One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Liberty Tree
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 ... 2048 next>>
Dec 16, 2013 08:04:04   #
carolyn wrote:
Paul Ryan and his pseudo-conservative cronies in the House have let us down. They pledged to the American people that if we elected them in 2010, they would work to reduce big government, cut spending, and balance the budget. But did anyone notice the budget "compromise" that Paul Ryan caved in to? The deal is just another Washington "gimmick" that does nothing to address the real issue: too much spending. They are hoping they can con us into believing that the budget they passed will cut spending and not raise taxes, but they are lying.

The budget goes back on the very moderate sequester cuts Congress promised us, and saddles the American people with $8.8 billion in "user fees" over five years.

But it gets worse! Paul Ryan, John Boehner, and the majority of the House Republicans who v**ed for this bloated budget agreed to $42.3 billion in spending over the next five years in exchange for just $16 billion in cuts tat will probably never happen.

We need to hold every single one of the RINO Republicans who v**ed for this bloated budget deal accountable or throw them out in 2014.
Paul Ryan and his pseudo-conservative cronies in t... (show quote)


Boehner h**es the "Tea Party" people but without them he would not be Speaker of the House. He and his cohorts want our v**es and money but not to give us a say in what happens. Behind the scenes there is little difference between the GOP elites in Congress and the Democrats. Our GOP Senator here in NC is about to sell us our on this phony budget deal.
Go to
Dec 14, 2013 10:02:57   #
BigMike wrote:
De Nada! Some folks claim we're just hallucinating all this stuff. :?


I know and that is the scary thing.
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 22:04:30   #
BigMike wrote:
Here's an interesting little article on the REAL goals of the people who Obama has surrounded himself with:



President Obama’s new staff adviser, senior progressive strategist John Podesta, is a key player in an initiative seeking more government regulation of the oceans and the ceding of U.S. oceans to United Nations-based international law.

That background could inform Podesta’s agenda in the White House, where he is to serve for one year as a “counselor” to the president. The New York Times reported he will focus on executive orders and so-called c*****e c****e issues along with Obamacare.







Podesta, a former chief of staff to President Bill Clinton, is founder of the highly influential Center for American Progress.

He is also a member of the Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, which seeks to ratify U.S. laws and regulations governing the seas.

“I am delighted to be joining the Global Ocean Commission, which I see as one of the most dynamic initiatives developing commonsense ways to manage fully 45 percent of the globe that remains common property, outside any national jurisdiction,” said Podesta when he joined the commission.

Aaron Klein’s “Impeachable Offenses: The Case to Remove Barack Obama from Office” is available, autographed, at WND’s Superstore

The Joint Ocean Commission Initiative bills itself as a bipartisan, collaborative group that aims to “accelerate the pace of change that results in meaningful ocean policy reform.”

Among its main recommendations is that the U.S. should put its oceans up for regulation to the U.N. Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Other recommendations of Podesta’s Joint Ocean Commission Initiative include:
•The administration and Congress should establish a national ocean policy. The administration and Congress should support regional, ecosystem-based approaches to the management of ocean, coastal and Great Lakes.
•Congress should strengthen and reauthorize the Coastal Zone Management Act.
•Congress should strengthen the Clean Water Act.

Last year, Obama’s Interagency Ocean Policy Taskforce, created in 2010 also by executive order, recommended the U.S. join the U.N.’s Law of the Sea Convention.

The convention defines the rights and responsibilities of nations in their use of the world’s oceans, establishing guidelines for businesses, the environment and the management of marine natural resources.

Republican lawmakers mounted fierce opposition to the U.S. joining the U.N. law.

‘One world government’

Podesta’s Joint Ocean Commission Initiative, meanwhile, is a key partner of Citizens for Global Solutions, or CGS, which, according to its literature, envisions a “future in which nations work together to abolish war, protect our rights and freedoms and solve the problems facing humanity that no nation can solve alone.”

CGS states it works to “build the political will in the United States” to achieve this global vision.

