer on this nation and is destroying it. We don't buy v**es, we earn them”…Crap
“We don't conduct dirty, yes, filthy dirty class warfare dividing Americans, we unify them”…Crap
“The fact is, liberals do not employ these un-American tactics because they believe in them. They do it for the cause of gaining power to themselves, at any cost, the good of the nation be damned”…Crap
Let's not mince words. And how about being honest about what your agenda means for our treasured Liberty? How does the Marxist/Socialist/Big Government Control/Central Planning/Central Distributionist Wealth Distributionist Utopian Dream World model bode well for that Liberty?... Typical and redundant Crap

“Explain it to us greedy freedom lovers. Start off showing us where at any time on this planet has it ever not failed?”… It has failed every single time with the over reach of a government no matter who was in power or what type of government.

“You guys need a new play book dude because your intellectually dishonest twisted logic mind games do not work on us, and I'm not afraid to stand up and call you out on it. You indeed live in lala land”… as to you who live under the rose colored dome.
“You don't believe in your own garbage you spew because you can't even stand up and defend it openly… We do all the time, you don’t hear what you don’t want to”…again, typical.
“It's attack and destroy. The facts simply are not on your side. History is not on your side”…more crap
“You want to play your sorry games on every one here. Let's get real and hear you defend your vision for liberty and the continued longevity of our country”… This is a discussion I would love to have, if you are opened minded you may find we have more similarities than differences.

“I'll be right here waiting. And here is the answer to your first onslaught: There is a difference between attacking and dividing wrongly to advance a false hidden cause”…than don’t do it.
“and calling out the t***h”… some t***hs are factual while others are t***hs of viewpoint, in way of thinking, of values and beliefs for a way of life, philosophy resides in one’s head, and if we agree there is no debate, it is when we disagree philosophies collide and we need not be fixed and unyielding, it is that exact pivotal moment we must both bend towards each other…but one can see your stance is already determined by your to belief in your conviction and feeling righteous that you along with many others on both sides “refuse” to bend and find compromise. There lies the problem. For we both have a deep and abiding love for our country and a strong feeling of patriotic duty. Therefore, do we come together with open palm or closed fists. Every relationship is 50% shared contribution. What kind you want to create, is half on you.
“I do not attack” you as a person”…your already attacking.
“but I will relentlessly attack what you stand for and would make us all suffer equally in the name of e******y”… your opinion ,your t***h.
“Self sufficiency is where it's all at”…at last we agree



e=rob2]You talk alot of sexist talk in describing Sarah Palin, while describing the right as corraling the horny right v**e. Pretty ain't gong to fix our problems. And I thought WE were the sexists, fighting a war on women, and all that crap. And not being too interested in Warren's ancestry means it's ok for her to LIE about it? That doesn't bother you in the least? That says more about her character than if she was from Mars. Is there any ethics to the liberal way of thinking? Or agenda? I suppose that says it all as to why Obama's constant lies is ok too. Do you realize what you sound like? You are saying it's ok to lie to advance your e******n so you can attack wall street, take the wealth and redistribute it? Are you that ignorant to realize wall street just plays both sides with e******n contributions, insider trading information lavish lobbying and all the rest? This is the problem with you liberals. You are not honest. You divide us and accuse us of being everything but descent people. And then you go out and set the example for the worst of the worst with your demagoguery, and personal attacks. At least conservatives speak honestly about their views and solutions. Liberals have to conceal their agenda, lie about it, and the unbelievable thing about is you expect us to take you serious, when you try and have us believe your agenda is good for Americans. Why don't you just admit you are scared to death of Palin, not because of her doing damage to the nation, but because she will do damage to the liberal agenda. Sarah Palin sees what we see, and has the vision aka Ronald Reagan of what she believes must be done, which yes, involves destroying liberalism once and for all. It is a cancer on this nation and is destroying it. We don't buy v**es, we earn them. We don't conduct dirty, yes, filthy dirty class warfare dividing Americans, we unify them.


The only thing you unify are yourselves of the same Ilk, that is pure delusion.
quot“This is the problem with you liberals. You a... (show quote)



There may be good points here but it is hard to sort out.
Go to
Jan 13, 2014 18:57:30   #
jay-are wrote:
How we choose to interact with people around us.

We have limited that freedom. People are not free to approach people at gunpoint, and demand that they relinquish their money or their car. There are limits to how we are allowed to interact with people around us.

That is a very poor example of a freedom I would like to protect.

I would like to protect the freedom to own private property, and

freedom to choose when and on what to spend my money, and
freedom to worship or not worship God in my own way.

I don't want to relinquish any of those freedoms to somehow create a better more complex society.

P.S. Look at the title of this topic.

"Right or Left bent is a genetic disorder"

He sure did use the word GENETIC.
How we choose to interact with people around us. ... (show quote)


You are right. I just looked at his post where he didn't use genetic.

I am guilty of having rose colored glasses when I look at people. I look for the good in others first.

When I interact with others I have no ill feelings towards them until they give me reason to. It is of my basic nature to give others the benefit of doubt.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 ... 477 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.