The questions were often very pointed. How about asking the candidates if they had ruled out splitting off and running as an independent ? How about Trump's comments on declaring bankruptcy ? What he did was legal -- but was it moral? How about the discussion about individual freedom and privacy versus security and getting into everyone's business? How about the discussion concerning immigration ? No one had a clear solution, but they all complained about Obama despite the fact that the numbers of i******s deported has been higher under him than under any other president ? Did you just suspend your powers of observation and your ability to think? It would appear so.

I don't know why you are wasting your time on this delusional escapade. All you will do is bring further to light the irrational mean-spiritedness of the radical right.

And supposing you do get some legal action going, the only ones who will win will be the lawyers, who will happily take your money for any cause.

Do you actually think Ginsburg and Kagan would do anything that would jeopardize their ability to perform the duties to which they swore? They may have done something you disagree with, but they have done nothing illegal.

Why don't you focus on strengthening "traditional" marriages within your own communities rather than trying to blame others for its disintegration.

"Let you who is without sin cast the first stone"

Well,Paul. Guess I'll address your post too, just for the hell of it.
Q. Are you familiar with the term 'Recluse'?
I assume so.
It has come to the attention of many Americans that both Ginsberg and Kagan were involved in some same sex ceremonies, as I understand the issue stirkng up considerable concern.
I haven't read US Code 28US455 but understand if, ANY SC Justice or Judge, in any way, shape or form may be biased, they are to withdraw from the case in dispute or under consideration.

We have 'judges' here in Okla that 'Recluse' themselves quite frequently for to not donso one cannot reach an open UNBIASED opinion.

For over 2000 years now, Paul, a marriage was between a male and a female human.Even Rkme and Greek, as corrupted as those civilizations became, from my studies, DID NOT define a marriage between 2 males or 2 females. The specie's would die out, I guess.
Like I posted earlier,to Murphy, great way to adhere to the 'Georgia Guidestones' Huh?

There is a reason that b****s left the GOP when jesse and strom and trentt joined...physics-action and equal and opposite reaction...I guess we are supposed to stay in the party with people who say aborting all black babies will eliminate crime...black unemployment will reach single digits this year..under a Dem President...a black one to boot....I am educated enough to not let the r****t party establish my mindset in a way that contradicts my own thinking and make me useful to them...while not getting schit out of the deal......your party's attacks on everything that makes it difficult for black people...from repealing AA, manipulating v****g laws and upholding an unfair justice system.....makes me want to say one thing: