One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Should s******n be prosecuted ?
Page 1 of 2 next>
Mar 23, 2015 09:14:40   #
dongreen76
 
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 09:24:37   #
JMHO Loc: Utah
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)


Wrong! They did NOT violate the Logan Act moron! 47 patriots, pal...whether you like it or not. I guess it was okay when the Democrats did the same thing...several times? Damn hypocrite...go crawl back under your c****e rock.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 09:26:52   #
katron Loc: Texas and Arizona
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you REALLY want to try recent cases for s******n OR treason, let's start with people like Leaky Leahy (Dem) for leaking secret government information years ago, and a few democrat presidents who KEPT us into wars designed to fail, then let's progress to all the s******nists who tried to cause President Bush to fail. AFTER WE HAVE TRIED ALL THOSE HUNDREDS WHO HAVE BEEN IGNORED THEN WE CAN DISCUSS THOSE YOU WANT TO HANG NOW. The ones you now speak of are the only ones in this country TRYING TO SAVE THE US. If you don't KNOW that, you are obviously another of Obama's goons who h**e America as he does.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2015 09:42:40   #
Liberty Tree
 
JMHO wrote:
Wrong! They did NOT violate the Logan Act moron! 47 patriots, pal...whether you like it or not. I guess it was okay when the Democrats did the same thing...several times? Damn hypocrite...go crawl back under your c****e rock.


Ir is Monday so all those who worship Obama have been given a whole new set of talking points and insults by the DNC and their favorite ELWNJ blogs. It is not original with them. They just spit out what they have been fed.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 10:09:28   #
dongreen76
 
A typical cliches response,as expected from rightwing i***ts, that fall regressively left when their Ideas don't correlate with an opposing Idea.We're not a past tense, we're talking about the here and now,Imbecile

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 11:04:52   #
pafret Loc: Northeast
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)


***********************

What are you smoking? The 47 congressmen have as much right to free speech under the First amendment as you have. Their letter was posted on a public forum and consisted of an explanation of our governmental process. Are you going to argue that they lied? How did their letter advocate the over throw of the US government? Historically, the law against s******n (Smith Act) was aimed at non-citizen adults. Approximately 215 people were indicted under the legislation, including alleged c*******ts, Anarchists, and f*****ts.
Some of these convictions were overturned and the law was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It was not "always" enforced.

We mention Obama's name, Moslems , Iranians, Saudis and other Camel Jockey countries with great regularity on this site. Are we all S******nists?

Your problem is that you believe Obama has attained Godhood and the Senators committed blasphemy. The rest of us don't worship at that church.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 11:15:48   #
katron Loc: Texas and Arizona
 
pafret wrote:
***********************

What are you smoking? The 47 congressmen have as much right to free speech under the First amendment as you have. Their letter was posted on a public forum and consisted of an explanation of our governmental process. Are you going to argue that they lied? How did their letter advocate the over throw of the US government? Historically, the law against s******n (Smith Act) was aimed at non-citizen adults. Approximately 215 people were indicted under the legislation, including alleged c*******ts, Anarchists, and f*****ts.
Some of these convictions were overturned and the law was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. It was not "always" enforced.

We mention Obama's name, Moslems , Iranians, Saudis and other Camel Jockey countries with great regularity on this site. Are we all S******nists?

Your problem is that you believe Obama has attained Godhood and the Senators committed blasphemy. The rest of us don't worship at that church.
*********************** br br What are you smokin... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Only imbecilic fools worship at Obama's feet. People with brains know him for what he is: our enemy.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2015 11:16:56   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
SILENCE the opposition. That's the M.O. of the entire Obama operation to undermine the constitution.

I do not believe a list to support the above is needed. If anyone has doubts I would suggest removing their heads from wh**ever rabbit hole it's been stuck in for 6 plus years.




JMHO wrote:
Wrong! They did NOT violate the Logan Act moron! 47 patriots, pal...whether you like it or not. I guess it was okay when the Democrats did the same thing...several times? Damn hypocrite...go crawl back under your c****e rock.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 11:28:33   #
dongreen76
 
Just as I stated before,a typical response as expected from people like you.Look at the kettle calling the pot black.You socially engineerd fool, you damned 'Parrot (wanna c*****r) People like you are taught that people as I don't think to divert your attention from sordid truistic aspiratons.Don't communicate with me any more reference what I said about you before as to the why of the matter.

Goodbye !!!

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 11:28:37   #
katron Loc: Texas and Arizona
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Trying to save our nation is NOT s******n, you creton!

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 11:57:18   #
dongreen76
 
I find that Jaded people always assert themselves to a plane of sanctomonium Government offcianodos can not openly critisize their superior or usurp the chain of command,the law looks upon that as insubordination,mutiny,s******n,and treason,and sometimes a violation of the Logan Act.

Reply
 
 
Mar 23, 2015 12:07:40   #
MrEd Loc: Georgia
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)




If you feel so bad about people breaking the law and getting away with it, then why don't you start with that POS obama and his trashing of our Constitution? You can start with TREASON and work your way down to the lesser crimes he has committed, but then you don't really care about doing anything to him do you?? Since when is your favorite president free to do anything he wants and no Republican can do anything without you jumping on them about something. By the way, the Logan Act has nothing to do with these people.

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 12:11:50   #
Antisocialist Loc: Florida
 
dongreen76 wrote:
There are forty seven s******nist that have only been remotely impugned.As far as I know such a high heinous crime,synomonous with TREASON, historacally has always been, prosecuted that is.The lame excuse for not doing as such,was rather `punkish`, of course what was done violated the "LOGAN ACT".The fact that it eas an open letter and they made no specific reference to the negotiation does'nt imply aquittal.What is pertinent is that they mention Obams' name and referred to a coumtry that the president is conversing with.
There are forty seven s******nist that have only b... (show quote)


Give those 47 the medal of Honor and Impeach the skid-mark on America.



Reply
Mar 23, 2015 12:19:33   #
katron Loc: Texas and Arizona
 
Antisocialist wrote:
Give those 47 the medal of Honor and Impeach the skid-mark on America.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Mar 23, 2015 12:20:24   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
BTW, DonGreen76, welcome to the OPP forum. It can prove a bumpy ride at times :wink: Buckle up and hang in there :!:

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.