https://therightscoop.com/report-pro-a******n-group-to-pay-people-to-protest-at-homes-of-supreme-court-justices/

REPORT: Pro-a******n group to pay people to protest at homes of Supreme Court justices…
May. 6, 2022 9:52 am by The Right Scoop

Yesterday we told you the White House refused to condemn left-wing groups for doxxing the home addresses of the five Supreme Court justices who v**ed to overturn Roe v Wade.

Now it’s being reported that one group is offering money to those who protests at the homes of these same justices.

THE FEDERALIST – A left-wing group is gathering a******n activists to march at Supreme Court justices’ homes next week, with stipends available for some protesters who participate in the Roe v. Wade crusade.

Beginning on Sunday, the group organized under the moniker “Ruth Sent Us” will embark on a week-long demonstration, with plans to protest outside the homes of the six conservative Supreme Court justices, whose alleged addresses have been published on the group’s website.

“Our 6-3 extremist Supreme Court routinely issues rulings that hurt women, racial minorities, L***Q+ and immigrant rights. We must rise up to force accountability using a diversity of tactics,” reads the group’s website, advertising monetary compensation for recruits. “Are you a muralist or chalk artist? Are you a graphic designer who would like to contribute remotely? Large-scale art will be included in the protests against the Supreme Court. Stipends available.”

Demonstrators with “Ruth Sent Us” appear to be coordinating with several allied activist groups including Code Pink, Kavanaugh Off Our Court, and Black L***s M****r. While the website advertises “peaceful protests,” the recent memories of Black L***s M****r r**ts terrorizing the country remain fresh in the minds of the public as communities are still rebuilding. This week’s violence in Los Angeles offers little comfort.

Yeah I expect none of these intimidation campaigns to be ‘truly’ peaceful in any way. These people are unhinged and there’s no telling what they’ll do in the name of ‘a******n rights’.

I just hope the Secret Service and police officials protect these justices and their families by keeping these activists away from their homes.**

But the homes of Supreme Court justices won’t be the only place where these protests are going to occur. It’s also being reported that the same radical group is telling protesters to show up at Catholic churches on Mother’s day:

**Protection of Federal Judges is the purview of the US Marshal Service.

Apparently there are not enough financially stable true believers to protest. They have to pay people to support their issue and protest.

There is not a single gentleman here who has not had such an experience. Enjoy!

https://babylonbee.com/news/wherever-you-want-to-go-to-eat-is-fine-with-me-lies-wife

'Wherever You Want To Go Eat Is Fine With Me', Lies Wife

VALENCIA, CA—When Nick Samuels took his wife out for their weekly date night on Monday, he was pleased to hear that she was flexible on restaurant destinations.

“Wherever you want, honey—I had a late lunch so I’m not too picky tonight.” Excited by his wife Nicholette’s flexibility, Mr. Samuels started rattling off local favorites, including a popular Texas-style BBQ joint, a Korean BBQ joint, and a burger place called Meats, Meats & More Meats. Early reports indicate that his wife was lying when she said “wh**ever you want” as she cut him off at the knees while they were still in the parking lot, insisting that she didn’t have a preference but she “had hoped for a vegetable or two.”

“What about that Italian place we love? The owner sometimes comes by to check on us – you like that, right?” Mr. Samuels had begun looking frazzled, according to eyewitnesses, as he had started driving but realized he still did not have a destination. His lying wife expressed concern about the indecisiveness, which sources say caused a panicked flurry of restaurant recommendations, ranging from Five Guys to Taco Bell and more.

At publishing time, Mr. Samuels could not be located for comment as he had pulled into a gas station to play Temple Run in the bathroom, leaving his wife with instructions to “text me when you decide on a place.”

I am going to break with my customary standard of using a linked news article, as opposed to spewing personal opinions with no basis for discussion starting, to create this thread.

Is there a compromise point for a******n?

There are those who believe a******n is never acceptable. There are those who believe a woman should be able to abort her baby even during the birth process.

Certain European countries have stringent standards at which point an a******n may not proceed without review by a medical panel.

Is there a compromise between the none at all and the anytime the mother chooses up until giving birth?

Below is a recent poll.

In the latest poll, nearly two-thirds believed that a******n should be illegal after 15 weeks, with a majority believing a******n should be illegal after the first trimester.

In point of fact, a 15-week ban on a******n is precisely what is before the Supreme Court right now.

Here's another.

Company I worked for was a Christian owned business. We custom made doors for all sorts of applications.
The company sponsored, helped finance, and provided material and crews to help build an orphanage in Mexico.
Twice while I was there, they posted a sign up sheet to recruit employees for a two week trip to the orphanage.
There was work to be done. I signed up. We were paid our regular wages.

We went to Mexico and began doing plumbing and sheet rock work.
The biggest thrill in this experience were the children, ten orphans, ages 6 to 14,
only the 14 year old could speak a little inglés. She would often lead the group in prayers.

The staff and the kids were very grateful and friendly, but the kids were really something.
One of the younger girls loved to dance. She put on a great show.
The meals provided by the staff were excellent.
We had a great time, and things got a bit emotional when our time was up.
Never forget it.

What sticks in my craw are these damned bloodthirsty l*****ts assuming we right wingers are only concerned about babies in the womb, but once they are born, we no longer give a crap about them.

Just once, I'd like to see some proof of this fallacious allegation.
From my POV, the l*****ts are projecting.

Look at a******n in other countries. Strong Catholic countries like Ireland and Italy have legal a******n and have not had the violence around this as the US. You may ask why and the answer is simple. In the US, 5 unelected people stretched the Constitution to create a decision that supported their beliefs. In the case of Ireland and Italy, they held a v**e on the issue and politicians codified a******n in the law. American politicians hid behind the courts, instead of stepping up and doing their job. Roe v Wade was a poorly decided case and politicians should have acted before this to establish a legal frame work for a******n.