The organization currently works on issues that fall into five general areas: U.S. global engagement; global health and environment; peace and security; international law and justice; and international institutions.


John Podesta was a chief of staff to President Bill Clinton

CGS is a member organization and supporter of the World Federalist Movement, which openly seeks a one-world government. The World Federalist Movement considers the CGS to be its U.S. branch.

The movement brings together organizations and individuals that support the establishment of a global federal system of strengthened and democratized global institutions with plenary constitutional power accountable to the citizens of the world and a division of international authority among separate global agencies.

The movement’s headquarters are located near the U.N. building in New York City. A second office is near the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.

The locations are significant, since the movement heavily promotes the U.N. and is the coordinator of various international projects, such as the Coalition for the International Criminal Court and the Responsibility to Protect military doctrine. The doctrine formed the basis of Obama’s justification to launch NATO airstrikes in Libya.

In 2008, Podesta served as co-director of Obama’s t***sition into the White House.

A Time magazine article profiled the influence of Podesta’s Center for American Progress in the formation of the Obama administration, stating that “not since the Heritage Foundation helped guide Ronald Reagan’s t***sition in 1981 has a single outside group held so much sway.”

The center is funded by billionaire George Soros. Its board includes Van Jones, Obama’s former “green jobs” czar, who resigned in September 2009 after it was exposed he founded a c*******t revolutionary organization.

With additional research by Brenda J. Elliott.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/12/new-obama-adviser-wants-to-cede-u-s-oceans-to-u-n/#dOTwfm7rPw4IpOML.99
Here's an interesting little article on the REAL g... (show quote)


Good post, BigMike. Thanks.
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 19:15:07   #
Hungry Freaks wrote:
I don't approve of a******n, but I don't consider it murder. You are in the vast minority who do.

I'm sorry to hear you call a******ns "executions" without respect to when they are performed. Big difference between a first trimester a******n and a third trimester a******n. Big difference.


No difference. An innocent life is still taken.
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 14:16:20   #
Hungry Freaks wrote:
It's pretty obvious to me that Broaddrick's story is true. The others I'm not so sure. Especially Paula Jones, who was paid by right-wing groups to say her consensual affair with Clinton was something else. Jennifer Flowers had a compelling story, but never said she was raped.

I stand corrected, even though Clinton had never been charged with rape. Broaddrick's story and the story of of Myers to back her up, is something most women wouldn't go through. Why she didn't file charges is something a man can question of a woman, but never really know what a woman goes into filing such charges, especially against a man in a powerful position such as state Attorney General.

It's a stretch to say that Clinton's behavior means the Democrats are unfit to represent women-the Republicans in Texas want to do a mechanical rape of a woman who wants an a******n. Besides, Clinton has never been charged. Until he is charged, he will always be an alleged rapist. I now believe he is, but that doesn't make it so, at least in the eyes of the law. .
It's pretty obvious to me that Broaddrick's story ... (show quote)


Clinton did not pay Paula Jones hundreds of thousands of dollars because he was innocent. He did not have to pay over $90,000 in court fines for lying because he was so innocent. innocent
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 10:59:17   #
slatten49 wrote:
Working together. :thumbup:


To what end? Working together to build a disaster is not a worthy goal.
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 10:53:05   #
slatten49 wrote:
That is an opinion shared by many, if not most...or all! This new budget deal, far from perfect, is a good start. Ryan & Murray may have gotten the ball rolling. :thumbup:

We shall see. :?: 8-)


A good start to where?
Go to
Dec 13, 2013 08:20:29   #
oldroy wrote:
Since so many of the left lean here seem to like Politifact I thought they would surely like to see this article from the Tampa Bay source. It seems that they consider the Obama statement that if you like your insurance policy you can keep it to be so bad that they rate it Liar, Liar Pants on Fire. I consider them to be very right about that.

http://www.politifact.com/t***h-o-meter/article/2013/dec/12/lie-year-if-you-like-your-health-care-plan-keep-it/


It was a togh call. Which of Obama's lies should be lie of the year? Lots of options to choose from.
Go to
Dec 12, 2013 11:39:03   #
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
39th!

