might want to take the hyperbole down a notch.

thank you.
It doesn't matter even if he wanted to!
Don't you think Clinton would have run for a 3rd term? He was pretty popular after the Lewinsky scandal b̶l̶e̶w̶ ̶o̶v̶e̶r̶ subsided.

another american thinker blog link
sigh

sounds like the Dinesh D'Souza gambit.
Accuse Obama of being a c*******t because he knew a c*******t once. Or because his dad was roomates with a c****e.
It cracks me up, there are so many things to take Obama to task for (SOPA, PIPA, Gitmo) why make stuff up?!

do us a favor and find ONE news article that corroborates this story. I find it hard to believe that 200 black youths could misbehave in such a fashion and not be front page news.
However a quick google search only brings up other forums and blogs linking back American Thinker. Which itself provides no source and no evidence.

Don't you guys ever get tired of getting jerked around like this? Don't let yourself be manipulated by fear.
The GOP only want's your v**es, not your concern. Alex Jones only wants to sell DVDs, he can give a damn about personal freedom.

more baseless right wing hysteria.
All it means is that the people who manage the Alamo can put a little logo on their letterhead. Ownership does not change. It's like having a LEDE certified building.
Oh and the government of the USA is forbidden by the UN from ever using the Alamo as an object of reprisals.
So if Texas secedes and Obama decided to bomb the Alamo to "show them", UNESCO would cite the US for violating a UNESCO sight.

well the sources you cite are awful.

you do realize there is a pretty far gulf between managing public perception and a dictatorship.
For example;
Do you have any evidence of insurance company execs being threatened with their lives?
Has anyone been renditioned so that Obama can get his way with Obamacare?
If you do not have any such evidence to cite, you are merely being an hysterical lemming.

Even disregarding that, if you go into the family history of the British Royals there was quite a lot of marrying 8, 9 and 10 year olds. Often it was done simply to seal a political alliance and the bride would not even show up for her husband until years later. However this was not always the case. And it was not a practice limited to the royal family.
Most Europeans have some of this nastiness in their family tree. And if you family lived through the various plagues and famines that ravaged Europe, you probably have some cannibals in your family tree as well.

"A number of conservatives including myself warned that once same-sex marriages became legal and acceptable that things like polygamy and p********a would follow in their quest to be accepted."


That the blog post starts off like this means it's already an illogical miscarriage.
Gays and p*******es are not the same thing.
Homosexuals have CONSENSUAL relationship. A child legally can not consent, and putting that aside a child would not know what they are consenting for and are much too easily manipulated by and adult. The same goes for incest. While there are certainly cases of brothers and sisters erring in that department, more often it is a parent or other older relative who initiates this kind of relationship, quite a lot of overlap with pedos.
Perhaps you should google set theory or Venn diagram.
While all 3 can be described as "perversions" only one is consensual, and legal with or without marriage. The other two are not legal at all.

And for the record I am sick and tired of people on the right using the nuclear option on every social issue.
Gays are not pedos.
Healthcare is not the N**is.
Gun regulation is not Hitler.

I live on the West Coast. I can tell you that we have seen an enormous increase in seabirds here. They are displacing the pigeons (oh the horror...) and other land birds.
It was not like this 20 years ago.

please google "circular logic"

SMOKESCREEN.
First off the $5000 penalty is a fabrication.


You do know that Rubio is one of the sponsors right?
You do also know that one of the worst things about the bill is the expansion of H1b visas That brings in tech and engineering workers as indentured servants to the companies that sponsor them. Taking middle class jobs from Americans so Cisco, Apple, Microsoft and others can shave a few margins here and there and have a better quarterly report.

I'm just waiting for the Tea Partiers to realized they have been duped. I am certain they are honest people who only want what is good for our nation. However the genesis of the Tea Party under multibillionaire Koch brothers. As well as the control of the Tea Party by a select few in the GOP. Means the Tea Party is not the answer. It is merely GOP 2.0. If you think the GOP was doing a great job before then why the need for a Tea Party?
After all the original Boston Tea Party was direct action not against taxes, but against taxation without representation. The colonists did not appreciate being taxed as British subjects, but were denied a seat in the lower house of Parliament.
Just think, if there had been an MP for the Americas, we might still be drinking tea.

you do know the NY Post is a total joke of a paper.
It is basically a tabloid like the National Inquirer or Weekly World News.