What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.
You must be hacking my device I did not send that that reply
Evidently my last reply did not resonate. I will have to have elaborate for you. is this supposed to be a political party boy intelligent debate or is this some kind of circuit to a massage your ego tistical hedonism intellectualism by the way this is not me typing this this is the computer taking dictations
The reply I email earlier didn't reasonate.I will have to elaborate. You're just like a n****r,,the people you constantly malign (your innovation not mine)
Look up the word forum,it implies plurality or public.That supercedes the procedure of Reply Quote or just reply to an individual through anger.I'm not that involved.Do you want to have a intellegent debate to resolve an important issue or do you want massage your pseudo intellectualisim due to a humongous in security no self esteem problem.
which most fanatical right wingers have.
Look stupid, didn't you get the last reply about about stories.It is not unusal for college students to co- habitate,dorms,have you ever heard the word
by the way, The area Obama comes hails from,and where he lives now,I grew up in (Kenwood/Hydepark) and still do.i have cross paths with him.I also have experience with the time of malignant gossip you are promulgating and I being a victim would it consist of distortions and speculating and
furthermore in the real adult world if can't prove it with cold hard fact don't alledge it.Let this be endof conversation,some where in your tutorlage you have been not to participate in such vulgarities,if you have not it's reflects on your `Mom.
Thats the key word with stupids like you ," Stories" you can't distinguish between the word stories and fact.When I was a kid,my mentors use to forbid us from flatout using the word lie we used to have to say,"he's tellin`a storie as oppose to he's tellin' a LIE.
YOU'RE A RADICAL RIGHT DEFLECTING QUACK THAT SHOULD NOT BE DIGNIFIED WITH A RATIONAL REPLY.
I find that Jaded people always assert themselves to a plane of sanctomonium Government offcianodos can not openly critisize their superior or usurp the chain of command,the law looks upon that as insubordination,mutiny,s******n,and treason,and sometimes a violation of the Logan Act.
Just as I stated before,a typical response as expected from people like you.Look at the kettle calling the pot black.You socially engineerd fool, you damned 'Parrot (wanna c*****r) People like you are taught that people as I don't think to divert your attention from sordid truistic aspiratons.Don't communicate with me any more reference what I said about you before as to the why of the matter.
Goodbye !!!
A typical cliches response,as expected from rightwing i***ts, that fall regressively left when their Ideas don't correlate with an opposing Idea.We're not a past tense, we're talking about the here and now,Imbecile
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.