19 countries with the best health care!

http://healthv**es.com/general-health/19-countries-with-the-best-healthcare/1696/

US doesn't make this list either!


Having the WHO evaluate which countries have the best healthcare is like having the National Kennel Club evaluate which is their favorite pet. The WHO loves single payer government run healthcare and h**es anything to do with the free market system.
Go to
Dec 12, 2013 10:13:29   #
bmac32 wrote:
I guess that would be the better thing for the republicans to do right now as they don't have the v**es in the Senate nor hold the White House but as you said hold the House and control the Senate and things can change.


Unless there is new GOP leadership it will not change much.
Go to
Dec 12, 2013 09:37:17   #
slatten49 wrote:
Unbridled optimism...that is what made this country great! :thumbup: :mrgreen:


The builders of the Titanic were optimistic that it was unsinkable, but that did not save it from reality when it struck an iceberg.
Go to
Dec 12, 2013 09:19:51   #
The Democrats got much of what they wanted and the Republicans got next to nothing. Spending will increase and more taxes will follow. Of course, the taxes will be called fees and anything else except what they are. Any spending "cuts", which are just decreases in proposed increases, are scheduled down the road and will never happen just like they did away with the sequester. The debt will continue to explode, except for the temporary lull we are experiencing. Even if the GOP wins the Senate and keeps the House do not expect anything to change. They will just run another RINO in 2016. We are standing on an economic house of cards and the wind is blowing harder. It will fall on the road our nation is on and that is exactly what Obama and his Marxist minions want. Do not believe the spin the GOP Congressional leaders try to put on it. This is a bad deal and was done because the GOP leaders are afraid to take a stand and risk another shutdown. They, like Obama and the Dems, just want to get by the 2014 e******n.
Go to
Dec 11, 2013 20:12:43   #
Tasine wrote:
Some of us have been wondering that for quite some time now, have written about the possibility. Amazingly it seems that now 1-2 people in Congress are wondering the same thing. Sharp people, Congress.

FTA
"Specifically, Rep. Trey Gowdy from South Carolina has now publicly raised fears that Obama could go ahead and suspend e******n laws in order to maintain control of the presidency. Gowdy says that since Obama has already decided to overturn the standing law on i*****l i*******ts, effectively declaring that the law no longer applies to them without any congressional backing, then what is to stop him from failing to enforce e******n laws?"

http://conservativebyte.com/2013/12/congress-fears-control-obama-suspend-e******n-laws/
Some of us have been wondering that for quite some... (show quote)


This fits into the whole purpose of the Democrats using the "Nuclear Option". It is so Obama can pack the D.C. Court of Appeals with extreme l*****ts who will sanction anything he does. This is the Court that hears most challenges to Executive Branch oversteps. Once they are in place he will seize even more power. After the 2014 e******n the real Obama will emerge. Take heed.
Go to
Dec 11, 2013 18:15:20   #
Glaucon wrote:
If a "t***h seeker" bit you on the ass, would you be able to identify him by the teeth marks and is that why Obama is a socialist/Markist, who doesn't eat his vegetables?


Thanks for proving my point. Your response is exactly how Alinsky taught his koolaid drinking followers to respond.
Go to
Dec 11, 2013 17:36:46   #
Glaucon wrote:
So? You apparently read a book. It is ancient history. I didn't know it was even still in print. Some of what Alinsky wrote may well be relevant to the present, but you get so emotional that you seem to loose track of wh**ever your point is. Don't try to use so many words. Just say Obama is bad and Democrats are bad, and capitalism is socialism when it is bad. Read another book,


It is far from ancient history. It is Obama's playbook. Alinsky was one of Obama's and Hillary Clinton's gurus. Reading this will tell anyone seeking t***h the tactics of Obama and his basic beliefs. Since it is for t***h seekers that lets you out.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 ... 2048 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.