Actually, what that article means is that since Russia isn't complying with the arms pact that limits the number of nukes each side is allowed to build/maintain so Trump is planning on ignoring the pact as well and presumably build more nukes for our side in order to maintain competitiveness with the number they have/intend to build.

Several hundred percent reduction in crime? Really? How do you reduce crime by any more than 100%? Did the citizens reverse previously committed crimes?

You can INCREASE by several hundred percent but you can't DECREASE it by even 1% in excess of 100%, regardless of what is being measured. Once you reduce something by 100%, you run out of wh**ever it is you are reducing.

































5

I typically find that if the "t***h" doesn't make any sense, it doesn't typically turn out to be the t***h.

With that in mind, let us examine the "t***h" of which you speak, the claim that they will "lie" to recruit non-Muslims to Islam.

What exactly would be the purpose of converting non-believers to a false version of your religion? Why would you wish to trick people with whom your religion would be a poor fit into joining your religion? How long will they be following a false version of your religion before they discover the t***h? Why would any deity command that you deceive others to join a false version of your religion? To what ends? Why would anybody believe that "their" religion were a true religion if they are to deceive non-believers to believe false things in order to get them to join your religion? Would you join a religion that commands that you lie to people in attempts to bring them in and have them join a religion that isn't a proper fit for them?

If you can provide a logical and reasonable explanation to those queries, then I might consider lending credence to the lies that ant-Islamic site puts forth as "t***h".

Keep in mind, that any site that isn't anti-Islamic isn't likely to infer that ALL Muslims are terrorists, that should have been your first clue that it was anti-Islamic. Also, there wouldn't have been a comparison between Islam and Christianity that showed Islam in a bad light and Christianity in a good light consistently if it weren't anti-Islamic. If they were just making a comparison for the enlightenment of those trying to choose between the two, it would have made an effort to show the positive traits of BOTH religions.


Edit: I am of course not making the claim that you are deliberately passing false information, only that I don't think you took the time to look at the information you are passing with an open and skeptical mind. If the "t***h" doesn't make sense, then consider it false UNTIL you verify it's validity and from reliable sources.

It would be a terrible decision to have to make, one I envy not.

That site is anti-Islamic and has no qualms about using propaganda and lies to sway those that are easily swayed. Please offer a link to a site less biased if you truly want to "enlighten" us, preferably one without such an obvious agenda.

It does make some exceptions that will allow a late term a******n under certain life threatening situations, but those exceptions existed before that particular bill as well.

If it was put to me, end one life to save another or risk losing both, the decisions would likely be a very tough and tragic decision that I would want to discuss ALL possible options and weigh ALL likely outcomes thoroughly BEFORE making the decision, but it is likely I would favor one saved over a potential none saved scenario.

If that is NOT the case, no life is threatened, there are alternatives that one can choose, adoption. Put the child up for adoption and you won't have to raise the child.

I don't think THEY were born that way, I think THEY chose to be RAPISTS and P*******ES of their own volition and as such deserve no compassion.

As for sadists, their "kinks" don't affect anybody as they perform their "kinks" in private and with other consenting adults.

So, when a child is born with mental and/or physical disabilities, we say this is the way Satan made them? Ask any Christian and they will say of any child with any a******lities that it is just the way God made them and that they love them all the same, as they should. After all, don't we always say that we are all god's children? Don't recall anyone calling children "Satan's children".

Most? I don't think ANY would choose such a lifestyle. It is just the way they were born, and if one believes that we are all born the way "God" made us, then obviously he did so for a reason, either that or he has one hell of a sick and twisted sense of humor.

If "God" chose to make someone to prefer to have relations with someone else from their own g****r, then obviously he doesn't take issue with homosexuality, regardless what the holy text written by man claims. It is possible that INITIALLY he wanted his creation to "go forth and multiply" but as the population expanded, started making some of his creation to favor their own g****r as a way to manage population growth. it is possible that those charged with writing and maintaining the holy texts didn't believe in what was being divinely passed down to them and refused to include it.

You may want to do some research




Yes, the Book of Mormon is based on Joseph Smith's own ideologies but it is still considered a religious text, just like the others and yes, Allah is the god of Abraham.

Here is a reliable source of information and this link links specifically to the resource you need to understand that Allah IS the god of Abraham: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam

JEHOVAH, YAHWEH, ALLAH, and many, many, many more are the names of the god of Abraham, you may not yourself pray to him under certain specific names, that does not mean they aren't the same god.

The Jews, they pray to the god of Abraham, YAHWEH and quote their scripture from their Torah, the Muslims, they pray to the god of Abraham, ALLAH and quote scripture from their Quran, the Christians pray to the god of Abraham, (so many sects with many different chosen names of god, one of which being JEHOVAH) and quote their scripture from their Bible, Book of Mormon, Deuterocanonicals, Jewish Tanakh, Letter of Baruch...

There are so many more religious texts for just the christian religion alone and I am certain I did not include/do not know all the religious texts for the Jews or the Muslims as well. The point of the matter is, all those religions, they have one major thing in common, they all believe in the god of Abraham and believe him to be the one and only, lord almighty (the Christians also worship the son and the holy ghost as well, the Muslims speak well of their prophet Muhammad).

His teachings were good, his belief in a deity... I would choose someone of his calibre to follow over any of the h**ers that claim to be his followers. By the way, many Christians DO follow his teachings, it just seems many on this site don't care to follow his teachings, makes you wonder why they claim to follow him.

Unless I am mistaken, it was Paul, one of Christ's disciples, one that walked with him and learned from him, I believe Matthew, Luke, and John also spoke out against judging others, Peter too was a disciple and he too spoke out against judging others. Did Jesus judge Mary Magdalene? Did he go ahead and cast that first stone?

I believe in treating others respectfully, apparently I am alone in this, it would seem modern day Christianity has strayed from the teachings of Christ.

As for speaking to you antagonistically, I haven't even spoken to you in this thread until now so...

It isn't cherry picking, it is all over the new testament. It also isn't cherry picking as I believe all of Jesus' preachings to be of worth, even if I don't believe in any deity of any nature, I have much respect for what Christ is said to have preached, we can learn much from him, those willing to be open to such teachings.