;;;
Oh sure, Rad, now you provide a Heritage document--no bias there.
It wants 'implementing reforms' now--after the republicans would not hear of that before.
It wants, now that the rich have been satiated, no more tax cuts (e.g., for the middle class) (who passed the last disastrous tax cuts? and who benefited?)
And of course, now that those trump tax cuts are adding $1T to the country's debt, now it is time for everyone except the rich to sacrifice for the good of the economy for which only the ultra-rich are benefitting.
http://econintersect.com/pages/releases/release.php?post=201904300846"Real median household income has continued to display an upward trend over the past 12 months (up 1.5 percent), and especially since the low point reached in June 2011 (up 14.6 percent). We continue to monitor the course of inflation, as this has a significant effect on the trend in real median annual household income. The decline in real median household income of $635 between January 2019 and March 2019 is likely related to the uptick in inflation during the same time period. We are at a point now where real median household income is 3.5 percent higher than January 2000, the beginning of this statistical series. Not an impressive performance by any means over a period spanning almost two decades, but the overall trend line has been positive for about seven years.
Additional Highlights
The March reading on the labor market from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics shows a similar picture as February, with one exception:
The official unemployment rate was 3.8 percent in both February 2019 and March 2019.
In contrast, the median duration of unemployment increased from 9.3 weeks in February 2019 to 9.6 weeks in March 2019.
The broader measure of employment hardship, which includes the unemployed, marginally attached workers (of which discouraged workers are a subset), and persons working part-time for economic reasons, remained the same at 7.3 percent for both February 2019 and March 2019."
You must be a very rich person, Rad, to be in favor of the economics that so obviously benefit the rich. But if you are middle class (income up 3.5% in 20 years) and are willing to take a hit so that the rich can enjoy even more benefits, you are either a super patriot or an i***t. I hope you are the former, but you certainly don't support economics that support middle class status.